![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
 |
Critiques and Writer's Discussion
For more in-depth critiques of stories and story writing discussion.
549 topics in this forum
-
- 55 replies
- 11.8k views
-
- 20 replies
- 11.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 8.1k views
-
- 13 replies
- 620 views
-
- 2 replies
- 99 views
-
- 4 replies
- 195 views
-
- 6 replies
- 347 views
-
- 1 reply
- 203 views
-
- 2 replies
- 219 views
-
- 19 replies
- 719 views
-
- 3 replies
- 181 views
-
- 15 replies
- 321 views
-
- 0 replies
- 154 views
-
- 0 replies
- 294 views
-
- 2 replies
- 236 views
-
- 35 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 11 replies
- 985 views
-
- 176 replies
- 25.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 247 views
-
- 13 replies
- 624 views
-
- 7 replies
- 661 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.1k views
-
- 3 replies
- 375 views
-
- 2 replies
- 323 views
-
- 2 replies
- 368 views
.thumb.jpeg.5cb8c9456c2ec2873baa31f4b77e87b6.jpeg)
-
Current Donation Goals
-
February BillsRaised $210 of $400 target
-
General FundRaised $65
-
-
-
Posts
-
It looks like this judicial finding could be used to shut DD down in Australia. After all, child abuse by means of diaper humiliation is a well trodden path on this site; could it be accused of "producing and disseminating child abuse material?" -
Thanks for this. I don't often laugh during tax season.
-
-
Thank God Mom's reaction gives a window into her mindset. Turning Alice into a baby was her ultimate goal all along. However, it seems like Alice was neglected at the same time. -
I found a bit of insight into the judicial mechanics behind what happened: https://www.criminaldefencelawyers.com.au/blog/what-is-the-meaning-of-child-abuse-material/ The nub of it seems to be that the evidentiary test in the relevant act is not simply "is" a child but extends to "implied" or "appears" to be one. There's probably an argument in here that role-playing literature that includes expository fact revealing the true nature of the role players (ie: she is a consenting adult) does not meet the threshold for "implied" or "appears". The point of the exercise is the role-play, not to emulate material fact. No reasonable person would think that the character was actually a child. Presumably if the author had been depicting a Furry wearing a rabbit costume she would have been charged with bestiality.
-
-
