DailyDi Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 I know it's been rumored, but check out this pic: Link to comment
Guest Baby-Toa Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 0.0 holy >.> i'm surprised. Link to comment
write_to_dl Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 Is this pic for real? Link to comment
curiositykilledthecat Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 too bad she's friggin nuts, she would be fun to hang out with. Link to comment
aDLddictbby Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 0.0 holy >.> i'm surprised. im not surprised ... i was watching chelsea lately before once and i remember her making comments about amy possibly being into diapers ... i mean comon she IS a human being and diapers are FUCKING HOT !!! she prolly just wants to be hotter ... who can blame her Link to comment
DailyDi Posted August 17, 2009 Author Share Posted August 17, 2009 Is this pic for real? As best as I can tell it is. There were 4 or 5 total showing the bulge or padding under her shorts. That offered the best angle. Link to comment
Junibug 4 Lucy Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 i can't help sitting here thinking that i'm not surprised....with all the stuff going on in her life she probably needs them....... xxx Link to comment
Guest Mummy's Cute Baby Lucy Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 Now we know what she keeps in that bee-hive!!! hehehe Link to comment
hidden Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 diaper or not, what the frick is she even wearing? Link to comment
freswith Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 Why doesn't someone ask her nicely; preferably one of our (genuinely) female members? Link to comment
BBoy Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 Here is another photo of the incident. Last year they published one that I didn't think looked like a diaper and this time I still think it isn't a diaper. However the paparatzi won't give up this story for anything. Link to comment
PhilDL Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 These pictures to me don't indicate diaper use. Just some funky style. Phil Link to comment
BBoy Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 These pictures to me don't indicate diaper use. Just some funky style. Phil It indicates to me Amy needs to get a fashion consutant. She is doing it to herself with clothing choices like that. Link to comment
Guest toddler82uk Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 more information here : http://dlisted.com/node/26184 just google it and loads come up Link to comment
timmyc Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 I love diapered women, to me nothing is hotter. But AW is such a disturbing vile creature she could pose in only a Bambino and it would do nothing for me. She has to be at the very bottom of the list of famous women I would dream to see diapered. Link to comment
adriansurley Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 She is crazy - that just looks like a fashion disaster to me not a diaper. Link to comment
tommee Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 If it isn't a diaper, what is it? (it probably isn't a diaper) Link to comment
AutieAB Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 If it isn't a diaper, what is it? (it probably isn't a diaper) A very strange attempt at "fashion", I suspect Link to comment
DprDJeff Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 It looks to me like she rolled a pair of long johns all the way up... Link to comment
DartDodger Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 I know it's been rumored, but check out this pic: I have no idea who that is...yes I live under a rock. So who is that what she do ect. Link to comment
AutieAB Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 I have no idea who that is...yes I live under a rock. So who is that what she do ect. Technically, she's famous for being a singer/musician but realistically, she's infamous for her drugs and sex and sex and drugs lifestyle... She's a 'trainwreck' to put an Americanism on it... Link to comment
tommee Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 It looks to me like she rolled a pair of long johns all the way up... But why? It just looks like she is wearing a diaper! Link to comment
BBoy Posted August 17, 2009 Share Posted August 17, 2009 A very strange attempt at "fashion", I suspect Looks like a slip for a skirt that is way too short. Link to comment
Aleia Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 It's rolled-up pants/shorts/long underwear. Look at the pic BBoy posted: you can see the black garter that's holding them in place. For someone who doesn't wear diapers, she sure has a shitty wardrobe. I just want to know how many small children she's hiding in that 'do... Link to comment
diaprbayb Posted August 18, 2009 Share Posted August 18, 2009 I know it's been rumored, but check out this pic: Dam it, I saw this picture months ago and was going to post it but never got my lazy butt moving. Good find DD. Link to comment
![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now