babykeiff

Unfortunately, due to whatever you wish to call it or deny it exists, global warming etc, the world weather patterns are in the process of change which results in futher extremes of weather on both sides - i.e. hotter summers, colder winters, wetter / more agressive rain etc. It is part of the planet trying to find a balance, and since the summer (in the northern hemisphere) was hotter by a percentage, the winter will be colder by the same percentage - that if the word is in balance, however it is not, so winter will be colder by a greater percentage and the following summer will be hotter by a greater percentage, and this and this trend will continue until an equalibrium is reached. Over the past few years, summers were extreme in areas as compared to usual, and winters have been colder. In places of rain, they have been heavier but when compared to the previous years values, they are 1-5% different ie hotter / colder / wetter. The reasons for this change is basically polution - from burning ALL carbon containing products - i.e paper, wood, coal, oil, plastic, gas in all forms as doing so bonds chemically hydrogen and similar gases to carbon which allows same to rise high into the ionosphere. This does three things, it blocks certain elements of sunlight which increases its ultra-violet strength the carbon chemicals mix with rain where the water increases its acidity. the ioniosphere lets less heat out similar to the behaviour of glass in a greenhouse which increases temprature in certain areas of the world. These actions, due to increased thermal differences, amplifies the effect of the local weather events. Although the populus world belief is that mankind has not done enough damage to make this irreversable, the scientific community disagrees and believes that it will take a lot of time before 'mother nature' finds a balance, and using historical comparisons of weather instability, predict that the weather changes will continue to exagerate until we get a partial ice age again.

I thought that the question might have came from a stranger or a work associate or a person in a retail store that did / didn't sell diapers - i.e. from someone who is just being nosey. There is a totally different experience when dealing in medial supply / incontince shops etc - and I have NEVER got anyone there asking do I wear diapers. I presume that it is from their own experience and training - i.e. not to ask the customer and/or they recognise the diaper shape etc even though it is under clothes etc due to knowing what to look for in a person's body shape. In simple terms, your choice of underwear is nobodies business except your own. Some doctors (not ones dealing with my diaper dependance) have asked me if I am wearing a diaper, and I have asked them (actually a dentist asked), what has my choice of underwear got to do with my teeth or mouth, or is there a new dental procedure that you intend to perform on me that involves my butt? The dentist went red, apologised and then told me that he knows of no procedure or has the equipment that involves my butt. I personally believe that my choice of underwear is private and nobodies business. Even most of my doctors, although some know (but it is usually their nurses that know), never bring up the subject as I try to not enter a doctors office with a soaked diaper - it might be damp as I have just changed it in during the time I was waiting, but never soaked and/or messy.

Night time voiding is about two linked items, ones confidence in that wetting will not wake you / make you cold the amount of vasopressin (an ADH chemical that restricts elements in the kidneys and therefore, reduces the amount of liquid being placed in the bladder) being produced. This quantity is reactive - i.e. there is a sensor that measures its quantity in the blood and if that is lower than what was determined to be the value required to keep you from needing to wake, the value will be increased. You can't directly control vasopressin levels, but can influnce it by addressing the self confidence. This is done by, in as much as possible, repeat the scenario you were in as a baby, but over exagerate it. Sound, smell, feelings are excelent memory triggers - and you want your mind to believe that you still are a baby where you wet your diapers without recourse. So, thick cloth diapers, noisy plastic pants, noisy plastic sheet under the bed sheets, reeking of baby powder, and if you had a mobile as a baby, replay the sounds of same at a low volumn in your bedroom. Getting thickly *(waddle thick) diapered 1-2 hours before bed is ideal as you will be getting into bed in a already damp diaper, but you really should not feel that in your conscious mind. This shoud convince your mind that even a wet diaper does not disturb your sleep, so the first night, your bladder will release a little bit before waking you - what you should do is contine to wet without moving - after all, you trust your diaper and it is thick enough to cope with way over what you would put in it. The second night repeating this process, you will wake up, but you will be half asleep while you wet. The third and forth night, you might not even wake. After a week or so of this, you will not be waking up until the morning, and you should find that you are soaking your diaper. The actual time line identified is different per person, but is only controlled by how much you trust your diapers - and nothing else. This process will work faster or slower, but does work and has worked for many members here and elsewhere. It also effects the vasopressin production AND accordingly, the bladder size but that takes time. It is not until the bladder volumn had reduced to mean that you are voiding every 20-45 mins should you reduce the size of the night time diaper - as you need the capacity not only to cover you overnight, but to also remove any posibility of leaks overnight - as all it takes is one leak to reset your mind back to the beginning. In relation to shrinking the bladder, if it is a side effect of voiding multiple times without notice, that is the ideal situation. However, if it is the side effect of you focusing on the bladder to keep it as empty as possible - that is a problem as the focusing is what a baby being toilet trained did - until it eventually learned to control same. You need to avoid 'knowing' that you need to void - and to just void as needed. This removes the alarm trigger to wake, and due to you waking 3 times a night, that gives your bladder capacity roughly 400ml but with the urgency alarm set at 150ml. Yes, you could last all night not waking, but your body has learnt to wake you at 150 and not let you sleep. If you convince your body with a thick multi layer cloth diaper that your diaper doesn't leak, the body very quickly reverts to voiding the 150 ml three times a night without waking you, which will increase in frequency while decreasing in volumn - i.e. 30-60ml every 20-40 minutes (similar voiding volumn and frequency of daytime). In your specific case, your bladder might have shrunk to about 130 - 200ml since that is roughly the volume you void three times a night based on the common 400-600ml urine production overnight an adult produces.

@cathdiap thank you for reposting this excerpt from the harvard medical file, where it explains a concept that is foreign to a lot of naysayers here. The concept is that the bladder can be taught to grow OR shrink based on how one uses it. The second, and more important concept is that because one is teaching the bladder to void earlier, the bodies alarm system will grow used to that level and inform the person of the need earlier and earlier. In my humble belief, that is what @Hannah YMS and others are doing, teaching their bladder to void earlier and earlier. They have stated that in diapers they wet *almost by reflex, but out of diapers they are uncomfortable, but still have bladder control. As a result, all they have done is decreased the level of when their bladder needs to empty without addressing, in any form, the alarm system OR the reason for the alarm. When I said that on this post and others, all I get is abuse, arguments etc. When another member stated that they 'think' that their bladder capacity might have reduced, and is in the medical feild, and I ask them to actually measure it (that for most needs a little thinking, but for someone in the medical training, it should be second nature to be able to measure the volume of a liquid!) he gets annoyed. I think that if someone is attempting to complete a task, as a way to calculate progress, one must be able to measure same, even roughly as a comparison to how far one has reached on said task. To measure bladder capacity, all one need is a plastic measuring jug, and some time. Go to a bathroom, sit on a diaper on the toilet and place ones item into the measuring jug. If they are voiding approx every hour in a diaper, they should not need to wait long to void into said jug. Read the quantity of liquid in said jug and note the value. Repeat the process every few days. An average adult will be triggered to void at circa 400ml. A baby wets every 20-45 minutes and does it as easily as coughing / breathing - as it is reacting to the need to void OR voiding by gravity. I have explained the reason in other posts, but most self convinced people here don't want to listen - as they think that everything they do is correct, and since what I am saying is different, I must be wrong. After all, I am a conspirary theorist of the worst kind - and these are the same people that believe that to learn something, i.e. by rote, they have to repeat it a number of times for the mind to store it - after all, that is what they did in school to learn a poem etc. Today, approx 10 years later, none of them could repeat any of the poems that they though that they learnt by rote - they forgot it. It is a concept that is hammered all the way through education - do and repeat, and repeat and you will get better. Well, the human mind is far better than that stupid way of thinking, and is capable of adapting faster than most people can think - but for it to do same, it has to fully trust the scenario - which none of the 'try this and see if it works' people can even accept never mind understand. It is one of the reasons a babies mind can absorb information and learn so fast as opposed to most adults in general. There is an axiom in life, that came from an advertisement - "before you make up your mind, open it" which is very apt in most situation in life. At this stage, I don't really care if people don't agree with me here - what I state has been proven by other ABs on other posts, not only here but on other ABDL sites, so at this stage, believe what you will - I am tired of repeating myself and hearing the same weak arguments against it. Hopefully maturity will teach these people, but I doubt it - they may be so set in their ways that they will still be trying to get a different result by repeating the same flawed process at age 70+.

Even if I wasn't incontinent, it is people like this that make me cringe and not want to be part of the human race. Although I understand that there are millions of people that do, what I would class as wierd, and something that I wouldn't do, but these people respect themselves and others to do that in the privacy of their own place. The concept of exibitionism, where the lines of normality are crossed, but even that is done on the edge of privacy where if there is any chance of public exposure, actions can be taken to place it behind closed doors. Even then, if it is filmed, the people are smart enough not to show their face - as they value their privacy. Doing this in an area that is frequented by public, with items that may or not belong to the company, did he not realise that, even if this is fake, the company will find out and, if he was an employee, he no longer is. Secondly, the company will go out of their way to ensure that this person at least, spends some time in jail. The company that he is toying with is a $32+ billion company, so unless he is a multi-billionaire, there is no way he is getting out off this one - he IS going to jail. That is why people make me cringe - I would presume that they understand cause and effect - yet they do things for whatever reason that will end up with them being put in jail with a label on them for life as a sexual offender... all for a few minutes of fame and maybe a thrill, that after a time in jail and a public record for life, they might understand that it really wasn't worth it. Even if the video goes viral, the maximum that was ever made on a viral video is $1+ million, and even if he gets that money, it will be going on his legal defence and in compensation to Starbucks. He will be lucky to own anything, even his own hole, after coming out of prison, cause people like this are fodder for some prisoners.

@KPAXOR1987 In the video, shadows appear on the styrofoam cups as he is moving, the same cups that you state is from blue/green screen. Also, shadows also appear across the rectangular napkin holder in the far background, the same one that is holding at least one Starbucks napkin. In relation to the sink, yes it is possible that it is in his own kitchen, but who has a sink except a comercial wash premises, that is deep enough to contain a 16" tall container standing up as that is the way he puts it in the sink. You stated that the sink is part of a Starbucks kitchen and that the person is moving from his kitchen in one video sequence to possibly a Starbucks kitchen in the second sequence, but this seems unlikely with specific shadows altering reflections of devices in what you have identified as not part of his kitchen and/or the sink as being part of his kitchen due to the flow off the counter and the placement of items one would normally relate to being a workstation - maybe Starbucks, maybe elsewhere. Starbucks, in certain versions, use four sizes of Styrofoam cups plus two to three sizes of clear plastic cups as they also serve hot and iced drinks. In the video, there are the four sizes of Styrofoam cups in cup dispensers, plus multiple sizes of clear plastic cups also in cup dispensers. There is also a number of other items in the rear common with an industrial kitchen such as two large bins, but these are located under the sink, the same sink that has been identified as being in his kitchen. The primary light source is from a high intensity ring light attached to the camera. The whole scene is similar to the layout of a coffee / food resturant that would be in an airport / mall, where this work area is centered in a larger room that is lit by downlighters etc. Looking at the quantity of downlighters that are switched on as compared to the level of light in the rest of the restaurant, it seems that a lot of them are switched off. As a result, one would see this as being either midday or where the restaurant would be empty and shut. Since the light level outside the window would seem to indicate afternoon, added to the lights in the restaurant being closed, the location of this Starbucks would dictate that there primary market would be early morning OR it is in a smalll local airfield that at the time of recording would be closed. To All: Even if this video is false, the link has been created between ABDL, diaper wearers, disabled, fetishs and fetishism and Starbucks where the effects from it are real. If you doubt abut how strong a belief is, have a look at religion - its whole story is based on nothing that can be proved scientifically yet there are people over 2000 years later that will sacrifice their life for that belief - as a result, I never doubt the drive behind blind belief and public perception.

The problem with recording / playing back video information is that, as compared to audio tape process, there is much more information needed to be stored in same media. The first ideas of video recording/playing was to use a tape running at up to ten to twenty times as fast as an audio tape. These systems allowed up to 8 minutes recording on a tape machine. JVC used the concept of recording/playing diagonally across the width of the tape instead of along the lenght of the tape. This process works when the recording/playing head is spinning across the width of the tape instead of fixed and just allowing the tape to move across a head. As a result, the video tape is threaded past a stationary erase head, a spinning drum that contains multiple record/play heads for video information, and a stationary audio record/playback head. To keep the tape speed and head tracking, there is also a pinch wheel that is driven at a set speed. The problem with this system is that if the tape is in any way damp, it can stick to the fast moving drum and then get wrapped up on the threading mechanism. In an audio system, this failure can exist when dirt builds up on the pinch wheel that pulls the tape across the audio heads, thus the tape sticks and wraps up around said pinch wheel. What has been improved which addressed the issues of damp tapes and the relevant jams was the improvement in home insulation. I know, improvement in home insulation was not originally designed to effect video recorders, but progress in one area is commonly known to effect the world as a whole as well as restrictions of progress is also restrictions in the whole world. The oil industry, over the past 200 odd years, have systematically restricted the progress in vehicular travel which created the dependancy on oil for everyone in the world. It is only realitivly recently that mankind has discovered the costs of this dependancy - in polution etc., and are attempting to address same. However, the world is figthing an industry that in a way, owns every other industry, so although change will occur, it will need a step backwards in order to move forwards. Consider plastics, a subsidary of the oil industry, we need to remove our plastic usage and revert to materials before plastics existed to be able to move forward from that - ie wood, bakelite, pressed steel, aluminum etc - materials that can be used, and then reformed to become new versions of the same item - something that plastics fail at / is not cost effective to do as it is cheaper and more reliable to use virgin plastic than recycled plastic. In relation to travel, every fixed journey run should be converted to electric (from above lines) - i.e. trains / trams / busses etc., as well as delivery routes for commercial vehicles such as trucks etc. In relation to cars / personal transit, the electric car is an option, but its development is only in its infancy today that needs a few thousand iterations to become anyway close to the ICE equivilant. Not saying that the electric car does / does not have a position in the modern world, just saying that the electric car is NOT a solution as it stands. In relation to air travel, answers have been provided when aircraft couldn't fly etc., but that is not a solution to the problems with air travel. Polution is one of the major costs in that industry that is not really being addressed. If we think outside the box and create a worldwide transport system that operates on the same speed as air travel without needing to leave the earth, that might be a solution. Since air routes are essencially roads in the sky, same routes can be tunnelled underground where the vehicle that transports are an electric underground train. Yes, it will be a large cost to change to underground routes, but once a route is established, its running cost is miniscule as compared to fuel costs. As is its level of safety. An underground train does not fall thousands of feet if it stops. Also, trains are very rarely on the same track going head on etc. As compared to air travel, it is thousand of times less risky.

Yes, police reverted originally to Cell Phones for security, and then to digital radio, and the security in these exist following a technology invented in 1896. If you have ever heard of the concept of hetrodyning, you would understand how Hedy Lamar created the concept in 1940s by mimicing the way player pianos of 1896 tracked and played music. Hetrodyning is the concept of constantly switching the carrier frequency or the encoding key in signals. For that process to work, both the transmitter plus the reciever needs to 'know' what is the next frequency to switch to. In the 1940s, both devices had a copy of the list of instructions, similar to a piano roll, and all they needed to do is syncronise the change so both were always transmitting/recieving on the same frequency. This concept was employed to control 'smart' missiles as to avoid the enemy cracking the code and redirecting a missile in flight back at who fired same. With the release of mobile phones, and the limited available of frequencies, in order to get maximum use of the available frequencies, hetrodyining was employed as standard. This stops another device like a radio reciever staying locked on the frequency of the phones since the radio is tuned to one frequency and the phone keeps switching to another. As a result, it is understandable that police use cell phones for secure transmission instead of fixed frequency radios. BTW, police started originally using codes over the open frequencies first, but now, most people know what the police (and others) codes are. I find it extremly interesting how an invention today is so dependent on prior events, and how far back in history the dependency exists. For example, a computer today goes all the way back to 1700s and the Spinning Jenny card programmable weaving machine - and how the concept of making a device thats behavior could be changed by changing its instruction set. It is what drives the world, the constanly changing goals we call progress as compared to certain peoples rigid belief in a concept which they attempt to stagenate progress - all for self gain and the futility of increasing ones wealth - and if one examined that concept, using the example of each person had a container that contains coins, and each person focused on increasing their own quantity of coins, all it does is increase every persons quantity of coins equally. It therefore devalues each coin's purchasing power. As a result, the goal of increasing ones own wealth is counter-productive and all it does is decrease the value of each individual unit of wealth. This brings me to the axiom and misquote of Albert Einstien - Insanity is repeating the same process expecting a different result which links to working hard/smart to increase ones wealth so that one doesn't need to work is a typical application of insanity. The concept of working to improve self-skils / world progress rather than for money is a much better goal, in my humble opinion, which places a number of skillsets/jobs in the hands of the insane / idiot and also shows how insane the concept of the aquisition of wealth / capitalism is, and how contary it is to human advancement. It can be said that every capitalist is a cost to humanity.

Yes, it it true that the more one 'holds' the bladder, the larger it can grow. This is part of how the body adapts - i.e. it gets used to a feeling of a full bladder so it doesn't signal the need as an urgency. The reverse can happen, if one releases more frequently, the bladder gets used to emptying more often so it signals the need earlier and earlier. However, this creates a problem for those who wish to revert to diaper dependancy. Yes, one will need to wear a diaper due to the decreased time between voiding and the usual associated urgency, however, each time they void they will be fully aware of it. Overnight, similar will occur where the need to void will wake same person. Although for some, this is enough, but the associated need to wake to void will also disrupt any quality of life that may exist. I'd predict that a person following that behaviour will eventually be dependent on diaper that they wet every 30-45 mins, where they are asleep / partially awake while their bladder fills, fully awake to void, and then revert to be partially awake / asleep for the next 30-45 mins on a continual basis. This will remove ones ability to take care of oneself in any form, and would, in my opinion, be hell on earth. Now we address the actual goal of members here - to revert to the voiding frequency of a baby combined with ignoring the event plus forgetting that they wet - the key goal of most ABs - without removing any quality of life and/or ability of the person to function in society. This happens with a baby (although a baby does not usually function in society as an addition, but does interact with elements in society) due to two reasons - the baby has been taught to do this plus a baby does not know about an alternative. As a result, a baby does this awake or asleep as it has never been taught that needing to void is something to be alarmed about - something that is deep within the adult mind, something that needs to be 'unlearnt'. Otherwise, the effect of the alarm will be all that the adult will be dealing with. Yes, there is a line of though that repeating behaviour is ignored, but this repeating alarm is designed to wake the individual - which due to the frequency being 30-45 mins, this means that the adult is awake once an hour every hour which stops the adult entering REM sleep which will eventually kill the person due to severe exhaustion. So yes, that process will work where you might wet while asleep, but the associated costs involved is something I'd advise against. The way to unlearn the alarm process is to address the reason one is alarmed about voiding - when a baby is being toilet trained, what is first done is to remove the security the baby has with its diapers. This is done by creating the situation so that the baby is uncomfortable when it wets. This is done by placing the baby in single layer cloth underwear or training pants. As a result, the baby gets almost instant feedback that it is wet, which makes it cold nd due to this being a shock to the system, the baby reacts by crying. This is repeated time and time again, so the baby learns that every time it needs to wet, the corresponding event of it being cold and wet will occur - a feeling it doesn't like. The next step in training is to introduce the baby to the potty. This becomes and autonomic response for the baby, to go to the potty everytime it needs to wet as a soloution to prevent a future event of being wet and cold. Because the baby is now focusing on the signals within its bladder, and reacting to same, this becomes aquired knowledge - which is built on overnight. There will be times when the babies focus is elsewhere and said baby will wet, but since the result is so strong, it enforces the memory event and the baby learns to control its bladder day and night. This is the situation that most toilet trained people face, they do not trust enough that the diapers that they are wearing will prevent the effect of them feeling cold and wet - and since that memory is extremly strong in their memory (it was what drove them to toilet train, and is also associated with the feeling of wearing a diaper and early childhood) this tends to force the mind to fully focus on the filling of the bladder which is contary to the goal of most people here. As a result, one needs to relearn to fully trust their diapers as they did as a baby - actually a baby doesn't know that they trusted their diapers - they trusted the people around them to keep them dry and comfortable as the baby was never put in a situation prior to being toilet trained where they were not wrapped in a comfortable environment. The baby also reacts to all events without question - and that includes the feelings of bladder and bowels. Another behaviour which is sometimes forgot is that a baby relaxes all muscles when it does not need to use them, including those within bladder and bowels - as it has not learnt to hold same. There never was a reason for it to keep muscles etc in a position. As a result, when material is placed within its bladder and/or bowels, and as its sphincters are in a semi-relaxed state, the relevant bladder and bowels rarely used to expand (unless some reason triggered it to close same) so the need to void was rare, but the baby still weeped urine / feces into its diapers OR forced same from the result of other triggers. For a toilet trained individual to 'relearn' the same behaviour, one has to recreate the same environment in as much as possible. The problem with an adult mind is that it knows to watch for the bladder / bowels expanding and this is an alarm. Any behaviour that doesn't effect this alarm process is futile in attaining the goal of 'unknown' diaper filling. I suggest that one does the following:- recreate the environment - thick diapers, limited to zero feedback, no chance of leaks, associated infatile behaviour of bottles, recreate the sounds (plastic russle) and smells (baby powder) of babyhood. The mind, since it is always learning, will learn the response from wetting said diaper - there will be no effect to the wet diaper - but since the mind is more accurate that what it reports to you, it will try a little and keep increasing quantity until it is fully convinced that the environment will not cause the 'cold and wet' feeling it is trying to avoid. This has a secondry effect - it removes the reason for the alarm of a filling bladder / bowels. As a result, the mind will adapt to the new situation of wetting / messing without informing you since it no longer is needed. This behaviour is so similar to the baby method of voiding, the mind will paralell this new behaviour with what it already knows and trusts, which will mean that the body will repeat said behaviour of partially to fully relaxing all its muscles unless it is using same. This is a conservation of energy process, which matches what the mind wants. Because of the partial to complete relaxion of muscles including sphincters, the need for bladder / bowel to expand is removed. This has the secondary effect of bladder / bowel shrinkage and eventual athrophy of these muscles, which also increases the frequency of voiding but also decreases each volumn. Since the bladder and bowels have athropied, this becomes an unreversable process. Any other process, ie focusing on bladder/bowel content and focusing on release although might increase ones frequency and decrease volumn, it does not address the alarm process. As a result, in obtaining the goal of diaper dependance similar to a baby, all it addresses is diaper dependance, but does not improve ones standard of life - and that type of concept of addressing an issue without addressing and/or improving ones quality of life is a common behaviour of the medical industry. Quality of life is usually dismissed in favour, in the medical industry, of profit generation., and that, many people here have experienced first hand.

-I +E Meet

-U + I Tidy

-E +Y -L +S -G +B -B +T -G +D stud

guys - remove the l, and add s keeping u,g,y and rearranging them by swapping u and g position and placing the new s at the end.

@Kaylaindiapers, Voyeurs on this and other sites tend to troll loking for females online due to, in reality, being ostracized for similar behaviour in real life. To answer your question, on this site there is no real way to block a person, but you can 'ignore' a member and their posts etc. This is done by moving your mouse up to the person's avatar and waiting until the full version of their profile shows. At the bottom of that box is three buttons, and by clicking on the button on the left labelled 'Ignore'. This will open a page with a selection of check boxes for you to select as you wish. At the bottom of said page is a confim button. In relation to stopping someone accessing your profile, I suggest you contact moderators and see how they might help you.

This person has damaged ALL fetishes as well as all incontinent and disabled in the world. He has made us all a target for the self-righteous, and will cause sweeping changes, not for the better of woman/mankind worldwide. The last person with the 'self righteous agenda was A.Hitler with his belief that the German Aryan Race of people where selected by God to be the master race - and with that concept, plunged the world into war and systematically murdered over 85 million people starting with German disabled and continuing on from there. The prior group was under the auspises of 'Holy Wars' and 'Crusades' and murdered approx 60% of the world population whilst also destroying data centres of information forever - i.e. the Library of Alexandria. The actions of this religious group continued worldwide with child abuse and murders until circa 1980s. It was not until the growth of the internet that some of the actions of the Catholic Church was identified and somewhat addressed, yet they have multiple excuses, the richest corporation in the world by far, for not paying compensation to victims / their families. This is one of the groups, I suspect, that will get on the bandwagon critizing people in the world for their sins of non vanilla sex / sex outside marriage / females working etc - which will be a direct attack on all fetishes, and also used as a source of blaim - i.e. God made you disabled due to the sins of your parents etc., and should be cast out of society and stoned to death. This same attitude was applied to many different demographics of people over history - the people of Jewish faith, the people born with dark skin, orphaned children, disabled people, women, and on and on. In the relevant era, it was accepted by everyone to treat these people as chattel (not as human beings), and toss them out with less care and attention one would treat an animal. This type of behaviour I expect from, and driven by the same group of people, and the actions of that person will be the excuse / catalyst. As I said, I fear for the future of all humanity now.

If what is being portrayed in the videos etc of this person is in anyway true, there will be hell to pay, not only for the person that done this, but for all in food industries worldwide - direct and indirect action of Health Services. Secondly, Starbucks has over 35k stores worldwide with a staff count of 402k+. This will effect Starbucks bottom line FOREVER, and it being a $32+ billion company, they can easily afford legal representation to chase and destroy not only that employee, but all who copy and repeat said video. As a result, @DailyDi, I strongly suggest that you or the mods delete ALL links to that story as a preventive measure. From a personal and professional perspective, the actions, even if it is fiction, will affect all and every non vanilla fetish. When one looks at the history of what was refered to as Witch Trials and/or Nazism, these all were started by a misinformed public opinion and fuel was added to it by one or two people's twisted beliefs. The last time an AB was in public, a politician, Sen Tom Coburn tried to make capital on it. Now, this is a $32+ billion company with an agenda, and if it effects the companies profits as it inevitably will, they now will act with a vengance to destroy all that directly / indirectly effect their bottom line. With a company this large, I expect a queue of people beating a path to their door inorder to pedal their agenda. I wouldn't be surprised if some bible basher joins this circus. In a word, I am scared, not only for myself, but for all involved in any fetish that is any way different than vanilla sex.

That vcr in my post was one of the first built for the domestic market, but was shortly replaced by VHS (of JVC fame) 1976 and BETAMAX (of Sony fame) JVC VHS Recorder Later model JVC VHS Recorder VHS Tape Betamax Sony Recorder Later Sony Betamax model Betamax Tape In relation to radio and tv, very high frequency (VHF) signal modulation did not come into existance until 1946. Ultra high frequency UHF was introduced in 1959, but used to suffer from interference in damp-wet weather. As a result, world wide tv frequencies were shifted to cable and now digital signals. FM (frequency modulated) was not used commonly due to the cost in manufacturing signal locking technology required (PLL or phased locked loop) with FM transmission. It wasn't until the late 1960s with the invention of the transistor and integrated circuit that FM became affordable. Instead AM (amplitude modulated) transistor based circuits - radio was popular, but it is a combination of Long Wave, Medium Wave and Short Wave signals. Shortwave signals, in certain weather areas, could bounce off the ionosphere so that a short wave signal could be transmitted in USA and reach Europe. The Shortwave transciever was the beginning of CB radio popular in the US with long distance truck drivers, and also, what is classed as HAM radio operators (shortened version of the phrase Amateur radio operators). As a result, the FM/VHF TV you show is roughly from 1975-1980 where it had transistor circuits and some other semicondutors in it including silicon diodes. The radiogram I showed is from 1960 era, and has only glass vacuum tubed (valves) as both diodes and amplifiers. Vacuum tube / valves from before 1966, transistors invented in 1947, but not in mainstream use until 1966, and ICs (integrated circuits) invented in 1959, but not in mainstream until late 1970s. Valve amplifiers have made a comeback due to the valves ability to amplify and provide rich sound without 'colouring' the audio, unlike the technically pure transistor and digital circuits. Some might remember how tinny the old telephones used to be, that was due to their design and inability to handle bass audio frequencies - one of the reason that the newer (1980+ technology) included bass boost / loudness switch as a feature in some audio equiptment. Surprisingly, Apple added that function to the media function within their phones. SMT or surface mount technology components on roughly twice the size of the above image, and invented in 1960, but even by 1986, was used in only 10% of devices. These are just miniture versions of the integrated circuits where some of the components are smaller than the width of a human hair - which without this level of miniturization, items such as cell phones, laptop computers, mp3 players etc would not exist.

I used Google translate, and it was quotes from two post, plus 'view source', copy - translate to english, toggle translate, translate to Chineese, and then paste. I am lucky to understand English letters, never mind Han - Chinese charachters. 🤪

and even that is not enough for you. What do you want me to do The lady doth protest too much, methinks! ... and it seems also to me that said person has nothing else to do in life now but protest and fight despite pages of evidence. I am not here to baby-sit, pacify, or add to anyones fantasy, and for someone expecting me to do that for them without the courtesy of asking me in the first place, you know where they can go - as a result, I think I have given this person amply oppertunity and laid down enough for them - so from now on, that person is blocked, as what they say / post, is nothing to me now. In relation to actual dress styles, see here and make your own decision. No matter where in the world you come from, and the people that have left their own country for a holiday or exploration will be fully aware of this, local belief and attidude is local, and usually coloured by a few outspoken people. When one leaves the limited area of their hometown etc., they find out about how sheltered they were reguardless of the size of their hometown. i.e., it can be said about an Austrailian person (using this as an example since Australia is so large) it is not until they leave Austrailia would they be exposed to vastly different cultures, beliefs, styles etc. The terminology is 'small town mentality' which is incorrectly named but aptly described as it doesn't have to be a small town, but the attitude of one or more outspoken people can force a belief. The Catholic Church have done similar to a huge portion of the world population - so it doesn't have to be a 'small town' to have a limited vision.

I'm almost twice your age.... I remember where phones had buttons A and B, and a big dial, and to make a call while not at home you had to go into a phone box with a handful of coins. Very few people had a home phone, and that was big and black and had a dial too - and making / recieving a local call was rare - and to make a long distance call you had to ask an operator to do it for you. I also had a mobile phone that was as heavy as a brick, where all I could do was make or recieve phone calls. Text messages didn't exist until past 1992, and internet....well that was a trip to the local libary where to find a book you needed to look up microfiche (a small screen where the image of a plastic film of tiny titles were cut into it, and light was shone thru it via a magnifying glass). I also remember my father paying almost the price of a car for a VCR, and the tapes were big and square and could record, badly, about 30-45 mins of TV. This is in the day before VHS and pre-recorded tapes. A neighbour went away on holidays, and due to them owning a colour T.V. asked my parents to take care of it while they were away. This colour TV took two people to lift and was as deep as it was high. My father plugged it in our house for the week, so we had a colour TV for a week until they came back. In the house was a piece of furniture, about the size of a fireplace with one big speaker in the bottom, doors on each side that allowed one to stack 78 records, and in the middle, across the full width, a coloured back lit glass with writing on it. Under the glass was a series of large buttons that selected the functions (LW, MW, SW1, SW2, SW3, Phono, Aux, Off) That was the radio. At the top, was a lid that hinged open where one could stack 4-5 records on it and switch same on - and it played each record in turn. The kettle in the kitchen was a big and brass, with a coil in its base and a thick black cable snakeing its way up to the only socket in the kitchen, which also had a big switch on it marked Cooker. The cooker had three black flat coils on its top, and a grill at the top of it as the only way to make toast etc. In a back room was two items, a big metal cabinet that pluged in, had a large metal lid that hinged open, and inside, had a row of wooden dowels to hang clothes. Beside it was a larger machine with two metal lids on it that lifted off. It also had a drain tap on the bottom of each that my mother connected a hose to when it was running. In between the two drums was a mangle, and the left drum, when running, would go back and foward a little bit and need to be filled with water from the kettle. The right drum when running ran at high speed would spin the clothes. I remember seeing my mother taking the clothes from the left drum with a wooden tongs, and placing them via the mangle, into the right drum. Then she would take the clothes from the right drum and hang them over the wooden dowels in the cabinet drier and switch that on, and leave them for a while to dry. How many people remember all these, and learning to use same? Comparing those to what is here today, I think that todays generation are kinda spoilt a little. They are talking of social media - it was 1992 that the first text message was sent (30 years ago). Before that, if you wanted to send someone a message, it was either pen and paper - i.e. a letter and a stamp to post it, OR you could actually talk to someone either in person or with a telephone - where people actually had a home number... and it was usually cheaper to call out to them in person, than to make a telephone call.

@stevewet it is understandable that the district nurse insisted that the nappies were taken away, cause you been put in nappies was telling your mind to continue the voiding behaviour you had as a baby. I would have expected that at times - i.e. when you were overtired and/or unwell, you would have messed said nappies sometimes. It was a bad idea of the continence nurse to re-issue you with nappies, but that was the concept of the era and what went through their mind - there is a problem so I must do something. Issuing nappies is something I can do, so therefore, I have addressed the problem cause I did something. It never crossed their mind that the something they did was incorrect, after all, they were given the power to issue nappies, so someone must think that is a good idea. Your parents trusted the continence nurse, after all, s/he is supposed to have dealt with this before. The reason that your bed wetting lasted until your 20s was, prior to that you weren't interested in dating. I don't know you from Adam, but can surmise that due to the bed wetting, you socially isolated yourself. It was not until you started working / became interested in another where wearing nappies would preclude, at that time, you bringing another home OR the effort involved in the morning with dealing with a wet nappy meant that you presumed that you would have a baby smell all day in work. It is surprising how the mind works, and how one seemingly unrelated item can change a persons life. In your case it was work OR a possible partner. The fact that you went back to nappies is probably due to the security etc that you felt in younger life, and is also probably due to the stress you feel in the workplace. It is creating, in your mind, a time where your self percieved social awkwardness is an advantage. After all, a baby is not socially isolated as everything a baby does is considered cute. In reality, your self isolation in your youth up to age 20 would have placed you to focus on what is around you, rather than people around you. This tends to increase your ability within academia, and I would expect that your one of the smarter people in most rooms, but due to your self driven insecurity, you are unable to show it and prefer a work associate to speak instead of yourself. This has probably been happening all your life, where these work-freinds have been promoted over you, but it is based on your ability and skillset, not theirs. My best advise to you is to grow a pair. You are better than those around you, and you know it but you need to show it. I don't know how long you are in your current job, but if it is longer than 5 years, you need to change company - not skillset, company as you have become comfortable. You need a place that will push you, but you need to push yourself harder than anyone else ever could - after all, you know your own limits, and those limits should be a goal of yours to exceed.

I would have to agree. When children start bed wetting, there are many ways it can be handled, each have their costs and gains. The goal is to get the child to learn how to survive the night without wetting the bed either by the child reducing the need to urinate OR by the need to urinate waking the child so the child can void in a toilet. Place diapers / pullups on the child - this supports the action, and reinforces the behaviour. The child will not stop as the need to stop has been eliminated as the child can wet the diaper/pull up and regress to infantile wetting behaviour. It is classed as coddling the child / forcing the child to regress. Complain to the child thus telling the child it is the childs fault with or without agressive behaviour. This increases the level of stress on the child which strips the child of energy. As a result, even if the child gets the signal to wake before wetting, the child is overtired and will sleep through. This type of stress has been found to exagerate the issue to such an extent that the child might also start soiling while asleep also, and this stress can be carried in daytime which can lead to issues with daytime control. Placing protection on the bed plus allowing the child, with the parents assistance, deal with it. This is almost the ideal situation, but has to be handled carefully. The child must not think, even if it is mentioned in teasing by siblings, that s/he is a baby cause s/he wets the bed. The protection on the bed must not resemble the plastic coating of a baby bed, and the relevant baby powder must not be used. The child normally drys up within a few weeks as the child learns to recognise the signals of needing to wet, which it takes as a wake-up alarm. It is advisable that the parent also wakes the child once in the middle of the sleep cycle as long as the child is not wet. If the child is wet, leave the child to deal with the wet bed in the following morning. If the child wets after the midnight wake, leave the child. The reason is so that the child does not loose out in sleep. Action #3 is commonly used by prior bedwetters (parents etc) for their children as the parent who was a bedwetter in their youth, knows from experience what they went through. Most good doctors / pedatricians will prescribe this form of treatment with/without an alarm system that works as an undersheet that wakes the child as soon as they start to wet. This concept is Pavlov's dog training, where the child is taught to associate a need to void with waking up. Unfortunately, this type of Pavlov dog training tends to reduce sleep cycles which can, without the alarm system, force the child into a deeper sleep as it is waiting on an alarm to tell it to wake to void. The reasons for bed wetting in a toilet trained person is the bladder is not large enough to hold the liquid being placed in it for the 7-9 hours of sleep. As a result, it needs to empty and will signal same to the sleeping person who is in too deep of a sleep to wake. the body is not producing enough vasopressin to reduce the quantity of liquid being placed in the bladder. the person was toilet trained in a rush, as a result, daytime control is reactive (rushing to a bathroom to void) instead of proactive (having learnt the signals when the bladder starts to expand, and schedule a bathroom visit in the next 15-45 minutes), and when the person relaxes - they revert to the normal (infantile) form of voiding (voiding as soon as any urge hits - which they are partially doing daytime but forcing a hold and rushing to a bathroom).

Translation from Chinese: Good Luck Translation from Chinese: Hello, can you only enter Chinese? @DiaperboyEddie12 if you are fluent Chinese, or can understand same, why not translate to English, the language of this site not only to assist @cxq, but also to bring her into the conversation? Chinese Translation of above: @DiaperboyEddie12 如果你的中文很流利，或者能听懂，为什么不翻译成英文，这个网站的语言不仅可以帮助 @cxq 还可以让她参与对话？

true, unless I am messy and need to change while out in public. Then I have to be in a germy public potty for longer than normal... a situation I try to avoid as much as possible. Let's put it this way, I was about 2 hour drive from home when I had a messy diaper, so instead of trying to change in a germy public toilet, I got back into my car, put a baby changing pad (12" square absorbant pad with plastic backing) on my seat, sat on it with the messy diaper, and drove back home. Yes, the diaper leaked a bit due to pressure etc and the mess was a lot larger than it would have been if I had changed in the public potty, but I still think it was better to change at home - after all, Theodore (see avatar) was there as was a warm shower and all the comforts of home.

I really don't care your age or where you came from as I am tired of your misrepresentations all based on your fantasy, and inablity to remember the details. You are talking about 70 odd years ago, where not only the concepts that you are mentioning of you, a male, being exposed to anything female is false, nobody had money to splurge on something a frivilous as clothes and/or diapers for anyone aged 24 months or older etc. Your actual memories didn't develop for you to recall until you were at least 4 years of age, and even the youngest member here can't, recall to the detail you profess, what happened when they were 4. Nearly everybody made their own clothes to whatever style they wanted, or passed it down from elder to younger etc. Here is a picture from New England in 1964 of four children, two girls and two boys where the two girls are wearing the normal dresses of the day in the area, NONE are baby dolls. All of them are ABOVE the knee, which was the common style of the day. The shorter, younger girl (approx 8-12 years of age) is wearing a normal dress, but something that is important, the style worldwide, which is NOT being copied in New England. In the picture to the right, in a brown skirt, is another picture from the World Fair, New England in 1964, Across the world is shorter and shorter hemlines which proves my point that New England and its styles are 'SMALL TOWN MENTALITY'. This is in the middle of the swinging 60's where the two styles were prevalant - short skirts and long flowing dresses, none are in small towns with the prudish 'reserved' mentality. Baby dolls of 1942, 1950s and 1960s Direct Quote from the page, and some of its images.... Although synonymous with 1950’s and 1960’s style, the baby doll nightdress as we know it actually originated in 1942. Its creation is attributed to American lingerie designer Sylvia Pedlar, a charmingly positive response to fabric shortages during World War II when necessity resulted in striking style solutions across the fashion industry. Pedlar ran her own successful company Iris Lingerie from 1929 to 1970, and was known for high quality products as well as developing the Baby Doll and her famous toga-inspired negligee. Despite these designs becoming known as ‘Baby Dolls’, no doubt because the shape and length resembled baby’s frocks of the time, it’s said that Sylvia herself actually disliked the term and refused to use it. The name found its way into more common use in the 1950s when it was popularised by the controversial 1956 film ‘Baby Doll.’ Based on a play by Tennessee Williams, and starring Carroll Baker in the title role as a 19 year old Lolita-styled character, the film has been credited by some as being responsible for the ensuing popularity of the baby doll nightgown, which Baker’s character wears. InIn In the seven images of baby-doll in the pattern book of 1960, only two of the designs have any waistband, and every one has exposed panties since the hem / edge of the dress is at the waistline of the model. A babydoll dress is one that :- easy to make since it does not have the complication of a bodice optimizes material functional for babies, and expose the diaper OR for adults and has similar short hemline a copy of similar coats, for that age group. was copied for the obese, and this one has an elastic at the top, no shoulder straps, and is made by using a large rectangular piece of material with a normal hem and the top is gathered in with the elastic which forces pleats in the whole skirt. As I have said before, and continue to say, it is only in the fantasy mind of @Little BabyDoll Christine that baby-dolls went to the knee or others, as when made for a baby, the function was to cover their top while exposing their diapers. When made for someone older, it was a night dress, and designed as sexual, functional, and as a clothing solution while material was in short supply. Most, if not all dresses for young girls were above the knee and usually slightly lower than the waist line which just covered the panty area. If these girls were wearing any form of cloth diaper, the diaper would ALWAYS be exposed. I really don't care how prudish @Little BabyDoll Christine wants to be, but in 1950-1970, it wasn't unusual to see young girls in such short skirts and dresses, and it was a trend to shorten this hem line, from 1910 it went from ankle length to knee lenght by 1927, and then further up to mid thigh 1940-45, and hip high by 1950-1960, and then hankerchief 1960+ (the era of the baby-doll and that of the mini-skirt and of the roaring 60s). This trend reversed later on in 1970 with styles like diagonal and/or short in front and long in rear. This also matches the growth in material availability. It seems that @Little BabyDoll Christine percieves that the large skirt/dress that is the stereotypical wear of obese old female tourists that normally has flowers on it and has an elastic / tie of a kind that comes from above / middle of the breasts and extends to the knee or below the knee and has been worn by both genders, is a baby-doll. The truth is that it's history is from a trapeze, created by Yves St. Laurent in 1958 where its original creation had a bodice with an A-line shape, and this morphed over time to cover the growing number of obese people in the world. The original also is similar to the Empire Waistline of the 1950s and 1960s, but the Empire Waistline fits / suits very thin people where the trapeze with its A line shape reduced to just be the puff / lantren sleeves and a realitivly wide neck and long hemline without a waistband inbetween tends to hide the extensive fat on the oversized wearer. This has been used in comedy - i.e. where Homer Simson wore one in the episode 'King Size' S07E07, but it is NOT a baby-doll, but a variation of the trapeze. A baby-doll would not waste that amount of material as it was not needed AND unavailable at the time something that @Little BabyDoll Christine seems to dismiss. With the amount of material used in the trapeze, one could make two baby-dolls of similar size - i.e. clothe two children with the same material to clothe one. Now, can we get back on topic please!!!! Wearing any form of dress, the shorter the better, and that is always a win for me. I even don't like wearing a onesie over my diaper, and today, modern babies are sometimes just dressed in a top / t-shirt and let run around with their diaper exposed, a concept caught onto by, and supported by Huggies when the created the 'Jeans Diaper'. This has been mimicked by other baby diaper makers when they fully colour the outer layer of the diaper - i.e. make it so it is not just white. This has been done so long that the plain white baby diaper is almost an antique.