Little BabyDoll Christine

I think I see a stranger. This one went with that one. It really helps to know some ancient Greek lit Knock knock Who's there? Euripades Euripades who Euripades pants; I breaka u face

Look in LL Medico and plastic-pants.com As I said, I first saw them for sale about late 1957. But I have never seen them used on babies IRL over the course of almost 30 years. If they were actually used, I would have seen it at least once. The utter mesmerization these have in the ABDL world, compared to the lack of IRL baby use is one of the more fascinating things

In the 1970's, rubber panties were routinely worn over throw-aways. The leg gathers were not watertight. Even in the late '80's they were recommended over throw-aways by home economics social workers

Oh yeah?! go on YT and see how they do it at St. Agnes Reformatory. It starts with a gyno exam by Dr. Sangita Khombatta

If it is Warhammer 40K, I will definitely pass. I do not whant a chain sword or Tyrannid anywhere near that part of my body. Although a diaper would be appropriate for Call of Duty or for use in the Septic-mus Empire

I did find a pair of Gerber panties on Ebay To me these look like Gary Panties that you would find at LL Medico or plasti-pants.com. You might want one of the baby prints I do not think you will need the high-waist. Back in the day, Pampers et all did not have SAP and depended on the absorbancy of the material so they were quite large and needed full-size baby panties like these. Now,even a premium ABDL diaper will fit in a regular cut Gary and Lowriders are made for throw-aways. I think the regular cut Gary will hold even the MegaMax or other large diaper. The nursery prints are various teddy bears and carousels

A couple of things: 1. IWhen Comco went down in late 2013/early 2014. I set out to find a replacement and found and recommended the Gary 7 mil as in that role. The story is in RUBBER PANTIES 'R' US in the "Conversation" section 2. The last Gerber-style panties I know of were VIP, long ago disconinued. Protex sells one that used to be called "I Can't Believe it's not Gerber" which, for obvious reasons, was renamed. You might go to the Protex site and find it by its resemblance to that brand. When I reviewed it, I said "I can [believe it's not Gerber] since it is made of smooth rather than grainy material like the original Gerber was. However since the 1990's I have found and purchased for my dollies Gerber panties made of smooth material but they were not very "generous". The 1960's to early '80's Gerbers that I saw were made of grainy material and were of no interest to me. Also, in the 60's (If Angela Bauer is to be believed and she was knowledgeable about that brand) to some time around 2000 Gerber made adult size panties. I doubt you will find "generous" adult rubber panties since one of the requirements for adult panties would be unobtrusiveness. Gary has a large size overlap I can fit with a diaper into L, XL and 2XL and somewhat into 3XL

Expiring minds want to know: Since bridge is played in "rubbers", is the scoring paper a "rubber sheet"?

I have plenty of those that they enclosed leg bands are a bit uncomfortabel, the feel a bit sharp. In the Golden Age, for elastics, some pantie had rubber strips that were sewn in place with monfilament thread (it felt like fishing line). The elastics need not be super tight if the panties have good coverage, covering the diaper well with some to spare. But adults do not want that and try to get away with as little wetproof material ("rubber") as possible, as though it will turn them into a baby, or maybe they like the material and do not want others to know I have both those and snap-on high-waist that is kind of part of the diaper in the sense that it gets changed with it

This presumption has been the bane of ALG's for decades, even before Sissy became a thing, with many LG's accepting that designation out of ignornace. It was best addressed here https://joanne-chan1.blogspot.com/p/test.html On more than one occasion, a Sissy has ended correspondence with me, saying I am "too girl". In fact there is a bit of group antipathy between LG's and Sissies because of the use of feminine, especially little girlish things that we cherish by Sissies is to be demeaning or humiliating, and the confusion that we are like that (I do not mince, lisp, want to be a princess in any wah and I am quite low on the "frilliness" scale. I have not been cuckolded nor SPH'ed and I cannot be any kind of a slut as I am always being sure my skirts are down)

What is involved here is being made a suborinate PERSON, such as a slave, child, cock, or "gender reference deciciency". This is different from a supordinate RANK, where one's actions are directed by a superior in an organization, such as police military or fire, In these cases, the POSITION is subordinante while the person is often very skilled with a good deal of merit and holds that position by choice, maybe intending to read higher positions in that chain A child's life is totally controlled by the parent, sitter, governess, etc, without any choice. It is in the nature of being a child, even though the AB/AK accepts that condition volutarily. The sissy, is defined by a sex role defined deficiency: the SP in SPH. Cuck, emasculated/effeminate or a "Pre-teen slut". Now, observe that none of these is NECESSARILY AB/AK. The infantile/little element is added. The Sissy, a product of BDSM>FemDom, is made effeminate by being framed as "little/baby girl" adding forced femiization into a parody of femininity. Hence the over-abundance of frill,, mincing, lisping, "princess" etc, putting him on the wrong side of the boy/girl group antipathy by exiling him from the "boy". Since the essential sexual variables are inactive in the 7-10 years old, a boy and a girl are basically equal so the attack is sex-role based rather than sex based. That kind of thing cuts at a cetral idea of who one is. That is where the humiliation comes in

Time of use is a better way to rate diapers and that is best done in a range since, even ordianry usage is variable based on body type and what one consumes in that timeframe. Also, that is not even the fullest or smallest extent. I have had a La Petite Damoiselle go for only about 10-1/2 hours and,as stated above, a La Damoiselle go for 25, but those are rare to the point of statistically anamolous. Also, in the non-ABDL; i.e.real, world, they do not use a diaper, especially a cloth; i.e. REUSABLE diaper, to the point where it can be used in an episode of SEA HUNT. The extra capacity is to accommodate things like more liquids than usual or an unexpected delay in changing. However, this is for cloth diapers, where, if you change "early", you have not "wasted" a diaper, which at over a buck a shot for anthing decent, unless you are well off, hurts a bit

Dispite all the glitzy hype. I thought the VA was the same old VA that it had been for years

And for anyone over 4-1/2, totally humiliating. It was better if Mommy or caregiver just assumed it was due for a change after a given amount of time or wettings, about which a little one would be honest to avoid, among other things, having her skirt lifted