erevu

I'm not saying it's right or wrong, but it's quite evident that it IS poking fun. If it's not, I'd like to see what your idea of "poking fun" is.

No U.

I stated a simple opinion. It's obviously IMO, and I didn't see the need to explicitly qualify it as such. Nor do I think that would have mattered. Sensitive people are sensitive. Also, the only absolute I used was that I don't approve. My reason why isn't even an absolute. I didn't say that all women who get tattoos are ugly. I didn't say that all tattoos make women ugly. I said very likely to detract from beauty. The chance is qualified, and even if it does, it's a lessening, not a negating. I now await all the men to start yelling "sexist" at me because I'm not a fan of man-boobs. It should happen any minute now.

Do I have to parse my words for you? No, I'm not a fan of women getting tattoos. I am also not going to tell anyone they can't or shouldn't. It's just my own god damned opinion, and that isn't a contradiction. And I NEVER said that men and women aren't "equal". I said they're not the same. There's a difference.

Wow, look at the feminist rage go. Because I don't care for tattoos on women, I apparently think the WOMAN is ugly... and I'm against woman's suffrage too! There's even a desperate attempt at a "hypocrite" angle. Precious. You really need to learn how to agree to disagree. I'm totally cool with women getting tattoos if they want to (and voting too LOL), but I'm not a fan of the idea of a woman getting a tattoo. Deal with it.

Because one is a man and the other is a woman. Call me whatever "progressive" slur you can muster. I think women are beautiful, and I think tattoos have a huge chance of detracting from that.

Tats on men are OK. Tats on women are not. Also, boobies on women are OK. Boobies on men are not.

Under normal circumstances: A threesome is a fantasy. It involves women as objects and that's it, period. When taken to reality, with a real relationship where there's so much more going on, it becomes much more problematic. He might worry that you like her more, for example. He could be afraid of what it might do to your relationship, regardless of your assurances. My guess about his "not set in stone" stance is that the fantasy appeals to him but the unknowns of taking it to reality repel him.

BRB learning to draw Actually I just made an account and then did some sketches of the human form. It's damn hard. I should stick with it though, I've always wanted to be really good at drawing. I think I have potential. I'm not going to upload any of my terribad things though; it'll be awhile before I have anything I consider quality enough to put up there.

I'll let you know when the medium I ordered arrives. Fuzzy Bear's post isn't making me optimistic though. We'll see!

I think protective gloves are a great way to make someone more at ease with changing diapers.

I count three in that post you just made...

What's up with that? It's the crack of dawn and I gave 1 positive vote before encountering this. Here's hoping the negative quota is at least as restrictive?

I ordered a medium chenille. If their measurements are accurate and I'm competent in taking my own, it should fit fine. Time will tell. I wish there was more of a pattern selection with the chenilles though.

I like anime more than disney so Cherry blossoms go natural with it.

They're going to make X-Plus baby print diapers. Just kidding.

Here's an idea: whenever you see a post with a negative rep rating, ask yourself if it's deserved and if not up-rate it.

The jumpin jammerz size suggestions are a bit strange. They say Large fits 6' to 6'4" but 190 to 215 lbs. That weight range is considered overweight for that height range. I'm 6'2" and my healthy range is 144 to 194, or about 170 lbs. That's comfortably in their Medium range, but max 5'11"? Bah. I'm guessing it would be medium based on the more targeted measurements, ie, inseam, etc. Anyone have any who can comment on how their sizes worked for you?

Ideologues and demagogues, oh my!

Would that be the biological one, or the one that's ongoing?

I thought that was quite legitimate. Perhaps you need me to copy/paste the list of resources it found?

I was considering a bulk purchase entirely separate from this deal, but I think I see what you're getting at... case 1: 15 for $15 case 2: 30 for $27 = 15 for $15 and 15 for $12 So, it is equal except the bulk case has an extra 15 for $12, which is a 20% reduction. This is better than the case of: 15 for $15 and 30 for $27 You might get even more, but you don't get the extra boost to the bulk discount. So equalize the diaper count to compare prices: 15 for $15 and 15 for $13.50 And therefore I will concede that you will save an extra $1.50 by combining bulk discount and flat discount. BUT WAIT! Bonus points for expressing it as a formula. ...nah, too many variables. And I need to sleep.

The $10 discount more than makes up for a bulk discount. A thought experiment... 15 diapers for $15. 30 diapers for $27. (10% reduction for bulk) Discount $10: 15 for $5. 30 for $17. $5 is less than 50% of $17, while 15 is exactly 50% of 30. How much would the bulk discount need to be to make it equal? It would need to get down to $10. So, the 30 diaper price would have to be $20. That'd be a 33% bulk discount. That'd be quite impressive. I went and peeked at the abenas at xpmedical and their case discount is barely 4%. In this case I think smaller = less per diaper.

Sorry, I couldn't resist!