![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
Baby Talk
Let your baby side show.
1,655 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 13.1k views
-
- 18 replies
- 3k views
-
- 6 replies
- 358 views
-
- 314 replies
- 48.9k views
-
- 25 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 6 replies
- 408 views
-
- 2 replies
- 247 views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 41 replies
- 11.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 529 views
-
- 4 replies
- 344 views
-
- 3 replies
- 187 views
-
- 7 replies
- 754 views
-
- 7 replies
- 944 views
-
- 60 replies
- 4.9k views
-
- 6 replies
- 407 views
-
- 2 replies
- 383 views
-
- 0 replies
- 241 views
-
- 2 replies
- 217 views
-
- 0 replies
- 227 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 17 replies
- 9.7k views
-
- 9 replies
- 605 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 245 views
-
-
.png.9a51a96e25e3e77d1da09587b011169d.png)
-
Posts
-
I think that was one of the best chapters yet! I really enjoy their explorations, the way they help each other find and push limits and switch to ensure it's for both. Well done. -
By bigdiaperedstevie · Posted
I was almost constantly on these kinds of forums for years then I sort of forgot about all of my diaper related kinks and I never used a diaper like 4 or 5 years. Now I wear a diaper as often as I can. I was always a diaper lover. It just was less often. If you enjoy or love wear diapers you are a diaper lover and that's awesome. -
By Little Sherri · Posted
My observations are similar to those of @undertheradar. I wore baby diapers for bedwetting in the 1980's, because pull-ups didn't exist at the time. I didn't wear them into high school, but I was in the 6th grade when I outgrew needing them (although I still haven't outgrown liking them...), and XL Pampers still fit on me back then, albeit they were approaching their engineering limits as I exceeded 80 lbs. Modern disposable diaper manufacturers have added a size 7, size 8 and even a size 9 (in the UK), over the last decade or so, and there is next to no difference between anything above size 6 - I think the difference is entirely made of marketing puffery. I had a size 7 and a size 8 Pampers Baby Dry in my possession about a year ago, and I measured and weighed them, and could find almost no difference - if you stretched them out, the size 8 had maybe 3/8ths of an inch more width at the waist, and they weighed exactly the same, however the took the weight rating up to 52 lbs (if I recall correctly). @Slomo 's graphic tells part of the tale; children add a lot more in height and weight, than they do in waist size, as they grow, so the size 8 diapers on the market can already fit kids up to about 8 years old. I looked at a sizing chart from a package of girls' briefs (I have daughters) a while back; they were sized by age, in 2-year increments. So, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12. The size 8 Pampers measurements with the tabs at the outsides of the front panel, were larger than the size 8's, and smaller than the size 10's. The size 8's are also the only ones that have a graphic on the back of them saying "Back!" , which suggests that they recognize that some of their users might be putting them on themselves - the smaller diapers don't have that, because presumably, mom or dad can figure that out. They will never offer a "real" size 8 or 9 or 10 tabbed diaper, outside of specialized medical products such as Youth Crews or the various Abena products, and their ilk, because the same companies that market Pampers and Huggies and Luvs also market pull-ups that cost notably more per diaper(approaching $1, at least in Canada), and they would much rather sell you those for your 8 - 10 - 12-year-old, than to sell you a less expensive tabbed diaper, even if we know the "real" diapers are a superior product, in terms of capabilities. My younger daughter wet the bed as late into her childhood as I did, so I am quite familiar with the practical performance differences between diapers and pull-ups... -
-
Sorry to be realistic... Most people are awful. I can say it, because of my past
-