Little BabyDoll Christine

This is the third of fourth thread asking this question. Without getting into the weeds, the first contact we have with the word comes from real life and is used as an insult aimed at boys who are not as "boyish" as their peers would like, usually in the 8-13 age range. The "girlishness" is just a presumed trait based on on the absense of traits associated with a "red-blooded boy", with "sissy" coming from "sister" ans in the more adult insult "weak sister" and there is also the description of doing something un-"manly" beign done "like a little girl". My first encounter with the term used in the sense it is done here comes from 1982 in CAROLYN'S KIDS catalog, ti was a single page headed "Be a Sissy!" with 3 items; a pair of "sissy pants" which I knew as a female undergarment from 1962, a long-line "sissy pants" and a petticoat of medium fullness. Then, in Y2K I found Mrs Silk's site, since it whas generally feminine, I took it to be something I could like. It was there that I first encountered the current iteration of "sissy". While the email was useful, it was nothing like me. This was before I discovered GirlTalk later GirlTalkl To. Then I saw some references to "sissy" by LG's and finally found the "Sissy Room" here. When I got here, there was no Little Girls Playhous so we kind of gathered here Ther question here is "who cares and why". Now, here is the importance of labels, Supposing you went somewhere for a doctor's appointment, or some place where you had to know where you are, yet there were no street signs and no GPS. How would you nevigate? Or suppose you went into a grocery store looking for a box of pasta and a can of sauce. Everything was in opaque packaging with no labels and everything was self-serve. What then? If you were a member of DPF and if you look at profiles that were moderately filled out, You notice "I am a..." and "Age: play age...". Why; and why do you fill that out? As I said earlier , this is the tird of fourth thread about this question. Since we do things, we seek to know what we are doing. Unlike "Little Girl", which is about 90% clearly articulated: Do you have any doubts about me?, "sissy" seems to have no firm definition We do get lists of preferences from self-proclaimed sissies such as humiliation along gender and sexual lines, forced feminization, cockold, henpecked in extremis and the like so that the "feminiztion" is not authentic or natural femininity, but emasculation and effeminacy. We get these in overwhelming amounts, up to 80-85% of self-decrition. Since I have no clearly stated ideas, in fact, I find contradictory claims made. The only thing I can do is define inductively, that is from what I see in the overwhelming number of self-decriptions and I have to use some form of logic to filter out things. For instance, whey should a femile who dresses in an exaggeratedly feminine manner not be just labelled as "overdoing it" rahter than "sissy"? and since most "sissy" thing would be in line with her "gender" how could a female even be considered a sissly? Also, most dresses I see on Ebay that are lebelled "sissy" would be just every so scrumptious LG dresses Another thing that makes this so hard to deal with is the idea of a lifestyle based on such total self-abnegation being a thing other than a massive joke. and being that the characteristics being abnegated are 99% masculine via forced feminization, cuckholding and henbecking. I conclude its roots are in FemDom, which appears to be a branch of BESM, with any AB or LG being just strapped on, not an essential element Since there are 3 or 4 thrieas asking this question, and since I did not start them, it follows that I am not the only one looking for solid ground here

In regard to the last sentence. Invert it and that is what I have been told by sissies who stopped corresponding with me here because I am "too girl" and that is not what they were looking for. If someone tells me that, then I must be a credit to my skirts

From what I have seen both here and elsehwere, that kind of ignores the RL origins. In all my years. I have never heard a girl called a sissy, although I have heard of gemale undies called "sissy pants" which I have described elsewhere. It also ignores that fact that about 85% of self-identifgied sissies mention humiliation as the main and essential attraction of the lifestyle. Also many LG's dress in an exaggerated manner, being high on the "frilliness" scale to the point that all the frills obscure the shape of the dress. Also, I notice that of those sissies who have a "play age" anear majority have such an age that is before gender acquisition: 3-1/2 to 5 and change. Under that period "girl" or "boy" is only something you are called and it has no intrinsic meaning. This means that the person is "editing" the experience with the adult psychological faculties so it cannot be authentic. I have memories from before I was 4 and pretty much all of what I was thinking had to do with what was going on at the moment

No, worster MUCH worster: A dolly I know PERSONALLY: The OG bitch doll of all space and time; TALKY TINA: "And you better be nice to me". I have her two sisters: Annoying Andrea and Loathsome Lisa

Never: I am a cloth girl so I have to have rubber patnies over the diaper and being a proper little lady, I must wear a decent length skirt, dress or babydoll

I have quite a bit of waterproof material on my bed. My metress is totally encased and covered with a rubber sheet. The spread is encased in a clear duvet cover when was quite expensive. All there is a bedskirt with scallped edges that hangs down. One of the reasons for this is to make my sleeping area bedbug proof. We have had a bedbug outbreak for over 5 years, you think there would be more clear divet covers at a decent proce. That is what was done in the 1940's and early to middle '50's to deal with critters like that. But that was when people were serious and smart

Visit the playroom in my siggy

Obviusely you do not rent an apartment I put my things in the bedroom closet, dressers/beureaus and under the bed, which I have on risers. I also have taken steps so that diapers and rubber panties would be taken as ordiary by the property manager (It is called "innoculation") and she actuall liked the way I decorated my bedroom which I explained this way. All I could get at a price I wanted was the white furniture and I did the rest not to clash with it. Also, the room is a bit tiny so that light or white furniture would make it look less claustro. As for the dollies, I have a somewhat complex story that is mostly true or very liekly true and is not worth parsing to find what is not

Like this

Is any of it here? https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=the+magic+garden By the time I turned 8, in '53, Romper Room was around. I watched about less than 10 minutes of one installment and dropped it, Ditto Cap Kangaroo as they just seemed to meander but going nowhere. There was no story to them. Likewise Ding Dong School (besides, what self-respecting kid would watch something with "school" in it?)

A still-unwet BabyDoll La Petite Damoiselle that I have been in for a coupole of hours

It would be a good idea to post where you got them I would not know, I have been using what I have for nearly 15 years. I am on my third set of snap-on rubber panties, the first being Comco that I bought in '09 and the second bought in '14

Now I am going to throw a real curve ball. It is something I first heard of in 1962, called a "sissy panty" worn by girls, I first heard about it in a convo between a cousin and someone else. I saw two examples in a COAROLYN'S KIDS catalog under a page headed "Be a Sissy" that had nothing to do with AB/LG. The first example was a panty, the second was a "long line" panty that had short legs. In both cases the body of the panty was fully covered in short ruffles from the waistband to the bottom of the side seam. these were not full-cut in the slightest and the ruffles did not appear to be lace or the like. Maybe Ebay has them

That happened to me at a nursing home back in '21. I was brought in from the hospital in Boston after an epitheleal keratoplasty not having been given a chance to dress properly and the hurse who did the intake said that "commando style" is not toloerated and asked me if I wanted a "brief" Now, a pullup is more of a brief than a taped-on thing so I said OK and she put me in a throw-away

What went on in my time and place shaped me and is my existential reference. I am very aware of how things have changed, as the Beatles put it "some forever; not for better". What the girl wore in '49, being in a specific context was more like a costume for that event. Since it was reasonably predictable that the "knickers" would show, then they were not meant as underwear Now back to the title of this thread. The first time and for the longest time "Rhumba Pants" and the "shell and Liner", underwear looking (by the design and material of the shell) with a plastic liner were synonymous. From my perspective, based on my experience, if an unlined lace-trimmed panty is now "officially" named "rhumba pants", it is derived from the lined panty first appearing in c1957. In fact, an article that I refer to in RUBBER PANTIES "R" US urges persons not to use "shell and liner" patnies because "if either the shell or liner rips, the whole garment is useless". What they said to do is used regular baby panties and put the lace-trimmed panties over it. I was already here when I read that, so it is relatively recent. I do not recall them calling the unlined article "rhumba panties". When I saw the title of this post, what I describe as "Rhumba Panties" is what came and comes to mind. I have seen both referred to as "ruffled" panties but then there was a type of baby and adult wetproof panty with lace at the legs and waist (the latter sold by A. C. Medical) that was also called "ruffled" I am not going to belabor this point any further. As with "babydoll" the term has expanded at least in some circles; a natural process but whether that expanded use is actually a term or just part of a loose reference that may become correct via usage, I do not know. It's like "assault weapon" being used to describe a rifle that has neith select-fire or bayonet lug. I have no idea whence came "Rumba panties" in the way that Playtex used in . By that, I mean the sequence of events that brought it about, though, having lived as an aware individual then, I could come up with an educated hypothesis. Use the link and look well at what I put in, and what I got https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=e770264821b4b2f0&sxsrf=AE3TifNaxPLlfKQolo5K5Oh0044NmnUx-Q:1752409168931&q=rhumba+etymology&udm=7&fbs=AIIjpHxU7SXXniUZfeShr2fp4giZ1Y6MJ25_tmWITc7uy4KIeoJTKjrFjVxydQWqI2NcOhZVmrJB8DQUK5IzxA2fZbQF4YL5sNSRJGgx0e9Z9AxEx1bmPbSY3ROQyoKhw9UuuwMa6u73fOSUeNMl3nUidiZzLnwz6Z8MHmWi4YdNSL-h_t8V7LARbEt0dOcH9HsmIXwiB-7_vX2wqahbyWxd3rXB8FJu8Q&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjwsY_w6LmOAxXZMVkFHcqZC14QtKgLKAJ6BAgREAE&biw=1161&bih=473&dpr=1.18 The "h" is not in the original. That suggests VERY strongly that it was added by the company to avoid any legal liability. I became sus of this spelling since I know the "rh" to be Greek or Welsh but have never seen it in Romance languages, the primary language group of Latin America. So, for me, "Rhumba Panties" is primarily the shell and liner baby panty with the name being extended to any panty or pant of that design