rusty pins Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 This may be a little off the subject here, but my mind works in strange but analitical ways. Link to comment
BabyJune Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 Actually, a continent "holds back" the water; otherwise the land would flood. So if a continent is a mass of land that holds back water, wouldn't "incontinent" mean an inability to hold back water? You, my friend, are dealing with an insane writer here. Ya never know what I'll come up with. 1 Link to comment
diaperpt Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 rusty pins - cute and clever thoughts. Baby June - nice response. Link to comment
nappyboymids Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 An older usage of the word - or rather of 'continence' - refers to chastity or celibacy (as in holding oneself together, restraint); I think this usage has probably diminished as the definition relating to bladder control has become the most commonly known one ... Link to comment
babykeiff Posted March 4, 2013 Share Posted March 4, 2013 This was discussed between Marcuss and myself http://www.dailydiapers.com/board/index.php?showtopic=15595&page=2#entry437659 Link to comment
wetman Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Where is your linguistics degree from? Link to comment
babykeiff Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 Where is your linguistics degree from? Actually, I am Irish Link to comment
willnotwill Posted March 5, 2013 Share Posted March 5, 2013 I always found the fact that inbred and inbreeding have rather different connotations amusing. Link to comment
rusty pins Posted March 5, 2013 Author Share Posted March 5, 2013 Actually, a continent "holds back" the water; otherwise the land would flood. So if a continent is a mass of land that holds back water, wouldn't "incontinent" mean an inability to hold back water? You, my friend, are dealing with an insane writer here. Ya never know what I'll come up with. Link to comment
wetatnight Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 probably some medical science person way back in past came up with a scientific sounding name for why some people can't hold their pee. Link to comment
Dubious Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 [Middle English, from Old French, from Latin incontinns, incontinent-, unrestrained : in-, not; see in-1 + continns, continent; see continent2.] Link to comment
square_duck Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 I was going to say much the same as Keiff, in that to find the true answer for this, you ave to go back and look at the root of the word. Incontinence being a medical term has it's roots in latin. All medical terminology is rooted in Latin, for what ever reason I don't know. being from a medical family, I have had to put up with this popping up from time to time. I guess it's because it's more specific than anything else. English is a bastardized language made up of many Latin based (IE 'romance') languages German, French, Italian, an d of coarse Latin. I think the Legal profession also uses a lot of Latin terms also....of that I'm not 100% on Anyways, so Keiff has the right idea in that to find the origin of a word or term you have to go to the root, an din this case, you have to go back to the Latin origin, where most current western languages started from. Link to comment
Bettypooh Posted June 1, 2013 Share Posted June 1, 2013 American English has so many different word roots that sometimes you simply cannot pin down an origin I'm a 'word nut' as one friend puts it, finding that learning about words and using them is fun Strangely, my English classes were my worst school subject and I hated them Link to comment
willnotwill Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 Given OED's historical tracings of the word, it turns out that the urine/bowels version of it comes later (18th century). The term for one unable to contain his sexual urges goes back the the 14th century. Link to comment
babykeiff Posted June 2, 2013 Share Posted June 2, 2013 ... All medical terminology is rooted in Latin, for what ever reason I don't know. being from a medical family, ... Link to comment
wetman Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Aufwiedersehn which means until [we] see [each other] again. While "Wiedersehen" is a concatenation of the terms "wieder" (again) and "sehen" (to see), "Auf" (onto) is a separate word. Link to comment
babykeiff Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 While "Wiedersehen" is a concatenation of the terms "wieder" (again) and "sehen" (to see), "Auf" (onto) is a separate word. Link to comment
DavidMW Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 It's not more recent knowledge. I got my linguistics degrees before 88. And a lot of what I wrote dates back to the 1800s, although it is still current today. There are no native languages at the south pole, btw. I assume you were actually referring to the folks up north. But the Eskimo-Aleut languages actually have about the same number of root words for snow as English does. Those languages do have more complex morphology, though. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now