Leaderboard

Some food for thought (copied from a blog I just wrote). 1. DK Enterprises, the name of the company producing these photos and diapers of young boys is very similar to the company name of IDK Enterprises, the monsters behind thediapersuperstore and [That site]. DK Enterprises, according to a few sources, is also the name that an admin at diaper-boys.net conducted business under. All three of these websites hold to the pedophiliac ideology that young boys should wear and be kept diapers. 2. DK Enterprises also owns tigerunderwear, a website that manufactures toddlerlike underwear for boys and men. Amongst the photos on the site are some very sexually suggestive photos of the same boy that is in the BMX diaper photos. ABU currently sells tigerunderwear and lists them as a partner on their website. 3. In the past, ABU also partnered with [That site] but quickly feigned innocence when the ABDL community raised in uproar. Many people believed them and thought it could have been innocent ignorance and urged them to look more into the businesses that they chose to partner with, but as this is a second (or third, if you include their connection with tigerunderwear as well) offense I think it is hard to just blindly ignore facts and a history of shadiness. 4. DK Enterprises and ABU are both based out of the same area of Washington State in the US.

ok if the media is seeking out certain types of people then it is unfair to say abs represent the abdl community poorly rather it is the media who intentionally seeks out poor representatives and then seeks to present the most extreme of this desire/fetish/lifestyle what have you ..... the same can be said of say addiction recovery centers who only show the small percentage of success stories and say see how great we are .... in this case the media seeks out the people who they can portray as the most extreme and say see how messed up those people are ..... so really there are probably loads of people who audition for the show who would be wonderful representatives but are not chosen simply because of this .... again this is the medias fault not the abs fault

gotdiapers: Wow, that's quite the supportive attitude to have! Damn, didn't your mom/dad/authoritative figure ever tell you that "... if you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say anything at all..?" Whats your passion? Collecting stamps, building miniature railroads, working out in the gym? Whatever it is, someone could see it as a waste of time, but its something you enjoy, so why not? But hey, to each his own... To the OP: Good luck! I hope you find it's everything you want it to be and more! I commend you on your courage to embark on such a journey.

If quality diapers or DK Enterprises is so innocent in all this why all the secrecy about the location and ownership? No address or PO box and completely anonymous web hosting in a different country than the company. If there was some way of proving that this was not run by d33ker or The Diaper Superstore I am sure using such a young model could be forgiven.

Complain all you like about the government, but you would not have been able to post your message online without the government's help. Yes, the government provided grants to the developers of the internet. It is actually a ban on low efficient light bulbs with 30% efficiency or less, not 100w light bulbs. Still, I would have preferred a tax on those low efficient light bulbs rather than a ban so if people really want them, they can still get them. I think a tax would have been successful in phasing out low efficient light bulbs without being so intrusive. Anyways, I have no idea how government regulation got into the discussion when it is not even on the table in D.C. right now. Besides, cutting regulatory agencies wouldn't even make a dent in the budget. Social Security, Medicare, and Defense make up about 75% of the U.S. Federal budget. Obviously raising taxes alone will not fix the budget. Cutting entitlements will have to be done too. As much as I would like to see a reduction in defense spending, it is providing many jobs and is supporting the U.S. economy ro a large extent at the moment.

I have not used them in a few years because the tapes ripped of the diaper after just wearing them for a little bit maybe they fixed them. if the tapes have a blue X all over it then they are still the same diapers. They are the cheap store brand that most store used walmart,cvs,Walgreen they all had the same blue x on the tapes just under different names but 100% the same diaper. Its been years since I used that diaper now all I use is ABU diapers Bambino and Depend pull ups. for the last few years so those diapers may be different now..

Your co-workers thank you for exposing them to the stench. Just because you can't smell it doesn't mean others can't. If you absolutely must mess while out in public, take some Nullo tabs that will reduce the odor.

Actually, the Dollar is backed by nothing, nothing physical anyways. When America got off the gold standard the dollar went from being currency to a note of debt. The only thing keeping the dollar propped up right now is America's AAA credit rating. The Treasury has been printing more dollars (QE1 and QE2) and using them to buy US debt back from foreign holders, but because the dollar isn't backed by anything that has caused massive inflation. Another reason gas is $3.50/gal. Your dollar doesn't go as far as it used to. The government has actually considered printing even more money (QE3) in an attempt to shrink America's debt. A portion of the govt. wants inflation to skyrocket so 14Trillion suddenly doesn't seem like such an impossibly immense number. However doing this is a slap in the face to every American with a savings account. 20 years ago if you had $10,000 in the bank it was a big thing... you could live for a while on that. But now inflation has cut the value of that $10,000 by about a third.

No, your post was NOT "very understandable." A couple people above backed me up on that. You need to get a grip on reality & understand that you NEED to make sensible posts. Your reply, quoted above, makes me sick, not only is it again a one long run on sentence that should be a paragraph or two, but it is again filled w/dozens of errors that could have been corrected by you with the dozens tools we are given. I have NEVER said this before, but I am in a very bad mood right now. Clean up your posts, make them readable, or get off this site! Sorry to all my other friends for the rant. This "guy" just set me off.

Lets refocus this argument shall we and can we stop with the negative rep tagging. I have always been in favor of Keynesian economics, because I think government should play a role in the economy. As I have said, the private sector can make irrational decisions as a whole leading to poor outcomes creating recessions or even a depression. Additionally, the government can inject itself too much leading to poor outcomes as well leading to the very same outcomes. It can be a gamble either way, which is why we need to strike the proper balance. I think the current economic downturn was actually caused by both government injection as well as private sector greed. The government pushed the banks to lend more home loans leading to the sub-prime lending, while at the same time, the banks taking these risks with the sub-prime loans had a huge stake in the economy, hence the term too big to fail. I partially blame the private sector for this, because these banks should have never been allowed to consolidate to a point where if they fail, the economy fails. I know many people here did not like the bail-outs, but I believe they were a necessity. Look at the bright side though, most of the money used to bail-out the banks and auto manufacturers will all be paid back with interest. Still, these issues I have pointed out have not been resolved as of yet as the size of these banks have not changed. Despite the government's failure to perform properly recently, I do not think its role in the economy should be removed. I still think the government should invest in the future of the economy. Now, how you invest makes all the difference. For example, corn subsidies have had a large negative impact and you have probably noticed all your foods now contain a corn product now, which was not the intention. On the other hand, investment in research such as nanotechnology and alternative fuel sources has a had a large positive impact. Lets be careful though, rushing application and manufacturing of these technologies with more government subsidies is a mistake and this is exactly what we have been doing. After all, the goal of investing in research for these technologies was to make them economically feasible, not prop them up with further government subsidies for manufacturing products based on those technologies. My skepticism of our current president begins here after the stimulus bill, because it was not the investment it should have been. The stimulus bill was a failure, and I think that is because the money was given to the states and not directly to the infrastructure projects, research projects, etc. After the money filtered through the state's bureaucracies, there was none left. I am speculating what happened is the states basically used the stimulus money to balance their budgets temporarily, thus preventing income from reaching the economy. I think money from the stimulus bill should never have been given to the states. It is very likely the economy will eventually recover by itself, but if the stimulus bill had been done right, we would be in a much better situation economic wise. I think we still would have ended up with a budget issue regardless. Here we stand now. I think I have said everything there is to say now about the topic of government and its role in the economy.

It took me a while to get there, but I came to the realization that while those who consider themselves strictly DL generally do not involve themselves in or indulge themselves with AB things, ABs can, indeed, be DLs as well as ABs. There are so many variants in the AB/DL "world" that it's tough to categorize a person as a strict DL or AB. I mean, I've come to enjoy a Nuk 5 adult pacifier from time to time and having had the experience, if it were every offered to me again, I would breastfeed from a full breast needing to be relieved from the pressure deep within - in a heartbeat. Otherwise, it's wearing and using diapers for their intended purpose, discreetly, in my normal adult world on a daily basis. As far as I'm concerned, every one of us in the AB/DL community are unique personality types and for an overview, we all are "special". I could care less that and how hairs are split in the "diapers by choice" world. I could care less about splitting hairs. I'm comfortable with who I am and how I am. As far as I'm concerned, I see and acknowledge there is a tremendous amount of varience in our "community". And, there's nothing wrong with that...

I will be even blunter OMG you are sooooooo much HOLIER than we are. You are SORT OF NORMAL! AREN'T YOU JUST SOOOO SPECIAL!!??!! Who died and made you the representative of anything? Nice to hear from the Van Snoots!! My Name is Chris And I'll tell you this you're so sanctimonious You know what to kiss Do you think it might be the fault of your perspective boyfriends for freaking in this day and age or is it that your brain is somewhere south of your bellybutton so you turn on your own family?

it boils down to this and instead of going back and forth we should accept. 1. some people find this offensive and no matter the INTENT they will not support it. 2. some people will see nothing wrong with it and support it. 3. some people will be offended but like the product so will ignore it... 4. some people dont care. 5. unfortuantly some people will like it to much. 6. another reason if you like it you will support it, if not you will not support it. bashing each other over our deferences will not solve this . I personaly feel this was a bad idea right / wrong , legal or not if just 1 person gets the wrong idea its a bad idea. we as a group MUST be carefull EXTRA carefull to the outside world and what they might see as bad and should do everything in our power to not push anyone to get the wrong idea about our group. the really sad thing is there ARE people who will use such a photo improperly and thus it shouldnt exist.

I had to respond. first I just want to say thanks for writing this :-) second well I have to be honest and say the writing is not terribly clear in places. not meaning to beat you up about it, just desiring to point out what you could do better :-)

I'll be blunt and say what a lot of other people here won't say to be polite. AB's are ruining it for the rest of us sort-of-normal people here. The rest of the society only know that people who wear are AB's. The media only report on the extreme but its not all their fault. AB's are happy to get infront of the camera and show themselves playing with toys, sucking on pacifiers and acting like babies. Should society think any different about all of us? Because of this DL's have an even harder time finding anyone who will accept them. I know that a couple of boyfriends freaked out when I told them as they thought I must be the type of person who pisses, poos, lives for playing with Fisher Price and being treated like a baby. Yes there is a difference between ABs and DLs and I truely hope that someday society will understand this.

That sounds like fun. Bring alcohol or whatever strikes your privy and a SO who is also into diapers and you will have it made.

I agree. The rest of you need to get your head out of the sand and look at the perspective. You all are digging for the negative aspect of the ad. Just because it is a child wearing the product, you automatically think child porn, or pedophilia. Why would this product be any better if it were an adult standing in the same stance showcasing the diaper? What makes it different? The diaper obviously has been developed for children/youth with bladder issues and the adult market has found a way to produce it in larger scale for the fetish community. Wake up and see this. Don't any of you watch television and see ads for diapers, goodnites, pullups? All those products are worn on children on national television. So what makes seeing this child model this particular diaper any different from any other child diaper advertisement? Come on....

How about the fact that diapers atract heat. In the summer time people who normally wear underwear keep thier clothes on, or wear something cooler. But for people, adult and children, who cannot wear something cooler would just have to wear thier diaper. Quality Diapers is showing thier demographic comfortable in thier product. ABU does not have a link to Quality Diapers, and they cropped the image of the boy to only show the diaper. Most of us couldnt tell that it was a little boy modeling the diaper until someone went looking for Quality Diapers, I would not have bean the wiser. Personally I dont think ABU was being deceptive, rather than taking an existing picture and making it PC for thier customers. Because I can buy the same kind of socks from Wal-Mart that I can at Meijer, does not mean that they are owned by the same people.

And what about us ABs that ARE youth/small size? I got excited when I saw this, FINALLY an AB diaper in my size! Not all of us are Medium/Large, you know...

How else do you market the look and fit of a diaper? While I agree most kids would wear clothes to hide their diapers, you can't show the quality of a product be hiding it. QualityDiapers is for the medical side of things, not a fetish site. The pics are innocent (and adorable) I like that they are selling diapers for youth who need them without the usual shame and embarrassment.

ABU sells Tiger underwear which is available in youth to adult along with I believe they use to sell Underjams(maybe wrong). So because they market a youth product they are promoting child...??? What? If a fetish store sells a package of Pampers, then they are pedo's too I guess then. Huh. Think that's a bit streeeeeeeeeeetched.

Sams club diapers are the same diapers that cvs and walgreens sell. You just get more in a pack (case) from sams..

I knew I was hooked on smoking and diapers when I was 13. I snuck out onto the roof from my bedroom window and smoked a joint. Then went back inside and pulled out my toddler diapers. I had some old smelly ones and new fresh ones. I played and played for hours. I had three or four orgasms and had just such a great time. I knew I was hooked from then on. Now 26 years later I'm still smoking, but now I am having trouble quitting. Nothing beats a joint and a diaper!!!!

Generally any activity + weed will make said activity more fun. Unless you're doing homework for differential Calculus, then it just becomes an exercise in frustration. One time I ate mushrooms, then fapped myself to an Earth-shattering orgasm in a poopy diaper. It was like my consciousness had transcended the physical realm and become one with Stinkus Pamperus Maximus, the omnipotent omniscent deity of dirty hippie diaper babies everywhere.

I was gonna use the potty, but then I got high.... Was gonna be a big boy not naughty, but then I got high... Now my diapers wet, and I know why... Because I got high, Because I got high, Because I got high

Qualitydiapers@yahoo.com Yeah, seems suspicious to me. I'm gonna have to agree with Annie on this one.

As expected, they took the pic down now that they have the diapers in hand to take their own pics

Add me to the list of people who think that ABU have crossed the line and left it way behind them (again), and who are waiting for a strong and believable rebuttal from "DK Enterprises" that they aren't who they look like they might be, and who won't be giving ABU a cent until I am satisfied as such. FWIW, you can totally tell that the photo on the front page of ABU's website is a child. I've asked them directly, to distance themselves from , via the only contact point I could dig up for the company. I doubt I'm the only person to do so and I'm not expecting an answer, although if I get one, I'll share it. Hopefully I've been restrained enough here to avoid another post deletion. My opinions (and my justifications for those opinions, which I believe to be sound enough to be asking very probing questions) remain unchanged.

Seriously that is your reply? I did contact the addiction show that is showing an AB at the end of July and never got a response. Why? Think about it, in the media today want extremes because the extreme will get better ratings. The media will always hunt out the AB instead of the DL because it is truely bizare behaviour compared to someone who just wants to wear a diaper under their clothes. Unfortunately we all get seen as the same, if you wear diapers you want to be a baby. Even people eho wear for incontinence with no AB/DL intrest are in fear of being lumped in with the rest. Face it, you are not representing the majority of diaper wearers very well.

sorry Di... but you dont see photos like that on goodnights website and you can show fit and look with out a kid.... i just disagree with you on this

You stay classy, Internet.

The DIFFERENCE is pampers,huggies,luvs and similar are for mostly for babies, toddlers and bedwetters. And they are offically licensed products. So is their website. And they don't put ABDL's on their websites, nor does incontience forums even. Nothing stopping ABDL's wearing say pampers though. But have altered pics of a minor on an ABDL website is plain sick, and gives us a bad name. And I'm not sure how offically licensed abuniverse now is. Pampers for instance is known worldwide and has been since the 60's. Most of the diapers ain't under their brand name, they're just an online store. If they can't model small sized diapers say youth XL on normal sized adults. Then why can't they pay some willing adult midgets, sounds mean but least they are adult. Or last but not least, human sized tailors dummies(mannequins). Like this even could be used: Human shaped inflatable mannequins. ^^^

thats kinda.... creepy. this is prolly where people get bad thought about us.

the site may be Innocent but the photos on the site give me the heebe jeebees ....

while it may be innocent my issues are kids at that age dont usually wear nothing but underwear/diaper... that age is past the innocent phase they know better... if they market to disabled teenagers they would not want to show off the fact they need a diaper... if they are marketing to adults the adults know what a diaper is an dont need to see it on a kid... my thoughts

Incorrect. They are marketing to the parents of said disabled child. In the latest years of wearing as a kid, I always ran around the house with nothing but the diaper on - when mom took me out, we put on clothes. Parents enjoy seeing the diapers on their kids just as much as the mommy/AB pairs do. If the kid has clothes on, then it's pretty hard to sell a fashion diaper to a parent as they can't see what they look like.

at 10-12 years ?? really?? sorry i dont buy that.... i wore diapers at 12 years old and the last thing i would do is run around the house in nothing but a diaper and my parents certainly would not want to see that either.... i am not saying everybody is that way and i am not saying anything about intentions on the site BUT...its such an obviously BAD idea and no real legitimate reason for such photos.

i get the fact that it may be innocent and probably is i get it some people see an issue with it and some dont... but if those photo's was of 10-12 year old girl in nothing but a diaper how would you all react? and yes I did not know it was a teen until i saw the other site... (rather lazy and why subject yourself to issues) i dont think its ok for the photos on the tiger underwear site either.. this may be just a moral, standard i grew up with but if its even possible for a few people to get the "WRONG idea" it may be a bad idea....

No, I sure don't know who Bel is. All I know, it says they're from the UK, they make a anti American statement saying how were stealing oil. Unless I misunderstood something, that's why I said what I said. I get tired of people saying no blood for oil ect. When we didn't even come close to doing that!

i saw this on another site and thought it should be passed on! creepy check both sites photos and see! http://www.abuniverse.com/products/abu-bmx.asp http://www.qualitydiapers.net/MoreInformationPage.html

Won't matter to all the morality enforcers and all the others who think they know the universal laws of diaper etiquette... but perhaps now they can stop griping about it and reiterating each other's posts and move on.

I been wearing my nappies 24/7 for ages now. In the past I always waited till I left work to do dumpies. But only recently have I started poohing on impulse. That's how it's supposed to be, right. Never hold it! But it never seems to smell. Well, it does if I change it and the loo stinks for hours. But as long as I just sit in my messy nappy, nobody notices. Which is awesome coz I luv sitting in pooh, it's so cumfy! I use TenaSlip Maxi Medium and henley plastic pants. Are they really that smell protective? How does everyone else feel about it?

I see you have lots of usless time on your hands huh....well good luck. Maybe a weight lifting progress journal or a lower your cholesterol blog would be more helpful for people....but each his own.

Lol..I said good luck...lol. Also im not trying to sell my people a blog about my stupid hobbies. I keep them to myself.....because your correct...no one wants to hear about them.