OMFG

Actually, it only matters if it was on Facebook. FB is the one source of truth. Did he update his status to "don't you just hate it when a drunk driver kills your ass?". If not, he's still alive Not really familiar with you, but I'm glad you're okay.

Also, infants in umbrella strollers with their heads unsupported. It makes me cringe every time I see it. Also, also, they always seem to miss getting the security tag deactivated for stuff I buy, then I get the "Stop, apparently we failed to remove the inventory control tag from your purchases. Please see the nearest sales associate." hassle at the end.

So, what we've ascertained is that it isn't illegal, although there is a chance there could be a civil case in the very remote chance than the subject saw the photo, and that it's okay to post humiliating photos of other people, as long as a different web site does it first and it's not British people we're embarrassing. Got it.

I am the photographer here, and to answer your question, I think there is a big difference in engaging in behavior at a private function such as a convention/meeting and engaging in it in a completely public venue such as the London Tubes. I don't wear diapers in public because I view it as a private act, so the circumstance you've asked about would never happen. She outs herself by sucking her thumb in public. All my iPhone did was capture the moment for posterity. I maintain that if she felt her thumbsucking was private and shameful, she wouldn't have been doing it in a tube. Frankly, I'd be more concerned about the sheer number of germs she is exposing herself to by sucking her thumb after passing through tube stations and potentially touching things. The London Underground is a vile petri dish of the very worst of human filth, simply due to the volume of people that pass through it daily. She would be well off to consider some hand sanitizer if she insists on sucking her thumb in the underground after potentially touching any surface in the entire tube system. It sparked me to read up on the subject, and I learned stuff, so I think sNs would not be opposed if I said thank you.

I am failing to see anything online that supports your stance that it is illegal to take or post pictures of people in public in Britain. From answers.com There is an increased trend toward protection of a person's privacy, but: A. it seems to be more concerned with the media B. it seems to pertain to cases where the person has a reasonable expectation to privacy C. in case where the person is in public, it seems more relevant to children, namely the children of celebrities I did not take this photo of her in her home or backyard or using a telephoto lens while she was alone on a beach. It was in a crowded tube. I am not selling the photo to the local news. She is not a child. Even if one of these conditions were met, it still does not appear to be illegal, although she might be able to sue for damages. I am interested in seeing what laws you're referring to. Could you please provide a link?

I'd be inclined to think that if she felt the act was terribly private, she wouldn't be doing it obviously on a london tube...

HOLY SHIT! YOU WENT TO AN ISLAND TO BUY DIAPERS? THAT IS HARDCORE!

Not really sure this is the best venue for getting advice regarding your real kids. Sure, there are parents here, but it's kind of like getting advice on how to fix your car on a computer forum. Why not register on a parenting message board and ask this? Your chances of finding someone who has experienced this are much better than they would be here.

Totally agree. If diapers are needed due to incontinence, it's a completely different story than if someone is choosing them over their spouse. The latter just makes me sad.

Also, find it kind of sad that diapers are more important to him than his wife...

I fully agree that the end result was good, and I think that's great. I am happy for OP, but I still think his girlfriend betrayed his trust horribly by telling people. If the friend had told a whole bunch of other people - family, friends, employer, etc - and OP was being ostracized and considered a freak by his social circle, everyone would be jumping on the girlfriend for betraying his trust. It could have just as easily gone sour. I still this the gf sucks for telling. It wasn't her secret to tell, no matter how well everything turned out.

If he wanted his best friend to know, he would have told his best friend. Hearing information about someone does not dictate that one responds in kind. In relationships, there is implied confidentiality. Among other things, this includes what goes on behind closed doors, whether it be kinky or vanilla. Once you start sharing details of that stuff with other people, it is no longer sacred and special to the relationship. She broke this confidentiality by blabbing about their sex life to a friend. It doesn't matter that it was well received. It doesn't matter that she revealed that she was involved. It doesn't matter that she revealed it to only one close friend (ever heard of Pandora's Box). His ABDL side was his to share or not to share, and she robbed him of that choice. Hence, she sucks.

I would be incredibly upset if I found out my boyfriend was telling friends personal details about our sex life, fetish related or not. Don't you wonder what else she is blabbing to people about when she's drunk if she so readily shares this tidbit?

DELICIOUS, especially with Cilantro Fancy spa packages

Okay, kiddies, let's pick a day! sNs and I leave in less than 2 weeks!!

Your fiancee sucks.

I think a hoarder is someone who keeps excessive amounts of items, even when they are valueless and potentially hazardous. Also, a hoarder experiences extreme anxiety at the thought of getting rid of any of their hoarded items.

She/he was so wet. He's hitting the bottle.

My car came with bluetooth. You don't need a passport, you're just going between Canada and the States. Vampires don't sparkle, stupid.

I'm the gf. As SnS said, we're up for meeting. We're casual, but fun. Hope we can make this work

I am glad you have found a balance that works for you in your relationship, but I am not enjoying the suggestion that one must atone for being incontinent. I want a partner who accepts me for who I am, as I accept them. I wouldn't expect my boyfriend to rub my feet and legs and back every night simply because he has terrible asthma. It is something that he can't help, much like you can't help incontinence. I much prefer being mutually supportive and understanding, and have the back rubs and sweet things be because we love each other and want to be kind to each other, not because one of us feels we owe the other for something we can't change.

But for several minutes? Go set your stove timer for 3 minutes. Use your open palm to spank your bare thigh continuously until the timer goes off. 3 minutes is an awfully long time for a spanking. I don't think the point of a spanking, if you're going to spank, should be to cause prolonged pain. It is to get the child's attention and reinforce the message that their behavior is incorrect.

I am now down 110 lbs. Without surgery. I can understand why someone would choose to go the WLS route vs the "au natural" route, and I briefly considered it. However, after further research and reflection, I decided not to. My biggest qualm is that weight loss surgery is done on the stomach, not the brain. I didn't have a stomach that was in any way abnormal, other than it was stretched out from a history of overeating. It was my brain that needed retraining. I needed to learn how to eat properly - what a correct portion size was, and what my body needed in order to function. No surgery was going to do that for me. It was a long process of researching and reading and experimenting to find out what worked for me. I am still learning on a regular basis. I sometimes get frustrated because if I had gone for WLS, I'd be DONE by now. As it stands, I still have 20-30 lbs to lose, and it's coming off slowly at a max of 5 lbs per month. I feel I am much healthier now than I would be if I'd had surgery. I can run. I can eat the volume of fruits and vegetables and lean protein and dairy and complex carbs that my body needs. I would not be able to do that with a WLS stomach. I would be forever dependant on vitamins to be properly nourished. I can run and do push ups and walk as many kilometers as I feel like every day. I don't think I would be able to get an adequate number of calories to support these activities with a post WLS stomach. Eventually, I will be able to nourish a baby from conception to birth. Again, I think that would be a real problem with a post WLS stomach. Finally, I feel that all the steps I've taken to change my body have extended my life span, and I'm not convinced WLS would have done the same for me. I think weight loss surgery would have saved me from obesity and related complications, but I would have been swapping it for a whole bunch of new issues related to malabsorption of nutrients. Although there are many people who have it and have few complications and have a fantastic quality of life after, the risks were too high for me to personally undergo it. I don't think it's the "easy way" out, but I am very glad I didn't go that way.

They won't take my license. It's photo radar. I pay my little fine and it's like it never happened. That's entirely my point. If a cop pulled me over and gave me a ticket that resulted in demeirts on my license and the threat of losing it, I would be more inclined to stop speeding. Also, I think a spanking that lasts several minutes is starting to head to abuse. I would not be comfortable doing that to a child.

A cannibal had his mother over for dinner one night. She was complaining that she didn't like his friends, so he told her to try the vegetables.