Jump to content

Watersports

Pee-play without the diapers!


98 topics in this forum

  1. Site Rules

    • 0 replies
    • 9.8k views
    • 192 replies
    • 57.8k views
    • 12 replies
    • 4.3k views
  2. Drinking wee 1 2 3

    • 52 replies
    • 12k views
    • 84 replies
    • 44.6k views
    • 0 replies
    • 122 views
    • 7 replies
    • 2.3k views
    • 4 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 12 replies
    • 5.9k views
    • 2 replies
    • 708 views
  3. pee in the potty

    • 14 replies
    • 3.3k views
  4. Secret Public Wetting 1 2

    • 25 replies
    • 15.8k views
    • 52 replies
    • 16.8k views
  5. Any from Manchester

    • 2 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 3 replies
    • 769 views
  6. 4th of July Holiday

    • 1 reply
    • 446 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 12 replies
    • 4.5k views
    • 5 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 0 replies
    • 379 views
    • 0 replies
    • 968 views
  7. Fetish of desperation and accidents

    • 2 replies
    • 1k views
  8. Your First Time Peeing 1 2

    • 41 replies
    • 29.2k views
    • 9 replies
    • 3.1k views
    • 1 reply
    • 837 views
  • llmed.jpg

  • paypal-donate-button-transparent.webp

  • Posts

    • Explain that again? You're saying that the diapers which were around before Megamax were differently shaped. Correct? You do realize that's exactly in line with what I've already said. After Megamax V1 was designed, more and more Chinese diapers were made as a direct copy to it. Of course the were different before that. I'm not talking about the brand being around before megamax. I'm talking about their shape and design being copied after Megamax was released. 
    • Eddie Drops in for the win!!!
    • And that is where you are quite mistaken.  Many of the "clones" you speak of were around well before Megamax was even introduced.  And I still have some of those v1 Megamax and shape and size of them aren't even close.   
    • I've tried some of them and there are some that work better than others.  I definitely think the front reinforcement offers better grip than the main "cloth" backing on the diaper itself.   Having also tried some medical brands that were cloth backed without that feature, the tabs simply shred the fibers of the backing rendering it unable to grip at all. Basically useless.   But, still not a fan of the "cloth back" because it's that texture/sensory thing.  So plastic it is - but not all plastic shells are created the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...