![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
Baby Talk
Let your baby side show.
1,655 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 13.1k views
-
- 17 replies
- 3.8k views
-
- 11 replies
- 733 views
-
- 6 replies
- 396 views
-
- 43 replies
- 12k views
-
- 18 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 15 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 4 replies
- 347 views
-
- 315 replies
- 49.7k views
-
- 1 reply
- 365 views
-
- 18 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 544 views
-
- 25 replies
- 3.2k views
-
- 6 replies
- 560 views
-
- 2 replies
- 364 views
-
- 21 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 8 replies
- 749 views
-
- 4 replies
- 476 views
-
- 7 replies
- 910 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 60 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 2 replies
- 444 views
-
- 0 replies
- 301 views
-
- 2 replies
- 255 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.7k views
-
-
Posts
-
Unfortunately no. Most current stents are made from a Nickel-Titanium alloy. Called Nitol. It's non-reactive in the body. But it's still seen by the body as a foreign object. The main reason stents can be used in arteries is they don't have regenerative surfaces. So there isn't much of a response by the body in an arterie. Plus, those stents are only used when you're already at risk of dying. Otherwise baloon dilation is more commonly used. But the urethra is different. It has a regenerative layer of tissue, which is highly reactive. That's why you can develop more problems with a foreign body in the urethra. You'd need something that is truly invisible to the body. That's why bio-compatible coatings are being developed. But we seem to still have a ways to go before public use is approved. -
By rusty pins · Posted
I'd like to say that Mikey (site founder and owner) advocates user participation and encourages people to post their thoughts and opinions (as he himself just posted here in this thread). Personally, we should be welcoming and encouraging our new members, not immediately making them feel like they did something wrong right off the bat because they brought up an old thread I personally enjoy reading older forgotten posts from years past and hearing new people's thoughts. Just because it's an old tread from several years ago doesn't mean it's not still relevant. There have been many new members since then who probably would have responded at the time if they had been around when it was first posted! If some people think they are so right about not bringing back old posts, why is the overall opinion of members who have replied trending towards the opposite? -
By rusty pins · Posted
First, welcome to this site! It's the best AB/DL site there is. Second, please don't be sorry. There are some people who would find something bad to say about getting a raise! The nice thing about this site is unless you attack someone over their orientation, religion, race or things like that, we are free to discuss our different opinions without being overly rude or nasty to each other. I'd also like to say that Mikey (site founder and owner) advocates user participation and encourages people to post their thoughts and opinions. Personally, we should be welcoming and encouraging our new members, not immediately making them feel like they did something wrong right off the bat because they brought up an old thread. Richie boy, as far as I'm concerned (and I'll bet many others feel the same way), not only does it not bother or annoy me that you brought to light an old thread, but I personally enjoyed reading it again and hearing new people's thoughts. Just because it's an old tread from several years ago doesn't mean there haven't been many new members who wouldn't have responded to it had they been around when it was first posted! -
By PottyPotamus · Posted
What I'm looking for is something like the "Almost a big kid" training pant that Baby-Pants sold. They are thick enough to feel like you're wearing toddler undies without being thick enough to make one's pants bulge. Anybody know of anything like that still available? -
-