LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Adult Baby Diapers


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

3 Neutral

About Orchidectomy

  • Rank
  • Birthday

Previous Fields

  • Diapers
  • I Am a...
  • Age Play Age

Profile Information

  • Real Age
  1. Please would you quantify "heavy gage" (gauge)? Since the apparent demise of Tuffy, I'm struggling to find anything heavier that 6 mil (Six one-thousandths of an inch) vinyl. That, apparently, classifies as Medium rather than Heavy. I'd like to try at least 8 mil, but I can't find any.
  2. I do like the concept of denial of sight of your own boy-bits and I'm glad to hear, Dizzy, that you are being kept to that régime. Strictly, I trust, by which I mean even at bath time, during diaper changes, when having your pubic hair removed and when being chastised.
  3. I do like the idea of the bib overalls as daywear, but might a lycra leotard underneath be a better (maybe also cheaper) proposition than a onesie? Four layers (high capacity diaper, heavy duty 6 mil or more plastic pants or plastic body suit, stretchy leotard/onesie and bib overalls in a coarse denim material) should be sufficient to stop even the most determined AB from all forms of self-arousal by day. No fiddling, no humping. Night-time is a different matter. Absolute chastity should be maintained - after all, what's the difference in terms of naughtiness between self-arousal by day and self-arousal at night? If chastity is to be imposed, both scenarios have to be considered in terms of both wee-wee and willy-touching. Mistressedbaby's input also merits comment. Yes, the carer should masturbate AB boys from time to time. Not too often, though. Just enough to drain stale semen - say once every ten days. But when done, done to excess. A total clear-out such that AB's balls ache. Achieve that and next time he may then be just a little bit less keen to have it done, at the same time incrementally lessening the desire to try arousing himself. Might a situation eventually be reached whereby AB doesn't like arousal - even seeks to avoid it? How about prostate massage as the routine stimulus? Very effective in completely draining the system, and no touching of dinky even by his carer. Very prim and proper! I like the idea of the resulting emissions being caught in AB's fresh diaper, the same one then to be worn until saturated with wee-wee. Combining these ideas, maybe AB could be made to come whilst his boy bits remain out of his sight? That way, he never even sees let alone touches his stiffy. But if, despite all, he does attempt to fondle himself, a spanking is undoubtedly appropriate.
  4. Personally, I feel that a Kigurumi would hide the fact that I'm diapered. Fine if that's what you want, but my preferences tend towards the opposite. Wearing a disposable diaper for practicality (apologies to the environmental lobby - I live in an apartment with inadequate drying facilities for terry squares), I like that to be held snugly in place by a onesie. Then towelling pants for a bit more bulk, topped off with oversize and very noisy PEVA (not PVC) plastic pants. I only change to quieter PVC pants when I go out.
  5. I've read your posts in the thread "My Catheter/peebag Adventures" but I'm unclear whether you found the catheter helpful in terms of avoiding sleep disturbance. Could you clarify, please? I don't think I'd have the nerve to try inserting anything like a Foley catheter myself, but maybe a Sheath Catheter might suffice for an experiment to determine whether turning in my sleep did or did not cause detachment or malfunction. My guess is that it would work for me by day but not by night.
  6. Time for a recap, methinks. The original post was a question, not a statement. It asked: " Do night-time diapers help prevent Alzheimers?" What is clear from the published scientific research is that uninterrupted deep sleep is beneficial in preventing Alzheimers. There's no disputing that; it is a done deal to the accepted standards of scientific proof. So what are the implications as regards action? Rather obviously, prevent deep sleep being interrupted - by whatever means that can be devised. So the question becomes: Is diapering one way of preventing interruption of deep sleep? My answer is "maybe". There are pre-requisites: The sleeper has to be prone to getting up several times per night, either to go for a wee or because they are wet. Without diapering, such awakening has to produce significant interruption of deep sleep. With diapering, the individual sleeps through episodes that would otherwise have awakened them. If those three tests are met, then it seems that diapering does indeed have a role to play, as the hypothesis contained in the question suggests. Improbable though it may sound.
  7. Elfy... It is well established in the branch of mathematics we call statistics that correlation does not of itself prove a causal relationship between two variables. There are statistical ways of distinguishing between causation and coincidence, but they only identify the probability of causation. To conclusively prove causation, one needs to go further and identify the causal mechanism. In the case at point, that has been done to accepted standards of scientific proof. So, far from the matter still being mere correlation, it is a done deal in terms of explaining why there is a failure to clear the amyloid deposits. That's why the search is now on for two things: In the realm of prevention: Enhancing uninterrupted deep sleep, to aid the natural process, and... In the realm of cure: Developing drugs that will promote clearance by mimicking or stimulating the natural process. The diapering suggestion is, at most, one possible contribution to the matter of enhancing uninterrupted deep sleep. It may sound absurd, but when I was born the idea of man walking on the moon was absurd. With so much at stake, surely we should consider all possibilities - even those initially suggested tongue-in-cheek?
  8. Jason, You wrote " By your logic, then you should never have kids, because, well, you know, babies cry quite a bit during the night." Nonsense! I did not say that, neither did I infer it. What I am suggesting is that all forms of sleep disturbance should be identified and remedied where possible and to the extent possible, so as to avoid interruption of deep sleep and thus head off the problem of failure to clear beta-amyloid deposits. That does not imply finding a single remedy. In such circumstances several partial remedies working together can be equally beneficial. Dlover49 has it right. Having to get up during the night is an age-related matter. Any benefit from diapering to help sleep through isn't going to contribute to the overall situation until an inability to sleep through without diapering arises. But once that age has been reached, why not take advantage of the potential benefit that diapering can offer?
  9. > Every other week there is news of a new way to cure something and it always fades away. What convinces me that we have something of substance here regarding Alzheimers is that the cause-effect mechanism is explained in terms of amyloid 'flushing'. Thus the research has gone far beyond identifying mere correlation between two matters that might or might not have a causal relationship. That is a very important scientific and statistical distinction. > I really don't see this as "Oh boy, better train myself to be a bedwetter!" type of news. Surely the implication is that all possibilities should be explored in terms of avoiding interruption of deep sleep? Diapering may well not work for everyone, but for me it makes the difference between getting up 3 or 4 times and sleeping right through.
  10. This is where I first found out about the new discoveries: http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2016/horizon-curing-alzheimers Unless in the UK you are unlikely to be able to stream the video. However, the key words are these: " A new system inside the brain has been discovered which clears amyloid in deep sleep, but allows it to accumulate when we don’t sleep well." Keep an eye out for syndicated transmission in your local TV area. Likely to be on a Public Broadcast station. Anything written more than a year ago now has to be regarded as out of date.
  11. Daddy Ant... Here's a link to a checkable and supposedly credible source on your side of the Atlantic: http://news.berkeley.edu/2015/06/01/alzheimers-protein-memory-loss/ Of course there are many other reasons for disturbed sleep apart from getting up for wee-wees. Noise and light pollution come to mind, especially when one remembers that one's sense of hearing stays "on guard" when we sleep. Therefore I'm not suggesting that diapering is the be-all and end-all of Alzheimer's prevention. But if one's bladder is the cause of three or four excursions to the bathroom each and every night, there must be some intrusion into what would otherwise be uninterrupted deep sleep. If, that is, one can train oneself not to wake up... I have successfully made the transition from getting up to wetting in my sleep, so I know it can be done. Snugglebear... Why do you find this irrational?
  12. Do night-time diapers help prevent Alzheimers? Believe it or not, this is a serious question! Recent research shows that Beta-Ameloid deposits in the brain (a prime cause of Alzheimer's) are flushed out during prolonged deep sleep. But not during cat-napping or REM sleep. Thus, if you train youself to wet your diapers and remain asleep, you might clock up more and longer sessions of uninterrupted sleep. Interesting...?
  13. > An advanced cute alternative is to have magnetic switches embedded within the diapered pleasure zone with opposing magnets in the locked mittens - KEEP THE HANDS AWAY FROM THE P ZONE and everything will be just [fine] - BUT pass the hands by the P zone awful things could be made to happen ! Excellent idea! Hurry along to the Patent Office!
  14. Willy pointing down... In an AB that probably would constrain a Dinky to the point where erections never develop fully, but not effective when naked during diaper changes, being bathed and so on. Masturbation to ejaculation by the caregiver does seem to be the answer to the prostate health issue. But how often and by what method?
  15. In respect of the male AB, one thing the caregiver needs to consider (not an issue with a real baby) is the advisability of inducing ejaculation from time to time in order to avoid a build-up of stale semen in the prostate - something thought to highten the risk of prostate cancer. This suggests that enforced chastity has to be done responsibly. How should "relief" be arranged, and how often? Give the AB time out from his play role, to participate in either intercourse or masturbation as an adult? Not really on if the role play is intended to be 24/24. Or should the caregiver masturbate the AB to climax at appropriate intervals, strictly perpetuating the ban on the AB boy touching his own genitals? If so, what form should physical contact with the caregiver take? Or should the anti-masturbation chastity rule be relaxed from time to time, whilst perpetuating AB dressing? (Example: AB allowed to slip a hand down a loose-fitting diaper a couple of time a week, ejaculating into it?) Other possibilities may exist... can you think of any?