![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
 |
 |
babykeiff
-
Posts
3,560 -
Joined
-
Days Won
56
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Store
Posts posted by babykeiff
-
-
2 hours ago, FretaBWet said:
My wife and I are replacing the shingles on a one story addition on the house we live in. It has been leaking so we really needed to get it done. We bought a range hood to install in the kitchen which we wanted to vent through the roof so having the roof stripped to the wood decking was the perfect time.
We started on Friday morning stripping all the asphalt shingles and the tar paper. It's been so hot out here on the prairie that we start early in the morning when the west facing roof is in the shade. We stop at about 11 or 11:30 when there is not an inch of shade on the roof. Then we go back to work around 5 when the sun is less intense and work until sunset. We put all the exhaust pipe in for the hood on Saturday. It's been so hot we are constantly drinking water but we hardly pee because we are both sweating so much. We would laugh at our diapers because the padding is hardly discolored but they were destroyed with all the Fluff broken away from the backsheet and in huge clumps. We both wear Betterdrys and we would waste a lot of wipes trying to get all the sap cleaned off ourselves.
Today (Sunday) we got all the the new tar paper and my wife's grandfather came by to help out with some of the singling. He didn't want to stop when we usually do so we were out longer. I had gone down below in the yard to pick up some more shingles when my wife waved to me. She laughed when she had my attention and shrew something white at me. It was a little clump of Fluff and sap from my diaper lol. I guess it was falling out of my shorts and I was leaving a trail. I don't thing her grandfather noticed but I went right in and changed.
Hugs,
Freta
Somebody needs plastic pants to prevent leaks of all kinds...
-
Fall.... and the world falls down.
Autumn, and trees bear fruit, crops are harvested, fresh food is pleantiful, days grow cooler and shorter, leaves that used to shade are now a multicoloured blanket on the ground for children to play in, the chestnut becomes toys while the birds, and their young, migrate to warmer climates. Clothes now cover fading tans, and toes are hidden. Bare arms and legs and onesies are replaced by footed sleepers. Bulky diapers ocassionaly peak out from under overcoats. The air becomes fresher since the humidity and temprature drops.
Harvest festivals start a series of early dusks and dark evenings, follow with Halloween and the aproach of Winter. Cinammon is added where ice used to dominate, and warm country meals replace the fading tomato and lettuce. The fox and squirel can be seen darting, while the owl patrols the now vacant habitats of the holidaying feathered friends. The mice are homeless since the harvest, and hide in the hedgerows venturing out in the dark in search for food, but become a snack for the sharp eyed nocturnal owl. These mice seek company within our homes and barns, but usually become toys for the family feline.
The cooling fans of Summer are temporarily replaced by fresh fruit displays - and retail tempt us with Tinsel, Mince Pies and early Christmas gifts. Do we forget about autumn and rush into the winter, or do we step back and revel in the calm before the Christmas rush?
-
11 hours ago, ValentinesStuff said:
Nope, it was cut straight thru.
It was on land owned by the National Trust, so there are no rivals to have paid for this.
If you look at this image...
you can see at thee white line on the stump, the angle on the tree in the distance, and the hinge mark remains where you'll see it broke - bits of wood on the stump pointing up. Secondly, the thickness of the stump is a single cut from one side to another since there is no join marks in the middle - this means it is a long chainsaw or long saw blade, not a standard lenght chainsaw/blade. It also shows a perfectly level cut - that takes experience.
-
On 9/29/2023 at 10:47 AM, ValentinesStuff said:
The tree was cut down, not by kids, but by a professional tree cutter. The way it is cut is there is a wedge on the right of the tree cut out by starting high and cutting down to a line, then the bottom of the line is cut for the wedge. This is a straight cut. This is followed by a straight cut from the other side of the tree to the wedge. To cut this so accurately needs experience of at least 5-15 years cutting trees with an extended lenght chain saw. There is even a spray white line on the tree for the woodsperson to follow.
This was not vandals, but more of a someone hired to do the job by a farmer / local buisnessman / rival business / landowner etc.
-
Freedoms do not protect things you like. It protects everything, including the thing you don't like - as without it, there would be no freedom.
-
3
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, Dubious said:
...Covid was just a more aggressive flu...
In all the diseases and virus that exist in the world that one can get, covid is the worst. The simple reason is that it attacks our lungs. This is a massive organ in the body, and like every bit of our body, when it gets attacked, parts or it swell and puss (dead cells) oze out. However, there is nowhere for the pus to go other than to collect in the bottom of our lungs. Paitents with covid might recover from the infection, but die because they drown in their own pus.
So no no no. Covid is not just a more aggressive flu.... it is much much worse.
There are weak variants of covid that are a more agressive form of flu, but they also increase the damage to already carbon coated average human lungs of city dwellers. These people might recover from the viral infection, but the relevant lung damage takes months to years to recover from - similar to what occurred with pneumocosis paitents during the industrial era of the early 17-1800s across the world until air quality was addressed. Today, air quality is a lot better, but there are people with 10-40% lung function loss walking around while trying to function. - some refer to this as 'long covid'.
COVID-19 & SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 is the virus, and COVID-19 is the disease. Due to the bodies respose to an invader (infection) the immune system ramps up (causes tiredness and sweating, and some weakness in muscles etc) to attack the invader. In simple terms, white blood cells surround the invader and creates puss. This stops the virus attacking. In the common cold, the pus is the snot that comes out of your nose. With SARS-CoV-2 infection, the puss collects in the lungs reducing your ability to breath. This is where the real danger is.
Vaccines
These are mini versions of the infection designed to trigger the same immune response, but not in the lungs. This is why one feels 'sick' from a vaccine shot. The same processes are working - the immune system ramps up (causes tiredness and sweating, and some weakness in muscles etc). This is supposed to toughen up the immune system so that it is prepared and can act very fast when SARS-CoV-2 attacts the lungs, but are relying on the body to make a mistake in identifying the real SARS-CoV-2 and act as it has been trained to act with the false version of SARS-CoV-2.
Anti-Vac Reasons (simplified)
When one does not introduce the vaccine, the immune response only ramps up from an infection. The way it handles an unknown infection is similar to how it handles a known infection, but when the body realizes that its response is failing, it doubles down. If it presumes that it is handling the infection, the body doesn't get to the double-down layer early enough. Remember, this is a lung infection, and the faster one can handle it, the less secondary lung dammage (flooding and drowning) occurs.
Effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 Vacinnes
This behaviour is 10-40% effective in the 100-500 people tested. Unlike all other medical interventions, this did not go through the multiple itteration trials that normally take 5-10 years before a medication gets worldwide approval. It was rushed due to worldwide media induced panic. This also means that the normal processes of passing the education to hospitals how to care for a paitent to enhance recovery was also bypassed. As a result, it will take another 5-10 years before paitent care reaches the needed level to enhance recovery.
Conclusions & Reality
Therefore, although the world is no longer in panic in relation to COVID-19, it is still here, and still a major problem, and will continue to be for the foreseable future. It is now being addressed in backrooms with little to no funding, and we might find the correct way to handle it in maybe 10-20 years.
-
20 hours ago, FretaBWet said:
@babykeiffI think you misunderstand my position. I wouldn't put my children "back" into diapers at night if they had acheived primary continence at night and then lapsed back at a later time. I meant that as long as they had not acheived nighttime continence yet I would keep them in whatever protection that was best suited to the need.
As far as achieving nighttime continence and then lapsing, as a parent that would signal a trip to the doctor. I would be very worried it could be something serious or something that could be fixed.
@FretaBWet, I did misunderstand your views, and appologize. I fully 100% agree with the idea of keeping a child in diapers at night until they attain primary night time control. This happens almost automatically after a child is toilet trained daytime as the child is learning to stretch its bladder etc.. After all, a child is in diapers day & night until they attain control and it would be silly/abuse just to remove diapers altogether if a baby/child is still weetting/messing day/night.
In relation to secondary loss (bedwetting after being dry at night) this is a common issue with children triggered by stress/puberty/growth spurt etc., and medical consultation is advisable, however the common medication used makes it worse - but that is the medical industry. The child will, with focus and help, relearn the signals. As a result, diapers and/or any infantile protection involved is abuse. An undersheet and lifting the child before it wets the first time teaches the chlild to wake from the signals. Letting it sleep through the second & subsequent wettings may seem cruel, but the alternative is diapers or reducing the childs sleep quantity, both actions are wrong. A parent may loose some sleep watching their childs signals to lift it, but that is what is needed for the childs gain.
Every baby/child before they wet/mess their diapers when asleep, move from being fully relaxed to spreading their legs, maybe spreading their toes or placing feet flat on the bed, and usually roll onto their back. A prior dry overnight bedwetting child does exactly the same, but due to them being in too deep a sleep, don't wake up before wetting. A parent needs to intervene and lift the child, who will wake. This is teaching the mind that it needs to wake from these signals, which the mind learns very fast, usually after lifting the child 2-4 nights. It may not be perfect, i.e. the child might weep urine a little after the 2-4 nights, or wet as they wake the next morning, but that will go as soon as the bladder etc gets stronger / used to the capacity.
-
On 9/28/2023 at 10:04 PM, FretaBWet said:
@rusty pinsI feel a lot of anger in your post above and I assume you have your reasons. I do however disagree with your views. Your opinion seems to be that parents who don’t actively work to help their child outgrow bed wetting are abusive. My parents had my genitals butchered at around age 11 because he told them surgery would cure me. It didn’t. In my personal opinion that is abuse. My parents did not diaper me at night long after 4 because my younger sister was born when I was about 3. Growing up soaking my bed like a biblical flood without diapers left me with severe diaper rash on the inside of both thighs from the urine pooling when sleeping on my back with my legs together. Think about the teasing and bullying I received in gym class when I had to shower and my thighs had painful very large and visible diaper rashes. In my personal opinion this was abusive. My parents belief that they were doing the right thing does not make what they did less abusive. At 17 they continued the quest for the cure by using a bed wetter alarm. I see a correlation between the events at 11 and 17. That correlation is that in one instance they were sold a bill of goods by a surgeon that made money and in the second instance they were sold a bill of goods by a corporation that made money. Neither one was helpful.
Did you take any time to see what the AMA says about curing enuresis? Or maybe looking at what Pediatricians say about what to do? None of my 3 children we’re bed wetters, but I can tell you that I would have handled it completely opposite. I would have kept them in diapers at night, I would have told them it’s not their fault, I would have told them I was a bed wetter and I understand how it feels. If they came to me as an adult and told me they had a diaper fetish I would not have any guilt over how I handled it. In the end I think you are doing a disservice to parents. I just don’t see how helping your child deal with bed wetting by having them wear diapers to bed equates to pushing your fetish onto them.
Hugs,
Freta
I feel for you and what you went through as a child - that was abusive from the start not only the actions of you parents, but also the inactions.
In relation to your choice of diapering a child for bedwetting after they have been dry is not addressing and/or helping the child. That is abusive as it is preventing the child from achieving a development milestone. I know that some see that leaving a child to wake up in a wet bed as abusive, diapers or any version of infantile garb encourages child to regress, and not mature.
The plastic sheet on the bed to create the flood and leave a child in a soaked bed is also child abuse. There is a compramise that addresses both issues without diapers, and that is an absorbant pad under the child combined with waking the child just before they wet the bed at night the first time. If this was done with you, you would have learnt to wake just before you wet - as what the child will learn.
I can see @rusty pins views, but I also think that he is also linking an adult discussion about bedwetting to AB as a fetish. We here are over the age of 18, and are adults first. Yes, it is incorrect to entice a child, either by action or inaction to become an AB or DL, but nobody here in their right mind would want to do that.
Simply, any form of infantile supporting behaviour (diapers, pull ups, bedwetting pants etc) being given to a child to wet while in bed after they have achieved night time control is child abuse as it is telling the child that it is acceptable for it to wet at night. The child already knows that it is not, and that adds to its stress levels. One supporting that action convinces the child that it is OK to wet. This does NOT help the child in any form.
As I said earlier, any action and/or inaction that doesn't help the child attain night time control IS ABUSE.
Therefore, keeping a child in diapers after the achived night time control due to them wetting at night expecting time to be a healer is silly. The child has zero encentive to control their bladder - so that action is enticing a child to become totally diaper dependant.
@Kawaharu, I can understand the decision of your parents to keep you in diapers - you never attained primary control maybe due to other issues. Could that be why you think that putting a prior trained child in diapers for bed wetting a valid option? Yes, it can make it easier for the child to deal with it - but the child SHOULDN'T be dealing with it - the parent should, and acting in a way to entice the child to attain night time control.
A wet bed, wet sheets & blankets and should not be part of the equation. After all, we all have washing machines - and that is the duty of a parent to wash clothes, not a 3-18 year old child! A parent needs to be attentive to their childs needs, and assist them as needed. A bed wetting child needs the parents help - and if that means that the parent needs to sit at the edge of the childs bed all night watching when the child wets - and the parent should know the childs actions to notice it - and then lift the child before it wets, that is exactly what the parent needs to do.
-
Equality means open for all without predjuice - therefore any public space being equal means ANYTHING can occur there, including public exposure of diapers. It is the parents / careers obligation & responsibility to protect their child from what they would see as inappropiate, NOT everyone else. You can't farm out care and responsibility of your child to the rest of the world.
THAT IS FREEDOM
-
2
-
-
32 minutes ago, DailyDi said:
Feeling fine today, no reaction except for a little soreness at the injection site.
That will go away, so find your plushie and cuddle up. Your plushie is medically trained and will nurse you back to happiness 😷
Just now, Dubious said:Only the old and people with shitty immune system gets covid vaccine in Norway.
For everyone else its no longer a problem.
I tend to disagree - it is a problem for everyone in the world, and will continue to be for the next 10-20 years until it gets like the common cold - something Lemsip and other OTC medication is supposed to help with.
-
1
-
-
Lets consider the concept of modesty, when and where it began in the world, and the corresponding enforcement of same. Some members here seem to see this topic to be discussing exposure of diapers in public where most are replying to exposure of diapers in private settings.
Around 10,000 BC, genitalia was commonly exposed in life, and all art forms. It was not until roughly 4 AD following Christianity becoming the state religion in the Roman empire, that exposed genitalia was considered a sin. What followed was a series of changes :-
- stonework that had exposed genitalia was either covered with a fig leaf or something, or the 'offending article was simple broken off',
- art work (paintings) were modified to disquise the exposed genitalia with an object etc.
The root of Christianity is the Bible, and nowhere in the bible is any reference to genitalia exposure being a sin. If one looks at history, this 'ruling' came from 'organised religious groups' - and due to their influnce in society then and now, it is now unacceptable to have exposed genitalia. These same religious groups, and misinterpretation of what they stated also enforced hiding undergarments to such an extent that women used to wear clothes where none of their skin was exposed. Today, it is considered OK for women to expose skin and some clothes do expose undergarments. The thinking and belief of hiding undergarments went to extremes in France and England where women would be clothed from nose to toes. Over the years, this had been relaxed by most people worldwide, but still some old ideas (18th-19th century dress) are being inforced by members here.
In certain countries, strict dress style and sence is being enforced by elders perception of bible teachings, or Quaran depending on prevailing religious beliefs. These include clothes that only allow visibility of the eyes and nose.
This 'modesty' concept is hilarious to me when one evaluates its source. If Christian belief of the day presumed that the nose was offensive to view, we would all be wearing nose knickers etc... and sex shops would be selling g-strings to cover the nose while all the time, people would be running around with exposed genitalia for everyone to see and compare.
In relation to diapers, if one looks at the history of same, it was not until the widespread use of plastic / rubber pants were diapers hidden from view - as when a baby wet their diaper they would leak everywhere - and needed to be changed. Changing a diaper is work, but not as much work as changing every item of clothing a baby is wearing. Yes, there are pictures of babies in robes, but that is for an event that the baby is attending. Diapers were originally a modesty item, a way to cover the babies genitalia in public. i.e. Nappy derived from anglisized term nappé, the french word for table cloth, or more likely napkin, a small piece of table cloth to hide baby genitalia. The diaper itself was originally a piece of woven coth (the weave increased absorbancy as compared to linen) to protect house dwelling babies from wetting on everything - and when the baby wet, the diaper was used to dry up the puddles, rinsed out, hung by the fire and then reused. Most of the time, babies travelling (like on a treck across states in US) where either naked or wrapped in a diaper while asleep. These diapers were hung by a fire to dry and reused. The diapers were not washed as it was believed that urine was a good disenfectant. Sometimes, wet diapers were just rung into a bucket to collect the urine before being hung infront of a fire to dry.
It was cold climate babies that were wrapped up, and the diaper part of the wrap and was made from moss and leaves - so when wet, was just replaced. The basket the baby was in was also a way to carry the baby, and to prevent the baby touching the snow as it was laid down for the diaper to be changed. These babies sometimes messed in the moss, but it was rare due to the extra work of its parent in cleaning the basket plus the limits of water to do so. Yes, there was snow, but using same on a baby to clean it would be a bit rough.
In warmer climates, babies like most primates, clung onto their mother using their hands and feet, and signalled their need to void. The young / human baby never wet or messed on parent that was carrying it - and when the baby needed to void, the parent would hold thier offspring away from themselves close to, or on a branch / ground where the baby would spread it feet and toes to enhance balance before voiding. Babies today do same, spread toes/feet before wetting / filling their diapers.
Before the introduction of plastic/rubber pants, babies were never allowed to mess same - not only due to the inability to get the cloth clean again - but also due to the act of potting a baby before/after a meal.
Hand washing wet diapers is only a matter of rinsing same, but with a poo diaper it involves a lot more labour - and without the benifit of washing machines or running water and/or hot water, it was very labour intensive and time consuming. Child rearing skills being passed from mother to daughter also passed on the ways to raise a child while not letting child mess in diapers.
With the introduction of plastic/rubber pants, diapers were more hidden and babies were let mess their diapers. This created the problem of diaper rash - which signifies to the grand mother that their daughter (the mother of the baby) is failing in her job. As a result, it took until the demand for women during war time, plus the introduction of diaper services before plastic/rubber pants on diapers plus babies messing diapers to be acceptable. Prior to that, it was a sense of pride to a mother for another to see their child sporting pristine white diapers AND a line full of white diapers drying in the breeze.
With the introduction of diaper covers and diaposable inserts and then pin on disposable diapers followed by tape on disposable diapers, more and more babies were raised in these type of diapers - wetting and messing same to their hearts content.
These diapers were changed to baby-shape, long lasting, super absorbant, super dry etc, each invention supposed to be better that the previous for your precious little angel.
The simple fact is, over the centuries, the toilet training age has slowly increased from 6-9 months to 6-9 years due to the changing products that are supposed to be better for your precious little angel
- as is the concept of modesty from none 10,000 BC to genitalia being chopped off, 4AD and continuing today where to some, diaper exposure in private is a little risque, but underwear exposure of any kind in public is a hanging offense!
Most of us remember running almost naked or in just underwear on the beach / near a water hole / any water source even a standpipe in the city to cool down in the summer, where babies / young children toddling around in just a diaper and sitting / playing with the water etc. In the 60s/70s/80s it was acceptable to see kids doing that. Today that is classed as exposure - all because a group of prudes in 4 BC are unable to read a bible, and they decide what the rest of the world should do.
Where is the concept and gift of free will?
-
On 9/3/2023 at 8:17 PM, babybuddha said:
Hey there,
Back when I was a TBDL, I experimented with several hypnosis tapes. I now realize that they didn't work for me primarily because my environment wasn't conducive to fully letting go. If you're looking for these tapes to have a profound effect, it's crucial that your environment aligns with and supports the outcome you desire from the hypnosis.
It's not just about the tapes; it's about creating a setting where your subconscious can truly accept the suggestions without distractions or reservations. From what I've understood about hypnosis, you also need to truly believe in the process and let go of any skepticism.
On a related note, as a professional meditation teacher who frequently guides individuals into deep trance-like states, I'm intrigued by the idea of creating ABDL-specific hypnosis tapes. It's fascinating to explore how the mind and body can synergize in such distinct scenarios!
Warmly,
Starlight ⭐
for research and also to create AB themed hypnosis, it might be a good idea to analyze how a baby gets toilet trained, what goals it has at the time, and ways to sate said goals while defeating the toilet training. Then your hypnotic creations might be more effective in assisting ABs to attain their wish of temporary to permanant diaper dependance. After all, all you are doing is getting the subject to act and behave the way they already know how to, but is suppressed deep in their mind in favour of adult thinking and acting.
-
54 minutes ago, Demon-hunter said:
You would be surprised how many people don't get covid. or if any get a very mild short-term case of covid. But the problem is a lot of companies and politician weaponize this whole fear mongering of covid and even the vaccine just for their own selfish gain.
For example with me throughout the whole entire 2020-21 I've been around people constantly and no one really wears masks, especially at our local big box stores like Walmart, no one really cared. And I went to few major events that my town normally hosts as well, my town would host a giant 4th of July Festival and a giant vintage car show Festival. And normally those festivals will have at least 10,000+people attending. And I never once contracted covid at all. Heck even my wife has an autoimmune disease and she never got a sniffle of it.
Plus what makes it even more upsetting is the fact that people plus what makes it even more upsetting is the fact that people would be misdiagnosed with covid, there have been reports of people dying from car crash and was labeled dead by covid ( this instant actually happened in Indianapolis and the family sued the hospital for pronouncing their daughter died from covid but not from a car crash).
And what's even more annoying there's a lot of people out there who pretend to have covid so they could get some benefits from their job from taking covid leave, see I work at a Walmart Distribution Center and there were days where someone who would have a misspick ( picking the wrong case or the right amount) on their order filling and they lose their incentive on that paycheck, or we've been working extremely long hours with extremely heavy load days, and then they'll be guys be like screw it I'm taking a covid leave and next thing you know you don't and then they'll be guys be like "screw it I'm taking a covid leave" and next thing you know you don't see it for next two weeks because they lied about them having covid. Thus adding another artificial tally to the case count in America.
Plus not to mention the artificial tallies, I believe most of the death counts and case counts were not legitimate, because you know political reasons and for boosting their view counts on their new stations. Because you really can't fact check a news station.
But I also believe that the vaccine was overly dramatized as well, deeming to be more dangerous than covid itself. Granted yes every medicine has side effects and everybody can die from a simple medicine it's common sense, but what's more annoys the crap out of me is we have people (the old geezers and karens at my church) believing that the covid vaccines have microchips then people in the governments is tracking you , and sterilizing serum in them to prevent pregnancy. Or what's even more annoying people believe you might come back as a zombie.
But my personal belief of the whole covid thing is that it was overly dramatized and it was used for 2020 political gain.
But what I believe cause more problem in 2020 ( and still is causing problem) is the fact that we have a more cultural, political, and social issues here in America. And honestly if people would have left politics out of it ( both the Democratic party and the Republican Party) 2020 would have been a lot smoother.
There are a lot of facts in relation to Covid, as well as a lot of media hype. I could go into listing facts, but that is a fire starter, and something I believe is banned on this site, so I won't. As a result, I can fully understand your views, might not agree with it all, but without setting an incendrary device here, can't really comment.
I will, however, identify the facts about biological life, which a virus and humans form part of.
We are all unique, even identical twins are unique. This is due to the way life is created - by joining strands of instructions to create a third strand. This process is used in all life replication, and is error prone. This error is what creates the uniqueness in offspring. This error also allows mutations to occur - and some mutations stay - cause of the benefits, while others die out - see Charles Darwin; Survival of the Fittest.
Key Point 1 As a result, every copy of an original biological object is slightly different to the original - which creates mutations in the copies. If you want to look at it this way, we are all mutations of our biological parents.
Key Point 2 Based on point one, since all biological objects mutate, a virus being a biological object mutates / changes. The concept is called survival of the fittest. As a result, a virus 'learns' to survive every way that is used to kill it.
Key Point 3 Simplified - Human immune system is a set of white blood cells and a group of killer cells. These killer cells can identify a possible intruder into the human, and attack and kill the intruder. Since these killer cells are not 'super', they can only identify an intruder that they were built to identify. This means that for disease A, A killer cells exist, and for disease B, B killer cells exist... and so on. However, these killer cells are built naturally based on the body being infected by A..Z diseases etc. Some killer cells are inherited from parents, but most are developed in the first few years of life. That is why it is not a good idea to protect a child from childhood diseases - yes, do keep them clean etc., but if one methaphorically wrapped them in a protective bubble, the childs immune system will not develop and later in life when the child is exposed to A childhood malady, it is liable to cause much more problems that if the child caught that disease early in life.
Key Point 4 Vaccines are supposed to 'teach' the immune system how to recognize the infection so the immune system can 'learn' how to fight it.
Key Point 5 Simplified Humans have never made a vaccine from scratch. They use soft versions of the disease to create a vaccine. I.E. Chicken Pox vaccine is made from infected Cow Pox cells. Spanish Flu vaccine is made from weak influnza cells. Covid19 vaccine is made from weak infected covid cells. or similar. Other covid vaccines is the virus stripped of certain behaviors - but I think microbiological processes are to much detail on a site like this.
Key Point 6 This then comes to the effectiveness of the vaccine, and does it teach the immune system. The answer really is no. The immune system is pedantic - i.e. if it has identified and can handle disease ABBA, it might be able to handle disease ABBA1 but it is not guarenteed. We are relying on the immune system not only to be able to handle ABBA, but to also make the error in identifying ABBA1 and presuming it to be ABBA and treating it as such.
ABBA to some music lovers is / is not a disease depending on if you like the band 😊
Point 7 Now we come to the 'common cold', as it is referred to. There are people that catch cold every year. Biology tells us it is not the same cold, as the cold is a virus and virus' mutate at each replication (Point 1), so the fact that it is called 'common cold' is a mistake. The immune system should mistakenly identify it as what it had last year, but sometimes it doesn't (Point 6) - as a result, it is another week or so coughing and sneezing until you recover.
Conclusion
What can we conclude from this in relation to the virus Covid and all virus'
- It mutates / changes
- Vaccines aren't guarenteed
- Immune system is 'flawed'
- People will get covid, and different versions at each time.
- Good hygiene will help prevent it so, as @foreverdl states The germs will not go home with you
- Complete avoidance to exposure is counterproductive.
- A strong healthy immune system is all that is between living and dying from any infection
Your survival is based on how you handle items like this - how healthy you are in the first place.
Life is not a reharsal or a practice. You only get one of these, and you can't come back and warn yourself to do better next time - cause there is no next time. I have found that being happy with yourself / others is all that is required - so if you find happiness being in a wet and messy diaper cuddled up with a plushie and blankie - go for it and enjoy the only life you have.
-
11 hours ago, foreverdl said:
I have never had a covid shot. ...so we are not out having sex with all the sick people
Is that the source of Covid.... having sex with all the sick people... so following your logic, if we have sex with one sick people instead of all the sick people we will be safe
-
1 hour ago, rusty pins said:
Parent's are doing their kids a disservice if they do not try and help them overcome bedwetting. REMEMBER! THIS IS AN AB/DL WEBSITE AND LIFESTYLE AND FOR ADULTS- NOT CHILDREN! Even though most of us like wearing diapers, that's where it should end where our kid are concerned! You really think you are helping them go through life if you just let them bedwet or worse, don't potty train them? How many members here have horror stories of being teased as kids in school by others who found out they wet the bed, wet or mess their pants or wear diapers? How did you all feel AT THAT TIME? Humiliated, upset and hurt. Most likely that helped you develop the fetishes you have now as an adult, but it's just wrong to inflict those same horror and humiliation on your own kids! SHAME! Some kids and teens have even committed suicide over the bullying and cyber bullying. You don't care enough about your kid that it may happen to them if you don't step in and help them overcome their bed wetting? They are not mature adults like you who have made the choices you have to wear diapers and do baby play. When they become adults themselves, maybe they will become AB's but to shun your parental responsibilities and just not potty train them or try to help them overcome wetting their bed is nothing more than abuse. I'm ashamed and disgusted by anyone who feels if their children want to just wear diapers, let them! It makes me sick just thinking about a parent not helping their kid overcome bed wetting or taking the stance, "Let them wear diapers all their life if that's what they want". If your 7 year old want's to go out for a walk in Central Park at 1am, you going to let him? You gonna give him several shots of whiskey too? Why not give him your car keys and tell him, "Take a nice drive on the interstate". May as well let him to drop out of school, too, if that's what he wants to do. Yeah, that's really a way to guide him through a good and proper life!
When it comes to your children, keep your fetishes out of their life!
I agree with what you say, but I think that you might be over reacting a bit with little information.
Did @Kawaharu mean when toilet training a child first and dealing with primary nocturnal enuresis, OR when dealing with secondary nocturnal enuresis.
When it is primary, the child never had night time control, so leaving them in diapers at night until they get to the stage where they can be trained is the right process. When it is secondary, this is where diapers must not be used, and would comply with what you stated.
-
26 minutes ago, DailyDi said:
Yep, worth it. The one year I didn't get a FLU shot I got the flu so bad I ended up in the hospital. Never again. And covid I take the better safe then sorry road keep up to do with the shots like a good boy to hopefully continue to avoid covid, or at least keep it mild.
I prefer to take precautions to reduce my risk of exposure rather than presume I am 100% sheilded. It is the prevention is better than cure concept, and dealing with the side effects to also enforce the presumption, in my mind, would be silly. Yes, I will prob. be exposed to a variant eventually - pure mathematics - but also expect my strong uncompromised immune system to be able to handle it - as has been proven with the growing list who recovered from same.
This virus is mutating and will continue to. As a result, we will all be exposed to a dose eventually - as @DailyDi elludes to - so there are two paths - vacinate and presume medical science is ahead of the mutations - which has been proven wrong, or avoid and allow small versions to teach your immune system to adapt faster than medical science.
I fully respect your choice to vacinate, and will fight to give you the choice. I chose not to vacinate.
-
1
-
-
I have never got a Covid shot... and don't ever intend to. Also, I have never got Covid.
-
1 hour ago, ~Brian~ said:
I voted for I wear an uncovered diaper with great frequency. in my mind, there's nothing to worry about, because I am in my apartment sitting in my chair watching TV or doing something that I love, usually hugging a rabbit while I'm doing it. When I get to the point where it gets really out of hand, it makes it real easy for me to be able to just have the diaper on. Love my onesies and I have all different colors but I have my greens my purples my oranges, and I'm planning on getting more colors if they are available I love these things I have 9 of them. Many times I put the onesie on over the diaper because if for example I have to go to the hospital, that way I just slide my pants over the onesie the diaper is already covered and it snapped together, so if I need to have someone help me change it is quite easy, however I do notice that when I'm wearing a diaper with a onesie over it, I went right through the onesie so I'm not sure if there is something that you need to do or if it's just that you have to put the trifecta over the diaper and then put the onesie over the trifecta.
Any thoughts on this? I'd be interested to find out what people think how you would be able to keep your onesie dry so you're not peeing through it or messing through it.
😁😁
Brian
@~Brian~, is your rabbit nice.......
slow roasted in red wine and brandy
-
1
-
-
23 hours ago, Little Sherri said:
It occurred to me recently that I probably spend more time now in just a diaper (and a shirt) than I ever did in my childhood. We live in a cold climate, and people tend to want to keep babies and toddlers warm, and, later on, I was very self-conscious about still wearing diapers, and tended to treat them like a state secret, so I don't think I spent a lot of time in an uncovered diaper as a kid.
I've read the debates here before about if diapers are "underwear", versus pajamas, versus something else - not quite "outerwear", but, more likely to be worn uncovered than, say, briefs or panties. Currently, I get to spend a fair bit of time in just a diaper & shirt- I always sleep that way, I'm usually dressed thusly for a couple of hours before we go to sleep, and because I work from home, I often spend a good part of the day with my pants or shorts hanging on a chair in my office - why create laundry if I have a press-out leak? I enjoy wearing just a diaper, when I can get away with it without offending anyone, and on a good day, I might spend more time with nothing on over my diaper than I spend in the opposite condition. So I'm curious as to where others fall on this question.
Underwear, the term tends to refer to any garment under the top garment - and that can be knickers, underpants, boxers, vests, or whatever garment that one wears next to skin. Therefore, without any doubt, diapers ARE underwear.
Babies are dressed with their diaper exposed most of their life depending on whether they are in public or not. Some parents prefer to add a onesie as the top, as if that hides a diaper, but at home, a baby is in a diaper and a top (in winter) and just a diaper in the summer. It is not until the baby is going out that one adds the extra layer of clothes - but that is out of sence of pride.
The reason a baby is in just a diaper and a top is to cut down on laundry. Having a baby fully dressed in a house and one is changing said baby every 30 mins to 1 hour depending on the age of the child, not only does one need to change the diaper, any poo that escapes the diaper, and one needs too change the whole layette. Baby poo on clothes tends to stain - due to the natural colours - and baby clothes need such care when being washed, a fully dresed baby is almost illogical.
A newborn baby is fully clothed until s/he reaches roughly 3-6 months old, but those 'super soft' clothes normally end up in a bin once they are hit with a poonami (as Pampers refer to it).
This concept was addressed partially in the topic Diaper-Skirt-Win, where the design and functions of a baby doll was identified, and where, in the era of cloth diapers and no plastic / rubber pants, diapers were fully exposed to allow a carer to watch and react to their childs wetting the diaper. After all, in that era every diaper leaked.
Today, diaper leaks are rare when it comes to wetness if the diaper is changed often enough, but poo diapers are a different story - where on a young baby lying in a crib filling its diaper from a pure liquid diet, the poo does oze out almost everywhere. Go to an older baby sitting in a high chair filling its diaper before/during or after a meal, and you will have a similar issue. Lets look at a toddler, they tend to hide before filling their diaper - and most poo diapers is almost liquid choclate (sorry for the image) or, if you are lucky, broken tea bag, but the reality is that poo diapers leak on babies. On adults who are diaper dependent, the poo diaper might leak if the diaper is wet from earlier, but that is avoidable if the diaper is changed often enough.
In relation to the question asked, at home I am in a diaper and a top most of the time, but fully dressed when I leave the house etc. I do have a dressing gown that I wear also indoors so I can deal with callers etc., and/or a pair of shorts / tracksuit leggings. My partner is also similar dressed - dressing gown / shorts + top, so that is not an issue.
My office being next to my house, I might put on the leggings / short going to/from the office, but most if not all the time, the diaper is exposed.
Overnight, since I don't wear pjs, I am only in a diaper - but the dressing gown is with easy reach if I need to jump out of bed for any reason - but that is rear, as my Plushies protect me
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Moochie said:
Wearing and wetting my diaper in my professional setting is so convenient, pleasurable, helps with stress, and better concentration when I just wet when I feel like it. All is discreet, no one knows...I think!!!!
I think that you have already crossed to the AB world - since wearing and wetting the diaper is a stress relief. You seem to be getting the same response a baby gets from its diapers - the sences of comfort, security, pleasure, relaxation and stress relief, all combined with the relief of voiding. This all aids in concentration and is prob. increasing your productivity.
In relation to productivity benefits, most AB aware diaper stores are aware of this, and encourage their staff to wear diapers plus other stock - like onesies etc.
In relation to who know, everyone is aware, but due to their perceptions, never link diapers to a person older than average toilet training age. However, I know of 55,329 people that know that you are wearing and wetting a diaper in work - the members here, and by simple averages by reverse calculation of adult diapers sold compared to world population, .5 - 1% of your workmates also wear and wet diapers, so there is a chance that they also know. Don't worry, they won't tell as they are hiding it also. You know the subtle signals of a diaper wearer - so see if you can find them - you never know, you might find another similar minded friend to play with.
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, iamdaddydave said:
I'm not too sure, I had bottles, pacies and stuffed animals around but I had hoped to use them with some nice AB girl or woman. I do admit that I sometimes pretend to drink from the breasts of my wife, that can be comforting, she even likes that feeling. Diapers on the other hand are more tolerated than loved.
Babies normally see the diaper as an obstruction and interference. They don't understand the need, so in a way, they are more tollerated than loved. If you doubt this, look at a baby / toddler who has had their diaper taken off and cleaned, they run away enjoying the two sences of freedom - freedom to move without the bulk of the diaper, and freedom to run as fun away from their parent / career. The babies behaviour is always looking for aproval and to be chased / played it, and is giggling constantly when it gets that interaction.
However, the bulk of a diaper to a baby is a familuar object - something it has had since birth, and something that it misses when it is gone. That is why it is thrilled with the temporary freedom, giggles when caught, but cries when it realises that it is being put back into a diaper. That dissapointment goes very quickly when the baby acknowledges the thickness and security it feels with the diaper.
These concepts are why the diaper is the primary fetish object for both ABs and DLs. The baby play is where one attempts to recreate the perception of oneself as a baby. You might not have reached that level yet, so it is understandable that you think that a diaper is tollerated only - but you miss this tollerated object when you don't wear it - so I suspect that you are closer to the edge than you wish to admit - and that is based only on fear - fear of the unknown (although you do know the baby feelings) you still fear going back to full babyhood as if it is a failure in moving from babyhood to adulthood. Remember, your wife seems to accept your little side to such an extent that she allows / like you sucking her breasts. She prob. sees it as cute and you letting barriers down.
-
18 minutes ago, abgirl said:
I'm a former member here from several years ago. The site has changed quite a bit. Is there no more open chat room? Or stories? I don't even seem to be able to find the pictures that members used to post. Please send help.
This site has changed over the past 16 years that I have been a member, so I can see, and agree to your concerns.
- The chat room are still here, but the members that used to be the life and soul of chat have left
- Stories are still here, but certain authors have left and brought their stories with them. - ie CS Fox etc.
- Pictures are still here, but that has also changed over 16 years
- The average 30 odd year old now were under 18 ten years ago, and some of these people believe that since they are now online, they are influncers. To me, an influncer is like the first lemming in the 1990s PC Game 'Lemmings' where the first few were sacrificed or exploded in order to get the rest out.
- With the growth in the number of scam artists in the world, there is a few here also.
In my humble opinion, it is almost as if some of the younger members here expect the older members to act as their babysitter, and when things don't go their way, tantrums are thrown. Things like respect, courtesy and manners is almost foreign. They have been replaced by backbitting, agression, slyness and obsequious behaviour - most of the traits that a parent would have trained out of children. I think that is the result of 'latch kid' and 'creche raised' people, now here as over 18s.
Social Media platforms almost thrive on that type of behaviour - where the real reason for social media most people don't care or realise. Before social media, nobody knew what an Influncer had for breakfast. Today, the members do know. The real question is - does the world care - NO. Does a post on a social media site help the world - and the simple answer, most of them are just junk.
I don't pretend to know where this site is headed, but I percieve that if it continues down this path unchecked, either the relevant people in charge will pull the plug OR some legal action will be taken to shut this site. It seems to be destined to become another ABDL site that had its time - similar to D.P.F. and others. Even most of the people that appeared on the Jerry Springer show were members here, and are now gone to the anals of history or their own forums.
-
1
-
1 minute ago, FretaBWet said:
@babykeiffI do still wake every time I wet at night but I have gotten good at falling right back to sleep.
Hugs,
Freta
Hugs back at you, and I am happy for you that you have learnt to handle the Pavlov dog training, if not defeat it.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, FretaBWet said:
This is the EVIL device my parents used to break my bedwetting. You are giving the child a life sentence of never having an uninterrupted nights sleep. It doesn't increase bladder capacity so the result will be waking during the night as many times as your bladder signals the brain it's full. It's a decision that says breaking your child is preferable to the expense and your embarrassment of having them rely on diapers at night. I'm 70 years old, they did this to me at 17 years old, and I'm still angry over it. I'm still in diapers because the alarm doesn't address the root cause, only a symptom. A more accurate slogan would be Break your child of bed wetting by breaking your child.
Hugs,
Freta
I love your description, but that device is a torture device. It is prescribed by the twisted civil servants - continence nurses - due to their lack of knowledge and/or care. The think that they have to do something to help a child who bedwets, and precribing this torture device is something, so they do it and think that they help.
Actually, this device sounds when it even smells water - and wakes the child. This trains the child to wake when it wets, not before it wets. Therefore it disturbs the sleep cause a woken wet child can't get back asleep until it strips and remakes the bed to wet again and wake again. Its design is flawed. It is similar to Pavlov dogs, who were trained to salivate at the sound of a bell, but this has zero gain to the child. It gets to a stage when even if it is removed, the child still wets and then wakes up to realize that it is wet - gets depressed and annoyed, gets up to replace bed clothes etc., goes back to sleep and repeats this torture forever.
I am not surprised that you are still in diapers, and I'd guess that you still partially wake after you wet your diapers at night - but time has made that less of a problem.
-
1
-
Leaving a trail
in Scoop The Poop
Posted
You could have a BBQ...... self powered by the look of it.😋