anondl Posted August 29, 2009 Share Posted August 29, 2009 The Mysterious Eleventh Torture Technique: Prolonged Diapering? By Spencer Ackerman 8/24/09 11:29 PM The 2004 CIA inspector general’s report on torture <http://washingtonindependent.com/56175/the-2004-cia-inspector-generals-report-on-torture> says clearly that in 2002, the CIA proposed to the Justice Department the use of eleven “enhanced interrogation techniques. Link to comment
freswith Posted August 29, 2009 Share Posted August 29, 2009 Goodness gracious me! It reminfds me of Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition sketch with the dreaded "Comfy Chair" with the soft cushions reserved for the particularly reclacitrant. I seem to recall a canard going the rounds that our illustrious Prime Minister, G Brown, had AB tendencies. There is said to be a picture (in the possession of one P Mandelson) of Mr Brown wearing a nappy and sitting on a rocking horse. Mr B was, it is claimed, at some time a very, very close friend of Mandelson, P., and only got married to his "beard" on their elevation to the cabinet. Pure rubbish, of course, and a serious libel on those two impeccable, worthy, faultlessly honest individuals. Link to comment
toddmdl Posted August 29, 2009 Share Posted August 29, 2009 Senator David Vitter from Louisiana had his fetish exposed to the public when it was found out he liked to have a prostitute diaper him or something like that. Link to comment
Brutal Posted August 29, 2009 Share Posted August 29, 2009 I think the diapers were used for two reasons. The primary is the filth factor (non-hallal) which is a big no-no for Islam. The second issue is more practical. You are taking all power from the prisoner. The diapers mean they are stuck in the same room and can't leave to use the bathroom while be interrogated. It means unbroken time periods where you can wear down a respondent/prisoner/whatever pc language you want to call them. Further, if you are wearing a dirty diaper for hours, you are going to be uncomfortable. Urine contains ammonia which is harsh on the skin. Fecal matter will clump and itch. It's about making the individual as uncomfortable as possible. While I don't wear diapers, I've heard that having to crap yourself without stool softners can really hurt. Especially if you have significant bulk. The bowel is trying to push out stool mass, and there is nowhere for it to go. Hence you anus and sphincter are traumatically stretched as you try to accomodate the load. I'm not much for torture. I suppose it would have been more humane to do what happens in all military conflicts and simply shoot all combatants and not take prisoners period. -Brutal Link to comment
Guest TBinthehoodie Posted August 29, 2009 Share Posted August 29, 2009 Goodness gracious me! It reminfds me of Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition sketch with the dreaded "Comfy Chair" with the soft cushions reserved for the particularly reclacitrant. I seem to recall a canard going the rounds that our illustrious Prime Minister, G Brown, had AB tendencies. There is said to be a picture (in the possession of one P Mandelson) of Mr Brown wearing a nappy and sitting on a rocking horse. Mr B was, it is claimed, at some time a very, very close friend of Mandelson, P., and only got married to his "beard" on their elevation to the cabinet. Pure rubbish, of course, and a serious libel on those two impeccable, worthy, faultlessly honest individuals. *busts in* NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is suprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise.... I'll come in again. *comes back in* NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Amongst our weaponry are such diverse elements as: fear, surprise, ruthless efficiency, an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope, and nice red uniforms - Oh damn! (couldn't resist) Link to comment
freswith Posted August 30, 2009 Share Posted August 30, 2009 I'm not much for torture. I suppose it would have been more humane to do what happens in all military conflicts and simply shoot all combatants and not take prisoners period. Two good points. My sergeant was always very clear on the issue of military ethics. If you get the chance to shoot someone, make quite sure that you kill him That way he can't lie on the ground and shoot back at you, he can't tell a pack of lies and deny that he was a combatant, and he can't sue you for damages. I think he would have disapproved of Guantanamo. He wasn't much into taking prisoners. He really was quite a tough nut as the Salvation Army goes. Link to comment
Aleia Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 I've learned better than to trust any "sources" on "torture." Link to comment
d_drew12 Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 This picture has been seen with numerous faces on it, it's a fake. Link to comment
Yvhuce Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 I wear 24/7. I don't have that issue. Is it different if you are trying NOT to mess yourself? It's different for people who don't usually wear diapers. It's also dependent on one's regularity and diet. If someone hasn't pooped for a couple of days and has to poop in a diaper, that can be a fairly traumatic experience. Link to comment
babykeiff Posted September 16, 2009 Share Posted September 16, 2009 Snakes and weasels in government, I'd believe, but AB/DLs - not a hope. We are not that breed of people to be that underhanded. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now