![]() |
![]() |
-
Posts
578 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Store
Posts posted by Babyqtboy
-
-
19 hours ago, Firefly 35 said:
Why?
Because Canadian based companies won’t even give us the option of paying the increased prices based off tariffs, most just refuse to even ship to the United States. This has forced me to find alternative options. To say I am a little miffed is an understatement, but if they want to make a political statement out of it, then so can I. I have been forced to buy my diapers elsewhere so that’s what I will continue to do, even after all this nonsense blows over
2 hours ago, abdlwpg said:Ya man I am boycotting all the shit I can't buy too LOL.
True but I plan on continuing boycotting them even after the nonsense ends and they want to start shipping to the U.S. some Canadian companies are increasing their shipment rates and price points, which I am fine with, the ones that just completely cut off US shipping are doing it purely for political reasons. They don’t want my business now just tells me they don’t want my business ever again. I will spend the extra money and buy American made
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
-
They look cute, unfortunately I am boycotting all Canadian products at the moment
-
4
-
-
9 hours ago, ValentinesStuff said:
You might want to reword that.
😂😂😂 lol fixed it
-
18 hours ago, SoggySoCal said:
Anyone get their hands on these yet? Would be cool if we could get some side by side pics vs the current XL that were rated to 140lbs.
I can post pics later, wearing a XXL now, as my package of XXL Goodnites arrived today. I bought a pack of the XL’s when they first came out, wore one and that was it. They were still a little tight, thin, and not really absorbent. On initial inspection, the XXL’s are about the same width as XL’s and larges, but the XXL’s are a few inches longer and have more stretch. They are also a bit thicker, and so far, much more comfortable and absorbent. Probably not going to be my night time diaper but I could definitely see myself wearing them occasionally during the day
-
2
-
1
-
-
Ordered some, will let you know what I think when they arrive tomorrow
-
29 minutes ago, ValentinesStuff said:
The price is right.
True, hard to argue with free
-
1 hour ago, ValentinesStuff said:
I checked on the prescription, apparently the VA has a contract with Attends. 30 years ago or so, I would have been thrilled.
Hopefully not the cloth backed ones, though the plastic backed ones aren’t much better. So I guess that means I am better off not getting diapers through the VA? 🤷♂️
-
Incontroldiapers.com I get a case of European Tena maxi plastic backed for around 120, 3 bags of 24, so 72 diapers. I find they are a good day time diaper and they have the Ultima for 136 if you want something a little thicker.
-
I fully expected John to piss himself when he got tasered lol not an uncommon occurrence
-
3
-
1
-
-
I drove from upstate New York to Florida in 16 hours, only had to stop for gas, gotta luv the new max absorbency diapers 😁
-
I absolutely love who they cast as Sophia Falcone lol
if you watched Gotham you could find a way to incorporate the Adult Baby retreat Spa that made an appearance
-
11 hours ago, WBDaddy said:
Are you sure about the gender-specific? Because I recall Luvs (P&G) being the first to market with boy/girl diapers in the late 80's.
In fact, I just checked this. Luvs launched their gender-specific diapers in '88, Huggies in '89.
lol getting old affects the memory I guess, I could have swore Huggies for him and her were a lot earlier than that. There was definitely a huge diaper war in the mid 80’s thru the mid 90’s where they were constantly trying to outmaneuver and out market each other.
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, Ishigreensa said:
Huggies didn't, but they had some cheap stuff for kids. I don't remember what it was called. It was an underpants style thing that you pulled up though, and they often did put plastic pants on over it. However, my memory could just be off. I never used them, and my parents thought they were a waste of money, so I might be misremembering, and they might have been just talking about regular diapers, not sure.
I did do a search for it, and I do notice that the internet says that pull ups were not ever a thing before 1989, and that seems really off to me since I remember my siblings having problems way before that. That was the year before I graduated, and I remember seeing something like underpants-like when I was in elementary school, but I might have just been confused. I don't know.
that said, since it seems my memory could be flawed, I will have to go through the story and rethink it. I do want it to be closer to the way it was, so if my memory is flawed, we'll do something else for the idea of pull ups, just not sure what yet.
Like WBDaddy said, cotton training pants with rubber covers were quite commonly used in the late 70’s and most of the 80’s for bed wetting kids that were otherwise potty trained. I had several siblings that were younger than me and remember my mom doing that. That’s possibly what you remember. 99.9% of the time, anything new on the market after 85, it was Kimberly Clark who came out with it. Pretty sure they were the first to do gender specific, leak barriers, elastic waist bands, and the had the market cornered on Pull ups and bed wetting pants for almost 2 decades
-
14 hours ago, Kaiko-chan said:
The story mentioned that it was a pull up
I missed that, went back and re-read it. It was one line. My bad
12 hours ago, Ishigreensa said:She is wearing pull ups in the first chapter, though pull ups in the 1980s were not as good as the things you can get today, especially for the older kids.
Huggies didn’t introduce pull ups until 1989, honestly, they were my first diaper as a teenager and they were thicker and more absorbent than the ones today in my opinion. Same with Good nites in 94 though the best run of those were 1997-2001 when they were plain white and came in L/XL
-
Is it cloth or disposable diapers? Only ask because diapers in the 80’s weren’t easy to take off and put back on so it seems like cloth diapers but they are a little more time consuming to put on and there is no mention of rubber or vinyl pants or a diaper cover.
-
I was so glad to see this story wasn’t abandoned. Sorry to hear about what you are going through though. Wyrd Bid Ful Eraed, trust in whatever deity or spiritual manifestation you believe in. Warm thoughts that it will all be alright.
-
1
-
-
UK size 8 Pampers and Tesco’s, are about the same size as Pampers size 7 in the US. It’s also interesting to note that size 8 diapers in the U.S. are about the same size as size 6 diapers from 20 years ago. I did a comparison of size 6 diapers from 1998 to size 7 pampers cruisers from 2007, 2015 and 2023 and size 8 pampers from UK and US. The diapers are in fact getting smaller and the companies are just marketing them as bigger. Even large goodnites from 1996 are bigger than XL Goodnites from last year.
in response to “welfare” and low income families being lazy, that’s just not true, in fact, delayed potty training is more common in low income families because they are predominantly single parent households and the single parent is over worked and under paid. The percentage living off welfare is less than 4% of all welfare recipients. There is also the issue of neurological and developmental disorders being on the rise. Yes autism and ADHD is over diagnosed but there are some good studies linking diet to the increase as well. My youngest is autistic and was in diapers until age 8 and was 1 of 6 kids in his class of 306 that was still in diapers. I have friends who are educators who say they see about the same number on average.
-
Pampers size 7 were introduced in 2006
-
1
-
-
On 5/22/2024 at 7:58 PM, FingerToes said:
So Darlene removed the hypnosis on his phone that day, and they went out to lunch and opened up about why he was wearing diapers. She felt bad about this. This was not in the story on the post but something I went back and added later in my final version. It is a very fair and valid question.
Which chapter was updated to reflect this change? Also, waiting with baited breath for the next chapter 🥰
-
4 hours ago, Eagle0769 said:
So right now he is wearing a diaper not a pull up in his room?
That’s the way I read it, he was in his underwear, contemplating the diaper in his hands and comparing it to the pull-ups he usually wears
-
45 minutes ago, Eagle0769 said:
Another great chapter from another great writer.
The description of the pull up is all wrong. Pull ups
do not have tabs. You pull them up and you ripe them off.
I wonder if Stacey will be interested in babying Ted too.
Maybe when Lara has Ted suckling on her nipples Stacey
will be interested?
Can't wait for the next chapter. 🙂
You might want to re-read the description again, I didn’t see anywhere where the pull-up is described as having tabs. That being said, Some pull-ups do have tabs, Korean and Japanese good-nites do or at least did at one point and seem to remember dry-nites in Europe did at one point as well. I mean, not exactly tabs, reattachable Velcro sides like Huggies Pull-ups have
-
People who call themselves “babies” “littles” “ babygirl” or they say age play is their kink but act disgusted or grossed out by people who do wear diapers . I understand being into age play and not liking diapers but that doesn’t make them better than people who are into diapers 🤷♂️
-
Thanks for the update, really loving this story
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, ABAlex said:
LOL wow.
I read Gerald’s Game about 3 years after I realized I was in fact ABDL, going back and re-reading older Stephen King and subsequently later Kng novels, I have realized that about 95% of his works include at least a single mention of diapers, bed wetting, pants pissing or messing. Not implying King is ABDL, but obviously he finds anything infantilizing, horrifying
-
1
-
Cottontailz ***NEW ABDL BRAND"
in Diaper Lovers
Posted
After all the doomsday propaganda, tariffs are only 25% on Canadian goods, It’s absolutely political. Regardless, I have been forced to find a different supplier and a different diaper so I see no point in returning to a company to a company that only cares about their bottom line and not about their customers.