Be Careful What You Download

[willnotwill]

With your diaper pics....http://www.mississauga.com/news/article/1573923--oshawa-man-pleads-guilty-on-child-porn-charge

[snidia]

i belive i have done that aswell, but if i find a pic that looks even a little but questeionable i delete right away, they said he had "as well as several hundred child pornography images," and he way putting them in a folder to delete at a later time.....

[BabyChris121675]

That's one of the reasons why I stopped using Gigatribe and other p2p programs because

[drynot]

I'm not sure how to take this article.

[superarrow]

I don't think i've ever seen a diaper site carrying child porn, nor even abdls expressing a desire to look at it. Why is this stuff getting mixed together?

[willnotwill]

There was a site back a few years ago where there was some questionable pictures.

[willnotwill]

Then there's this one...I had missed it because I thought it was the same case as above ..

[BabyJune]

It seems to me that more people get into big trouble for downloading and

[froggy]

It seems safest just not to have any pictures of real kids in diapers, even product pictures.

[freswith]

My sister puts pictures of her infant grandchildren into my dropbox.

[ListeningToTunes]

I'm all for child porn being treated as contraband, but there needs to be reason exercised in instances of simple possession, when that possession is incidental or unintentional. An accidental kiddie-porn picture/video/etc on a computer happens, whether it be from hacking/virus, or just being part of a webpage--and consequently into the browser cache--that the reader didn't know had such content until after he/she let it finish loading. On the other hand, those who willfully host and distribute and (obviously) produce it should have the proverbial library thrown at them.

[Dubious]

If you search for "Diapers" with Google and click on pictures, what do you get? Pictures of children..

You can even find pictures of naked children

[shelbyd]

and, isnt it better that the real pedos watch pictures instead of abusing children?

[anned]

The problem is there is a group of pedos that have threatened to hide kiddy porn all over the internet and hid it in ways that if you download anything you might get it on your computer and never know it because its in hidden files.

[bwakee]

If children in diapers is child pornography, then Huggies, Pampers, Luvs, and all the sorts ought to be thrown in jail. Those damn pedophiles!!! Anyone who walks down the baby isle at the grocery store is a pedophile too! Oh, what's that? The canned tuna was at the other end? Sorry, you should've walked around. Pfft. While we're on the topic, let's just jump to what we're all thinking here. Anyone who has children is a pedophile. Clearly, you had a baby so you can look at their privates and take "sexualized" pictures of your kids. AND WOW! You send those DISGUSTING photos to your parents, grandparents, co workers? WHAT!?!? You keep a picture of your kids in your wallet? You disgusting, nasty, dirty pedophile. You disgust me. Parents: You keep pictures of your kids' kids in your wallet? You hang them on the wall? What? Is your family like this massive pedophilic cult of perverts? Wouldn't surprise me, based on all your disgusting pedophilic behaviors. If you took any of that seriously, and worse, if you agreed with it, then you might be a member of the government. In which case, you may need professional psychological help. But hopefully your future therapist doesn't have pictures of her kids on her desk. She's a pedophile too. Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using Tapatalk HD

[Baby Brian]

I think we need a much clearer picture of what constitutes child porn. Obviously this applies to any age under 18. My general thoughts are;

[jeremy12312]

Sadly, intent is what makes the difference, and is tough to quantify. For example, the Star Diapers webpage. None of the models are nude, but man, the whole thing is creepy and I consider it to be child porn. The catalogs are sold to guys for the purposes of beating off.

[Bettypooh]

If you draw a clear line, many will toe it and lean as far as they dare Few will respect the danger abd step back And fewer still never approached that line in some form or fashion. I have a few non-sexual pics of children that ar not related to me on my computer, and one has a child in a bathing suit. Acording to some all that makes it porn though to me it isn't, so who is right? I will say that I am one of those who keeps back away from that line- first because I have no desire to get near it and second because I am well aware of the equally guilty idiots who want to stretch the truth just to hurt someone and who do that without the least bit of thought or remorse If there's a pedo around I want the authorities to nail them and I'll help if I can, but some of those authorities are going overboard and nobody is stopping them I rely on my judgement, not theirs, and I will not support them in their over-zealousness to create crimes and criminals where none exist.

[bwakee]

I think we need a much clearer picture of what constitutes child porn. Obviously this applies to any age under 18. My general thoughts are;

[Baby Brian]

Bettypooh, you say you stay away from that clear line of porn (which is great!), but my point is how do you know you're staying away from it when nobody even knows where that line is? I too agree that cops & everyone else should go after pedos but the only true way to make sure nobody goes overboard is to clearly define where that line is.

[jeremy12312]

Does it change your opinion at all that Star sells a $100 subscription to their catalog, containing the photos on their website?

You do get a slight discount on the product, but the primary purchase is the catalog.

[Baby Brian]

jeremy, It very well might. I try not to judge a book by it's cover and would hope I wouldn't do so with a web site either. If the subscription only includes the photos I saw online then no, if it's way more then possibly yes. Still, I'd have to see some of the photos to make a decision on that. The fact they charge $100 for a catalog means nothing to me, lots of companies over price one product or

[Billiardnut]

I am in no way, shape, or form condoning or supporting child porn, pedophilies, etc.

[Eir]

I am in no way, shape, or form condoning or supporting child porn, pedophilies, etc.

[jeremy12312]

...and turns them on the most physically.