Jump to content

My New Religion


Recommended Posts

Posted

Had a dream the other night that revealed to me the truth about the end times! I dreamt that the rapture came and we were all taken to purgatory. But purgatory was not the land of nothingness that we have been told. It was a giant transportation hub where you waited to be taken to heaven. The good news is everyone goes to heaven! The downside - based on how you lived your life you may have to wait longer for your turn to ride!

Live well, help those in need and get your reservation near the front of the line!

  • Like 2
Posted

Last night i dreamed i had a concussion and my eyes got infected and they had to be removed.

O_o

sometimes dreams need to be taken with a grain of salt.

xD

Posted

You ever get that feeling that you had a dream, but don't remember anything at all about it?

Yes! And it drives me crazy because I am always convinced it had to be a good one!

Posted

Daily,

I like that idea.

I'm not sure if there is a Heaven, but if there is a way there, yours makes more sense than most.

Posted

Had a dream the other night that revealed to me the truth about the end times! I dreamt that the rapture came and we were all taken to purgatory. But purgatory was not the land of nothingness that we have been told. It was a giant transportation hub where you waited to be taken to heaven. The good news is everyone goes to heaven! The downside - based on how you lived your life you may have to wait longer for your turn to ride!

Live well, help those in need and get your reservation near the front of the line!

I think that you are spending too much time of your life waiting in queues, and trying to rationalize it with your dreams by creating a possible happy resolution to the queue. Sigmund Freud would have a field day with this one.

  • Like 2
Posted

sigmund freud has been mostly debunked.

i am an athiest.

sounds like a cool dream though.

i dreampt the other night my mother was driving a car, my brother was in the front seat and i was a passenger in the back. she drove the van going like 60 miles an hour over a median strip and into a house, our car came to a stop in the bathroom of the house...

i haven't spoken to my mother or brother in 3 years and i wear diapers... wahts this dream trying to tell me? lol

  • Like 1
Posted

I've had a few reoccurring dreams that ended up happening IRL, with different results each time (both in the dreams and IRL). I've also had some seriously weird dreams that completely obliterate the fabric of reality... Most often, my dreams are weird enough that my mind can't fool itself into thinking it's not a dream. Thus, I've perty much been able to lucid dream since I was a little kid. So, yes, one has to be careful about taking dreams too seriously.

Personally, I'd avoid making life-changing decisions based on any dream... And the main problem with trying to figure out the afterlife is that you have to be dead to get there... But only you can really decide what's right for you...

Posted

sigmund freud has been mostly debunked.

i am an athiest.

sounds like a cool dream though.

i dreampt the other night my mother was driving a car, my brother was in the front seat and i was a passenger in the back. she drove the van going like 60 miles an hour over a median strip and into a house, our car came to a stop in the bathroom of the house...

i haven't spoken to my mother or brother in 3 years and i wear diapers... wahts this dream trying to tell me? lol

That debunkers have been debunked and that there is a God who wants to re-unite you with your mother and brother in the bathroom of heaven. Fortunately, they will let you wear diapers there.

angel_not.gif

  • Like 3
Posted

cool dream, there is no purgatory though. It was invented by Pope Technoclitan(don't quote me on spelling) III as a means to drum up additional income for the RCC. The original slogan was a "A coin in the coffer ring, a soul from purgatory spring." In regards to the dream, I'd imagine since we're a special folk, we'd be riding the short bus. :P Ours would be the most rocking though.

I've had many cool theological like dreams when I was younger, nowadays I don't remember most of my dreams.

Posted

I envy your sleep DD, I've not had a proper one since my new mattress arrived with the dodgy springs digging into me..

Posted

I'm putting Heavy Metal on the census next year, if 9999 more people do it, it becomes an official religion :D

Abrera,

mathematically, according to your information of 10,000 people are required to form an official religion, ABDL IS a religion. :roflmao:

Praise and hail to the bringer and changer of diapers. We worship and adorn you.

  • Like 2
Posted

Woo hoo, tax exempt diapers religious garments

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Posted

But people must put it on the census for it to be real. It happened with Jedi in the post-millennium census :D

Speaking as a Star Wars fan, the Jedi religion folks are a little too weird for me. I may adhere to the tenets of the Jedi philosophy in my daily life, but I'm not going to walk around in robes and wave my lightsaber, much as I may want to sometimes. An AB/DL religion would be interesting. I wonder whether the diaper would qualify as the object of worship for some or merely as an icon of faith? <_<

Nice view of Purgatory, Daily. Certainly a lot nicer than Dante's version.

Posted

I'm not an atheist, but a lot of your posts are more comforting than what's coming out of the Vatican these days! :screwy: I know my diaper life makes sense to me :)

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm not an atheist, but a lot of your posts are more comforting than what's coming out of the Vatican these days! :screwy: I know my diaper life makes sense to me :)

Speaking as a Catholic, there are days when I'd be hard-pressed not to agree with you. Our faith does produce some interesting and varied perspectives (how is it we can produce both the likes of Mother Teresa and Pat Buchanan?).

Diasprum vobiscum (may the diaper be with you). :thumbsup:

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, and Thomas Merton! As a good addition. I'm still comfy in my diapy though. :D

  • 15 years later...
Posted
On 4/12/2010 at 9:24 PM, sarah_ab said:

 

 

i haven't spoken to my mother or brother in 3 years and i wear diapers... what's this dream trying to tell me? lol

Sounds like you need to call them.

Posted
On 4/14/2010 at 3:57 PM, JDL23 said:

 

 

Speaking as a Star Wars fan, the Jedi religion folks are a little too weird for me. I may adhere to the tenets of the Jedi philosophy in my daily life, but I'm not going to walk around in robes and wave my lightsaber, much as I may want to sometimes. An AB/DL religion would be interesting. I wonder whether the diaper would qualify as the object of worship for some or merely as an icon of faith? <_<

 

Nice view of Purgatory, Daily. Certainly a lot nicer than Dante's version.

What would you worship ? Diapers themselves…or the contents ? Not too thrilled about offering divine worship to a lump of fresh warm steamy poo. 
 

Flatulence is a different story. 😅

  • Haha 1
Posted

This  tread got me to join  Dailydiapers

I just had to share my  death on the operating table.

  yes there is a bright  light drawing  thousand of paper like chad to it ,, yes  there are also the hot fires of someplace else ,, i was drawn to the light and said to self no i dont want to 

 and was fighting the draw  untill i felt and intense heat  and said to self whoa  and fought  my way forward  kind of like swimming against a stream  i found a ledge  and climb up on .

 between the light and flame a Body was being built  and lil chad like thing where  coming back  from the light and from the flame ,, a lot more from the light btw.

i sat and  watched in fascination.  and after a while some one came over from the boys  that was forming   and said he was the foreman   and they where not ready for me yet.  i was welcome to hang around .  next thing i knew  i was awake and everyone in in operating room  was very relived .  I was dead for about 3 min and  they had used a defibrillator to get me back .

 Still in no hurry to die but know  when i do i will become part of something new is very reassuring. 

hugs  L-M

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Sorry to go all religious, but this thread is heading that way...

Yes, I have toyed with the human enforced rules where 10,000 members makes a religion, but that concept is based on not knowing a true religion. Is there a true religion. There very well might be, but there is no one that can prove it.

St. Peter was showing a new soul around heaven. He pointed out different groups of people saying 'There are the Mormans, there are the Islam followers, there are the people of the Jewish faith' when the soul asked St. Peter, 'what is behind the giant wall', where St. Peter replied 'Shush... they are the Christians... and they think that they are the only ones here.

It is a human trait - arrogance - to think that x group is the 'true' religion where one dismisses every other one as fake. It reminds me of Beni Gabor, in the film The Mummy when he is accosted by the Mummy, Beni repeats, while holding the relevant organised religious icons (Cross, Crescent Moon etc), in the original language (English, Arabic, Chinese & Hebrew) of the organised religion a phrase similar to 'God help me' to the multiple deities, where Imhotep (the Mummy) recognizes Hebrew as the language of the Slaves that built the specific pyramid.

This is an example of one trying to cover all bases in how a gambler would bet on all in a race, understanding that one of them would be the winner. In my humble opinion, what Beni does, is in direct oposite to each of the 'true' religious groups, where both are arrogance.

Religious belief, in my humble opinion, is based on one or anothers interpretation of certain verses in either the Bible, Quran or whatever text that one choses. However, something that most people tend to forget, and/or organised religion tends to gloss over is:-

  1. The source material is just a group of stories with a message of some form. It was the way those messages were taught to an audience that had little formal education, and may not have had the ability to read and/or write. As a result, the message was put in a story format, as a way to pass the message to as much people as possible.
  2. The books of reference are usually translated from the original language, where errors occur in the translation.
  3. Organised religion tend to move events to suit their calendar.
  4. The books / scrolls etc. were all wrote by humans.
  5. Certain peoples misunderstanding tend to change and manipulate to their advantage - it is said that history is wrote by the survivors. Who are the survivors other than the cowards and the victors - where the victors will record what shows them in the best light, and the people that were defeated as weak and/or not worthy to survive. As a result, our history is, by default, coloured.  

Example 1: In the Adam & Eve story, Eve is supposed to be 'of Adam' and made from Adam's rib. - Is it more likely that the 'Adam' was of both genders where the genders were created / seperated to create the two dominant ones - since we are all capable of developing either female / male organs but due to a chemical, we make one dominant and the other recessive. Still, in some places in the world, female are subservient to males based on the misunderstanding that female is 'of male'. Even in the etmology of the words man / woman, the history of the word woman is 'of' man.

Example 2: A serpent (animal) communicated with a human and convinced the human to eat of the Apple tree, the tree that Adam & Eve was told not to eat of.... and since they did eat of same, were banished from said garden.

For this to hold true, then this supreme all knowing and all powerful being must have, similar to the failings of some humans, manipulated the situation, and the behaviour of Adam & Eve, to engineer the banishment.... but also knew that Adam & Eve would not do as told. This is also the root and source of heaven & hell etc.... what the some religious groups use as a way to manipulate the flock. 

Example 3: In this 'Garden of Eden', Adam & Eve felt shame after eating the apple. Shame from whom? There was only the two of them, both exactly the same age (a few days old), related either as brother/sister or husband/wife! How many people ask their pet to leave the room while they are getting dressed? How many 1-2 year olds seek privacy, and Adam & Eve was only a few days old. How many life partners feel uncomfortable naked around each other. Therefore, why is nakedness / genitalia exposure shameful / embarrasing for Adam & Eve?

In 443 BCE, rome created a role of Censur to manage the Census (counting the population), and extended the role to address moral issues, where they deemed that exposed genitalia was shameful. In 1545-1563, the Council of Trent issued a decree against "all lasciviousness" in religious art, leading to the widespread use of fig leaves etc. to cover genitalia. This is the same group that created a hieracal order, sent preist to be educated which deemed that the followers were to thick to understand the stories within the relevant books. This is a mimic of what the elders / pharasees (political group) are depicted as doing in these books - keeping the teachings of the stories to themselves as they deemed that these teachings were only for the elite etc.

We all have witnessed this same behaviour from our elected politicians, the so called people that were elected to be our representive and not our parent / caretaker! This is where they are confused between the title 'leader' and 'representive'.

What would have happened if this elected roman person had decided that exposed noses was shameful?

These images / feeling are being enforced on Adam & Eve, and all decendents based on what the one or more people wished to enforce. This means that between the beginning of time, the time Adam & Eve ate of the Apple, and 433BCE / 1563 , shame did not exist until some human decided it did!

Example 4: In this garden was a Tree of Life, and an apple tree was the Tree of Knowledge of Good & Evil. Does this mean that if I feed a baby apples / applesauce, the baby will instantly know of shame & good & evil? Secondly, when Adam & Eve was banished from the Garden of Eden, they lost access to the Tree of Life. If the Tree of Knowledge was also in the same Garden we all would have lost access to that also, which would deem that apple trees do not exist, and since said apple tree does not exist, why do we feel shame?

Example 5: If the Almighty is supposed to love us unconditionally, why would he, or any loving parent, set up Adam and Eve, and all humans (his children) to fail? This is a human behaviour, and not the behaviour of one that loves us unconditionally!

Example 6: In the story of the birth of the Almighty, it is said he was born in a stable / barn with the animals in mid winter (December 25th ). However, in Bethleham, the houses were on stilts (to keep cool in the hot summers, but to allow the storage of animals below same in the winter months so the rising heat from the amimals would heat the house above.) Out buildings such as stables/barns did not exist. Secondly, December is usually wet, and the animals would still be out in the fields. The spring lambs would not be born until March-April. December is the time of the pagan mid-winter festival, which the church wanted to dismiss.

Conclusion: Understanding the methodology of the day of passing teachings by stories, plus the stories were simplified and also linked (as a way of supplying a point of reference for the listener) to the current understandings of human life at that time, it deems that the stories with said book are not to be taken literally or factually, but where one has to extract the messages within to understand the teachings.

In the story of Adam & Eve, is the message that our parents are created by one all powerful being, where s/he endowed our parents to create offspring - us? 

This is also the strenght and failings of a religious belief - one has to believe without proof. In relation to not beliving in a supreme being of one form or another, have a look at the following...

In a mother’s womb were two babies. One asked the other: “Do you believe in life after delivery?” The other replied, “Why, of course. There has to be something after delivery. Maybe we are here to prepare ourselves for what we will be later.”

“Nonsense” said the first. “There is no life after delivery. What kind of life would that be?”

The second said, “I don’t know, but there will be more light than here. Maybe we will walk with our legs and eat from our mouths. Maybe we will have other senses that we can’t understand now.”

The first replied, “That is absurd. Walking is impossible. And eating with our mouths? Ridiculous! The umbilical cord supplies nutrition and everything we need. But the umbilical cord is so short. Life after delivery is to be logically excluded.”

The second insisted, “Well I think there is something and maybe it’s different than it is here. Maybe we won’t need this physical cord anymore.”

The first replied, “Nonsense. And moreover if there is life, then why has no one has ever come back from there? Delivery is the end of life, and in the after-delivery there is nothing but darkness and silence and oblivion. It takes us nowhere.”

“Well, I don’t know,” said the second, “but certainly we will meet Mother and she will take care of us.”

The first replied “Mother? You actually believe in Mother? That’s laughable. If Mother exists then where is She now?”

The second said, “She is all around us. We are surrounded by her. We are of Her. It is in Her that we live. Without Her this world would not and could not exist.”

Said the first: “Well I don’t see Her, so it is only logical that She doesn’t exist.”

To which the second replied, “Sometimes, when you’re in silence and you focus and you really listen, you can perceive Her presence, and you can hear Her loving voice, calling down from above.”

It is not my words, but from Life after Delivery...  by Dr. Wayne Dwyer.

Beliving in a supreme being is a totally individual process that cannot and should not be dictated by another, which in my humble opinion, is being monitized by so many different organised religious groups to such an extent, I normally refer to such religious groups as 'Religious Groups Ltd., since that is all they are - a for profit business selling a concept where no-one has ever came back to challenge them. If these 'religious groups' followed their own teachings, there would not be one poor / disadvantaged person in the world.

This is also an inbuilt failings of humanity - nobody, despite what they say, has the answer. The failing in us is that we expect there to be an answer, so we make it up.

@DailyDi dream is, when analysed, where the human brain tries to make sense of random ideas and concepts. In normal everyday life, we are in a queue of some sort, where some of them are for a procedure that is objectionable to us, however as an adult, we know and trust that it is eventually for our self gain. When we dream, we can place a more benificial gain to a queue, and in DailyDi's case, joined an unknown, life after death, to the concept of eternal life in heaven, where the waiting place was allocated as purgatory. @curiositykilledthecat correctly mentioned that the concept of purgatory was created. Its roots is from the slogan "As soon as the coin in the coffer rings, the soul from purgatory springs" by Johann Tetzel, a Dominan Friar during the 16th century for selling indulgences, which were papal documents that, according to the Catholic Church at the time, reduced the time a soul would spend in purgatory. Martin Luther famously critiqued this practice in his Ninety-Five Theses, arguing that it was a corruption of the church and that salvation could not be bought with money.

@DailyDi's dream is as true as everyone elses - where one waits in purgatory in a queue to enter heaven when one takes both ideas of purgarory and heaven as human equivilants of what we do not understand. When linked with the unconditional love of this being, it would logically make sence that there is a place in heaven for everyone of us.

@JDL23 whether you follow and/or believe in the Jedi faith or Catholism, the fundementals of both are the same = we are all His/Her children and we are supposed to respect and love each other as our brother and sister. I am not saying that is easy, and these books say the same Mark 10.25 It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God. If read literally, then there is a kingdom, where no person can enter.... however, this is a story adjusted to suit the audience of the day. The concept of a kingdom is where there is a ruler and subjects, but other parts of the same books identify as a loving father and children where the concept of subservience does not exist. It is more to do with love and respect instead of servitude. The second part of the text refers to a rich man, but in all cases, where one is rich / wealthy, it was created on profit, which is exploitation of one or more other people.

In relation to comparison of a good and bad person in our opinion, that is us judging another. If we had the ability to understand, would we be so critical? Unfortunately, we do not have the ability to know everything about everyone else. This information is limited by our ability to communicate, which itself is flawed as it allows for misunderstanding and people to jump to conclusions. In natural human behaviour, we tend to judge others and guess without all the information. This is easily seen when one sees a part of an object, and our brain fills in the rest based on what we expect to see. Our brain also fills in the rest based on what we expect to be told, which creates the errors within our understanding.

The concept of beliving and following another is blind belief in an idea where in our current perspective, similar to the two babies in the womb and their limited perspective, we simply do not, and cannot have all the information. In our current perspective, we can see the mistakes that these two babies are making, and the root of their mistake is that they do not have the information that relates to living outside the womb / life after birth. Similarly, we do not have, and never did have the information that relates to life after death. As a result, those people who claim to know 'this' such as those from any religious group, are both arrogant and incorrect, but are also correct based on all known information.

Logically, therefore, all religions must be incorrect, but in the same view and for the same reason, they all must be correct.

Diapers as a Religion

In the group of attendees here, we all chose, in some form, diapers and/or regression as some form of self soothing / comfort. Due to both the ignorance and self-righteousness and the lack of exposure to this interest within organised religions, this diaper interest is not addressed. It does not deem that organised religions will accept this behaviour, but in the tennets of the relevant books Bible / Quran etc., this type of self care is not only excepted, but required. It is your free choice and responsibility to take care of yourself medically, mentally, physically and spiritually.

  • Medically - it is more benificial to your skin care and bilogical functions to use diapers rather than use indewelling aparatus.
  • Mentally - one is calmer and less stressed when regressed. As a result, one can allow the power within the brain to deal with whatever issues one has while calmer, and if getting to this level is sucking on a pacifier / bottle etc., it is a lot better for you than alcohol / other form of drugs.
  • Physically - there is no long term damage to one physically in regression, other than maybe loosing bladder/bowel control.
  • Spiritually - the concept is to love another as yourself, and what is the greatest way one can love another other than taking care of their every need. To do same, one has to learn to love oneself completely - where self regression also leads to rebirth / regrowth and internal strength. We have all witnessed a child as they self-soothe. This level of internal peace that the child achieves is a goal for some of us, which allows us to accept the love of ourseves and others.

@DailyDi quoted 'free religious garments' with reference to diapers etc. This is the way the countries governments monitize and/or create exceptions for a comercial religious group, by allowing the garments of said religious organisation to be state paid. In actuality, these garments are being paid for by all citizens of that state / country, where the only person / people getting benifit is the ones who use these garments, but, based on these books, why do we need garments to adorn a religion? Would that not contradict

Exodus 20 “You shall have no other gods before[a] me. “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them;

.... or is this another section that was ignored by the Council of Trent as a way to excuse / allow the adorned robes, statues, stained glass and paintings, the golden icons of candle holders / chalices, within organised religious buildings?

In the film 'Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade', the task within is to find the Holy Grail or the cup/chalice used from the story of The Last Supper.  Indy: That's the cup of a carpenter where the cup / chalice is carved from wood, a skill taught by a carpenters earthly father to his son. This is where the writers, with reference to the relevant books, created this pseudo icon to as closely represent what the story of the Last Supper would use. Earlier in the film, Indy is faced with a leap of faith - where he has to believe beyond all reason, that he will not plumet to his death when he takes a step following the instruction Only in the leap from the lion's head will he prove his worth where the lion's head is carved over his head at the edge of a cliff. It is not until after taking the step does Indianna notice that the path he is on has been decorated to allign with the rocks to be perfect camouflage.

This is the leap of faith that we are told by that we need to take, and as humans, we tend to not trust it, but this mistrust is due to what we have learnt from other humans with the same failings of mistrust. 

A test, designed by Joseph Campos - The Visual Cliff was performed on crawling babies of different ages. 

The test was a gap in a pathway that was covered by clear glass, where the pathway way safe and no one could fall. The younger babies crawled across without hesitation, but as the age increased, the older babies hesitatied or simply refused to crawl across the gap. This is where these babies had been taught fear, and from their perspective, they did not understand that there was a safe path across the gap.

The original is 

Animals also have this same failing....

Similar has been created as a tourist atraction in Taihang Mountain in Hebei Province where installed on the bridge is a set of transperent monitors cued up with speakers that occasionally sound glass cracking while the monitors show images of cracked glass. 

We are human, with the inbuilt problem and gift of free will. We get paid for our labour, but according to the Beatles and others, one can't buy love and/or understanding, yet many organised religions are trying to sell us the path to eternal life. It is the ultimate con game, as if/when they fail to provide the product/service that they are selling, you can't come back to complain! If you really wish to look at this, Adam & Eve never read the terms and conditions of 'Apple' before the ate the Apple.

What every you chose to belive in, do it for your choice and reasons, and not for mine or others. After all, you are the only one that can answer for your free choice. Religious belief is firstly to accept ourselves, and then accept each other as our equal, and to step over the concept of borders and different nations. The idea of borders and its implementation was where human conflict between another human etc determined lines on a map. Religious belive is very simple - everyone is your brother/sister, and if one believes the Adam & Eve were the root father & mother of all of use, this deems that everyone is related to you. This is a very difficult concept, for some people, to accept. It really doesn't matter what your neighbour / brother / sister believes in (they have that free choice), it is up to you to just accept them and love them just because they are the same species of you....

and to quote Dave Allen, 'may your God go with you', and thanks for reading my rant!

Edited by babykeiff
Spelling and added content
Posted

That's a nice dream Daily Di! If there is no hell, then those who committed really evil crimes might be stuck for nearly eternity in a waiting room that's like the DMV. 🤣   I like the Ancient Egyptian mythology- the weighing of the heart against the feather of truth, and anyone whose heart is heavier than the feather gets their soul devoured by Ammit (monster was a mix of: crocodile head, lion front end and hippo back end xD) But that's mostly cuz I like monsters. 😂

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...