![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
 |
 |
Diaper Talk
General discussion about the AB/DL lifestyle
Forums
-
- 33k
- posts
-
- Hi Everyone
- By AbabeBill,
-
- 68.3k
- posts
-
- 271k
- posts
-
- 22.3k
- posts
-
- 52.1k
- posts
-
- 6.4k
- posts
-
- 120.9k
- posts
-
- 16.8k
- posts
-
- By BabySimon,
-
- 821.3k
- posts
-
- 26.7k
- posts
-
- 21.1k
- posts
-
- 6.3k
- posts
-
- 2.2k
- posts
-
Current Donation Goals
-
July BillsRaised $318 of $400 target
-
General FundRaised $0
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
-
Being in a wheelchair during a two week wheelchair challenge.I was held in the wheelchair by a restraining belt that my wife put on me so I would no cheat and get out while she was at work,I was diapered.I was hoping to hold it in until my wife got home so she would release me to use the toilet to poop that was part of the deal we made no pooping in diapers.Well it did not end that way I could not hold it and it came out very soft and mushy and it spread all the way up the back and the front over my balls and dick<my diaper at that stage was quite wet already from using it since the morning.It was simply one of my best experiances pooping in my diapers<would love to do something like that again. -
Peculiar Chageling are you merely trying to pose as Canadian by including Timmies in your story? I only ask because I have never heard someone say a "Hortons run" in my life. It has always been a "Timmies run" 🤣 -
By Little BabyDoll Christine · Posted
This is the third of fourth thread asking this question. Without getting into the weeds, the first contact we have with the word comes from real life and is used as an insult aimed at boys who are not as "boyish" as their peers would like, usually in the 8-13 age range. The "girlishness" is just a presumed trait based on on the absense of traits associated with a "red-blooded boy", with "sissy" coming from "sister" ans in the more adult insult "weak sister" and there is also the description of doing something un-"manly" beign done "like a little girl". My first encounter with the term used in the sense it is done here comes from 1982 in CAROLYN'S KIDS catalog, ti was a single page headed "Be a Sissy!" with 3 items; a pair of "sissy pants" which I knew as a female undergarment from 1962, a long-line "sissy pants" and a petticoat of medium fullness. Then, in Y2K I found Mrs Silk's site, since it whas generally feminine, I took it to be something I could like. It was there that I first encountered the current iteration of "sissy". While the email was useful, it was nothing like me. This was before I discovered GirlTalk later GirlTalkl To. Then I saw some references to "sissy" by LG's and finally found the "Sissy Room" here. When I got here, there was no Little Girls Playhous so we kind of gathered here Ther question here is "who cares and why". Now, here is the importance of labels, Supposing you went somewhere for a doctor's appointment, or some place where you had to know where you are, yet there were no street signs and no GPS. How would you nevigate? Or suppose you went into a grocery store looking for a box of pasta and a can of sauce. Everything was in opaque packaging with no labels and everything was self-serve. What then? If you were a member of DPF and if you look at profiles that were moderately filled out, You notice "I am a..." and "Age: play age...". Why; and why do you fill that out? As I said earlier , this is the tird of fourth thread about this question. Since we do things, we seek to know what we are doing. Unlike "Little Girl", which is about 90% clearly articulated: Do you have any doubts about me?, "sissy" seems to have no firm definition We do get lists of preferences from self-proclaimed sissies such as humiliation along gender and sexual lines, forced feminization, cockold, henpecked in extremis and the like so that the "feminiztion" is not authentic or natural femininity, but emasculation and effeminacy. We get these in overwhelming amounts, up to 80-85% of self-decrition. Since I have no clearly stated ideas, in fact, I find contradictory claims made. The only thing I can do is define inductively, that is from what I see in the overwhelming number of self-decriptions and I have to use some form of logic to filter out things. For instance, whey should a femile who dresses in an exaggeratedly feminine manner not be just labelled as "overdoing it" rahter than "sissy"? and since most "sissy" thing would be in line with her "gender" how could a female even be considered a sissly? Also, most dresses I see on Ebay that are lebelled "sissy" would be just every so scrumptious LG dresses Another thing that makes this so hard to deal with is the idea of a lifestyle based on such total self-abnegation being a thing other than a massive joke. and being that the characteristics being abnegated are 99% masculine via forced feminization, cuckholding and henbecking. I conclude its roots are in FemDom, which appears to be a branch of BESM, with any AB or LG being just strapped on, not an essential element Since there are 3 or 4 thrieas asking this question, and since I did not start them, it follows that I am not the only one looking for solid ground here -
By Crinklz Kat · Posted
I was up at my normal time --- had to go to work. It's also "Big Diaper Friday" ---- so what "big diaper" do you have on tonight? I haven't decided that yet since I only got home about 30 minutes ago.
-