cruxshadow

People called it "humiliating " that her 5 year old was still in diapers at night? Her body is still in its very early stages of development. It's only humiliating if other people are humiliating her for it, which is precisely what these jerks are doing! <-----‐----- I wanted to use a much stronger word than jerks. A compound word. "Holes" just might have been the second component.

I found the episode on DailyMotion, but not in English. If you search for the show's name and season 1 17, you'll find it. He doesn't have a bladder condition, he accidentally gets water from a fountain on his pants, and later, spills his soda on his lap at lunch. When he manages to get his pants dry, the janitor accidentally bumps his mop into his pants, as he bends over.

If they were here in Portland, Or, they'd be looted by now.

I recall reading that this was satire. My German's good enough to understand about 2/3 of it, but not good enough to determine dry, Onionesque sarcasm. Unfortunately the video has been taken down due to a terms of service violation. I'd assume it was due to copyright, rather than content, as it wasn't obscene.

This ened up getting stuck in my head and I caught myself nearly singing it in the grocery store.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/1m6JQ5WoVJc She also mentions that she used it, and that her cellmate was a nurse. Sadly, the nurse did not change her. (For the life of me, I've forgotten how to embed a video in this forum. I've made numerous address adjustments to no avail. Could somebody help me out?)

The super-absorbant polymers in pads and diapers are non-toxic. I first looked that up due to the tendency of a puppy I have to shed and eat parts of her floor pads. While I suppose there could be a chemical specifically used in Indonesia's sanitary product production which could be inebriating, such as the chemical in Aqua-Dots which was metabolized in the body as GHB, this story has all the characteristics of an urban legend, including how this story keeps coming up every few years as something "new", quoting the same kid, etc...

I occasionally read the DM for the entertainment value. I'll read it most days for about a month, and then all the negativity, racism, cartoonishly-far right members bashing anything different than themselves will bring me down, and I'll stop reading it again for about 6 months. They're definitely blur the lines between truth and lies quite often, and they still post bigoted, sexist, politicized propaganda all the time, but now they paraphrase, or don't say it directly, instead allowing people in the comment section to say it. Whenever there's an act of violence in the U.K., there's no article about it, but It's a far right-wing paper, but many of their readers even further on the edge complain about it being too liberal, even though if you say anything even remotely liberal in the comments, you will get destroyed. It's true, that they don't support Trump, but that's because they are first and foremost nationalists. There's a pattern of only writing flattering articles about the U.K., and only derogatory ones about the U.S.. Also, for some reason, there are hundreds of articles with the phrases "(celebrity name) puts on a leggy display" or "puts on a busty display" in their women as sex objects articles. Strangely, they're attributed to different writers, so I don't exactly know how their article production works. It does seem that many of their "articles" are not written by native English speakers, and I often wonder if the authors' names are fake.

Well, then you might end up suffering from light incontinence, unless I completely misinterpreted the meaning of that condition.

That's probably not true. Same with the Katy Perry story about her wearing throughout high school. Those IC websites that have a celebrity section always reference each other, rather than verifiable sources. A few years ago, there were tons of articles and videos about how Japanese women were wearing diapers to work to keep up with their male counterparts and to break taboos. Every part of it seemed like a clear parody of Japanese culture, but the more people wrote on it, the more verifiable it seemed to everyone. After doing extensive research, and going far beyond the dozens of articles about it, I found the original source was the Japanese equivalent of the Onion. It was satire. Think about how many people believe that we swallow 7 to 9 spiders a year. (The old myth was in a lifetime, but that just wasn't sensational enough apparently.) It's hard enough to swat a spider when you sneak up on it. Why would they crawl down the throat of a giant predator, and why wouldn't we feel it? My general advice is that if something "blows you away," and sounds absurd, perfectly ironic, or too good to be true, look into it further, because there's a good chance that it isn't. This is especially important now that ethics have deteriorated so much in modern journalism. It's all about the clicks now.

Cotton diapers are soft and absorbent, which made them a perfect tool for washing and polishing cars. I think people tend to use microfiber cloths now, but I don't know if that's a matter of quality or economy.

s03e13: "The One with Lisa Kudrow in a Small Role" Personally I don't mind bringing up old threads. It seems like a better way to piece together collective knowledge. Imagine if libraries threw out books that were over 6 weeks old.

I'm not familiar with it. Does he need them in an ongoing basis, or is this a one-off incident?

Eh, at this point, obesity has become the new norm, so people probably wouldn't, but that's beyond a slight weight issue. That's severe anorexia.

That's actually truer to the actual course of events, because Lisa Nowak didn't wear a diaper either. People assume that because astronauts wear pull-ups during launch, they must be really high-tech, but they were cheap in comparison to premium diapers. They were only manufactured by one company, and when they were discontinued, NASA bought nearly all the stock. Why steal from rationed government stock (they actually keep count of how many remain,) instead of getting a comparable product from a grocery store? The reality is, she had a messy car, and the cop pulled her over, saw a bag of her kids' baby pull-ups, in her station wagon, and asked "What are those for?" She sarcastically answered that she didn't want to make pit-stops. They were toddler-sized and she gave a sarcastic answer, but the cop wasn't too sharp, and missed the insult.

Yeah, it's not quite right. He's an assistant to a biology teacher.

I prefer tape-diapers. Mostly I wear Goodnites though, because they are discreet, I can buy them from a store, and can wear them for a couple days before using them (I'm poor). As for adult products, I really don't like pull-ons at all, and prefer plastic backed taped such as Tena Maxi (or whatever it's called now, haven't tried the new ones,) Molicare Maxi (I miss the purple). Actually since the Goodnites are girls, all of them have/had some purple. Though I'd say my favorite diaper now is Super Dry Kids.

Are you sure it's not just a gigantic cat?

It is. It's actually a crime in every U.S. state. In some states it even counts as a sex crime, as it involves the public exposure of one's genitals, occasionally resulting in the guilty party having to register as a sex offender.

Very rarely. I used to be able to induce lucid dreams from a waking state, and one time with practice, was able to leave my body (which may in fact be nothing more than a wake induced lucid dream,) but I've lost that ability. Since I have severe insomnia it's pretty much impossible for me to fall asleep naturally, so this usually doesn't work. If I can ever get it down again though, I intend to live out some fantasies that I couldn't in real life.

I agree with that Toyboy, I don't advocate anyone eat any particular diet. My own is inconvenient, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. I'm just saying that the matter of antinutrients is something that's gotten misinterpreted, and dispersed through social media, but it isn't really a legitimate issue for most people. Some people point to the Inuit as proof of an all-meat/zero-carb diet being sustainable, but their diet actually contained a fair amount of carbs in the form of glycogen in the muscles of freshly killed animals, which begins to break down shortly after death, and vitamin C from their brains, which is an extremely essential vitamin. Most westerners don't eat freshly killed raw meat, or brains.

Zero carbs is an unnecessary extreme for preventing epileptic seizures.1 Ketosis can usually be achieved around 30 net grams, which does not count fiber from leafy and cruciferous vegetables. The idea is that if only 30 net carbs is good, zero must be better, but there's no scientific basis for that. I eat a ketogenic lacto-vegetarian diet (yeah, that's actually possible,) then sometimes alternate with a standard vegetarian diet which I've eaten for 30 years, and have had tests done, and I have no nutritional deficiencies (though I do now take iron, since cutting out bread). At 29, I looked 17, and could run over 100 miles. Now at 38, I won a fencing tournament against kids half my age. While antinutrients do prevent some absorption, eating a balanced diet nullifies this. Just like not making the jump from going from low-carb to no-carb, it's a matter of balance, rather than extremes. Antinutrient derived deficiencies are only really seen in people who have a very limited diet. I eat a lot of spinach, and a lot of homemade quark (similar to yogurt,) and cheeses, and despite my spinach consumption, my calcium levels are tested as being on the high end. Why? The spinach doesn't steal away all of the calcium, because I'm not eating an entire pound of it while only consuming a morsel of cheese. I've seen a lot of people talking about avoiding beans because of lectins, but cooking them destroys the lectins. No one goes to the store and buys lentils and chows down on them like they're tiny rocks. The whole anti-nutrient scare is, like most scares, based upon misinformation. I'm not trying to change your beliefs, just like you wouldn't try to change mine, I'm just trying to provide additional info for people who might read your post and take it as gospel. 1. https://www.epilepsy.com/learn/treating-seizures-and-epilepsy/dietary-therapies/ketogenic-diet

It's not the first time either. At a big game in 99, Ronaldo wore diapers due to a diet pill side-effect.

It would be weird considering Lisa Nowak never wore a diaper during that fiasco. Her car looked like a hoarder's home, and had all manner of things in the back, including baby pull ups from before her kids were recently potty-trained, but probably not on long rides yet. Anyway, a cop asked her why she had those in the back, and because it was such a stupid question, she sarcastically responded that she didn't wan't to make pit-stops. Any rational person would have recognized her sarcasm, and the fact that they wouldn't have fit her, but he was one of those very literal sorts, as many cops are, and took her joke at face value.

I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill Kelsey Grammer. What flavor is the sun?