![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
Cloth Diapers & Panties
For the Cloth Diaper Lovers and their Panties of choice.
510 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 10.8k views
-
- 4 replies
- 88 views
-
- 8 replies
- 344 views
-
- 4 replies
- 271 views
-
- 19 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 215 views
-
- 22 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 2 replies
- 149 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 465 views
-
- 3 replies
- 256 views
-
- 72 replies
- 14.9k views
-
- 0 replies
- 149 views
-
- 2 replies
- 281 views
-
- 11 replies
- 572 views
-
- 38 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 419 views
-
- 35 replies
- 8.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 841 views
-
- 0 replies
- 254 views
-
- 9 replies
- 827 views
-
- 0 replies
- 228 views
-
- 12 replies
- 804 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 6 replies
- 600 views
-
-
Posts
-
By little_madd · Posted
Ana was a bit hesitant about letting the girls sleep in the same room as Emilly, given how rebellious Emilly had been acting; perhaps it would be better for her to sleep in the living room in the playpen or portable crib. However, she needed to see how the return trip went. When Maddison, Alice, and Ana arrived home, Alice asked, "Can we play in your room, sister?" Maddison replied, "I think it's best not to right now; let's keep it free for Emilly—she's going to need it." ================================== Camilla was excited about the challenge Emilly presented; she planned to use all the items she hadn't used with Maddison—boots, a paddle, a time-out chair, and other tools—on Emilly. At the same time, she was considering promoting Maddison to pull-ups and nighttime diapers, or letting her use them whenever she wanted. Emilly was incredibly stressed and angry; she wasn't holding back her words or minding the pain in her backside. "It's even worse if they're adults—they're actual babies! Listen closely: I am NEVER going to wear diapers or be a baby." Camilla had expected that kind of reaction from Maddison, but it came as a surprise from Emilly. Still, Camilla knew there was no room for negotiation with Emilly; any chance of earning "big girl" privileges was gone. Emilly remained defiant: "You're crazy, and Maddison is even worse—she's a baby who deserves to wear those diapers. You'll never make me forget how to use the toilet." -
I understand what DiaperBandit is saying. We all know what this guy did is beyond wrong. Putting the crime aside, witnessing the embarrassment of being in a soiled diaper and the association we have with our diaper lives, makes this feel like a shock. And it shows how society has labeled it by their remarks aside from the crime itself. We all know there is a line that was crossed. Trying to contact a child is wrong on so many levels - and how stupid can you be, like your phone can't be traced? I mean the guy did it to himself. What bothers me is how people blur the lines on what a pedophile is and is not. I think many DLs are attracted to the idea of being a child in a diaper. And there can be a guilt for having the thought of a child looking cute in a diaper - a thought fueled from something deep down in ones subconscious. But the thought is not the crime, It's when you take action to contact a child for your own pleasure. That's the crime. But many people would assume the guy who finds young girls attractive want to get them alone and undressed. But, some people have never had the desire to see people of the opposite sex without cloth. For example, it is common for an AB/DL to not find nudity attractive because the diaper is the attractive object. So that brings up the question, should people such as AD/DLs that have never committed such actions, be guilty of just having a thought that a child looks cute in a diaper? Many people would label that person as a pedophile. But acting surprised how someone views a child, let alone what that thought even looks like, is like trying to understand how a tree survives without any concept of it's roots. Not all thoughts have the same associations. Now in the case of this video, this guy was undeniably wrong because he reached out to a minor to materialize whatever he was thinking. -
-
The bigger issue at hand is spending ANY amount of money. Consider you are probably going to deal with 30 minutes of traffic. Deal to find a half-bad parking space. Deal with the lines and overpriced food/drinks. Deal with disruptive people in the front row. Deal with a half-hour of stupid ads. Deal with overly lound sound. Then when all that is over deal with 30 more minutes of traffic. And the alternative is to simply wait a few months. Pay a fraction of the cost to watch the exact same move. Watch it on your own big-ish but also closer-to-you screen, with a personal stereo system or high quality headphones. Enjoy your own food and drinks that your prefer anyways. Stay comfortable in your own chair and panamas (or just a diaper and tee shirt). AND, no traffic or annoying people. Given the choice, you couldn't pay me to go to a standard movie theater these days. And it's a wonder anyone still pays a theater for all they have to deal with. -
Nope. Having a cather in place, even long term, will not cause incontinence by itself. The key is being able to keep your sphincter relaxed long enough to cause atrophy. But having your sphincter clamp shut over a catheter is still not relaxed. It may simulate full incontinence, but you'll go right back to normal continence after removijg it. UNLESS you also managed to stay relaxed the entire time. But with a catheyer in place, you can't even tell of you are or not. You're better bet is to just diaper train/reverse potty train like normal. Also, having a catheter in place long term can cause major irritation. Especially for guys with our constant penis size changes. But also from the catheter moving a little or being pulled on. Or worse, by using too big of a catheter that also stretches the urethra. All of this is just asking to develop a urethral sensitivity. Which is where having anything in your urethra becomes slightly painful. Trust me on this, I once made it 7 months constantly being catheterized. It was per a urologist to give my bladder a chance to calm down and heal, while also hoping to do the same with my sphincter mucles. While it did give me a nice break, I did not become functionally incontinent, but catheters now hurt as well. More specific to your last question though. Yes you absolutelty can have an open urethra. Either by ultimately having your sphincters removed like I have, or by having an open catheter in place. And yes, that means letting your catheter drain into your diaper or even a pool. One BIG caveat though is you absolitely are going to be at a higher risk for a UTI. Because yes, bacteria can still travel back up into your bladder. You can greatly mitigate that by making the catheter a closed drainage bag system. Or by adding a small one-way valve to the end of an otherwise freely draining catheter. Or even just by staying extremely well hydrated, withbkr without an open catheter. This means well over 2 liters of fluds per day! No exceptions!!! This way you're constantly peeing and flushing out your urethra. Drinking plenty cranberry juice also helps mitigating any UTI risk. That 7 months I did. That was all open draining into my diaper. I did get used to drinking 3 liters of fluids a day. But by the end I was sick of cranberry and oj. Cranberry and apple juice. Cranberry and vodka. And cranberry in general. Buy I never had a UTI.
-