Little BabyDoll Christine

Is any of it here? https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=the+magic+garden By the time I turned 8, in '53, Romper Room was around. I watched about less than 10 minutes of one installment and dropped it, Ditto Cap Kangaroo as they just seemed to meander but going nowhere. There was no story to them. Likewise Ding Dong School (besides, what self-respecting kid would watch something with "school" in it?)

A still-unwet BabyDoll La Petite Damoiselle that I have been in for a coupole of hours

It would be a good idea to post where you got them I would not know, I have been using what I have for nearly 15 years. I am on my third set of snap-on rubber panties, the first being Comco that I bought in '09 and the second bought in '14

Now I am going to throw a real curve ball. It is something I first heard of in 1962, called a "sissy panty" worn by girls, I first heard about it in a convo between a cousin and someone else. I saw two examples in a COAROLYN'S KIDS catalog under a page headed "Be a Sissy" that had nothing to do with AB/LG. The first example was a panty, the second was a "long line" panty that had short legs. In both cases the body of the panty was fully covered in short ruffles from the waistband to the bottom of the side seam. these were not full-cut in the slightest and the ruffles did not appear to be lace or the like. Maybe Ebay has them

That happened to me at a nursing home back in '21. I was brought in from the hospital in Boston after an epitheleal keratoplasty not having been given a chance to dress properly and the hurse who did the intake said that "commando style" is not toloerated and asked me if I wanted a "brief" Now, a pullup is more of a brief than a taped-on thing so I said OK and she put me in a throw-away

What went on in my time and place shaped me and is my existential reference. I am very aware of how things have changed, as the Beatles put it "some forever; not for better". What the girl wore in '49, being in a specific context was more like a costume for that event. Since it was reasonably predictable that the "knickers" would show, then they were not meant as underwear Now back to the title of this thread. The first time and for the longest time "Rhumba Pants" and the "shell and Liner", underwear looking (by the design and material of the shell) with a plastic liner were synonymous. From my perspective, based on my experience, if an unlined lace-trimmed panty is now "officially" named "rhumba pants", it is derived from the lined panty first appearing in c1957. In fact, an article that I refer to in RUBBER PANTIES "R" US urges persons not to use "shell and liner" patnies because "if either the shell or liner rips, the whole garment is useless". What they said to do is used regular baby panties and put the lace-trimmed panties over it. I was already here when I read that, so it is relatively recent. I do not recall them calling the unlined article "rhumba panties". When I saw the title of this post, what I describe as "Rhumba Panties" is what came and comes to mind. I have seen both referred to as "ruffled" panties but then there was a type of baby and adult wetproof panty with lace at the legs and waist (the latter sold by A. C. Medical) that was also called "ruffled" I am not going to belabor this point any further. As with "babydoll" the term has expanded at least in some circles; a natural process but whether that expanded use is actually a term or just part of a loose reference that may become correct via usage, I do not know. It's like "assault weapon" being used to describe a rifle that has neith select-fire or bayonet lug. I have no idea whence came "Rumba panties" in the way that Playtex used in . By that, I mean the sequence of events that brought it about, though, having lived as an aware individual then, I could come up with an educated hypothesis. Use the link and look well at what I put in, and what I got https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=e770264821b4b2f0&sxsrf=AE3TifNaxPLlfKQolo5K5Oh0044NmnUx-Q:1752409168931&q=rhumba+etymology&udm=7&fbs=AIIjpHxU7SXXniUZfeShr2fp4giZ1Y6MJ25_tmWITc7uy4KIeoJTKjrFjVxydQWqI2NcOhZVmrJB8DQUK5IzxA2fZbQF4YL5sNSRJGgx0e9Z9AxEx1bmPbSY3ROQyoKhw9UuuwMa6u73fOSUeNMl3nUidiZzLnwz6Z8MHmWi4YdNSL-h_t8V7LARbEt0dOcH9HsmIXwiB-7_vX2wqahbyWxd3rXB8FJu8Q&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjwsY_w6LmOAxXZMVkFHcqZC14QtKgLKAJ6BAgREAE&biw=1161&bih=473&dpr=1.18 The "h" is not in the original. That suggests VERY strongly that it was added by the company to avoid any legal liability. I became sus of this spelling since I know the "rh" to be Greek or Welsh but have never seen it in Romance languages, the primary language group of Latin America. So, for me, "Rhumba Panties" is primarily the shell and liner baby panty with the name being extended to any panty or pant of that design

A La Petite Damoiselle that I have already wet once

Your methods would not have been allowed in my time and place. Only females changed little girls. While that was not a law, 5 will get you 10 that if a dispute arose on the matter, it would be enforced by the authorities Also, Rhumba panties were pretty much by nature "Shell and Liner", allong with "Fancy Pants". I believe created by Playtex. So, apparently, we are not talking about the same thing. There are adult versions of what I am talking about and have been since I joined the community in 1982 with my first CAROLYN'S KIDS catalog. I have something like you describe except one of them is part of a babydoll that was made for me and it has 5 rows of ruffles that go all the way around and like the babydoll is made of ivory satin. I also have a pair of baby Rhumba patnies that are as I described them

I am wet before I am in bed, having been changed around suppertime into a 12 your diaper. The nature of the diaper requires that I get out of bed to wet

The little nit would get better than he deserves. And he would not appreciate a bit of the upgrade. Who would not just wet herself silly at the prospect of being a little girl surrounded by loving, adorable dollies?

"Have you actually looked?"? This is ME you are talking abut. Just short of making it known. And yes, there were plenty for sale here, their heyday beginning c1961. What is your timeframe of observation. I would guess it would have begun in c1975, with most of it being, since you referenced nieces, in the '80's and '90's, which was as mine was in slow decline. In fact, by the time you were born, so much of the Insterstate System was in place that routinely putting girls between 4 and 7 in diapers for toad trips had ceased since 90% of them were under 2 hours and even age3-1/2 was not common. How did you observe them without making yourself knowable as doing so? I suspect that location and economics may have played a part. 1. They were or are pricier than regular rubber panties, in fact, a good percentage of what was used here were made of the grainy material. 2. Diapers and rubber panties were UNDERWEAR, so something was pretty much always worn over them. However, I never saw them in homes where I did see rubber panties. Now a strange thing about them, though preium pridced, the inside liner was either grainy or papery material that was quite thin and, to me, of dubious quality. I did see that style of panty as part of a so-called dress set. I say "so-called" because the "dress" ordinarily let a bit of the panty show. These came out in the late '60's along with the "sexual revolution" and were, hereabouts considered part of it and considered part of sexualizing children so were not popular here

I think I see a stranger. This one went with that one. It really helps to know some ancient Greek lit Knock knock Who's there? Euripades Euripades who Euripades pants; I breaka u face

Look in LL Medico and plastic-pants.com As I said, I first saw them for sale about late 1957. But I have never seen them used on babies IRL over the course of almost 30 years. If they were actually used, I would have seen it at least once. The utter mesmerization these have in the ABDL world, compared to the lack of IRL baby use is one of the more fascinating things

In the 1970's, rubber panties were routinely worn over throw-aways. The leg gathers were not watertight. Even in the late '80's they were recommended over throw-aways by home economics social workers

Oh yeah?! go on YT and see how they do it at St. Agnes Reformatory. It starts with a gyno exam by Dr. Sangita Khombatta