DiaperBigBoy Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 Body: Yes, it's true now men can have babies. Check this video out http://www. youtube. com/watch?v=mk931puQZKI Here's another one check on it http://www. youtube. com/watch?v=AiU-KZ_KADY&feature=related Yes, yes, now men can have babies, now all thsoe gay men who wanted babies can have them and don't have to worry about getting the help. So, now there is no need for women? You can send all the women in my direction. I'm sorry i have nothing serious to say about this, it's just funny too me Link to comment
Repaid1 Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 So if there is no need for women, where do the eggs come from?... Google this!===> What is the only animal that has the same amount of chromosomes as a human and theoretically possible to have a baby from our species ?? If your brave enough to catch her and nail it..think Spiderman. (It's not a spider!) Without getting into a war on this cause I could care less. But if a creator wanted men with men, or women with a women to procreate then it would already happen..without the science of man/women intervening! Kinda just common sense. Like I said not a slam on people being what they are, just a thought! and Evolution has nothing to do with it, it's science. The girl says it best..Just because you can do something...doesn't mean you should! Adoption!! HELLO! my thought BTW... both your links sent me to RoadRunner web site, probably my computer! Yeah I could fix it..but why, take out the spaces! Link to comment
BriGuy Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 {It was my understanding that those men having children were transgendered women. Therefore they were not biological men to begin with, they still have their uterus ovaries etc. I was watching a 20/20 broadcast about it. So don't get too excited gentlemen, or women for that fact, ya'll will still be bearing the children! } Link to comment
Eric D Posted April 1, 2008 Share Posted April 1, 2008 Sorry - but I find the simple idea to be SICK, WRONG, and JUST NOT GOOD. For some reason nature designed this to work in a certain way - and I don't think it's a healthy or good idea to "change" this. Link to comment
tris Posted April 4, 2008 Share Posted April 4, 2008 I don't have a moral argument against this, either. In fact, I think it's important that people do whatever is necessary to achieve their ends. But, like as was said above -- nature will fight back, and it might not be pretty. I'll be surprised if they give birth to a healthy, normal child. The odds of birth and genetic defects are, without a doubt, significantly higher. Link to comment
belinda_sue_fox Posted April 5, 2008 Share Posted April 5, 2008 so yes nice post for April the first. Link to comment
Aleia Posted April 5, 2008 Share Posted April 5, 2008 Hey, where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket? Do these people want to be good parents, or do they just want kids? Because good parents put their child's well-being before all else, whereas these people seem more interested in passing on their genes. But I think I might have to second Belinda. Link to comment
pax87 Posted April 5, 2008 Share Posted April 5, 2008 the one on oprah IS transgendered with female reproductive organs.. Link to comment
Saschadzg Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 Being pregnant is he ultimate female experience. In Germany, this person would lose the female name upon childbirth. For change of status they demand infertility in Germany. Kvetinka Link to comment
Aleia Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I suppose you guys will want periods next? Link to comment
PArms Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 Nope! Cramps, bloating and mood swings are best left to those who can deal with it best! Link to comment
Aleia Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I've always wondered which is worse: having periods, or dealing with people who have periods? Link to comment
saulykins Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 First of all this guy is a transman - which is a female to male transsexual. He is not a 'transgendered woman' nor is he a woman at all. Perhaps he still has his female reproductive organs (not all transpeople choose or can afford surgery), but that does not make him a woman. He never actually was a woman, unless we're speaking legally. Secondly, lots of transmen choose to get pregnant, there's even a documentary about this (not sure of the name, but that's beside the point). This guy was just stupid enough to bring it to the media's attention. This is nothing new, it's been going on for quite some time now. Some guys do it before they transition, this guy chose to do it post-hormones/chest surgery. My opinion? If this guy wanted to get pregnant because his wife couldn't then more power to him. That really says something about how comfortable he is with himself and his gender identity, and I respect that. I could never do what he's doing. On that same note, he should not have brought it to the media's attention and should not have made himself seem like something brand new. The fact that he did that enrages me to no end. Most people don't understand transpeople and never will, so why bring trans-related things to their attention if it's just going to make it worse for us? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now