Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

GhostGirl

Members
  • Posts

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GhostGirl

  1. 20 hours ago, Firefly 35 said:

    It could be that males are more often bedwetters, regardless of sexual orientation.  I've heard that boys often take longer to potty train, but I'm not sure if that carries over to bedwetting.  

    Girl secrets: Many girls, during puberty, have wetting problems. Some worse than others. Our anatomy sucks, and when it goes through changes, like puberty or pregnancy, everything gets weird, so I am not sure that is exactly true.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. 56 minutes ago, dl_ashlee said:

    Sadly, its highly unlikely they were wearing diapers under their sleepers. Teen girls tend to group together and do kooky things like wearing sleepers out and about.  Also sleepers now have become accepted, specially for females to wear.  Females can even get away with wearing onesies as their "shirt", ones with a baby print might get some passing glances, more normal prints wouldn't get any notice most likely.

    Those are not onsies, they are called body suits and supper comfortable typically. You wear them to hide the underwear line when wearing tighter clothing. They are not as loose as onsie, and tend to be very very form fitting. Sometimes they blouse out at the torso, so that can be worn as outer wear as well.

    As to the rest of the thread... if you see a pretty person that is fine, if you leer, that is bad... Looking fine, leering bad.

  3. While terrible, that is not doxing, nor is it anywhere near as dangerous. Destructive yes. Yeah, that woman was terrible, and probably should of been reported to law enforcement, although I completely get why you did not.

    Doxxing though, is when your personal address, phone number, daily schedule, home address of your family, firends, etc... is released on the internet for anyone to see, use, or do terrible things with.

    It is a common tactic used to scare women, particular feminist, and their allies into silence. There have been several high profile cases where DOXXED men and women have had strangers show up at doors, or the doors of family members, with the intent to assault, or have actually committed assault.

    You were not doxxed, you were blackmailed, and had your privacy invaded.

  4. I do agree that a gay man is more likely to reject toxic masculinity and thus be open about things like bed wedding... however it would be wrong to say all gay guys do this, because many of them can be very into the toxic masculinity. Some of my most sexist interactions with men have come at the hands of gay men. 

  5. On 11/17/2018 at 10:04 AM, Elbs said:

    I don't buy your psych's theories at all. If you look at Understanding Infantilism's research, which is the most extensive research I've seen on ABDLs, there's a slight elevation of a few psych conditions (which, incidentally, is also true of LGBT people - for example autism spectrum conditions are linked to fetishes, bi/asexuality, and transgender identity), but certainly far less than your psych's theory would suggest. The majority of ABDLs don't have any psych conditions.

    I think it's also relevant to point out that a few decades ago, prevailing psych wisdom was that being LGBT was definitely abnormal and due to psych issues, such as having a poor relationship with the same-sex parent. This has been largely disproved.

    Normal vs abnormal is very subjective in general.

    By a purely statistical definition, being gay or trans is definitely abnormal, since both are present in less than 5% of the population. In fact the only LGBT identity that would be considered normal is bisexuality, because depending on how you define it, between 8-40% of people are bi.

    If you define it as something 'wrong', then it's extremely subjective. Is it because you think being ABDL is environmental? So is your religious beliefs, and what language you speak. Is it that you feel it comes from an underlying factor that causes distress? My lack of religious beliefs are in part due to being abused by Christians. That doesn't mean that being atheist is something 'wrong' with me, or that healing my trauma would involve becoming Christian.

    I know of a lesbian sexual abuse survivor who said that she doesn't even care if her abuse is why she's lesbian - if it is, "at least something good came out of the abuse". Now, I don't think abuse makes someone LGBT (or ABDL for that matter) but I also agree that even if it did, that wouldn't make it a bad thing even if it came from something bad.

    The challenge with your claims is that ABDL, like most fetish communities, are really hard to count. Furthermore, if we accept the basic premise that many are self-medicating due to trauma (Which is not only abuse, which you implied in your response, feel free to correct me if I read it wrong.) they are unlikely to self-report, and if they manage moderation, medical intervention is unlikely to take place. Alcohol, and drug use as a form of self-medication gets detected more due to the medical consequences of those lifestyle choices.

    Again, this is not to say that people are "wrong" for wanting to wear diapers, even if it is a response to an underlying trauma. I am only proposing the theory that ABDLism is a response to some form of stimuli that needs to be balanced out. This is not what causes people to be gay, as far as science can tell. (Although with many homosexual individuals, there is room for error as the mere fact of being gay in our society creates a whole host of shames, guilts, and worse, which can send us into mental health spirals.)

    You also have to understand I am not using abnormal to say something is wrong, and it is not subjective in an academic sense. Abnormal simply means it falls out of statistical norms. IE, if we have 100 people, and 99 people are not ABDLs and 1 is, statistically speaking, that means the one ABDL is abnormal. I made the point over and over that there is nothing "wrong" which is a morale judgement. (In this context, wrong can be a factual judgement as well, such as the shape of a circle is either drawn correctly, or incorrectly.)

    Now I probably should of been more careful when I described LGBTQ as normal. That was a poor choice of word inspired by counseling people coming out at my college. LGBTQ is, most likely according to current scientific study, biologically determined. There is a lot of science here, looking at chromosomes, DNA, etc... but more and more evidence is growing that homosexuality is biologically determined. That is a whole other post.

    Being ABDL is not biologically determined. You do not have a gene in your body that says "You will want to wear diapers." That gene can not exist. What you do have are memories, traumas, and associations, which can trigger preferences and fetishes later in life. 

  6. 2 hours ago, rusty pins said:

    With some hunting you need to sit in a blind.  I know you are talking about deer, but with ducks it's most always from a blind and you have to try and attract ducks that are flying by to come set into your decoys.  It takes a lot of skill to know just where to set your decoys based on wind and the flyway, how to set them to look natural and what kinds of decoys to set out.  You may not want to mix some different species of ducks together, and you need to leave an open pocket for ducks to come into.  Then you need to be a good duck caller to get their attention and you need to know when to highball a duck quack or when to chuckle call, and just when to call and when not to.  You also have to be able to identify what species of duck since there are limits on some species and some species you can't shoot at all.  Not good to shoot ducks that come over your decoys only to find out they were protected species and you can't shoot them.  Even then, not all ducks quack!  Wood ducks, for example whistle.  I say this because any type of hunting takes some skill to be successful.  It's not as easy as just sitting waiting for something to come close enough to shoot at.

    As far as deer, some of the same things apply.  It won't do you any good to build a blind from tree branches and brush if it's in an area where there are no deer.  You have to scout areas out first, look for deer trails and even then you don't know if a trail is active or not.  You can look for scrapes where a deer has scraped the leaves away and urinated to attract other deer, and also rubs on trees where a buck has rubbed his antlers to scrape off bark defining his territory.  Then you need to be able to tell if the rub is fresh or old.  Once you know you are in an area where deer have been recently, you need to know which way the wind is blowing and set up with the wind in your face to blow the scent away from the deer.  It also wouldn't do to be facing one way and have the deer trail behind you.  Deer have very sharp scent and hearing and while many people can stalk deer (and many do), most will do their scouting first to find where the deer and moving and set up a blind.  Later in the late afternoon many will do their stalking when deer start moving again.  So, even though you are sitting in a blind for a while, people do track their deer first by scouting the area to determine where the deer are, looking for rubs and scrapes and sign.  True, we would all love to stalk up on a deer and shoot it that way and many do, but there are many who stalk their deer, see one that takes off and they shoot it, wound it and never find it.  


    Thanks for the quick synopsis of information I already know. I will see more people wound deer from stands than they do stalking, simply because the people in stands are more likely to be drunk, and unfit. Meaning they don't bother to chase it. For deer, I do dislike stand hunting because those are the guys more likely to shoot me when I am out there, because as I said, they are less likely to be physically fit, and more likely to be drunk. As you pointed out as well, they are often destructive to the environment. But hey, I am just a girl, what do I know.

  7. What is with all this sitting in blind stuff... that is not hunting... that is sitting in the woods waiting for the dumbest deer to go "Hey, Frank and Willy died here... I am going to go this way too!"

    :-p

    Track your deer dang it :-p

  8. On 2/13/2008 at 4:27 AM, Repaid1 said:

    "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."

    Jefferson didn't actually say this, in fact no one knows who starting saying it, but it starts to circulate in 1990s... so...

    Anyways, history doesn't even suggest that Jefferson said this, because Jefferson reduced our Navy because he thought it was to much for what we needed, and would only cause others to escalate to meet us.

    Anyways.... 

    I own 3 firearms. Mosin-Nagant 1898, a Walther Gewher 41 (Which my Grandfather claimed to have been his after he was conscripted by the German's... he has a lot of stories of how he ended up with it, we are fairly certain it was just a rifle he got after the war...) and a CZ 27. I use both rifles when I hunt, although I don't do that very often.

    I have no problem with people owning guns. I think using a gun as home defense is pointless. If you store them safely and correctly, then they are useless for home intruders, because by the time you have it readied, it is to late.

    In public defense, well I have watched a crazy ass woman pull her hand gun at a guy running outside of a store because she THOUGHT he was shop lifting. She didn't hit him at all, but did kill a dog, and did some damage to a BBQ Grill for sale, and a couple of cars. The guy wasn't shoplifting, he was running back to his car to get his wallet. He was black though, so...

    The problem is the amount of danger a moron with a gun can cause far outweighs the help one can cause.

    Minimum education standards, harsh punishments for idiots from the example above, and keeping people liable for the use of their guns, even if they were not the ones using it in a crime, would go a long way to keeping people safe. Background checks, allowing research on gun violence and safety, etc... are important as well.

    The problem is a minority of gun owners are so freaking belligerent about zero compromise, that eventually a total ban is what is going to happen.

    2 hours ago, Elbs said:

    Anyone who thinks they can count on guns for self-defense should really rethink.

    Firstly, a gun can kill you before you even know it's happening. The idea of "one guy draws first but the second shoots faster" is complete fiction.

    Second, you can store your guns safely enough to prevent accidents, or have them handy for self-defense, but you cannot do both. Do you seriously think a burglar is going to wait for you to open your gun safe, get the bullets stored separately, then load the gun?

    More home shootings are done by toddlers (actual toddlers, not ABs) playing with unsecured guns than by people defending themselves against a home invasion. And that's not even counting the non-toddlers who accidentally shoot themselves or others with an unsafely secured gun.

    If you have guns for sport, hunting, collections, etc, that makes sense. But don't expect guns to keep you safe. You're better off getting martial arts training - then you know what you're doing and no one can take your weapon away.

    Baseball bat, pepper spray, and hand stunners (non-projectile tazers)

    I have used two of the three to defend myself. Never felt I needed a gun.

  9. I am a music major playing violin, and violoncello. Mostly classical, and orchestral, but I do a little folk stuff. I play on my grandfathers violin, which survived Germany's invasion of Czechoslovakia, and he dragged it around with him when the Germans conscripted him, and it was the one thing the Americans let him keep when he surrendered to them. I love my violin!

  10. 5 hours ago, rusty pins said:

    People can pick the fly $hit out of the pepper all they want to, but my actual meaning is clear enough.  Who gives a rat's a$$ if it's a lifestyle or not.  That's semantics.  The point is some "groups" (or are they not groups either?) have gone though many years of ridicule, being outcast and labeled before they started to gain some acceptance.  Those who like to play at babies or wear diapers (I won't label them for fear of more semantics and pepper/fly $hit picking) will most likely take an even longer time to start being understood or gaining some acceptance based on what they like to do weather it's right, wrong or misunderstood.

    The term lifestyle is often used against LGBT communities to water down what it is to be gay. Lifestyle does imply choice in the matter. This is used to justify the existence of gay conversion camps, the labeling of gay and transgendered people as mentally ill or social deviants, etc.. Its semantics to you, it is a big fucking difference to me, because that word is used to delegitimize how I feel, and what I am attracted to all the freaking time.

  11. One day is not really long enough to be honest. I wouldn't want to change anything for just one day. 

    I mean, all the guys here saying they would like to experience being a lady to see the other side, kudos for the recognition and desire to walk in our shoes, but one day is not enough to get that picture... (Although if you are a young adult women, you could probably get some of the picture because you will have zero experience with what going outside is like.)

    What I am trying to get at is that a day is not enough time to get used to any change and enjoy it... so I would just stay as I am...

    • Like 1
  12. 4 hours ago, rusty pins said:

    To clarify, I was not comparing LGBT with diapers.  What I was doing was stating how long it took for one type of controversial lifestyle to become relatively accepted (LGBT) and how much longer it will take for the AB/DL lifestyle to become accepted based on the type of lifestyle it is and how much fewer of us there are overall when compared to other lifestyles like LGBT or bondage, for example.

    Being gay is not a lifestyle. No more so than being straight is a lifestyle. Calling it a lifestyle implies choice.

  13. So, about gay people being accepted and such in public. That aint happening. I get that straight people think they are accepted, but just today, I was denied an autoloan because the banker, and I quote, "I don't make deals with fags."

    My HOA for my condo just told me I have a month to evict my girlfriend because the MOI prohibits same-sex cohabitation, so I have to choose fines, kicking my girlfriend out, or filing a lawsuit.

    LGBT are not accepted in the mainstream yet.

    And diapers are even further away, and not even related. This is closer to BDSM than it is to LGBT, and you don't see the BDSM community, generally, wishing they could walk around town with their sub in a gimp suit. Time and place.

  14. I'd never hunt with a diaper, willingly in a diaper... when I went not to long ago, even with my issues, I wore as minimal padding as I thought I could get away with.

    I also don't use deer stands. I'd rather hunt than wait.

  15. From my understanding, Bowel Incontinence is normally a side effect of paralysis, or a result of muscle degeneration. In both these cases, I think this is just a reminder of a lot of other crappy issues they deal with.

    Now there are apparently a lot in this community who have trained bowel incontinence, but I am not sure how many of them walk the line between acting is if they had no control, and actually having trained away control...

  16. No regrets related to my DL stuff... I mean I do regret how young I was when I first had sex, and I do regret using sex to hide my discomfort with my own sexuality... I also regret wrecking my car... the bus sucks... the heat sucks, walking, bus, pregnancy and incontinence plus heat REALLY sucks.

  17. 3 hours ago, Spokane Girl said:

    I wear pajamas to bed over my diaper. I used to sleep only in a diaper and socks sometimes but since my son likes to crawl into my bed, I can't anymore. I will also sometimes wear pajamas pants and a bra or sports bra to bed with my diaper. 

    I have no idea how you can sleep in a bra... it baffles me whenever I find out that a woman does this. I might be our choices in bras and such, but I like letting the girls air out during the night, and just be free under a t-shirt.

  18. 5 hours ago, rusty pins said:

     

    Do you for one moment think they didn't dress that way or buy those jeans because they didn't want men to look at them?

    No, that is not why we fucking dress the way we do. We dress the way we do because we like how WE look and feel. We are not showing off for you, or trying to get you to look at us. This idea needs to die.

  19. 7 hours ago, Spokane Girl said:

    But if he is just looking at videos online of parents changing their kids diapers, how can that be illegal? I see that stuff on youtube all the time and I just skip it because I am looking for adults changing their diapers, not parents changing their children. 

     

    Sorry, I still don't see how a minor is being harmed just because their parent chooses to put a video online of themselves changing them for other parents to see and someone decides to jack off to it. Children don't consent to their parents recording them changing their diaper and putting it on youtube or on facebook. Maybe the parent should be charged too by your logic? After all they are possessing in child porn. 

    The video itself is not illegal. The second the dude watching the video whips out his penis and starts rubbing, he is now committing a crime. In cases of pedophilia, a minor does not have to be harmed. People get sent to jail over using advertisements of kids in swimsuits, finding home videos of kids in bathtubs, etc...

    It is the act of using children in a sexual act that is against the law, not harming a child (which is covered under different laws and carry far more punishing consequences.)

  20. 39 minutes ago, Comfortably diapered said:

    Actually a ex girlfriend ruined a few shows for me because we watched them together hell even songs we liked I can't listen to. So it's not just a girl thing as ghost girl seems to think. I hope it gets better for you don't let one guy run everything. I honestly enjoy my time alone because most people suck at this point.

    Yaay condescension!

    Anyways, I was not implying that men don't suffer similar things, however, using your example, you do seem to saying you can't stand etc.. and you suggest there is anger.

    Women struggle with this stuff because we feel shame. We are trained to assume we did something wrong, and when we are reminded of a relationship, we end up feeling less of a person, like if we had tried harder, we would be fine, and we just run through a list of crap we felt we did wrong.

    The entire post I wrote was about being positive with her choice, that it was a choice to improve her life, and that it was a healthy choice. 

  21. 12 minutes ago, Spokane Girl said:

    t's not illegal what he is doing since it's not real CP and no child is actually being harmed.

    That is actually incorrect, in Texas, and California (The only two states I really know anything about) pedophilia is described as a sexual act involving a minor, and the expansion on that is "photos, video, of children in pornographic mediums, or recordings, photos, advertisement featuring children, or obtained by recording children, with or without consent."

×
×
  • Create New...