babykeiff

Ok genius, tell us all what ABDL is since you seem to believe that you are the expert to be able to say what it is not - or which part of your body is that crap coming from, ....or is it more like what I and others see is that you are a fraud that has invaded a ABDL site like a virus! You seem to think that you can bully me with petty insults, ...and I will run away crying from you.

The is an issue that occurs with age - it is the deterioation of muscle mass and/or function. When it comes to controlling bladder/bowels, we all rely on a ring of muscles called sphincters and rel on them to create a seal. This seal, over time, becomes weak, and scientifically it has been suggested to be diet additives that cause this weakness. The problem with the medical industry addressing this issue is that the is no profit in solving a problem. There is more profit in treating symptoms. As such, there may be a cure, but to get it prescribed to you is like finding hens teeth. Although there may not be a medical intervention that addresses this, still medical intervention is advised as there are more than age that causes bladder/bowel issues. Therefore, step one in addressing leakage is a medical consult - to rule out any undelying cause. Once that is addressed, then the remaining step is dealing with the leakage - and that can be ignorance in the hope that it will go away - it doesn't - OR accepting that you leak and altering processes so you can still function in this world. There is a tried and tested process that the world uses to handle leaks - and that is diapers in one form or another.

From my understanding in reading this story - Nicole is still the same size, but has the mental and physical behaviour and needs of an infant - she wets and messes without notice, she can't pronounce words correctly, her body behaves as if it is an infant, her mind is somewhat to totally regressed, she is totally dependant on another for care, she can't feed herself, or walk and gets around by crawling, she soothes herself by constantly sucking her thumb, her main source of nurishment is breast milk. The last vestige of adulthood - her coffee - makes her tummy upset where it relives itself by filling the diaper. Vanessa is now producing breast milk to feed Nicole, and also acting as her babysitter. Vanessa, maybe without knowing it originally, put Nicole in this situation - and Nicole has 'lost' her adult life from this. Nicole is being punished and Vanessa has got away with her actions. From the way Vanessa was behaving orignally - setting up lights etc with Nicole doing all the heavy work, Vanessa is more of a user - and used Nicole not only to move, but to suit Vanessa's agenda. I suspect that in the future, Vanessa will get bored of babysitting and farm this out to another while she enjoys her life - and leaves poor Nicole in infancy. I wonder how long it will be before Nicole's lack of salary is an issue to Vanessa, and whether Vanessa will sell Nicole to another for the money. After all, that is her charachter - to create a situation to her advantage at the cost of another..... and poor Nicole is already paying that cost as being a permanant infant but still missing her mind and her adult life.

See a doctor.... and then cough while s/he is examining you 😁 On a more realistic note, is this part of your training - or something else. If it is something else, do make an appointment to see a specialist.

In this world there are millions of unique people all with different driving forces. Controlling how a internal action effects us is like deciding when to be gay / female / male etc. ABDL is exactly the same. To some, it is the self-image of them being a specific age - i.e 12 months old in a crib / playpen dressed in a onesie with the pacifier etc., To another, the details are differerent be it age and/or accessories. Point 1 - In this world, due to the concept of stereotypes, this is called a fetish. As a result, one cannot control a fetish - you are either a X or you are not. That is if a title has been placed on the behaviour. Point 2 - The associated behaviour with a fetish, interests the person with that fetish, but may seem sick/perverted to another. As a result, it is unfair to each other to refer to fetish driven behaviour as sick / perverted / twisted. Point 3 - A fetish actions may for some be a form of sexual relief, but it also can be a form of stress relief and no sexual relief. In that way, having a drink / cigarette at the end of the day gives stress relief to a person - that makes it a fetish - so fetish behavior CAN and does occur in a public setting. This all means that, despite what others wish, fetish behaviour CAN'T be controlled, fetish behaviour can be percieved to be sick and/or twisted based on your views AND some fetish behaviour is accepted in public. Now we come to the act that occured, where it crossed the line is that it exposes (by being in public) over 18+ behaviour to a group we are supposed to be protecting. The behaviour, if it occured in the persons home etc., this really woudn't be an issue. Some might see it as sick and twisted behaviour, but that is the perception of a person who may or may not be involved in that specific fetish. Controlling whether one is gay / male / female / MTF / FTM etc IS NOT POSSIBLE. That is Catholic Church teaching and discrimination - training the 'gay' out of them.... - 1884 Pears soap commercial where the soap is washing the 'black' from a dark skinned individual! Therefore, it is your opinion of what is 'sick' and what is not the world should follow = the world according to @WBDaddy OK - just for you, every one that is openly different will hide behing doors - after all being GAY and wearing bright colours is an obsession. As is being a member of L.B.G.T. group.... or any group that doesn't fit into YOUR concept! To All: Be careful of those people who, come into our midst pretending to accept this interest of ours. Be aware of wolves in lambs clothing. @WBDaddy is a Daddy to a member here, but that does not mean that he either understands and/or accepts the ABDL interest and/or fetish. He can't use the excuse that people misunderstand what he wrote, after all, he is a author and a wordsmith that is an expert in the manipulation of English!

I have found that Pampers 6,7 and 8 compared to each other have the same size padding but slightly longer and wider backing material. Same, I find with all the baby diapers in sizes 6,7 and 8. The only 'larger' diapers is the + sizes as they are designed to be extra absorbant. This means that the 6+ are larger than the 6, 7 etc. I really wish I was small enough to fit the baby diapers of either 5,6,7 or 8 and the relevant clothes, cribs etc.

For a rainy Sunday evening, cunas atá tú?

@PeculiarChangeling, you are a true wordsmith, taking us on a journey where we know, love and feel for each charachter you create, and I respect, admire and thank you for that. Also, due to the appreciation of each charachter, I feel that you might have terminated the story a little too early - as you left out what will happen on the day after the chart ends. Not to spoil anything, we all know how it started by V's mischevious nature in writing a name on same chart. The story, in a way, punishes N but also gives her a much needed rest while V's life will go on, a little closer to N, but still proceed without much interuption. It doesn't seem fair to N, but her mind is regressed also so it is almost cruel. Another day where it reverses - i.e., a twist from sleeping in the crib where the magic switches the two charachters maybe added to by N writing V's name in crayon could be a way to fininish without the 'cliff hanger' concept! Despite that, still a brilliant story, and keep it up. I would sugest that you publish some of your work as it is more than worth it - maybe not ABDL style but more generic to suit the general market and/or fantasy instead of PG18+ style - not that you are incapable of that, far from it, but more of your work deserves to be shown to as large an audience as possible.

Has this site been accessed and is someone using @DailyDi 's account. I know that someone is using my account 🤪 - me! Is there someone using your account?

I wouldn't call it a birth defect - everyone looks cute when that size - even me (but I may be a little biased)🤪 If we were all that size, getting the baby onesies etc., would be easy.

You're welcome. No need to expain.

Brilliant. @ValentinesStuff, well done.

Is that a new thing in US... instead of flipping burgers, one flips fleas - as it really is not a vegatarian meal... or is that how new vegatarians become.... by reducing meat intake a little at a time. 🤪😜🤣😂

@Draventhedark, you, having a discussion/argument, from your perspective as DL, with a person who states is a Daddy. As a result, before you and he gets into it, I doubt if the two of you can find a middle ground. From my own perspective as diaper dependent to keep clothes clean & dry and AB, I can see, and agree with your points completely. There is a part of me that, even if I wasn't diaper dependent to keep clothes clean & dry, I would be diaper dependent if only for the feeling of same - prob similar to yourself.

When I discover it and I am out, I figure out a place to change same, and continue on with my day. When at home, it tends to make me feel more infantile - ie very comfortable and sleepy. Sometimes, at home, if I sence that I am about to fill my diapers, the same emotions of a toddler sweep over me, i.e. ultimate feeling of relief and happiness followed by feeling mischevious - which is similar to a toddlers behaviour. In relation to the options given : Cry, whine, squirm, get uncomfortable, like a baby. Giggle, smile, relax, get happy, like a toddler. A baby, before wetting / soiling might cry / whine depending on prior parental behaviour, but usually does not cry/whine until the diaper gets cold and therefore uncomfortable. A baby treats wetting and/or soiling its diaper as inconsequential an action as sneezing or coughing and since a baby does not understand cause and effect, it does not understand that the action of relief after an event resulted in a wet / soiled diaper. It is also used to a full diaper, so doesn't see it as being different or a cause to seek attention and/or assistance. A toddler, before soiling its diaper tends to hide before the event, and might giggle from the result as it percieves that it will get attention - the attention of a parental figure while they change said diaper - as a result, only a toddler tends to react from filling its diaper with glee that it is going to get attention. A baby doesn't usually react as unless it is bored already AND parental attention is responsive enough to watch the child as it fills its diapers each time, and didn't leave the child in a wet/soiled diaper for even short times. This tends to teach a baby to draw attention to its diaper needs before and after it voids as opposed to normal baby interaction of ignoring the voiding events until convenient for the career, whihc teached the baby also to ignore and/or forget that it has a full diaper. A child care facility changes a babies diaper by the clock - i.e. after set time feeding and before putting baby down for a nap, and after the baby wakes up from the nap. Therefore, when a baby wets / soils its diaper after its nap and before getting fed, it gets used to the feeling of a full diaper and accepts that as normal. An adult sees the difference between a wet and a messy diaper (based on the work involved in changing one over the other) while a baby doesn't. To it, the diaper is squishy - and although to us the poop smell seems foul, to a baby, the smell is ignored. After all, to a baby, unlike to an adult, there is no effect that needs to be dealt with - human behaviour is to focus on everything percieved as a threat, and once handled, forget about it. A baby doesn't see a full diaper as a threat. A toddler sees a full diaper as a chance for interaction.

It must be cheaper to produce per unit when one critically compares a plastic backed to a cloth backed. A cloth backed uses much much thinner plastic backing. As a result, even if the less plastic was $0.01 cost as opposed to plastic costs on a plastic backed being $0.02, the maker is saving $0.01 per unit. Add that to the fact that these weep when wet, the user is changing more often which equates to using almost twice the amount of diapers per time period. This ends up with projected sales being doubled yet production costs being reduced. It is only the ABDL world and/or smart users who compare plastic backed to cloth backed diapers that find out this reality. So the actual sales of cloth backed never reach projected sales unless the company removes the plastic backed from sale - which is a risk as they are the staple that keeps the company afloat. A lot of companies have done that with baby diapers, but are loosing out to the older brands that still are plastic backed OR still produce plastic backed for night time use etc. Similar exist in the adult diaper market - cloth backed, but these companies still produce 'Active' adult diapers for mobile adults as the cloth backed tapes tend to fail with a mobile adult user due to scale. Have a look at the size of the tape on a baby cloth backed diapers in proportion to the size of a tape on an adult cloth backed diaper. The adult one is much smaller (in proportion) and will stretch / fail. Baby ones to compensate have this 'elastic stretchy band' thingy between the diaper and the tape. I have yet to see similar on an adult sized diaper - so the whole back of the diaper has to compensate for movement, which usually doesn't work, and the tape (velcro thing) fails. So yes, it is all about money, how much money the manufacturer can make while at the same time, convince the user that it is better for them to change more often. Yes, it is better to change more often a diaper that keeps the skin damp, but with SAP in pulp, a wet diapers does not rewet skin. Therefore, the advances in cheaper manufacturer of adding SAP to reduce costly pulp created a situation where diapers could last almost 24 hours (depending on usage). The makers, for pure profit, created a product to increase their profit - after all, it doesn't cost them for a diaper change. In a medical setting where paitents are semi-mobile / stationary (like in bed etc), the cloth backed tend to work, but since they leak, a diaper change also includes changing bedclothes. This is avoided by adding an indwelling catheter plus a bag strapped to the bed. As a result, the diaper only has to protect modesty and/or contain mess in a paitent the is bedridden and immobile. With mobile paitents, these diapers are changed more often - i.e. after one or two wettings. It won't be long, I suspect, before accountants in a medical setting will notice the increased cost due to increased usage. Added to this is the increased labour involved in multiple changes - and despite the lie of 'breathability', compromises will be made by these medical businesses to decrease change count and go back to plastic backed.

They are too cute on you. I'm kinda envious that you can fit into sizes 7 and 8 baby diapers, while the rest of us need the larger adult sized ones.

Thank you for your support. It amuses me, in a mischievous way, when some people rush in with what they percieve to be factual based on what they have read about Irish history. The Irish are a wierd race of people (and I am one of them, so I can say that) that, due to English occupation, do not talk openly about anything in case ears are listening. Some countries follow the axiom 'loose lips, sink ships' but we Irish are even cuter than that - we tell no-one nothing. We have, within our genes, mastered the way to talk for hours yet tell you nothing. This is how we got the name of great story tellers. Even the Irish language has multiple layers where most Irish can pass information to another by a simple phrase as Dia duit - in english, Hello and/or a look or, what most would see as a facial expression etc. We, in our own way, have suceeded where thousands of years of invasion has failed, and done it without the cost of rebuilding an infrastructure. Today, in every corner of the world no matter where you look, there is people of Irish descent. Also, in most countries worldwide is an Irish bar. We Irish have taken over the world quietly without anyone knowing it, and suceeded where from Romans to Russia and USA have failed. This, from an Island Country smaller than most US states with a population of 4 million people! I told you that we were wierd and cuter than most people in the world - however, that can't be true as by simple maths, there is not a person worldwide that can't trace their linage back to being Irish 😝 ... so hi cousins, or in our native tounge, Mo chol ceathrareach, dia duit

Cloth backed diapers as compared to plastic backed diapers have a problem that is hidden. In a plastic backed diaper, the plastic backing has to be thick enough to hold everything together - i.e. like the frame on a product. Cloth backed diapers split this job between the plastic and the cloth. As a result, the plastic is a lot thinner. Within disposable diapers are super absorbant polymer particles that are sharp, and the compaction of diapers to fit into packaging causes these to poke mini holes in the thiner plastic of cloth backed diapers. This is sold as 'breathable', but in reality, it causes weeping and leaks. A thicker diaper tends to reduce the amount of micro holes in the plastic layers due to either less SAP and/or protection with the pulp but the holes still occur. This means that cloth backed diapers are less effective, by design, at keeping clothes dry as compared to plastic backed, but none are really guarenteed to keep clothes dry without the addition of another absorbant layer (such as training pants etc) and plastic pants. From my own perspective, I don't trust the cloth backed diapers as, apart from the leakage, they also rely on velcro type tapes which I find either slip when the diaper gets wet AND once the diaper gets heavy at all, the diaper stretches since the plastic is so thin and the cloth layer can tear. With plastic backed diapers, if tapes are an issue, they can be reinforced with a layer of sticky tape over them. This doesn't work with a cloth backed diaper, where I have had more than a few fall off me. Another issue I have found is that overnight, bed clothes can pull a cloth diaper off - which also makes cloth backed diapers in bed unreliable for me. The only real benifit of cloth diapers is that they are supposed to be more comfortable in the summer heat - i.e. reduce and/or eliminate the outer layer of a plastic diaper sticking to skin - however, talcuum powder between the plastic outer and legs solve the issue with plastic backed diapers without all the problems of cloth backed. If one needs more protection in plastic backed, one can add stuffers inside and plastic pants outside - the same one would need with cloth - which means cloth backed has no advantage, but all the disadvantages. All I see with cloth backed is less absorbancy, more changes and more profit to the maker.

In my humble opinion, you don't need to explain or justify your actions or comments. You didn't throw a tantrum or scream at the owner / moderators of this site. We all know that we are guests in @DailyDi's home, and most of us behave accordingly. It is the few that don't behave either here and/or in public. It is these few that ruin it for everyone, not only ABDL but also every non vanilla fetish including the people that deal with being differently abled either mentally and/or physically. It is the few who believe that their rights to do whatever they want supercede everyone else's rights. It is the few who have not got the common sence to understand that... a few freedoms must be given up in order for everyone to be free. a few rights must be given up in order for everyone to have rights. otherwise, the world would be in total anarchy. I personally don't like the fact that I have to hide my diaper dependence from the world, but I know that to keep medical information private, a number of personal freedoms have to be sacrificed. I personnally don't like the fact that I need to be anonymized on this site, but to keep my professional career intact, a number of freedoms have to be sacrificed. I don't like that laws and rules exist, but I am willing to comply with same to share a world with other people. True freedom is an illusion, and the illusion is in effect because we fight to ensure everyone else is free. Only then, can we enjoy freedom.

I am not making excuses for him, I was Putting a magnifying lens on the validity of the report - it doesn't make logical sence to me Questioning the actions of the daycare owner. To me, there are glaring omissions in how this daycare is being run. That is why I listed four of them :- I do not support the actions of either party involved in this debacle, and expected this to be fully investigated. According to the link identified by @ValentinesStuff, one of the parties was indicted, and same was reported in a newspaper article. I queried what happened to the other party - as in my humble opinion, both are at fault when it comes to the safety and welfare of children - as is, in a way, the newspaper. There is an axiom "if you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem", and to me, the newspaper reporting on only one side of the story is being biased. Could it be that the investigation only investigated the person who broke into the daycare center and never looked at the daycare center's running - yes that is possible, and if that is the case, the investigation is not concluded and it is up to the people of the area / State / USA to get the answers and not a person the other side of the pond. I look at this from the perspective of would I place a child of mine in this daycare - and the simple answer is no - as in my humble opinion, my child would not be safe there. Despite what another has said about me, I have the funds and this is not about money - it is about child safety. There are more details to be concerned with that most regulations attempt to address, but my experince has seen that same regulations to be lacking - and when one looks at running a business like a daycare, corners are cut and shortcuts are taken that are on the edge of being legal, where the only people suffering or being exposed are the children that the daycare and regulations are supposed to be protecting. In relation to that concept went out the window in USA when, if I recall correctly, McDonalds were sued for serving a customer a hot cup of coffee where McDonalds had not identified that the coffee might be hot! This set a precedence in the US where, it seems, nobody takes responsibility for their own actions - after all, legal will defend one. I do concur with you in that people should take responsibility for their own actions, but with the prevelance of human rights etc., more and more excuses are being sold to the world as why they don't. After all, their mother didn't love them, they got bullied in school, and the list goes on and on.

This site is owned by DailyDi with more on his mind than basic housekeeping. This costs $400 plus per month just to exist, plus plus. There are 55k odd members posting their opinion basically anywhere. It is run by moderators who, although by your statement are not doing the job to your requirements, they are doing their best. We are only guests / members who are visiting. I really don't think it is fair or respectable to the owner, or the moderators what you are saying. If you wish something moved, all you need to do is draw private attention to that - i.e. message one of the moderators / raise a query etc. There are always better ways of doing things instead of ranting on a post. If you want to be that critical, please look at your own posts first - where there are spellings, grammar, text case and punctutation errors. No, I am not the grammar police, and don't want to be, but do you think that your points and opinion might have a little more weight if it was easier to read?

There are a few point here, some made by people from a legal perspective, some from suffering abuse and some from a general perspective that needs to be identified and addressed. A child will fully explore its body, and when it can talk, learns the names of each parts. If one follows the prudish behaviour of considering genitalia to be rude and to be kept hidden and not talked about, they can stiffle the childs growth. On the other hand, if one works with the child and understands the child, one can use whatever words that is needed that the child understands. Flower / private parts / pee place (or pee-pee in males) etc is normally used with young children as a way to sate their curiosity until the child gets old enough to learn fully about the functions. 'vag' or 'vinni' can also be used without much problems. The real issue occurs, not with the child describing or identifying a part of their own anatomy, but with manipulitive solicitors twisting the wording / actions of a child and trying to use the fear and distacing that any child gets after someone other than who they trust invades their privacy. This, to me is scummy, and most legal proceedings attempt to protect the child in as much as they can by using a doll or some other form in a play room or a comfortable room for the child for the child to point to instead of using 'adult' / medical terms for body parts. The issue with legal is that a solicitor is charged with doing everything in their power to defend their client. This, in most cases, is the excuse these solicitors use for being scummy. What I see it that these solicitors are worse child abusers than the accused, and would like to see that solicitor recieve the same punisment as their client - maybe it would bring it home to these people what they are doing! Names of body parts start from simple terms based on the age / mental capability of the person learning them, and then slowly get corrected. Names of items also follow same line - to such an extent, a baby understands what a bob-bob etc is, where to a 1-2year old, calling a bottle a 'bop-bop' might get it thrown at you by the same child.

The teaching is more than one shake and one is playing with oneself. In relation to post voidual dribbling, that shouldn't really happen, but for some, depending on age and restrictions (of clothes etc) it is possible and totally normal depending on volume dribbled. Volume dribbled is subjective to length of member, whether it is aroused / partially aroused or not, and a lot more beside, but without you posting a picture of the offending article, plus a ruler (the correct way around 🤪 also in the shot) plus all your medical history etc., an issue can't really be identified or diagnosed online. As a result, it is something to be discussed with your own doctor / urologist at the next appointment - and let him/her handle your member with the magnify lens / microscope / or whatever equiptment she/he determines is appropiate. Real medical diagnosis is not the perview of internet forums. Go see your doctor.

@prideful, it is more correct to state that you are dependent on protection. The actual reason for your dependency might be deduced by a urologist, but without that being critical (it usually is), the deduction is usually never done. I'd advise you, if only for peace of mind, that you get a specialist to discover what caused this dependance as bladder/bowel loss is normally a symptom of something else. It seems to me that your doctor, presuming it to be oab, is dismissing it and only addressing the symptom in passing and ignoring any root problem that you might have. That would annoy me, and drive me to drop said doctor in favour of a medical specialist that will do the work - but that is just my opinion. To All: The medical industry is never interested in solving a problem, and focus its attention in treating the symptoms rather than addressing core issues. Many here have first hand experience of that, and it is something that frustrates and annoys me about the industry as a whole - the arrogance of a group of people who go out of their way to avoid following their own oath - "ὠφελέειν ή μὴ βλάπτειν" or translated to english - "Do no harm". They are all aware that treating a symptom while avoiding the root problem is doing harm to the paitent as every disease / issue will progress and get worse if it is not addressed. So, by only treating symptoms of a problem, they ARE doing harm to their paitent, and a paitent is supposed to trust a Doctor. After all, the description of a Doctor is "a learned and trusted friend". Would you trust this learned and trusted friend who goes out of their way to harm you with the guise of attempting to cure you? I am not suggesting that you avoid these, as at the moment, there is nothing better. All I do advise is that you don't implicity trust them.