superdiaperbaby Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 http://www.webcastr.com/videos/underground...ikes-again.html QUIT MAKING US LOOK BAD! Link to comment
PampersPete Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 You're a day late and a $1 short my man. There's a LONG thread about this guy already.*sells propane for $100 for people's flamethrowers* Link to comment
Pollyanna Fleshman Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 this is nuts! Where is the other thread on this? This is insane! Link to comment
Vic Posted May 13, 2009 Share Posted May 13, 2009 I've already stated this before, but here we go again. If a persons actions constitute a danger to himself or others (in this case he's being harmful towards children) they can, and should be locked up in the state hospital. Unlike prison, there is no set time to be served, they can keep them there until such time as they feel that this man no longer poses a threat. If they feel he is not cured, they won't release him. You don't need a criminal conviction for this, all the court needs to show is that he has a history of mental problems (which his behavior cleary demonstrates) and that more than likely this behavior will continue unless he is removed from being in public. They even have cells there for those that may pose a threat to anyone in the hospital. It's simple, you don't need to change the law, all you need to do is to have him committed, which I'm sure that anyone dealing with him in their community could do. Why they haven't taken this route to deal with him I guess I'll never know. Rock on, Vic Link to comment
diaperedinIA Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 Just remember there is always going to be sicko's out there. No matter what you are into there will always going to be a few bad apples. thats just life as they say Link to comment
Andy Posted May 14, 2009 Share Posted May 14, 2009 excuse me please. but what is different between a guy showing off his diapers in public and two girls playing football just diapered & sucking a nuk on a public road right in the middle of Berlin around noon ? to one everyone applauds as being cute , despite children could have seen it easily but the other one is condemned (ok in a different part of the world but still compareable) And I am quite sure that most of the people here have seen the two girls already as it was even aired on TV and the clip still floates around the net. I find it rather sick to make up two scales on the same thing really. Link to comment
diaperedinIA Posted May 15, 2009 Share Posted May 15, 2009 excuse me please. but what is different between a guy showing off his diapers in public and two girls playing football just diapered & sucking a nuk on a public road right in the middle of Berlin around noon ?to one everyone applauds as being cute , despite children could have seen it easily but the other one is condemned (ok in a different part of the world but still compareable) And I am quite sure that most of the people here have seen the two girls already as it was even aired on TV and the clip still floates around the net. I find it rather sick to make up two scales on the same thing really. Well for one thing they had the diapers on over shorts, and they were not "flashing" little kids. That is just plain sick. Link to comment
Vic Posted May 16, 2009 Share Posted May 16, 2009 Actually he is just technically under a lewd act with a minor, but just barely. Either way it's not something that should be happening. The guys a diaper loving exhibitionist, but learned from his first offense to go no further than flashing the diaper. That he likes to do it with children watching is disturbing, and for his own sake, and the sake of others he should be committed to a mental institution. There he can get the medical attention he needs, and it would also keep him out of circulation. They have to change the law to send him to jail, where he'll do two years and be back out amongst kids again. With the state hospital they can keep him until they no longer feel that he's a threat, and that could be a life sentance. Rock on, Vic Link to comment
baby-dandan Posted May 17, 2009 Share Posted May 17, 2009 I live in Utah too, but I am a few hours away from where this happened. I think this time he was passing out fliers of a website called Pamperfun to the children. The website contains pictures of young children in their diapers. This is going too far! Link to comment
Pull-ups man Posted May 19, 2009 Share Posted May 19, 2009 I kinda dont see what all the fuss is about. I think Andy had a good point there. Whats the difference? I personally didnt get any bad or disturbing feelings from that report. mabye I just happen to have a different view on this "case". For some reason I dont find a guy who just shows off his diaper (not his genitals) in public to be something disturbing. I mean he doesnt DO anything to those kids, right? He simply want to get attention by doing what he does. talk to you later people Pull-ups man Link to comment
FretaBWet Posted May 19, 2009 Share Posted May 19, 2009 I think it might be a case of innapropriate attention from an innapropriate source. This may also be a case of just because it's legal doesn't make it smart. It's like playing russian roulette. Sooner or later the odds favor him doing it to a child with a parent who wont be concerned about legalities and he'll end up with a bullet in his head. Problem solved as they say. Hugs, Freta Link to comment
DailyDi Posted May 22, 2009 Share Posted May 22, 2009 Seems it's not legal either - he's been charged with 5 felonies. He needs serious help. Link to comment
acemanner Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 If only the world considered diapers just like underwear , then we could commit all the kids who wear their pants at there ankles! Its so funny to watch them run lol Link to comment
Pull-ups man Posted May 26, 2009 Share Posted May 26, 2009 yeah, its all about social views... sadly, diapers are still viewed as something for only children up to 3 yrs (max 6 but thats already considered strange) to wear. Well, we have to wait a couple of years (decades) for diapers to be viewed as underwear... how would that be nice not to feel embarrased infront of anyone for wearing a Pull-up Link to comment
Nat Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Could this guy be a pedophile? Am I the only one here who is thinking that? He is only showing his diapers to kids, not to adults also. Sounds pedophilelish to me. Link to comment
Heven Posted May 29, 2009 Share Posted May 29, 2009 Is it legal even to do this with regular underwear? Seems to me that if you went to a playground and started flashing kids while wearing tighty-whiteys, someone would definitely call the cops. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now