Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

~Brian~

BB 2024
  • Posts

    7,591
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by ~Brian~

  1. ~Brian~

    tom-jerry-sleep-24.jpg

    From the album: ~Brian~'s Pictures

    Tom and Jerry are Good Friends: This one showing both of them sleeping. In this case, I see Tom as @FretaBWetand Jerry as @LilRugrat
  2. ~Brian~

    tom-jerry-friends.jpg

    From the album: ~Brian~'s Pictures

    Here is another of our friends Tom and Jerry: TOM = @FretaBWet JERRY = @LilRugrat Sometimes, I wish I could get a HUG like that: This week has been HELL for me However I am NOT giving up yet Brian
  3. One of my brothers used to tell Dad "Talk to the HAND" (of course, saying that could result in a slap to da face, which he claimed wasn't listenin' hehehehe )
  4. ~Brian~

    life-is-24.jpg

    From the album: Sage Advice and Sayings

  5. NOT: I win hehhehehe Brian
  6. GPG Key Error: https://repo.mysql.com NO PUBLIC KEY ERROR / APT-KEY DEPRECIATED Over the past week, I have been trying to do apt-get update, and I thought that the problem was the sury.org repo, but then realized that it was the mysql repo. I had the key I needed, but was lost, so I had to post to linux questions, as this is a CRITICAL FUNCTION (apt-get update/apt-get upgrade/apt-update) that needs to be done. so I posted on Linux questions: This question Doing as they suggested I then today tried again when logging in to Cardinal: brian@cardinal:~$ sudo apt-get update [sudo] password for brian: Get:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security InRelease [48.4 kB] Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Get:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease [44.1 kB] Get:4 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye InRelease [17.9 kB] Err:4 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B7B3B788A8D3785C Hit:5 https://packages.sury.org/php bullseye InRelease Ign:6 https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable InRelease Hit:7 https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable Release Hit:9 https://packagecloud.io/varnishcache/varnish60lts/debian bullseye InRelease Fetched 110 kB in 7s (14.9 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done W: An error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B7B3B788A8D3785C W: Failed to fetch http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian/dists/bullseye/InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY B7B3B788A8D3785C W: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. brian@cardinal:~$ sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys B7B3B788A8D3785C Warning: apt-key is deprecated. Manage keyring files in trusted.gpg.d instead (see apt-key(8)). Executing: /tmp/apt-key-gpghome.XSuPZqf9nu/gpg.1.sh --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys B7B3B788A8D3785C gpg: key B7B3B788A8D3785C: public key "MySQL Release Engineering <mysql-build@oss.oracle.com>" imported gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 brian@cardinal:~$ sudo apt update Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security InRelease Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease Get:4 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye InRelease [17.9 kB] Get:5 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye/mysql-8.0 Sources [949 B] Get:6 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye/mysql-apt-config amd64 Packages [566 B] Hit:7 https://packages.sury.org/php bullseye InRelease Ign:8 https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable InRelease Hit:9 https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable Release Get:10 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye/mysql-8.0 amd64 Packages [12.6 kB] Get:12 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye/mysql-tools amd64 Packages [4,114 B] Hit:13 https://packagecloud.io/varnishcache/varnish60lts/debian bullseye InRelease Fetched 36.1 kB in 7s (4,821 B/s) Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done 16 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them. brian@cardinal:~$ sudo apt-get update Hit:1 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease Hit:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security InRelease Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease Hit:4 http://repo.mysql.com/apt/debian bullseye InRelease Hit:5 https://packages.sury.org/php bullseye InRelease Ign:6 https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable InRelease Hit:7 https://download.webmin.com/download/newkey/repository stable Release Hit:9 https://packagecloud.io/varnishcache/varnish60lts/debian bullseye InRelease Reading package lists... Done brian@cardinal:~$ Questions: 1. So I used the key it called for, and ran the update again. Problem is: is there a way to make sure that they keyserver is pulling keys from debian sites, as opposed to ubuntu sites? that can cause problems sometimes. as debian and ubuntu are similar in some ways, different in others? 2. How do you deal with "apt-key is depreciated?? Not sure how to fix that, and may need some help on that Thanks, Brian
  7. @DLClayMongoose I understand: Politics is something that is hard to discuss sometimes, because everyone is either LEFT or RIGHT, and there is NO MIDDLE anymore, so you are EXTREME One side or the other. All I WILL say is the government does NOT seem to work to help you like they should, and as such I say that our government is "broken" and seems to need a REALITY Check, or the world we will have will be one where it will be even more messed up than it is now! It's better to stay clear of politics to be safe, because you don't want to start a "dumpster fire" that deals with this: It is my hope that whomever makes decisions regarding the issues we deal with will do what they think is the right thing, using the LAW and the Constitution! I have learned that NO ONE is supposed to be or IS above the law, and that is what the Constitution imparts, and that is what I was taught, but with all the media garbage, it is hard to say whether someone will decide that the document the "founding fathers" constructed will remain as intended, or whether someone will decide that what the founders wrote is not what they think they meant: I PRAY that the constitution will decide this, the right way! I have faith that the Constitution tells us the answer, but will those who look into this come to the same conclusion - I hope so Respectfully, Brian
  8. Headache (I hate them, and I have one now, and allergies SUCK!)
  9. @DLClayMongoose I find ADISC to be the type of place that is not understanding, not helpful, and also, as in the move "A Few Good Men" when someone says "I Want the TRUTH!" the response is "You CAN'T HANDLE the TRUTH." They are trying to "protect" a population of individuals from what? The TRUTH? As for the moderation over there, I am not involved in that, BUT I will say that a "moderator" is SUPPOSED to be a GUIDE. and NOT someone that will use power with Dictatorial Disdain. Here on DD, we have Good people, who I believe moderate FAIRLY, and they allow us the freedom to express opinions without worrying that it's gonna lead to WW3 - @spoonchicken, @DailyDi, @warpiper and the rest of the team will NOT allow it to get that far, and USUALLY, a well authored post, or a gentle "nudge" from them works well, and hopefully results in allowing others to see that there is a difference of OPINION. which is OK, but we also need to be RESPECTFUL to others aas well. Power and tools that are given to an admin or mod, should be used when necessary, and sometimes the LOCK option is used to allow for people to "calm down" and take a breath: It is NOT always necessary to ban people, but sometimes, that is the ONLY way to deal with situations. Each situation is different, and I have seen our admins/mods do a pretty good job! Moo and the rest of the crew over there can wallow in their own REASONING, but when you have a difference of opinion that results in issues, this will ALWAYS happen, so unless they want to deal with more strife, or what others call "differences of opinion," they better understand that the SITE is usually what draws the USERS, because people think of their SITE is part of a community - My former pastor said to us after devastating floods this past summer: "The Church is NOT the building: The Church is the People, The memories. the joys, the ministries, and all of the things that make us ONE" ADISC is a server: it runs as it sees FIT: However, @DailyDi runs his server ALOT differently, which to me means that He CARES about us too, but I'll always remember that I am a GUEST in Mikey's house. As such, I WILL respect him, the TEAM and the rules he sets: ADISC somehow seems to have forgotten that we all have differing opinions. and we CAN state them, and if they don't like it, well, there will be others that follow @DLClayMongoose's lead and leave ADISC in the dust. Respectfully, Brian
×
×
  • Create New...