tris

I work two jobs: one as a property helper, and the other as a sandwich artist. Both are semi-high public interaction jobs. I'm always around people. I've been wearing 247 for a good bit now, and no one has noticed until I told them. Pick any occupation, as long as its not stripping, you can do it diapered.

erin go bragh!

I'd also like to point out that stupidity is infectious; a dangerous contagion. After so many years and many, many posts, I'm experiencing some less-than-perfect spelling symptoms. Just reading idiocy can expose one to its crippling effects. Please, people, for the sake of mine (and others') superiority, exercise good sense and spellchecking when exhibiting text or materials for public consumption.

Guys, read our original thread about this... there's no need to get upset about it, its meant to be funny, not insulting. ..

Dop·pel·gäng·er –noun a ghostly double or counterpart of a living person.

Hon, you're on-point. Don't backpedal.

You wanna fit in? The answer is simple: Fit in. I spent the majority of my school-age years, thru the end of HS, being a social outkast. It's no fun. But if you want to be part of the crowd, you hafta be 'part of the crowd'. Get the haircut, get the clothes, cop the attitude. We're humans, we're adaptable -- it's what we do best. And the great thing is -- we can change as much as we want. In fact, that's the name of the game. Ask Jesus, he'll tell you! You want to be happy and be part of the crowd, then you hafta make the changes to be 'part of the crowd'. It's not always a bad thing, I can promise you that. Since I graduated from HS in '04, my life has been exponentially better than years '90-03. I started hanging out more, went places and did stuff. Partied, alot. Got a group of friends by being positive, upbeat, and the kind of person that people want to be around. Pretty soon, you actually become that person. At first I was scared that I would somehow be sacrificing my morals, standards, or losing the essence of 'me', by pretending to be all these things that I wasn't, but, in the end, it was probably the best choice I had made in the last 5 years . . . And I didn't feel like I changed at all! I just played the game the way everyone else did, and I'm still doing pretty good at it. For instance, I have moved twice in the last 24 months. That means two new places, two new jobs, and many new people. I've felt like a celebrity everywhere I went because people really took to who I wanted them to see. I showed them my personality, my style, and I've been socially rewarded for it, everyday. You can do it, too. Just sit down and think about it, and you'll come to realize what it is that you've got to do -

Just do it. There's no better way to 'get' comfortable with it besides just going for it. Besides, you're married now. He's stuck with you. So, ask and ye shall receive.

Some chicks just don't like sexy undies, man. That's all there is to it. Personally, thongs and boyshorts top the list of panty styles I don't like. They don't do anything for me. But are they really granny panties -- or just plain ol' white cotton briefs? Cuz those, I find sexy. . .

By "get a job", I meant, in general, people are happiest when they're productive and have money coming in. To combat the unhappiness, find something to do! I understand what's going on here now, though. Sorry your friends suck. I remember when I told all my party friends about being an AB. It was tough, but I made it, and you will, too. Hang in there.

First, don't be a pussy. I've been with Mommy for nearly three years now, and I've been taking it slow. No results, man. Every so often, I feel neglected and get all moody (and mean!) about how she doesn't care about this side of me and won't participate, giving me what I need. Last weekend, I changed that. I got all upset, like I have times before, and I spoke firmly while she cried. (because I'm apparently, really really really mean when I'm mad. Why hit your wife/gf when your emotions are the superior firepower? ) Take some control. Force her to do it. I don't know what your sexual relationship is like, but, in mine, every so often, we hafta fuck, angrily. There's pushing, shoving, slapping, and slapping. Of my balls. Against her . . Whatever area it is that they hit. I'm pulling hair and talking in her ear, telling her what I want. Guess what I got? Exactly what I fuckin' wanted! Our women still want men, bucko. Nut up, shut up, and take what you need. It's gonna feel contrived at first, I know. But, here's the second: Second, be consistent like frosting, persistent like dandruff. Stick her with diaper-duty. Show her, step-by-step, what you want done. Between that, keep the pussy smiling. It's like putting ten bucks in the tank of the Emotional Engine. Theirs runs on dick. Once she knows what to do, she can do it without too much direction from you. Next, be persistent. Set a schedule. You want her to diaper you at night, right? Start bringing it out when you're ready. Get front and center and let her know that you're waiting on her. You're not going anywhere until there's a diaper on your bottom. For a passive-aggressive approach, I'd suggest wetting the bed, then placing the blame on her the next morning. "Well, if you had diapered me before bed (like I wanted and needed) this wouldn't have happened. Now wash the sheets." I've used this trick a couple of times when my diaper leaked while we were sitting on the couch: "I think you're forgetting who's in control here. Hint, it's not me. If you had checked me, you'd have known I needed to be changed. This, (points to wetspot) is on you." You can do it, be brave!

^ Yup, see. That's apparently why we're not allowed to call bullshit. Ever. Someone always rides in on a horse and 10 times outta 9 it's not the OP. I'd also like to point out that the OP hasn't returned to defend their position, or even comment again. (Oh, right, it's because we're all mean, huh, tpins?) Allow me to analogise -- I don't particularly care for cops or LE personnel. But I know that they're a necessary part of our society. They take care of things I never see, but I still reap the benefit of their actions. Some of us have finely-tuned BS-detection engines. Mine happens to be 12 cylinders, ala Lamborghini Gallardo. It performs. Well. I use it to detect BS, and drive it away, so the fine citizens of our society aren't forced to bear the consequences. "You can't BS a BS-er. I'm BS-Proof. I will use my BS Flyswatter to swat away the flies, that are your BS."

From my experience, wiping is always best. Having spent most of my younger days at an in-home daycare, I recall seeing babies being changed into a dry diaper without having a wipe taken to their little bottoms. While it's not the best practice, inevitably, you're going to change them again within a couple hours, so you'll have many more opportunities to do it the right way. For us, it's a must, and it's because we're in the same diaper for longer than real babies are. Our change periods are stretched further apart by at least 2x. Like the others have said, getting the bacteria and rash-causing chemicals off of your skin is the best thing to do. I don't know about you, but I take a little bit of pride in the fact that my balls are washed four to five times a day, plus one or two showers. There's no reason not to be fresh!

You needa job, kiddo. There's one out there for you- Go find it!

Uhm, What? ^

Dammit. I kinda wanted to be the first to call her out, but I refrained because, you know, we're all so tolerant and accepting here that if we don't like a thread, or where it's going we're just supposta move on and not call 'em out. . isn't that right? I gotta give props on the good setup, though: "I think my little brother wants to wear diapers. . . We're gonna goto lunch and I'm gonna ask him" -- "Yup, we went to lunch and he said he liked diapers, so I showed him mine!" Ergo, I'm now questioning to what degree the OP is physically factual to their profile indications. . Mommy: "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is, sweetheart." Me: "Oh." Oh, and I didn't mean he would want to. fuck his sister, I meant that if this scen-hairy-oh were true, It's high-ly likely that he'd want her. To play with him. So once again I'd ask: "How do you feel about your brother masturbating to you?"

Omega wristwatches, is my guess. They're quite a spendy little item -- well into the thousands. Real Silver and Gold, and actual diamonds in some. I believe the new Bond wears Omegas, though in previous versions, I could have sworn he was a Tag Heuer man. . In any case, something worth running back into a burning building for. Judging by your posts, it wouldn't surprise me that somebody somewhere thinks you're worth enough to pay you the kind of money that affords such luxury items. I laud you for your position in the social strata. You know you can attempt to convert all that shit to digital, right? I mean, that way, it can never really be destroyed. . . Think that'd be an option?

Grrr, I'm 2.5 sizes too big!!! Those are way cute, though! Good find!

I'm gonna expand on Angela's post - They're most likely not actual models. Only because they are photographed wearing or using a product do they fit the definition of 'model'. Most likely they're already users of the product, or are close to the originator or distributor, which makes them an ideal candidate to be pictured for sales and advert purposes. I highly doubt that any business or organization (other than WetSet, Skymouse, etc.) seeks persons with the sole intent of photographing them in a diaper.

@Hidden, Loopy: Guys, read the part where she shows him her diaper: "Well, just got back from lunch (really long, I know) but it went amazingly! We started out with the usually talking about school, how things are going back with the fam-fam, the normal small talk. We're pretty close, despite the age difference, as surprising as that is. Anyway, I brought up the fact that he'd been seeming like he had something on his mind. He said he had, not meeting my eyes. I asked what it was and he went a little red, saying that he didn't want to talk about it. I told him that was perfectly fine and we moved on. After a while he did tell me that he wanted my advice. I told him I'd try my best. He admitted that he had been looking around on the internet and he found diapers a turn on. He was pretty embarrassed about it so I hugged him across the table and lifted my shirt a little to show him I was wearing a diaper. He looked so surprised, but also really relieved. I told him I'd be there for him the entire time, told him about this site, and he said he'd looked into it. He thinks he's an AB so I'm pretty excited. He knows about my Daddy (Mike) and stuff as well so I think we're going to be talking about this and comparing ideas again soon. I'm really happy with how it turned out!!!" If you were 13, and your older sister showed you that she was wearing a diaper in the same conversation where you told her you were interested in diapers -- I mean, c'mon! The scenarios I suggested aren't as farfetched as you'd like to think they are. @older sister - How open is your daddy/LG relationship? Did he know about that before you had this little lunch session?

Sister, I say tread lightly, you're on shakity ground. . Don't forget, this is your little brother. Bad things that can happen: He wants to see you in diapers, now that he knows you not only wear them, but are also interested in them, similar to how he is. How do you feel about your brother masturbating to you? He wants you to diaper him. I don't think I need to further elaborate how dangerous this scenario can be. Many of the stories here involve young boys being diapered and babysat by their older sisters. In fantasy, this can be harmless. In reality, it's not something that can result in a positive outcome. Again, how do you feel about your brother masturbating to you? I'm glad you think this is a good thing -- and it can be -- but there are so much more opportunities for this to be something VERY tragic to both of you. Think very hard about your approach and actions with this newfound information. Set extremely conservative boundaries for both you, and your brother.

Anyone know if tailors/alterations places would make our adult clothes more babyish for us? For instance, I've got a couple pairs of cords that I'd like to see an elastic waist on them, perhaps it would make them look more like kids' pants than the big-boy dress pants that they are.

We're a group, and there's dynamics involved, whether you like it or not. The majority of us have a similar idea of what we would expect to see and discuss here, and those that push the limits are taking a risk -- it's either accepted by the group, or it's not. In the instances of which we're discussing in particular -- the chewing on/eating of used SAP apparently doesn't sit well with the group. The poster took a risk, and I think it's very clear as to how it was received -- not well. We can't be so open-minded that our brains fall out. You hafta draw the line somewhere and we draw the line at the using of diapers and disposing of them. If we were all into the consumption of our excretions, then we'd be in a community that's more interested in such activities. Ergo, this isn't the place for that kind of interest, plain and simple.

I think this is an excellent idea, for two big reasons: First, that teens have a place to go. While not legally considered adults, I'm sure many of you have noticed that kids are growing up faster these days. I know that when I was a kid, I still had a childhood. There was still a time of innocence. Not quite the case in this present time, and I blame not just the parents, but, our media and society in general. As the young mind develops, they still need a place to go to exchange ideas and learn about this side of themselves. I'd like to think that we could be the place to help sculpt them, but I'm afraid this is the double-black-diamond of ABDL forums. The second, and biggest reason, would be for our own security. While our country still has a War on Drugs, the new focus is the War on The Internet and protecting children from predators. It wouldn't surprise me that we'll soon have our own color-coded threat level assessment on internet safety. It's the new War on Terror. You can thank the USPA and USC 2257 for this new world order. Remaining Topical, making this kind of decision protects our community in a big way. Any site that is directed at minors, or has a large membership of underage persons is a site of interest to not only predators, but to the FBI and other agencies. Neither of those groups are people we want on our boards. We abide by the laws, (within reason) but I'd hate to see an episode of To Catch a Predator where the 'mark' has found his 'victim' here on our turf. It'd be uber bad press, and worse, it means that we've got not only actual predators here, but federales poking around to trip 'em up. I'm sorry, but I'm just not comfortable with that. Choosing to actively direct minors somewhere that's cut out for them seems to be the best choice for all involved, protecting both them AND us. It goes without saying this also protects The DDi(Mike) from any personal/civil liability that stems from our interactions with other members, should it be found that either party were under the age of legal majority. Good call, brother!

Recent threads claim it was Tommy of DPF who coined the full descriptions of the acronym we commonly use, AB/DL.