![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
Rainbow Diapers
A space where our Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans members can discuss related issues.
521 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 12.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 16.5k views
-
- 27 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 8 replies
- 654 views
-
- 115 replies
- 13.7k views
-
- 62 replies
- 25.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 774 views
-
- 9 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 22 replies
- 9.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 257 views
-
- 8 replies
- 2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 278 views
-
- 2 replies
- 326 views
-
- 38 replies
- 9.7k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 973 views
-
- 4 replies
- 292 views
-
- 1 reply
- 176 views
-
- 3 replies
- 629 views
-
- 4 replies
- 455 views
-
- 1 reply
- 306 views
-
- 33 replies
- 7.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 15 replies
- 973 views
.thumb.png.e76412a12890a4f63d9fa4c4165cb1cc.png)
-
-
Posts
-
In the baby market, Pampers / Huggies came out with diapers/nappies with a jeans print on it - and some parents fell for the supposed cuteness of the product, but it was a phase where reality hit hard - i.e. a tape on diaper that looks like underwear is a problem as it tells the wearer that they are supposed to wet and mess their underwear. This has been propagated with bed wetter pants that are also supposed to look like underwear. Modern disposable baby diapers have cartoon charachters on them, not the bricks, bears, pacifiers of the supposed infantile print of the ABDL diapers. Those infantile print adult diapers (and some other clothing) are designed to enhance the play action within the ABDL world, and are usually kept in private - i.e. the clothes are sleepers / onesies / plastic pants etc, very rarely overgarments. However, in the adult world, the adult wearing the diaper is a lot more intelligent than the baby/infant going through potty training. Yes, there is a small market for the printed diaper, and when it comes to infantile prints, that market is even smaller. When it comes to prints that mimic jean shorts, it is lacking the rest of the shorts part... and looks like jean underwear - something that no one would wear. So in reality, who is it for - what is it trying to do other than supply a larger version of a prior infant product that was desiged to confuse the infant? An adult wearing a diaper is for a medical need be it pschycological and/or physical. Most other adults cannot get their heads around this. The adult that needs the diaper is in one of two camps - wearing it as a fetish object > and may prefer the infantile prints etc OR wearing it due to dependency > where the extra infantile prints may be a bonus / cost... and it all depends on where the person is wearing it. Now we get to the jeans diaper - it fails as a jeans shorts as it does not have long enough legs... therefore, it cant be mixed up as jeans and worn uncovered unless in private. So, where is the likeness to the original baby product within the advertisement, of the baby/toddler waking around with a short cut top and these jean diapers, maybe a work belt and a hard had as a pseudo representation of a worker - the outfit on a baby / toddler is cute as it portrays a baby's imagination - but on an adult, that is firstly devaluing the adult's mind to that of the baby, and then trying to praise the devalued mind since it has imagination! There is no way the diaper can be confused as anything other than a diaper - which then portrays the stereotype that the person wearing it must be mentally challenged 1 - to need to wear diapers, and 2 - to be proud to play dress up. Neither is in any way benifical to the wearer, or the ABDL comunity as a whole. Considering the above - what is the actual demographic for this diaper. The absorbancy has not been discussed, nor has its functionality - all it is is something that is supposed to look good. Therefore, the users of this would be the small group of diaper lovers who wear for the image and the exhibionism of same and do/ do not use it. These are the people we see in the news being arrested for trying to manipulate others to be part of their fantasy - breaking into day care centres and attempting to enforce their fantasy on others by finding the most public place they can, and broadcasting as they soil their diapers / going to different towns and indulging themselves and their fetish in their actions... where it is only a matter of time before they end up behind bars - the same group of people that bring the ABDL world into disrepute and also embarrass and humiliate the group of us that are dependent on diapers. Theese are the same group of people that enforce the stereotype that only the mentally challenged wear and use diapers! It is similar to the group of supposed ABDL pictures that clog the internet of some male / female with a pacifier in their mouths, an obvious short top, infantile hair style, makeup on their face showing glowing cheeks wearing a cheap pull-up, who advertise give me your credit card and I will show 'Baby X' getting fed / changed by a loving nanny etc. IMHO, it is all fake, and something to avoid. -
Its definitely shaping up that way for Heather. Thank you for being invested. -
Thankyou. Its always a challenge to balance length and detail then finish with the end still an unknown. The challenge is to not loose track of all the players as new characters are introduced. Might have to make a mindmap! Littles - Heather, Dawn, Sarah, Babysitter in Vegas, Girl in Vegas, Girl’s Mom in Vegas, Sarah Amazons - Hotel staff, Ivy, Diane, Diane’s daughter, Amanda Featherstone - Emergency Fostermom, Police Sargent, Constables x 2, Adoption Agency workers x 3, Evelyn Diapre, Susan Gerberino, County Jail workers x 5 (Sue McKay - Daycare Supervisor, Amalia Johnson - Student Nurse, Kimberley Clark, Sandra Luvv - Littles Adoption Coordinator, Cleaner), a few more I suspect lost to the passage of time.
-
By sissybabypaige · Posted
Hoping for a new chapter soon. -
A great development of the story. I love it but the picture sent to the group is a nightmare for me. Thanks for writing for us.
-