ldatsea Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 the movie "Shoot em up" has an AB scene where a man in a diaper his getting feed in a room with a crib and racks of baby dresses and a whole lot of adult baby bottles.... the action hero interupts the feeding and soon the bad guys are shooting up the crib....literally. Link to comment
babyfett Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I have the movie on dvd. Its a pretty good movie for a B movie. The scene with the AB guy wasnt that great in my opinion. Link to comment
Guest sissylucy Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 ok.. well this was unlikely to be my sort of film anyway.... but.... with the added horror of someone shooting up a pretty AB nursery... i don't think i will... Are you trying to make all the ABs cry... hehehe Giggles Lucy (P.S. This was post #200 for me! Wooooo!) Link to comment
Necare Posted February 26, 2008 Share Posted February 26, 2008 Not a particular interesting AB-scene, but hey, who wouldn`t want to be Monica Belluccis baby? God, that woman is beautiful! Definitely a dream-mommy right there! Link to comment
diaperedpuppy Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Fun movie - and hey - nice crib in her den too! DP Link to comment
Eric D Posted March 8, 2008 Share Posted March 8, 2008 I liked the movie - especially the carrot-action I think it was kind of weird to have such a scene in such a mainstream movie - I don't know who came up with this idea - but it must have been an AB. Whilst I didn't really enjoy the "scene" as I'm not into AB Stuff at all, I still thought it was quite a bold thing to show off for a mainstream $$$ movie. the movie itself I thought was quite funny - and very well choreographed - the gun-fights are quite something "new" Link to comment
will_k2 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 ok well.. this is what i think.. the scene was terribly done, not enough info bout it!! but hearing that chilled music and seeing the beautiful monica on the bed... i would DIE to be an infant in her hands.. Link to comment
DiaperBigBoy Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 I don't care what anybody says, I love that movie. It was so clever. I hope there is a sequel Link to comment
Eric D Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 I don't care what anybody says, I love that movie. It was so clever. I hope there is a sequel I actually hope there will be NO SEQUEL to it... Sequels ruin most everything. I really enjoyed Shoot Em Up... it was original, a lot of fun, the choreography was very refreshing, it didn't try to take itself too serious, has a lot of good moments and was a great bit of entertainment. I don't see that a sequel could do any good. look at "the matrix"... I loved the first one - it's an amazingly made movie - the story was quite good and imho philosophic too. the graphics, effects and stunds were something really new on screen back then. I was quite stunned with the digital effcts, quite mindblowing at that time. The sequels to it were Horrible HORRIBLE imho (I know, my opinion,...) - they ruined a perfectly "closed story" (first matrix movie) - runied a whole lot of characters,.. and didn't make too much sense compared to the first one. it's just one example - but so far I haven't seen a sequel to any movie which was as good or even better than the first. I might say Lord Of the Rings is an exception, but then again it wasn't really sequels - it was a trilogy from the beginning, so I regard it as one single movie... I'm love movies... I've seen many... but I can't remember one real sequel which beat the original or at least was on the same level - most were quite worse. Link to comment
Eric D Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 ok well.. this is what i think.. the scene was terribly done, not enough info bout it!! but hearing that chilled music and seeing the beautiful monica on the bed... i would DIE to be an infant in her hands.. Ok, again - I have NO AB Experience, and it's absolutely not my thing. It's a huge turn-off acutally for me... so I might not be the right one to judge the scene in Shoot Em Up for it's "quality"... but what - what was done so terrible about it ... you have a beautifull "mommy" or "wet-hooker", you have a guy in cloth diapers (albeit no plastic panty), you have bottles and baby stuff... isn't that what it is about?? it might not have been a full scale AB Nursery - but in the context that she playd a wet-hooker /mommy in a kink-brothel I think the room of hers was made to accomodate a broad range of "fantasies" and would work for it's shown purpose. And "NOT enough INFO about it" ?? Ehm? sorry? what sort of INFO did you expect - Shoot Em up was not supposed to be a "Kink-Educational Video Documentary"... In the scenes before the Nursery scene, you see glimpses of other kink-rooms and some other role play, S&M, some other kink stuff... but it was only a glimpse and quick.... the nursery scene and the "customer" running off in his diapers was actually quite "obvious" - more so than the other scenes... what did you expect - the movie making a hour long stop in that nursery - having explaining dialog and educational character??? Link to comment
DiaperBigBoy Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 I actually hope there will be NO SEQUEL to it... Sequels ruin most everything.I really enjoyed Shoot Em Up... it was original, a lot of fun, the choreography was very refreshing, it didn't try to take itself too serious, has a lot of good moments and was a great bit of entertainment. I don't see that a sequel could do any good. look at "the matrix"... I loved the first one - it's an amazingly made movie - the story was quite good and imho philosophic too. the graphics, effects and stunds were something really new on screen back then. I was quite stunned with the digital effcts, quite mindblowing at that time. The sequels to it were Horrible HORRIBLE imho (I know, my opinion,...) - they ruined a perfectly "closed story" (first matrix movie) - runied a whole lot of characters,.. and didn't make too much sense compared to the first one. it's just one example - but so far I haven't seen a sequel to any movie which was as good or even better than the first. I might say Lord Of the Rings is an exception, but then again it wasn't really sequels - it was a trilogy from the beginning, so I regard it as one single movie... I'm love movies... I've seen many... but I can't remember one real sequel which beat the original or at least was on the same level - most were quite worse. Well for the most part sequels usually are bad, I know there are good and bad ones. (Back to the Future, Indian Jones. They could make a sequel with the baby grown up, or what not. And Eric I have to agree with you. If it was anymore of an AB movie it would be a porn, but it's a main stream film, so your right. Link to comment
Eric D Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Well for the most part sequels usually are bad, I know there are good and bad ones. (Back to the Future, Indian Jones. They could make a sequel with the baby grown up, or what not. And Eric I have to agree with you. If it was anymore of an AB movie it would be a porn, but it's a main stream film, so your right. _How could I have forgotten about Indian Jones - I really like the trilogy.... I wasn't much into "back to the future" though. But I have a weird feeling about Indy IV.... I'm not sure if Ford isn't a tad too old for that kind of a movie... Besides imho the best "sequels" in film history is the James Bond movies... Ok, again they're independent stories so not actually a sequel-series, but Bond movies (with a few minor exceptions) have never really failed.... Link to comment
will_k2 Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 yo eric chill dude ... i was never judging the movie ... this topic is about the spotted AB scene !! pheww hold ur horses bro Link to comment
lynniehyde Posted March 26, 2008 Share Posted March 26, 2008 Sequels are a convenient way to feed the Hollywood "greed machine". Lazy SOBs. Unfortunately, for the movie going public, most subsequent "suck-wells" of major hits have jaded the majority of movie fans. Take "Jaws", for example. The original? A classic piece of filmaking. Each following episode, soiled the memory of the first. Hackneyed plots. Poor casting. "Let's make a fast buck!" attitude. I do, however, enjoy the "Terminator" sequels. As well as the original. This is the first I've heard of "Shoot 'Em Up". I suppose it's available at Blockbuster, or some other similar video provider? Cuddles, --heidilynn Link to comment
DiaperBigBoy Posted March 27, 2008 Share Posted March 27, 2008 Sequels are a convenient way to feed the Hollywood "greed machine". Lazy SOBs. Unfortunately, for the movie going public, most subsequent "suck-wells" of major hits have jaded the majority of movie fans. Take "Jaws", for example. The original? A classic piece of filmaking. Each following episode, soiled the memory of the first. Hackneyed plots. Poor casting. "Let's make a fast buck!" attitude. I do, however, enjoy the "Terminator" sequels. As well as the original. This is the first I've heard of "Shoot 'Em Up". I suppose it's available at Blockbuster, or some other similar video provider? Cuddles, --heidilynn It was a main stream movie, but yeah, you can pick it up anywhere Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now