Gender Identity of Littles

[Guest Sasha]

[ForbiddenFruit]

Thing is, what kind of 'scientist'? Some 'creationist scientist' with a degree from 'Liberty' University? Where are those neuroscience credentials?

[diaperpt]

Spark and oddlynappied, give me a moment to step out of the muck and clean up my hip boots... yes, there.

[oddlynappied]

Always good to have a debate on ‘gender’.

[oddlynappied]

Spark and oddlynappied, give me a moment to step out of the muck and clean up my hip boots... yes, there.

[oddlynappied]

Spark and oddlynappied, give me a moment to step out of the muck and clean up my hip boots... yes, there.

[diaperpt]

Your posts just blatantly conflict with one another. First you claim special powers of observation as a scientist, then say you happen to be a scientist with an opinion.

"I don't think I have read a more ignorant or stupid statement in years. I am a scientist so I will approach my rebuttal with the lack of bias that we are taught to bring to the table,..."

[h200420012]

Going off topic here.... it seems in the last site update, RileyKilo is now listed in the "womens" pictures.

[:dlb]

it is an interesting topic.

[oddlynappied]

Diaperpt:

[diaperpt]

"I exit this thread now." I meant it.

[Benjamin]

Jesus H Christ!

For the record, I read every single post multiple times before deciding to reply to this.

Honestly, I have to side with 'Rosalie.Bent' and 'OddlyNappied' on this one.

[BabyJune]

Girl clothes are so much cuter--that's what got me hooked. There's nothing wrong, however, if you prefer to role-play being a boy. (Just try to behave yourself, though). Have fun and remember that what's in your mind is YOUR world and you can be whomever you want to be.

[spark]

Betty; first of all I apologize if you took my comment about 'issues' as gender bashing.

[Bettypooh]

Hmm, I don;'t see where anyone has posted verified statistics here though others have posted numbers without verifying them- not me. I can do that but it would take more of my limited time that this thread is worth. Perhaps one day I'll get bored and compile all my research (along with references and verifications anyone can find) into one post. It will take several pages to do that as complex as this subject is As to the actual numbers of TG's, it is actually closer to 1 in 1500 which is a lot more common than others seem to think. That number comes from professionals researching the subject and is generally considered to be accurate. I have already

[spark]

Betty- just out of curiosity- where do you get those numbers.

[diaperpt]

(I'm not really here... remember, I 'exited' but I am very happy to see civilized discussion return...Play nice, children...)