willnotwill Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Well I got this nuisance ticket for expired inspection. Link to comment
Rachel Emily Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 That would be my luck, I think. How big of a fine did you end up with? Link to comment
willnotwill Posted May 15, 2015 Author Share Posted May 15, 2015 With court costs it was just under $100. Link to comment
Bettypooh Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 My last ticket would have gotten reduced or dropped, but the usual Judge was at my uncle's funeral Link to comment
Diapered Jason Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 My last ticket would have gotten reduced or dropped, but the usual Judge was at my uncle's funeral 1 Link to comment
Dill_Pickle Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Actually, seeing (as opposed to simply looking) often works better with your eyes closed...your brain isn't distracted by all that visual input! Link to comment
Diapered Jason Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 My point was in relation to our own prejudices and value systems, which often get us into trouble. Link to comment
Bettypooh Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Nor am I stupid I've just paid attention to life and have seen more BSer's than the average person has. Rhetoric may win a debate or make a point, but it doesn't have to be based in truth and it often isn't so I rerfuse to be swayed by it And in a courtroom rhetoric reigns supreme, not truth Link to comment
rusty pins Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 I can understand how some people with very busy jobs just hate the idea of Jury Duty. Link to comment
Dubious Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 My reason to be excluded: S/he is guilty no matter what, end of discussion Link to comment
Diapered Jason Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Nor am I stupid I've just paid attention to life and have seen more BSer's than the average person has. Rhetoric may win a debate or make a point, but it doesn't have to be based in truth and it often isn't so I rerfuse to be swayed by it And in a courtroom rhetoric reigns supreme, not truth Bettypooh I think you just used a poor choice of words in the comment above. When you said morals, you probably meant principles. No one should be judged by anyone's morality, otherwise we would all go to prison. Link to comment
willnotwill Posted May 16, 2015 Author Share Posted May 16, 2015 Only received jury call twice over the years. Link to comment
Baby Brian Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 I used to get speeding tickets a lot (before I got a good radar detector & memorized all of the speed trap locations). Every court appearance I had I was wearing a decent suit and a diaper underneath. The suit may not have helped very often, but my diaper sure came in handy. Link to comment
willnotwill Posted May 16, 2015 Author Share Posted May 16, 2015 I've been pretty lucky, I've only gotten maybe one or two speeding tickets in the past twenty years. Link to comment
Bettypooh Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Morals and Principles are pretty much interchangable when you add reality to them There is never a completely moral choice, only a better or best one for the situation at hand. Principles have to change according to the situation at hand as well, for they are not "one size fits all" either. Don't expect to find either allowed into legal proceedings because they are not save for principles used as a precedent to justify a procedure without having to go over that ground again- which might be the right thing to do but cannot happen because that is the guiding principle of Case Law In the end, the side with the best rhetoric and appearance almost always wins and good Rhetoricians don't come cheap Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now