![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
Rainbow Diapers
A space where our Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans members can discuss related issues.
521 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 12.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 16.5k views
-
- 9 replies
- 673 views
-
- 27 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 115 replies
- 13.7k views
-
- 62 replies
- 25.2k views
-
- 4 replies
- 775 views
-
- 9 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 19 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 22 replies
- 9.2k views
-
- 1 reply
- 257 views
-
- 8 replies
- 2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 278 views
-
- 2 replies
- 327 views
-
- 38 replies
- 9.7k views
-
- 9 replies
- 1k views
-
- 6 replies
- 973 views
-
- 4 replies
- 292 views
-
- 1 reply
- 176 views
-
- 3 replies
- 629 views
-
- 4 replies
- 455 views
-
- 1 reply
- 307 views
-
- 33 replies
- 7.2k views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 15 replies
- 973 views
.thumb.png.e76412a12890a4f63d9fa4c4165cb1cc.png)
-
-
Posts
-
Adam Hamilton, the senator elect from Kansas is a self described moderate and has been registered as both a Democrat and Republican at various times. I'm not saying it is easy, but it does happen. Particularly in times like this. I'm also a fan of the ranked-choice-ballot, but both parties need to agree to do it and it must be done by the states. -
Feederism has two roles, the feeder and the feedee. The feeder may derive pleasure from many aspects of the role - supplying food, cooking, hand feeding or watching the other consuming the food and gaining the weight. This creates a classic master - servant OR dependee role, where the feeder acts as care taker / surrogate parent for the feedee. Studies have shown that some feeder's have an overdeveloped maternal/paternal need - to take care completely of the feedee. This is where there is a cross over to the ABDL world, where the feeder becomes the care taker of the feedee, including, when the feedee's weight gets large enough, nappy/diaper changing, cleaning the feedee. The feedee is seens as the servant, but it is usually on the direction of the feedee that the feeder acts - feeding the feedee what s/he want to consume. From a medical perspective, both parties are in a spiral where either medical / legal step in to stop it, or death occurs. If one over-eats (eats more than the energy that they are using), the excess is stored as fat. This fat will put pressure on all organs which leads to internal organ failure. When they get to a excess level, classed as bariatic, which shockingly enough, a lot of us are very close to it - i.e. do you wear the large / extra large nappies/diapers - do you get out of breath running up or down stairs - if you had to run from a threat, could you? - If you answer yes or maybe to the first two, they maybe you are a little unfit. Back to topic - At that weight, excess pressure is placed on our joints and limbs, so much so that if we step a little awquardly, we twist our ankle etc. Consider that the human body was designed to run across uneven ground where we would need to flex all our joints even sideways to avoid becoming a meal of a preadator. When one gets to that weight, without intervention, death is just a matter of time. Even if there is medical personell on hand, very few medical personal and equiptment can handle that level of fat / weight. @Fatpiglet Can I presume that you are a feedee based on your title, and that has linked you to the ABDL world - i.e. the need to wear diapers, and it is for need based on ability to get to a bathroom? If that is true, what I see is you looking for a care giver who is also a feeder. In this comunity, the care givers are rare and unique people, where there is a higher proportion of adult babies as compared to care givers. In a relationship, as most here can attest to, or have learnt the hard way, there is give and take which is called compromise. In the ABDL world, some of the care givers are also adult babies, so at times, the baby - adult roles get reversed. Yes, there are the feeders out there, as the world is full of individual people, but I would make a wild guess that it would be extremely rare to find a feeder here. After all, the adult in any relationship is also the prime source of finance unless the baby is financially independent / financially secure. Yes, it eventually comes down to money and love. The care giver in the relationship needs to love and respect the baby in their charge, and the baby needs to have some financial independence where they are not 100% dependent on the income of the care giver. This is where the A in ABDL rears its head... the adult side of every relationship is the one that keeps it together OR disolves it for something better if that original relationship is one sided or toxic. @Fatpiglet I wish you luck in your search, but I doubt if you will find one here, as this site, although vast, has :- Adults who need nappies / diapers as either a comfort item, or to prevent them soiling clothes / furniture etc. Adults who offer care and assistance to other adults that wear nappies/diapers with / without the added infantile paraphanalia. where people in group 1 can easily switch to group 2 or visa-versa or whatever role that suits them at the time. Yes, the care giver can partially fit into the feeder role, and the baby can fit into the feedee role, but although there is some cross-over, there is the adult side that at times steps in, where the adult does things like earn money and other boring things that adults do... where in the Feedism fetish, both parties is seeking the fastest way for the feedee to gain weight, where any physical excertion would be counter-productive in that goal - even walking to one's car to drive to a place of work (for the feedee) and the feeder leaving the feedee would place the feedee in a exposed and dependant position - after all, one with a dependant child does not leave them unsupervised at anytime. Despite what we, in the ABDL world dream, if we were actually treated 24/7/365 as a pre-communicative baby, it would very quickly destroy us mentally - but the feedee in the feedism fetish needs to be treated like that to assist with the weight gain, the goal of both parties within Feedism fetish. This also prevents the feeder from ever leaving the side of the feedee, which means that both parties need to be financially independent. -
Exactly! This is what i have experienced lately. Im glad you doing better. Take care of yourself. Don't like those dark stories 😊 -
Does anyone else have issues when there pooping with an almost involuntary push when popping there diaper. I just wanna relax and let it come out. It I always seem to push even if I tell my self not to it’s just like a reflex. Anyone else deal with this. -
I have just noticed the post from Northshore - where Adam is claiming quality control issues. I sincerly doubt that Northshore can defeat the laws of physics. A high absorbant disposable diaper has a large quantity of padding interspaced with SAP. When this diaper is made, the padding mixed with SAP is placed, via a mold, on either a roll of front staydry liner or the rear plastic. This is compressed onto the backing by two pinch rollers, and then either more padding is added or the second layer (front or back depending on whether the nappy/diaper is made upside down or not). These layers are glued with the leg gathers etc, and then the nappy/diaper is seperated from the roll by a blade. This makes the nappy/diaper an individual item, where a machine folds it in two or three. From the folding machine, the nappy/diaper is stacked on top of others, where when the quantity reaches the required bag quantity, two arms pick up that quantity, compress them together and place them into a bag. Physics means that the more urine that can be held by a nappy/diaper, the more padding and SAP are used. 100% SAP does not work as SAP needs time to absorb. Padding can absorb faster, but it had a re-wet issue, i.e. urine can be squashed out. As a result, for high absorbancy, there is physics that mean x quantity of padding and y quantity of SAP. The more padding, the higher the compression, and the less able the padding is capable of staying together. Padding had fibre threads that allow it to hook onto its neighbouring padding, but when it is compressed, each individual padding can be forced to stick to its neighbour. Therefore, movement will 'break' a group of padding which causes the clumping issue and other problems. @NorthShoreAdam, I would like you, as the representitive of Northshore, to explain what actions that Northshore do to reduce the compression of the padding so that the nappies/diapers can 'do what is advertised'? This is not the test diaper that you take from the production line before it is compressed into the bag, but the one that is delivered to the customer after it has spent time compressed in its bag, wrapped tight on the pallet, transported a couple of hundred miles from the maker to the store, stored for a while in a freezing / overheating warehouse, and then eventually delivered to a customer. That would be the true test of a nappy/diaper - and more close to what the end user is dealing with? P&G originally supplied nappies / diapers in boxes. It was a decision in 1959 by Sten Gustaf Thulin, an engineer of Celloplast to place finished product in plastic bags rather that carbord boxes - mainy to increase the profits of the company he worked for. Industry followed suit as more product could be placed on a pallet and placed on a delivery truck. This, P&G followed in 1985 placing diapers into plastic bags intead of carbord boxes at the cost to the consumer. Today, we have a plastic polution problem - all due to the greed of people like Sten Gustaf Thulin etc. We also have limits to the transit weight of delivery trucks where before 1960, limits were not needed. The world plastic polution is so bad that... If human civilization were to be destroyed and its cities wiped off the map, there would be an easy way for future intelligent life-forms to know when the mid-20th century began: plastic. From the 1950s to today, 8.3 billion metric tons of plastic have been produced, with around half of it made since 2004. And since plastic does not naturally degrade, the billions of tons sitting in landfills, floating in the oceans or piling up on city streets will provide a marker if later civilizations ever want to classify our era. Perhaps they will call this time on Earth the Plastocene Epoch. Quote from New York Times article July, 2017 by Tatiana Schlossberg Plastics, being man-made, has no natural way to revert to its core components. For nappies/diapers, we use plastic as a replacement for the rubber pants of yesteryear, but using plastic as the bags to contain nappies/diapers where there is an alternative as carbord (which is paper and biodegradable / reusable as paper), from a world health perspective, I can't see the logic of using plastic bags instead of cardbord boxes. Even plastics in food wrapping can be replaced with aluminum foil, where that is fully recycleable. For world health, we must penalise those who chose the contaminant as the cheaper (for them) alternative to the recycleable material, at penalties that are so large, it is not cost effective for these companies to ever consider doing this to OUR world ever again. All these compression changes have increased world polution and end user costs all for the profit margin.
-