Little BabyDoll Christine

I think I see a stranger. This one went with that one. It really helps to know some ancient Greek lit Knock knock Who's there? Euripades Euripades who Euripades pants; I breaka u face

Look in LL Medico and plastic-pants.com As I said, I first saw them for sale about late 1957. But I have never seen them used on babies IRL over the course of almost 30 years. If they were actually used, I would have seen it at least once. The utter mesmerization these have in the ABDL world, compared to the lack of IRL baby use is one of the more fascinating things

In the 1970's, rubber panties were routinely worn over throw-aways. The leg gathers were not watertight. Even in the late '80's they were recommended over throw-aways by home economics social workers

Oh yeah?! go on YT and see how they do it at St. Agnes Reformatory. It starts with a gyno exam by Dr. Sangita Khombatta

If it is Warhammer 40K, I will definitely pass. I do not whant a chain sword or Tyrannid anywhere near that part of my body. Although a diaper would be appropriate for Call of Duty or for use in the Septic-mus Empire

I did find a pair of Gerber panties on Ebay To me these look like Gary Panties that you would find at LL Medico or plasti-pants.com. You might want one of the baby prints I do not think you will need the high-waist. Back in the day, Pampers et all did not have SAP and depended on the absorbancy of the material so they were quite large and needed full-size baby panties like these. Now,even a premium ABDL diaper will fit in a regular cut Gary and Lowriders are made for throw-aways. I think the regular cut Gary will hold even the MegaMax or other large diaper. The nursery prints are various teddy bears and carousels

A couple of things: 1. IWhen Comco went down in late 2013/early 2014. I set out to find a replacement and found and recommended the Gary 7 mil as in that role. The story is in RUBBER PANTIES 'R' US in the "Conversation" section 2. The last Gerber-style panties I know of were VIP, long ago disconinued. Protex sells one that used to be called "I Can't Believe it's not Gerber" which, for obvious reasons, was renamed. You might go to the Protex site and find it by its resemblance to that brand. When I reviewed it, I said "I can [believe it's not Gerber] since it is made of smooth rather than grainy material like the original Gerber was. However since the 1990's I have found and purchased for my dollies Gerber panties made of smooth material but they were not very "generous". The 1960's to early '80's Gerbers that I saw were made of grainy material and were of no interest to me. Also, in the 60's (If Angela Bauer is to be believed and she was knowledgeable about that brand) to some time around 2000 Gerber made adult size panties. I doubt you will find "generous" adult rubber panties since one of the requirements for adult panties would be unobtrusiveness. Gary has a large size overlap I can fit with a diaper into L, XL and 2XL and somewhat into 3XL

Expiring minds want to know: Since bridge is played in "rubbers", is the scoring paper a "rubber sheet"?

I have plenty of those that they enclosed leg bands are a bit uncomfortabel, the feel a bit sharp. In the Golden Age, for elastics, some pantie had rubber strips that were sewn in place with monfilament thread (it felt like fishing line). The elastics need not be super tight if the panties have good coverage, covering the diaper well with some to spare. But adults do not want that and try to get away with as little wetproof material ("rubber") as possible, as though it will turn them into a baby, or maybe they like the material and do not want others to know I have both those and snap-on high-waist that is kind of part of the diaper in the sense that it gets changed with it

This presumption has been the bane of ALG's for decades, even before Sissy became a thing, with many LG's accepting that designation out of ignornace. It was best addressed here https://joanne-chan1.blogspot.com/p/test.html On more than one occasion, a Sissy has ended correspondence with me, saying I am "too girl". In fact there is a bit of group antipathy between LG's and Sissies because of the use of feminine, especially little girlish things that we cherish by Sissies is to be demeaning or humiliating, and the confusion that we are like that (I do not mince, lisp, want to be a princess in any wah and I am quite low on the "frilliness" scale. I have not been cuckolded nor SPH'ed and I cannot be any kind of a slut as I am always being sure my skirts are down)

What is involved here is being made a suborinate PERSON, such as a slave, child, cock, or "gender reference deciciency". This is different from a supordinate RANK, where one's actions are directed by a superior in an organization, such as police military or fire, In these cases, the POSITION is subordinante while the person is often very skilled with a good deal of merit and holds that position by choice, maybe intending to read higher positions in that chain A child's life is totally controlled by the parent, sitter, governess, etc, without any choice. It is in the nature of being a child, even though the AB/AK accepts that condition volutarily. The sissy, is defined by a sex role defined deficiency: the SP in SPH. Cuck, emasculated/effeminate or a "Pre-teen slut". Now, observe that none of these is NECESSARILY AB/AK. The infantile/little element is added. The Sissy, a product of BDSM>FemDom, is made effeminate by being framed as "little/baby girl" adding forced femiization into a parody of femininity. Hence the over-abundance of frill,, mincing, lisping, "princess" etc, putting him on the wrong side of the boy/girl group antipathy by exiling him from the "boy". Since the essential sexual variables are inactive in the 7-10 years old, a boy and a girl are basically equal so the attack is sex-role based rather than sex based. That kind of thing cuts at a cetral idea of who one is. That is where the humiliation comes in

Time of use is a better way to rate diapers and that is best done in a range since, even ordianry usage is variable based on body type and what one consumes in that timeframe. Also, that is not even the fullest or smallest extent. I have had a La Petite Damoiselle go for only about 10-1/2 hours and,as stated above, a La Damoiselle go for 25, but those are rare to the point of statistically anamolous. Also, in the non-ABDL; i.e.real, world, they do not use a diaper, especially a cloth; i.e. REUSABLE diaper, to the point where it can be used in an episode of SEA HUNT. The extra capacity is to accommodate things like more liquids than usual or an unexpected delay in changing. However, this is for cloth diapers, where, if you change "early", you have not "wasted" a diaper, which at over a buck a shot for anthing decent, unless you are well off, hurts a bit

Dispite all the glitzy hype. I thought the VA was the same old VA that it had been for years

And for anyone over 4-1/2, totally humiliating. It was better if Mommy or caregiver just assumed it was due for a change after a given amount of time or wettings, about which a little one would be honest to avoid, among other things, having her skirt lifted

When she is well padded with rubb incloth with rubber panties over them that smell just a bit like dried pp and your lips are put firmly between her legs or if you are both made to kiss each others rubber panties. under each others' short dress. That is very humiliationg for both of you, You have your lips where she wets and she has somone under her skirts. And Mommy, Babyminder or Nursie gets to watch or feel the rubber panties she has put on you

And do you know how vulnerable you are if you are in the typical little girl dress/skirt, with it's full-circle 2/3 or 3/4 to the knee? By the time you are 5, you are very conscious of it. Or, you could be put in a baby-lenght halfway to the knee for some reason so you will be especially aware of what can happen and Mommy might mention rubber panties. Or, you may have no younger siblings and Mommy leaves rubber panties where they may be seen, like drying over the bathtub, in the tub, on a dresser in your room or on the bed and tells you that if you move them, she3 willput them on you and lift up your skirt. Just imagine that happening when your favorite teacher may be over for a visit, in from of your best friend, or your worse enemy when you are about 6 or 7

I dropped it the minute I read "breathable". They are not plastic, they are textile, so I was misled. I do not touch "breathable" since they leak. Being "gas permeable" they allow gaseous and vaporous components of excreted substances to pass through to contaminate clothing. They may be fine for pampers, but for cloth: not good. I will stay with what has worked for over a century; the traditional baby panty materials

tHE SAME AS MY NIGHT TIME DIAPER. bABYdOLLa Petite Damoiselle: see below for description it is a 12-15 hour diaper so it is thick. That is of no concern since, like any proper LG. I am in skirts, dresses or babydolls since that is a uniquely feminine garment and therefore defines me as a girl. Such garments tend to be l oose-skirted so they can conceal some very thick underthings. It is changed only twice a day but at a predictable time since the changing times are half a day apart. Sof if the time is 7:30 then it can safely be left on all night. This is wonderful for caregivers. It is not a baby diaper, but an over-age wetter diaper for girls tnat can also be worn during the day so it is a good general purpose, non or limited incontinence diaper. The French diaper, since it is strongly felt and requires the wearer to stand or sit up to wet, exacts a bit of a price for being to lazy or stubborn to not act your age. It is also a chastisement or punishment diaper

That is what MAD Magazine titled their movie parody of INDEPENDENCE DAY

I could convert to the new one where persons worship low prices in discount stores: I-Dollar Tree

One throw-away thorougly and it became apparent that they suck. Everything about them is just plain ick. And two or three other less persistent tries did nothing to change my mind. (though, under some conditions, I will use pullups but that has nothing to do with my "why", but necessity) Two tupes of cloth. The first were the usual and the second, and current ones are made after what I was in as a part-time girl (we did not think of ourselves as "little") from age 6-2/3 to shortly before I turned 10, since I learned how to upsize them using existing resources, though I would like to see what they would be like if made specifically from scratch

What you could do as an alternative is find a baby powder fragrance Here on Ebay You may have to try several different oncs. It does not take much. The one I got came with a tiny eyedropper; a little goes a long way, 4 eydroppers full took care of a quart, and it does require shaking well at each use, but since this was not run through a professional homogenizing device, that is a good idea anywaY Here is the list of active ingredients and their benefits 1. Glycerine 50% 2. Aloe Vera 25% 3. Coconut oil 25% The advantage to this method is that, instead of adding about 5 ounces of an inactive ingredient for scent, you only add about 1/8 oz or less

You do not know how to wear skirts. In real life, if your rubber panties showed under you skirts, that would reflect very badly on your mother or caretaker and would just not happen. You can see what I am dressed in here and here and my rubber panties never show. All of my things are halfway to the knee so they are decent. And I am still made to wear rubber panties

The baby powder smell that will bring back all those memories. And you can have it all you want -- Anywhere you want!. This has been around for almost 7 years