WallaWalla

http://www.abena.sk/down/abena-app-form.pdf http://www.medline.com/incontinence/videos/adult_brief.wmv I was mostly funning, but that's what the manufacturer's instructions say! Personally, I find that it makes the seat of the diapers more 'bowl shaped' and keeps it from cutting into my thighs/pelvis.

I've become more scenario oriented and less diaper oriented. That is to say, I've gotten more progressively interested and aroused by ageplay, medical, domination, and bondage scenarios. The diapers themselves used to be so overwhelmingly arousing that they were satisfying enough as a standalone. I still wear them just for the heck of it, but they are more of a means to an end than an end to itself. But, on that same page, I've found that there's been sort of a sublimation of diapers into the rest of my life as the object fetishism has diminished. I find myself wearing them more often when I'm engaged in activity that isn't directly related to sexual activity or roleplay. It's just something that's becoming integrated into my identity as time goes on. Sometimes I feel like wearing them, and I think that it has some minor influence on my affect while I'm wearing them. Just like certain other articles of clothing can have a bearing on one's affect. Just like I get a certain sort of a confidence boost from putting on my favorite dress and shoes I guess you could say. Although, perhaps not so simple as just a confidence boost, but a boost in different traits depending on what I am wearing. I guess the diapers can remind me to let my guard down a little, goof off a bit more, and not take myself so seriously. So, in a way, they are almost just another article of clothing at this point. Just an article of clothing with a special significance and peculiar sense of functionality in certain situations.

No need for me to worry about such a thing, as I have been found out by multiple friends and family as it stands.

The bottom tapes are not pointed upward, thus improper application, plus hairy legs, means two demerits for Mr. OnlyDisposables.

OP: Why do you lie? 1) Prescriptions are not filled at any hospital I know of, in any country I've heard of either. 2) Doctors do not change diapers. 3) No medical professional is going to offer to change the diaper of an ambulatory and alert individual. Independence of the patient is encouraged to the furthest extent possible. 4) Another case of mystery incontinence, gee golly whiz that sure is prevalent around here! I wonder what causes the prevalence of idiopathic incontinence to be higher by several orders of magnitude in the fetish population than the population at large?

I really like them and never have a problem with the tapes. I always make sure to get the very best fit out of my diapers when putting them on though. I think most people put them on too tightly. And about landing zones, I've concluded that I have mixed feelings despite my prior claim that I think all diapers should feature them. I actually don't like how stiff they are on most diapers I've seen. It seems that this makes the diaper not only more loincloth like(in my personal experience), but it also can cut uncomfortably into my belly when I'm sitting down. That being said, I agree that it's terribly frustrating when you put one on and it doesn't fit quite right, then have to readjust and possibly end up tearing the diaper without one. But hey, diapers are a compromise from the start. They will always have some hangups that standard underwear doesn't.

You only live once, making mistakes is part of the program.

I find it ironic how everyone bitches about how queer people won't stop making a big deal out of it, yet they demand that trannies walk around with a sign on their chest. I am entirely honest about the fact that I'm a post-operative transsexual to the people with whom it should matter. There is absolutely no reason for me to include such information in something so cursory as a profile though. If you have a reason to talk to me apart from something sexual, well then it shouldn't matter until something sexual comes up. If you are sending me a message with the explicit intent of sex alone, I don't give a shit about you anyway. As the profile is written, it asks for a gender, not a sex. What a miserable place for you to decide to make a statement about this. If it bothers you so much go write a topic.

And this is really silly. I was just sitting around on AOL and entered 'adult diaper' into the search bar. I've always been OBSESSED with the things, so it was really just a matter of putting two and two together. It's the exact same way that any teenager is going to end up looking for porn if you leave them alone with the computer.

Around the same time here. Do the math, we were both underage.

I don't see what there is to contest about my original statement in that case then. Nothing that I said contradicts any of what you said. We both agree that there's a barrier and it takes effort to cross. Goodness, you guys would think think that I referred to them as space aliens or something. I just don't see why it's such a controversial issue to think that you are going to relate to those who are older than you in a different manner than you are going to relate to those of your same age. And you know what? You can isolate yourself from a group of people for certain purposes without isolating yourself from that group of people entirely. If I say that I'm not going to date somebody who is over 90 years old, that's not me saying that I won't have anything to do with them regardless of circumstance for the rest of my life. This is a personal decision on my part, not a failure of character. If you read my original post carefully, you will notice that I speak specifically of how individuals relate to other individuals. I believe the most important part is this: So yeah, if you are old enough to be my Mom or Dad, feel free to approach me, just don't be surprised when I react to you like you are old enough to be my parent. You know, the real kicker is that most of these people expect me to approach them in a manner that is similar to how I feel I should approach them. You know, with a deference and respect toward their age. There's no negative connotation involved. Nor frankly, do I feel that there has been any negative connotation involved in any of what I've posted. Older generations lived in a different time and thus had different experiences(imo), this doesn't mean that they are outdated or inferior. It means that they are different. Can we get past the differences? To a large extent, yeah. But there are still differences to get over. As for generalizations, I don't think that it's a very harmful generalization to assume that most octogenarians will be alienated if I walk up to them and start talking about video games. Can you really say with a straight face that there isn't a diminished likelihood of them understanding what I am talking about when compared to a 16 year old kid? Does that mean I am saying that no person over the age of 80 on the planet earth knows a thing about video games? NO. It simply means that I am making a conscientious effort to observe and understand the condition of those around me. Similarly, are most of them going to be able to go jogging or mountain biking with me? No. Does that mean that no person within that age group is capable of doing so? No. So is it really a harmful assumption to think that I should go somewhere other than a retirement home if I want to find a workout partner? Is that really such a damaging and judgmental thing for me to do? Similarly, is it really so damaging and judgmental for me to want to entertain discussion of a certain nature(like ya know, a nature of which is related to a SEXual fetish) to people of a certain age group? Am I really being held back as a person for that? Is the world really being harmed for my attitude in such a regard? I can't imagine how it is. Can you?

It was my foul for even bothering to chase such a tangent. It's wholly irrelevant to the discussion at hand, even if I'm deeply skeptical of your claim. This is an absolute strawman, as I explicitly stated otherwise before you even decided to take up this argument against me. Of course younger people can learn from older people. That doesn't mean that they are going to relate to them as intimately as they do people of their own age. I am not speaking in any absolute terms here(apart from the absolute that, stuff changes), some people will be able to form intimate connections with some people who are much older or younger than them. However, as a general trend, people relate better to people of their own age. You've said yourself that people like to blow up the differences. So, quite frankly, if for no reason other than a perceived sense of comfort this trend holds true. Another strawman. Go back and read the original post I provided: Quite frankly, you are just conveniently letting points slide by and are beginning to put words in my mouth. This is an exercise in futility at the rate that we are going, so I will digress from further argument with you in this thread. However, I would say in closing that the vast majority of people I have encountered who would typically be considered 'baby boomers' are very hard for me to relate to. This is my personal experience in the manner and it makes sense to me for the numerous reasons provided above. I do not see how my own personal ability to better relate to those who fall within 10 years of my chronological age(who are also native to the culture I reside in currently) is able to be disputed, as I am the only one fully aware of my own ability to relate to others and my life experience which has led me to develop said attitude. Indeed, I am the only one to have a direct relationship to the attitude itself at all, and it would be impossible for anyone else to offer an appraisal of said attitude with any accuracy given that no-one other than myself is even entirely aware of what that attitude actually is in a complete way.

Have we changed all that much fundamentally as a species? No, but that's entirely aside the point and a whole different argument altogether. The cultures that we reside in have changed, and continue to change, and this change affects the outlook of the people within the cultures. You are 35, that's pretty young, and the differences are incremental. Obviously you are going to have more in common with people growing up today than those who were born 60 years ago. Yeah, radiation therapy, robotics, pharmaceuticals, x-ray imaging, we just 'forgot' about that stuff and figured it back out.

Okay, are BLACK PEOPLE just as discriminated against in the United States today as they were 50 years ago? Okay first off, the fact that there ARE people living in rural areas is not a counterargument to the assertion made on my part that we have become more urbanized in general. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urbanization Neither one of us lives in Mexico and this is a complete strawman. There are generational differences between people within the same area over the course of 100 years. Also, Mexico is more urbanized now than it has EVER been. The percentage has went down, even if it is not all the way there to developing yet. The culture my grandparents grew up in is different from the culture I grew up in. The culture of the 90s is different from the culture of the 2000s, which is in turn different from the culture of the 20s. The draft changes very little? Having millions of people from a population forcibly drafted into military service and then losing a significant percentage of them doesn't change much? What? You mean to say that the Holocaust didn't change much? You mean to say that the 60 million people killed in WW2 changed very little? You mean to say that the older generation who lived through that war was not significantly impacted by it? What on earth, I don't even... Also, explain how this oil rationing is being carried out and how it affects the end consumer. Because you know what, I can't find any information to back up or verify your claim, so please provide a citation.

http://www.agseminary.edu/faculty/faculty_publications/articles/creps_generations_chart.pdf You're in lala land if you think gay people are just as discriminated against as they were 50 years ago. EDIT: Just stop and think about that. Many of your online friends. And I'm sorry, but the percentage of people living in rural areas has dwindled. Yes, there are still people there, but the overall trends have changed. Where are these racially segregated schools that you speak of by the way? I wasn't aware that we were rationing rubber for our wars in the middle east currently either. There's a draft going on now? Ever think that culture might change with time? I'm sure that Ancient Romans thought just like us too. Same thing, just different religion, technology,language, and time period.

Yes, I'm sure that technology and cultural revolution has nothing to do with the attitude of people. That's pure a myth, and the human psyche has remained more or less unchanged since neolithic times. Tell me KittenAB, are gay people more accepted today than they were 50 years ago? Do you think that older people might have a harder time accepting gay people than younger people? Do you think there might be reasons related to cultural evolution and technology involved in that if so? I've also noticed that the demographics of those adhering to a certain belief system changes with time as well. As does literacy rate. As does IQ. As does lifespan. As does the % of our income that we spend on our food. I wonder if things like that might have something to do with how people view the world? I did not attend a school which was racially segregated. Don't you think that my views on race might be a little different than those of somebody who did on account of that? What about the economic differences? Did you know that my grandmother grew up on a farm? Did you know that a larger percentage of the population 100 years ago in the United States were rural farmers? Do you think that things like that have an impact on how people think by chance? She also talks about this thing called the "Great Depression," evidently a bunch of crops blew away and people had a hard time finding food or a job. She says it's always best to pinch your pennies because you never know what is going to happen. I wonder if something like that depression thing could have changed how she viewed the world? What about how my grandfather fought in a war? People sure seem to say that has an impact on how a person views things. It might be a myth, but gee golly whiz he sure does act weird sometimes because of it. He also talks about how his parents left to work in a factory in California while he slept on the floor of a roller rink that he had managed to get a job at. He also yells about 'the niggers' a lot too, I wonder why he has such a chip on his shoulder about other races. I mean gee, it's not like his background should influence his way of thinking or anything like that, that's a myth after all! So yeah, I'm sorry, but somebody that is 50 years old doesn't have a clue what I am going through or what the world is like for a suburban teenager these days. The world changes, and so do the people in it. I don't see how you can explain cultural drift any other way.

You guys can say age is just a number all you want, but if you're under a certain age you were exposed to different things in upbringing and thus will tend to have a different outlook on life. I haven't seen any kind of express bias against older people being promoted here. I've just seen some people who are claiming that they find people who are closer to their age more easy to relate to. Frankly, I am one to agree with them. This doesn't mean that I can't learn things from older people, it just means that they are on a different wavelength for the most part.

Click on my(not your) profile, then click the topics tab.

I would never do anything like this. Think of all of the horrible things that could happen to somebody who did such a thing!

Just don't use it too often or you might suffer some renal toxicity.

I must be mistaken, the only show I see called 'Doctors' when I google it is some daytime talk show.

It's not very hard, you just listen for the part where they say they wear 24/7.

Kids wear cologne these days? That's horrible.

Hey guys I am gonna spy on my neighbor and then put it on TV. Human beings are disgusting.

Why are certain people so heavily invested in defending the quality of a product?