Jump to content

2011

2011 Survey Questions


11 topics in this forum

  1. In A Word... 1 2 3 4

    • 93 replies
    • 24k views
    • 40 replies
    • 11.9k views
  2. Down There! 1 2 3

    • 54 replies
    • 28.6k views
  3. Relationships 1 2 3 4

    • 80 replies
    • 22.2k views
  4. Nap Time! 1 2

    • 37 replies
    • 9.8k views
  5. Socially Acceptable 1 2 3 4

    • 82 replies
    • 21.5k views
  6. Crossing Over 1 2

    • 32 replies
    • 11.7k views
  7. Does That Make Me Crazy... 1 2

    • 31 replies
    • 10.1k views
  8. Vices 1 2

    • 39 replies
    • 11.3k views
    • 24 replies
    • 7.1k views
  9. Snack Time!

    • 16 replies
    • 4.6k views
  • llmed.jpg

  • Posts

    • Chicken noodle casserole 
    • @lilJester I once had a nice conversation with a Network just about that topic.  I asked them if they are going to force us to buy the whole package then let us choose which channels we want to watch. When I was living with my mom in Tennessee, we had like over 1,000 channels but I might just watch about 10. My stepdad might watch like maybe 5 channels.  And my mom had about 5 or 10 channels. I asked them why can't I just choose the channels that we watch and get rid of the rest.  And make it like $20 a month.  They said that they can not do that they gave me some of the lamest excuses.  As for the money they could charge everyone $20 a month and still make billions.  But they are so greedy they want all the money.  And for streaming services they have 3 or more tiers why do they need 3 tiers on there system just give 1 tier charge like $10 or $20 per month and that is it.  We pay these ass hats a lot of money and we still have to have ads on some of them which is stupid. Social security is definitely a scheme.  Watch this video then come back and tell us what Joe says.  You might be even more shocked. https://rumble.com/v5rtbgh-social-security-scheme.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_upp_v If everyone truely new that the wool was thrown over their head life in America would be different. 
    • I'd assume the word "fanciful" is defined somewhere in the preceding sections?  I looked it up and nowhere is it defined in 107 itself.  Since "fanciful" can be defined as simply "not rooted in hard fact", any depiction of someone over legal age as under legal age could be considered "fanciful". As such, I'd assume "fanciful" in this case is meant to reference "beyond any reasonable belief".  Probably basically to the point where anyone who actually believed those involved were the stated age (a 30 year old portraying a toddler, for example) would be unreasonable in that belief.  So if you're a Dawson's Creek-ish 24 and you're claiming you're 15, even in ABDL contexts you'd probably fall foul of this law.  But if you're a tall, curvy and buxom 18 year old playing an 8 year old you're probably safe. In all honesty, this might end up being more problematic for men making content, because a lot of the cultural imagery for what makes a young teenage boy versus a grown adult male is not hard to many of us to recreate even well into our 30s (if we're lucky enough).  Women's bodies change a lot more than ours in ways that are much more difficult to reverse.
    • We switched to a split king bed.  She hates plastic sheets but I love them.  Now we're both happy. My side has a fully encased zippered wipeable plastic cover.  It's just noisy enough to be embarrassing. It never needs to be removed since it is not cloth covered.  When my diapers leak, it just gets a wipe. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DWC1ZCQB $15.00
×
×
  • Create New...