Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

Latest News

Updates from DailyDi


1,573 topics in this forum

    • 12 replies
    • 12.3k views
    • 42 replies
    • 4.8k views
  1. External Link to Chat

    • 15 replies
    • 13.9k views
    • 0 replies
    • 5.5k views
    • 15 replies
    • 540 views
    • 0 replies
    • 198 views
    • 0 replies
    • 164 views
    • 12 replies
    • 563 views
  2. I'm begging

    • 9 replies
    • 347 views
    • 1 reply
    • 150 views
    • 11 replies
    • 319 views
    • 2 replies
    • 286 views
    • 0 replies
    • 230 views
  3. Donations Needed

    • 8 replies
    • 441 views
  4. February Donors

    • 1 reply
    • 196 views
    • 0 replies
    • 196 views
    • 10 replies
    • 426 views
    • 7 replies
    • 353 views
    • 14 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 273 views
  5. December Donors

    • 7 replies
    • 421 views
  6. Sad Godzilla News

    • 1 reply
    • 381 views
  7. BeDry Night

    • 1 reply
    • 500 views
  8. November Donors

    • 10 replies
    • 418 views
    • 0 replies
    • 173 views
  • Current Donation Goals

  • NorthShore Daily Diaper Ads - 250x250.gif

  • abdl diaper hypnosis square.png

  • Posts

    • I always think it's crazy when parents have that attitude. I sort of understand the feelings of parents who think "diapers/pull-ups would embarrass an older child too much," but honestly (and maybe I'm biased) I feel like it's far more embarrassing for that child to wake up in soaked pjs and a soaked bed than to wake up in a wet pull-up/diaper but a dry bed and dry pjs. At least that attitude, while ignorant, is in consideration of the child's feelings, but far worse are parents who have the mindset that if an older child wears pull-ups/diapers for bedwetting it will discourage them from staying dry, as if a child can help it (making a bedwetter uncomfortable isn't going to help them stop).
    • TAPE? I'm a pins in a cloth diaper baby--the way it should be!
    • This might be permissible morally or legally if the company added another word to the one in use and copyrighted/trademarked the whole thing, like "The ABDL" for a specific model of diaper, or changed it in some easily recognizable way that deliminted its use, Like "BabyDoll". The generic term has three iterations "babydoll", "baby doll" and "baby-doll", any of which could be appended to a little girl's name. BabyDoll has two upper-case letters. Upper case letters are well known to make names of words. Now, if someone was willing to produce the items with that name as per my instructions, "BabyDoll" could probably be copyrighted or the image on the label as shown in the albums trademarked The main point being made is that while a generic word is used, it is PART of a larger whole that is copyrighted/trademarked, not the word itself
    • Strawberry milk in the Safari Bottle this morning.... mmmmmm.....
×
×
  • Create New...