Edmonton Sex Offender With Diaper Fetish 'High Risk To Reoffend'

[Guest toddler82uk]

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Edmonton+offender+with+diaper+fetish+high+risk+reoffend/2783740/story.html

EDMONTON — He has a history of sexually abusing toddlers. He has a diaper fetish. He blames his behaviour on Satan.

This is the disturbing picture newly released parole documents paint of a pedophile living in Edmonton.

Bruce Donald Windsor, 48, moved to Edmonton after he got out of prison on March 26.

He served every day of a two-year sentence for sexually interfering with a little girl and looking at child pornography. The parole board repeatedly refused to grant him early release.

Police and school board authorities would only say upon his release that Windsor poses a "significant risk" to commit offences against young girls. The parole records explain why.

They say he favours toddlers and admits to drugging his young victims. He thinks some two-year-old girls are "sexually curious" and consent to sexual activity, the documents say. He has a diaper fetish and had an enormous child-pornography collection, according to the information, which also says that when police raided his apartment, they found eight large child dolls.

The documents say Windsor blames his behaviour on Satan.

According to a March 2009 parole board decision, Windsor started sexually abusing toddlers when he was 12 years old. He sexually assaulted his sister's three-year-old friend and, while it is not clear whether he was charged, he said he spent an extended period of time in the Alberta Hospital.

In another case, he claimed a two-year-old girl tried to undress him and that she was so sexually curious he "had to fight to resist her," the parole board wrote.

He has also admitted to grinding up sleeping pills and adding them to a drink so that his victim would fall asleep before he assaulted her.

Windsor's current charges were laid in 2007 after RCMP seized 1,100 CDs, eight computer hard drives, VHS tapes and other electronic storage media crammed with pictures, movies, stories and audiobooks depicting children having sex. After police seized his computers, he built another one from scrap parts and stored child pornography on it. When he was arrested, he was carrying an MP3 player loaded with audiobooks that told sexual stories about men and little girls.

In September 2008, he was sent to a sex-offender program. One month later, staff found him writing "inappropriate stories" on the program computer. He tried to hide his work by changing the colour of the text to white, so it wouldn't show up on the page.

When they searched his cell, the found a hand-drawn picture of a girl wearing diapers.

"These incidents clearly demonstrate your inability to disengage from your crime cycle," the parole board wrote.

"Due to the lack of any progress via programs or intensive interventions made, your risk has not been mitigated. Your case management team feels that you continue to be at a high risk to reoffend."

[messyman]

Canada has a legal system not a justice system.

[DailyDi]

This guy is a chronic child molesting pedophile - other than shock value I don't see what a diaper fetish or dolls has to do with the story. Molesting kids is the issue that needs to be dealt severely with, not his underwear.

[diamondback6881]

I'm thinking a swift shot to the back of the head is appropriate.

[Guest Wetnmessy247]

People like him make us babies seem like predators.

Why is it so hard to understand that we don't want to abuse/rape kids....we wanna BE the babies.

People like this make me so mad I would just love to smear one of my dirty diapers in his face.

Or course, he'd probably like it.

WE ARE NOT CHILD PREDATORS!!!

I get asked this a lot. Look, just because I suck my thumb and drink from bottles and sleep in onesies and suck my fingers and wet my diapers and mess my diapers and watch cartoons and eat baby food and sometimes regress to the point where all I can do is scoot on my messy bottom and make cooing sounds DOES NOT means I like to molest kids.

It means I wanna BE ONE.

[WallaWalla]

My oh my! Aren't y'all righteous?

I'm sorry, but something has always struck me as awry with those who take the time to air their violent ideations toward those who have offended their moral sensibilities. I'm a dyed in the wool Texan who has no qualms with the death penalty even, so it's nothing like that. I just can't help but feel like going on about what you would do if you could get your hands on a pedophile is self-indulgent and egotistical at best.

Killing somebody out of anger or disgust is hardly anymore appropriate than harming other people to quench your own lust. Sure, you might be able to argue that he deserves it, and maybe he does. I don't think that makes it anymore necessary to share with people on the diaper board how you'd like to skin a cat though.

[Shade]

Naaaa a gun is to humain.....if it were me.I would get a very blunt and rusty sword and well kill him like that.It would be a very slow and very painful death.Fiting for a sicko like this guy I hope he burns in hell for all eternity.And thats my two cents....or whatever money is used.

[vins didee]

There's a special place in hell for people like this

[boy ricky]

My oh my! Aren't y'all righteous?

I'm sorry, but something has always struck me as awry with those who take the time to air their violent ideations toward those who have offended their moral sensibilities. I'm a dyed in the wool Texan who has no qualms with the death penalty even, so it's nothing like that. I just can't help but feel like going on about what you would do if you could get your hands on a pedophile is self-indulgent and egotistical at best.

Killing somebody out of anger or disgust is hardly anymore appropriate than harming other people to quench your own lust. Sure, you might be able to argue that he deserves it, and maybe he does. I don't think that makes it anymore necessary to share with people on the diaper board how you'd like to skin a cat though.

Well said.

[Darkfinn]

Why don't they lobotomize people anymore?

[sarah_ab]

Why don't they lobotomize people anymore?

actually it is still practiced, although very rare, it is possible to get one.. same as electric shock therapy.

[DiaperedSpencer]

My oh my! Aren't y'all righteous?

I'm sorry, but something has always struck me as awry with those who take the time to air their violent ideations toward those who have offended their moral sensibilities. I'm a dyed in the wool Texan who has no qualms with the death penalty even, so it's nothing like that. I just can't help but feel like going on about what you would do if you could get your hands on a pedophile is self-indulgent and egotistical at best.

Killing somebody out of anger or disgust is hardly anymore appropriate than harming other people to quench your own lust. Sure, you might be able to argue that he deserves it, and maybe he does. I don't think that makes it anymore necessary to share with people on the diaper board how you'd like to skin a cat though.

I feel obligated to say how right on the money I feel you are. Pedophiles are doing an immoral action when they molest children, but these actions are far from deserving of death. A legal system in which sexually abusing a minor results in death for the committer of the crime, is a bad legal system. It's one thing to say he's a bad person and he makes us AB/Dls look bad, it's another to say he should be lobotomized.

[Crimson_Wolf]

I can't believe all the people defending this sick fuck. I guarantee if this happened to one of your children you would all sing a different tune. This monster doesn't qualify for a quick death. He deserves the most brutal, agonizing, slow torture anyone could find by watching foreign movies. This will give everyone great ideas on how to punish this guy. These people get the most protection when they are in jail along with the cop killers. If it were up to me I wouldn't allow this special privilege. Do you know how many sex offenders and child molesters go unregistered and are arrested after repeat offences. So please save your righteousness for someone else more deserving.

[WallaWalla]

I can't believe all the people defending this sick fuck.

I'm not defending anybody. Rather, I'm condemning the practice of foaming at the mouth over things that you only have only the slightest awareness of.

There's a reason we have a justice system. NO, it is not perfect, and people(both innocent and guilty) fall through the cracks all the time. That doesn't make it any more appropriate for any one of you to decide who deserves to live and die. Justice is something that, inherent to the definition, is not weighed against the personal judgment of an individual. Sure, there are individuals(judges) who interpret the law and make decisions based on that. However, they do not simply formulate what they feel is appropriate. Instead, they take the situation and try their best to apply it to criteria set forward by legislation. Regardless of that notion, the issue I really have here is that most of the people who feel so smug in saying he should die are speaking from a position of anger. There's a fine line between vengeance and justice, and I personally draw the line at the intention behind the action.

So, again, he very well may indeed deserve to die for all I know. On the other hand, he might not. I don't think any of us here is intimately familiar with his case and the actions he carried out. The only source of information put in front of us is some sensationalist rag, a specious piece of information at best.

Any way you slice it, coming here and telling us 'OH MAN IF I COULD JUST GET MY HANDS ON----' does very little to rectify the wrongs perpetrated by this individual.

[messyman]

A legal system in which sexually abusing a minor results in death for the committer of the crime, is a bad legal system.

So is one that lets them out after two years so they can do it again. A lot of the pro death penalty people in Canada are only for it because they are fed up with the joke sentences and repeat offenders. If a life sentence meant you died in prison like the politicians said it would when they shut down the gallows people would not be complaining.

[diamondback6881]

With that said, advocating violence towards him doesn't solve anything. Just isolate him from society for the rest of his life (not comfortably, just not torturous) and be done with it.

So you want to pay to keep him in prison for the rest of his life? Makes plenty of sense to me.

Killing him is way, way cheaper.

[WallaWalla]

Killing him is way, way cheaper.

Given the number of appeals and hearings involved in executing the death penalty, not really. Sure, we could expedite this process, but we couldn't do so without condemning a lot of innocent people to death.

Frankly, the only way to appropriately balance human and legal rights vs the death penalty is by having long, drawn out, and convoluted legal procedures which mitigate the chance(and even then, don't eliminate) of innocent people ending up in the execution chamber.

It's definitely not an open and shut issue.

[Darkfinn]

Personally... laws need to be more stringent period. It needs to be clearly defined and spelled out somewhere. "The punishment for A is B" and so on... no weaseling through the system. You committed the crime, you take the punishment. If we are all equal in the eyes of the law then why should the rich get off scott free while the poor rot in jail.

As far as what this bastard did... I do believe that there are crimes other than murder where the death penalty is deserved. Violating innocent children is one of them. He has already been found guilty... screw the appeals, and don't bother spending millions to keep him locked away forever. Drag his sorry ass out behind the cell block and put a 9mm slug in his brain.

[Vic]

It's inconsievable that a person such as this, who is almost certain to re-offend should ever see the light of day again. Here in Indianapolis they let out a pedaphile who raped and killed a 13 year old girl not even two months after his release. Her parents had no idea that a molester had moved into their neighborhood though he lived just two houses down from them.

I knew a molester myself, although I didn't find out about all that he had been doing in his home until one of his two daugters finally told one of her teachers at school. Then everything came out, you can't tell one of these guys from anybody else you meet.

These people are supposed to register into the sexual predators registry wherever they move, but a lot of them don't. Most of them go on to re-offend, it seems like the best way to handle them is to keep them imprisoned, or perhaps some God forsaken island in the middle of nowhere where we could njust dump them and forget about them.

Once they've shown themselves to be the sick, twisted individual that they truly are it should be apparent to everyone that they have given up all rights as human beings. Human beings don't prey on the innocent.

Peace,

Vic

[AutieAB]

I can't support the death penalty - unless you believe in hell, it's an easy way out. It all goes dark and that's it. Nah, that's just too easy for fuckwits like this. Lock him up for the rest of his life in a 6x8ft cell with a 7ft cell mate who likes to be called 'Charlene'. Let the bastard suffer like he made his victims suffer

[Darkfinn]

I'd be all for that if it wasn't my tax dollars footing the bill. Why should we good law abiding citizens have to pay to keep the criminals fed and clothed?

I believe that all prisons should be self-sustaining work farms. Power and water could be supplied by renewable sources such as solar, wind, and hydro... and the prisoners could sell any extra crops they grew to buy things they couldn't make themselves. Certainly better than paying for them to work out or mill around the cell block all day.

[diamondback6881]

I'd be all for that if it wasn't my tax dollars footing the bill. Why should we good law abiding citizens have to pay to keep the criminals fed and clothed?

I believe that all prisons should be self-sustaining work farms. Power and water could be supplied by renewable sources such as solar, wind, and hydro... and the prisoners could sell any extra crops they grew to buy things they couldn't make themselves. Certainly better than paying for them to work out or mill around the cell block all day.

This I agree with.

[AutieAB]

I'd be all for that if it wasn't my tax dollars footing the bill. Why should we good law abiding citizens have to pay to keep the criminals fed and clothed?

I'm pretty sure that all the appeals, re-appeals, re-re-re-appeals right up to the Supreme Court and other processes associated with the death penalty (that cost many, many millions of tax-payer dollars) are probably more than the cost of keeping one prisoner on a life/no parole term... I could be wrong but I don't think non-death penalty prisoners have access to the same breadth of appeal routes...

I think you'd find the comparison between the cost of carrying a death penalty case from prosecution to execution vs a whole-life prison term surprising...

[dogpiss]

I have a sister who was molested by a relative as a minor so I kind of have a dog in this fight. Since this guy was found guilty in a legitimate justice system (and given the benefit of the doubt where the state had to prove his guilt... not some questionable 3rd world hell hole, all [stupid] jokes about Canada aside), I would say it's not about self-righteousness as it is meting punishment. This seems like a case of the punishment not fitting the crime! Meaning too LITTLE punishment. He needs a more substantial punishment, and seeing what molestation has done to my sister, death would almost be too kind. This kind of sick bastard should be made to suffer... no worse than his victim, but none short either. Paedophiles have no place in society and, like any cancer, need to be removed to be properly treated. Now I understand cases of people being labeled as paedophiles who aren't, but in the case of someone who /clearly/ is, rm is the best option and, personally, would not take joy in such a task, but not shy away from doing such if it became necessary. It's like taking out the rubbish... not a pleasant job, but to have a clean functional modern society, it must be done.

[DL_DB]

It's inconsievable that a person such as this, who is almost certain to re-offend should ever see the light of day again. Here in Indianapolis they let out a pedaphile who raped and killed a 13 year old girl not even two months after his release. Her parents had no idea that a molester had moved into their neighborhood though he lived just two houses down from them.

I knew a molester myself, although I didn't find out about all that he had been doing in his home until one of his two daugters finally told one of her teachers at school. Then everything came out, you can't tell one of these guys from anybody else you meet.

These people are supposed to register into the sexual predators registry wherever they move, but a lot of them don't. Most of them go on to re-offend, it seems like the best way to handle them is to keep them imprisoned, or perhaps some God forsaken island in the middle of nowhere where we could njust dump them and forget about them.

Once they've shown themselves to be the sick, twisted individual that they truly are it should be apparent to everyone that they have given up all rights as human beings. Human beings don't prey on the innocent.

Peace,

Vic

That's just it, these people are sick. Is there anyone here who believes this person is a normal, healthy adult? We no longer treat schizophrenics as criminals, so why this guy?

I'd be all for that if it wasn't my tax dollars footing the bill. Why should we good law abiding citizens have to pay to keep the criminals fed and clothed?

I believe that all prisons should be self-sustaining work farms. Power and water could be supplied by renewable sources such as solar, wind, and hydro... and the prisoners could sell any extra crops they grew to buy things they couldn't make themselves. Certainly better than paying for them to work out or mill around the cell block all day.

Try not to think of it as paying to keep criminals fed and clothed, think of it as paying to keep them away from decent, law-abiding citizens. A security tax, if you will.

I have a sister who was molested by a relative as a minor so I kind of have a dog in this fight. Since this guy was found guilty in a legitimate justice system (and given the benefit of the doubt where the state had to prove his guilt... not some questionable 3rd world hell hole, all [stupid] jokes about Canada aside), I would say it's not about self-righteousness as it is meting punishment. This seems like a case of the punishment not fitting the crime! Meaning too LITTLE punishment. He needs a more substantial punishment, and seeing what molestation has done to my sister, death would almost be too kind. This kind of sick bastard should be made to suffer... no worse than his victim, but none short either. Paedophiles have no place in society and, like any cancer, need to be removed to be properly treated. Now I understand cases of people being labeled as paedophiles who aren't, but in the case of someone who /clearly/ is, rm is the best option and, personally, would not take joy in such a task, but not shy away from doing such if it became necessary. It's like taking out the rubbish... not a pleasant job, but to have a clean functional modern society, it must be done.

His suffering isn't going to change anything. It's not going to undo what has been done, and contrary to popular belief, won't make anyone feel better about what happened. These people need treatment, and unfortunately our current system of psychiatry doesn't seem to be up to the task. In the United States the penal system is supposed to be about reform and rehabilitation, and it sucks. Just as I think we need tort reform (a completely different beast) I also think we need major penal reform.