tris

Use phrase, "Bicuspid-less" while messy: Check. Yup, that oughta do it. Strangely, I'm gonna hafta agree with you. Couldn't live without teeth or eyesight.

@DFinn, Finally, someone else who sees it the way it really is! The "Bachelor's becoming the new HS diploma" is spot on, and most likely where the job market is going, sadly. Would we all be so patriotic once we realize that we've classed ourselves out of our own jobs and livelihoods? However, with Master's degrees on the rise, so are their salaries. Unless the commonly-considered value and compensation levels of Master's degrees are lowered, this will affect prices on products and services rendered. I think people have lost respect for the elitist nature of education. By sending nearly every high school graduate to college, you're severely cheapening the value of education. Let's face it -- college wasn't intended for everybody. Only in the last 30 years has so much emphasis been placed on students going on to college. Private schools use their matriculation rates as a selling point, and public schools use them to justify themselves (and their once-again-outstretched hands) to everybody -- from Parents to School Board Members to Real Estate Agents -- all of them Taxpayers. Every High School in America has now become not just a basic education institution, it's now a Sales Associate for nearly every University in existence. Colleges are still a business, like anything else. They are many things, and a not-for-profit organization isn't one of them. Like any good business, they recognized flaws in their strategies, and realized that a larger market base equals larger profits. Colleges weren't always intended to be for everybody, though. In past years, only the especially bright (and usually affluent) children were considered college-bound. Despite the obvious financial ability of the wealthy consumers, it was still only a limited selection of the overall population. I don't hafta explain why limiting your customer base isn't the best move you could make. Now in many other cases, by increasing your production and thereby flooding the market with your product -- college grads -- , your product is devalued by the sheer supply. Therefore, what people will pay for your product (College graduate's salary) will naturally decline. When the value of your product declines, so do your profits -- what future customers are willing to pay in tuition. But what's unique to the college game is that this doesn't apply, or hasn't taken effect yet. People are still willing to fork over (or borrow) upward of 100k to attend college on the premise that they will secure a job paying at least that much after obtaining their degree. Remember, now we're making sure that all the average (and even below-average) students get a shot at going to college -- not just the exceptional ones. However, with the production rates so high (number of people in school), my concern is now about the quality of the end result. Only now that everybody gets pushed to go, you're using cheaper quality (Average students) materials for your product. Before, when colleges were still exclusive to those who were appropriate, the materials were of higher quality, and so was the end result --something our country is riding on right now. However, because humans do have a shelf-life, in addition to being rather fragile creatures by nature; we're going to need a continuous supply of fresh product. But now that we're using less-quality materials, and producing lesser quality results, how can we still expect to sustain ourselves at the same level? The college business is flourishing in many unique ways, due in part to the service they provide for the consumer (student), though they're starting to seem more like an insurance racket. But then again, the truly elite -- those who have been around a while, like Stanford, Harvard, Yale, or Cambridge can still produce not only a higher quality product, but a Brand Name product that's in higher demand, and highest compensated. Further proof that those who've been doing this a while produce better products and provide a better insurance to those who qualify to purchase. The difference in quality of the product depends on where you bought it and what you paid for it. Not all degrees are created equal. So perhaps it's still: Experience: 1 Education: 0 Why take on more debt? Just get good at something!

. . . and take on more unneeded debt? Meanwhile, you still hafta work, but it's probably not in your chosen field. Once again, you could have had better experiences somewhere else, and not incurred student loans you'll be paying on until you retire. At what point do you hafta do the math and figure that by the time you've maxed out your schooling, you'll be paying student loans for the majority of your career? I don't know about y'all, but I hope to be solvent ten years after I'm done with school, preferably sooner. And so all these unemployed people have gone back to school -- great. So now all of you are overqualified and still unemployed. In addition to having no job, you've just added more debt on the premise that you'll somehow snag a 'better' job when you're out. I just don't see the advantage -- everyone has now moved up a level in education and qualifications, but, since EVERYONE has done it, the playing field is still level; the only difference is that they've each paid to play. Once jobs, services, and products have been outsourced, you can't just bring them back. I mean, who wants to pay more, when you've been paying less? And your only selling point is patriotism (Buy USA made!) -- sorry, Rollbacks are gonna win every time. Personally, I think greater taxes, penalties, and tariffs should be imposed on 'American' businesses who do not have their headquarters within the jurisdiction of the United States. Frequently, corporations will move their headquarters offshore in order to mitigate some, if not all, of their tax liability. Perhaps if Americans were made to pay more for products that were not 'Made in the USA', we might be more inclined to buy American. I'm no economist, clearly, but, forcing our country into sustainable solvency just might pay off in the long term.

The problem with not using powder is that with most disposable diapers, the oil and lotion tends to break down the way the fluff sticks to the actual diaper, causing sagging and bunching. Also, powder serves to keep baby drier, and to help absorb excess moisture from the skin, like oil or sweat. If you mean to say that you have respiratory issues, I can attest to having no problems with J&J Powder, and I've got pretty severe asthma. Using too much powder can cause breathing problems, as well as clogged pores, so, try not to go overboard with it.

Usher. So hot right now. I only wish I could move like he does. It's uber sexy. #Jealous Haven't heard this song, but love a lot of others.

You know what else isn't pleasant? You. Go away. I am going to be in S GA for just a couple more weeks, and the heat has definitely turned up here! Being used to wearing diapers all the time, I haven't noticed that it's the diaper area that gets hot. I'll just strip down when I get home if I'm super sweaty after work and such. I work an outside job and an inside job. My outside job is only for a few hours of the day, and in the mornings, but it's still hot. My only complaint is that the disposables can't handle heat and movement; my diaper will be sagging and bunched, even though I may not have wet yet. This is only frustrating because of having to change a diaper I haven't used. But, I'm sure real babies get changed out of many not-so-wet diapers, meaning that everyone in disposables usually experiences wasted diapers. It's just a sad fact of being 247.

Just as it's hard to train a sub, even when they want to be controlled, its even harder to train your dom/mommy. I personally have been struggling with this as well. Feel free to PM me, we can exchange ideas -

Been listening to a paid file from wmm "MM_Bladder Retraining" for a couple of weeks straight, while sleeping. I try to follow along as best I can, but I have a feeling that these things only work if you're able to clear your mind. Mine doesn't have an off button, as there's always something going on in my head. I have experienced no results from any of wmm's files, unfortunately, and I've been praying that they will work for me. I'd really like to have no control, but, having been 247 for quite some time (3+ years) now, and using the hypno files, I have yet to experience an involuntary wetting. I'd like to think that I have some loss of control, but, I find that if I really wanted to go without a diaper, or even just stop wearing altogether, I'd be just fine. Sucks, too. I'd rather not have control. . . Some people do not react to hypnosis; their minds are too strong. Apparently, I'm a hardcase -

They (the same people who happily defend this of Nonsense/BS/Lies , btw.) keep talking about some 'ignore' feature/button, but I cannot seem to find it. A lil' help from my friends?

If I buy you a plane ticket to England, would you go get yourself committed alongside Goerge?

um, why is this a good post? The OP is whining about his circumstances, just like everyone else. And reviving it? What for? What's Dr. Phil hafta do with any of this? He doesn't even discuss incontinence or psycho-sexual issues. . . This is all so confusing.

I don't have any problems with the way you post. Other than that it always looks like this. Each line is a statement. And each one is simple. This leads me to believe you aren't very intelligent. Just as spelling, grammar, and word choice are important aspects of posting on the internet, so are sentence and paragraph structure. You seem to write like everything is an IM or chatbox. . In my personal opinion, I don't particularly care for the fonts and colors, I think they're just dumb, no matter what the poster has to say. So, since you're asking for critique, this is mine, and while you don't seem to post much, your posts are all rather simple. Try being more verbose -- treat each post as if it were a short essay. think about what you're gonna say, and then follow this simple formula: - Tell 'em what you're gonna tell em. - Tell 'em. - Tell 'em whatcha told 'em. It's that easy!!

@Kari - No, masturbating less will absolutely NOT increase your stamina. If you've ever been on a first date and put forth the effort to get laid, you'd know that it's in your best interest to work one out before you go pick her up. This is done for a couple of reasons - you're not gonna be so horny that all you can think about is sex (and thus, probably say something stupid and turn her off) and if'n you do get to hit it, you're gonna make a great first impression -- no woman likes a two-to-five fella. (which, you'd be if you failed to fap before you left the house.) Also, it's a use-it-or-lose-it scenario: You don't take care of your shit, it's not gonna take care of you. And most importantly, don't take sexual advice from your mom, unless she's one of those alcoholic 'cool' moms. Most women's advice on modern dating is neither relevant or useful, and it will guarantee you won't get laid. (Which is probably what Mom's aiming for anyway, cuz she, better than anyone else, knows you're a loser -- despite that she tells you to the contrary.) Best anti-depressant for fucking: Wellbutrin. It's nearly impossible to cum, but you'll stay hard for a LONG time. If you've still got a sex life, I'd recco switching to this. Relatedly, I personally do not think that fat or overweight people need to be having sex. At all. It's just gross. Those who are depressed -- well, you need more sex. But if you're fat AND depressed -- exercise, dammit! @B - 105lbs? Seriously? You could be a stand-in for Seacrest!

Ditto. Include her in this, or she'll include you in the divorce decree.

So old, Benjamin Franklin said it was a repost!

They're thinking about putting something similar in Shelton -- a Biomass Incinerator, which, apparently would start by burning excess forestry products and converting them into energy. Of course, things like this have repercussions -- environmental, and economical. Some are good and some are bad, as far as consequences go - I'd like to wait and see what pans out, and we could all go from there . . .

I remember watching it Live on the Today show as the second plane hit and the tower collapsed. When I got on the bus to goto school, we made the bus driver turn on the radio. For once, the bus was quiet as we all listened to what was going on. When I got to school, we talked about it and some people cried and whatnot. . Stupid debate class, haha. My fat bitch of a debate teacher (Ms. Martin, MS. for a reason) was wearing her purple snakeskin pants and I got sent out to the hall for insinuating that the terrorists attacked because her pants were so hideous. Man, I was a terrible teenager. A few months later I was kicked out of that HS. Went to alternative HS, and that was badass. . . As for being littler and fitting into real baby stuff -- back in 6th grade I bought my first package of boys' pullups at the QFC near the Seattle Center. I was shocked to find out that I could still fit them, and comfortably. What a rush! Wish they could still fit like that, but I'm now a 32in waist, and at that time, I was maybe an 18-19. . Oh, the good ol' days.

Me, but not for much longer. Depending on where you eat around town, I've probably made your lunch a couple times - Shit, you might even already know me! . . Or maybe you're one of my residents. . ! Anyway I'll be here thru the end of the month, and I'd be down for hanging out and meeting just a few people before I never ever again set foot on Georgian soil. (that's a pact and a promise!)

. . .

@Jeisin: Can I be your hype-man? Let's take this shit on tour, bro!

PM sent, kiddo. Good luck!

Different brands have different features, and absorbency levels, and not all are created equal. For someone who is truly incontinent, picking the right kind of diaper for the day can make all the difference, and having more options is always a plus. Maybe one day you're going to wet really heavily, so you're gonna wanna go with cloth diapers, or if disposables, a Bambino or Molicare Super -- something high absorbency. Another day you might only be slightly wet, so having a thicker diaper on would be of no real benefit. Times like those are when one might be able to get away with a lighter, less-thick diaper.

Hm. How many of you have actually used duct tape on the mouths of babes? I think not. Soap is best for that one.

To quote Richard Griot: Diapers are for poo poo! Use my new microfiber towels instead! Cotton diapers have polyester fibers that can scratch paint and cause swirl marks. Though super absorbent, they're not the best for your paint -

Thanks. I'm just as charming IRL, too.