![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
 |
 |
Wet Knight
-
Posts
1,035 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Store
Posts posted by Wet Knight
-
-
and sarahab, you realy realy think its wise to let the government take guns from law abiding citizens? believe me it will have zero affect on criminals, africa has the strictest gun laws of the world, boy there sure are safe over there arent they? yup no gun crimes at all!
for another example schools already have a federal ban on firearms on the premises, guess someone forgot to tell that to the shooter, whats more all it will do is make it so that anyone that does continue to have a firearm BECOMES a criminal after all if its a crime to have a gun then you are a criminal for having one, the amount of armed criminals skyrockets with such a law, at least with legal possession of firearms they can be considered law abiding and we can then expect them to continue to abide by them,the amount of armed criminals skyrockets, the amount of law abiding armed citizens hits ZERO, think about this for a minute, just let it sink right in, ask yourself if this sounds safer the amount of armed criminals skyrockets, the amount of law abiding armed citizens hits ZERO,
so lets see you think the government will protect you if they can take your guns? thatll make you more safe? the governments who murder thousands of children every year in sensless wars and drone strikes overseas, you trust THEM?!
and your observation that you have survived thus far without owning a weapon at all, ever think maybe the fact so many around you DO own weapons might have something to do with it? good thing they havnt needed to use em, yes believe that every day you are in the presence of concealed carry citizens, the odds support it, unless you lock yourself inside your home all day every day.
the saying goes better to have it and not need it then to need it and not have it,
and in response to your sarcastic know it all tone regarding this issue
http://www.theblaze....ith-one-bullet/
boy it sure is a bad thing that off duty sheriff was carrying a concealed weapon, as a citizen (when off duty you are bound by the same law as citizens regarding firearm possession, a ban on firearms would have had that off duty sheriff defensless) i mean its not like he saved lives in that movie theater by being armed oh noooo not at allllll
oh btw, that same morning as the sandy hook shooting there was a stabbing at an elementary school in china
http://worldnews.nbc...s-in-china?lite
22 children stabbed, boy it sure is a good thing guns are banned in china i mean that sure did keep those children safe from the crazy people now didnt it? i mean its better safe being dead by knife wound then to be unsafe dead from bullet wound, what a BIG FUCKIN DIFFERENCE, now all they gotta do is ban knives, yup, let government take all the sharp pointy objects and just wrap our world in bubble wrap, we need big mommy police state government to protect us from the bad items so we can be carefree RIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT?????
btw hitler also banned all firearm possession, hmmmm i wonder why...... perhaps so his citizenry had no choice but to bow down bend over and take it up the ass, after all what good was the populace's knives against their guns and tanks...... boy it sure is a good thing germany banned weapons, that sure kept them safer didnt it? another ironic coincedence, germany was also in a self professed war against terrorism, how funny, just what are the chances of that.....
in a society were no one is defenseless only the nonagressor survives, and they thrive,
the more guns carried by moral law abiding citizens, the more chances we have of killing the non moral law breaking criminals in the moment when they attempt to bring harm to others, government and police will never protect you, they can only show up to the scene after the damage has already been done, protect yourself,
whats more i cant believe we would even have to have such an arguement regarding americans freedom to possess a material item, for fear of what it might be used for? what the fuck ever happened to freedom? you know all those rights that the soldiers have supposedly been fighting and loosing lives to protect? this is one of those!!
so that ole saying "i may not agree with your opinion but ill fight to protect your right to say it" since when did that stop being applied to all the rights of this REPUBLIC<
people act like america is a democracy were we can just choose to throw this RIGHT away here and there when we become convinced its wise to do, WRONG
this is a republic for a reason, the constitution, bill of rights, declaration of independence, are meant to superseed any and all other law or popular opinion, it doesnt matter if the majority begins to disagree with them they are the bases of a republic not a democracy,
the pursuit of happiness constitues having no ill effect or harm on anothers life liberty or property,
if you support for them to take guns from people who do not use them to harm anothers life liberty or property,
then YOU ARE HARMING THEIR LIBERTY TO PROPERTY,
and your opinion that the 2nd ammendmendt was created to aid us a gainst the british, lol, this just shows your ignorance while your tone shows your arrogance
Thomas Jefferson
- No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
- Proposed Virginia Constitution, June, 1776.
- The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, ... or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of the press.
yes he is saying that if you are debarred the use of arms then you are NOT FREE
John Adams
- Here every private person is authorized to arm himself, and on the strength of this authority, I do not deny the inhabitants had a right to arm themselves at that time, for their defense, not for offence.
James Madison
- The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for the common liberties and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the late successful resistance of this country against the British arms will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments of the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.
- Federalist No. 46 (1788).
- In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.
- Federalist No. 51 (February 8, 1788).
on that last note let me add
“This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilised nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!
- No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
-
I said that's what he meant. I didn't say I agreed.
SO ? which are you? GOD or a phychiatrist, that you know what I meant to say.
Just joking
P.S. Don't forget to set your clocks to Myan mean - time on friday 21st December, Don't want to miss the end of the world!
-
Wow. I was referring to the social and political atmosphere of the time when the declaration of independnence and bill of rights were being written we were just becoming a nation so yes the British was considered an invading army ..... and when the bill was written only white male land owners really had rights ....
Clearly the need to own weapons is crucial; I mean i know every time I leave my house I am in danger, and know I am risking my life by not having a weapon; and every time I get home I am risking my life by not having a weapon :... I mean there is just danger everywhere so clearly I need to purchase a gun and keep it around at all times to protect myself ...
. i mean how i have made it 30 years without one is just simply a miracle
ANSWER: By walking sassy, pouting, fluttering your eyelids and beaming a come-on smile. It is weapon of mass creation called "sex appeal"
P.S. I once read that over half the cops in US of A that get killed by gunfire, are shot with their own gun.
-
It was repeated again last night on another channel. Not sure which one, as I was just flipping through.
-
wait the amendment that was written solely to allow white male land owners the right to own a musket in which each shot had to be hand loaded to band together for form militias to fight the invading british army WHAT ? "to fight the invading British Army" at a time when we did not have a national army, navy, air force, marines, coast guard and national guard?
to fight the invading British Army ????
Most of america was an English colony. The French were causing mischief in the south and north east, slaughtering the local inhabitants as though they were pests, which made the local inhabitants dislike all europeans.
The Dutch and English settlers begged the English to send troops to defend them, which England did, at England's expense. The few English troops routed the French, parleyed with the local inhabitants and would have withdrawn.
Sadly, before all were withdrawn, some of the settlers were beastly to the local inhabitants, at which point the English decided that the settlers should help finance the remaining troops, which they agreed to do; however, when the English realised that the local inhabitants were not the trouble makers and tried to be even handed, the settlers, unjustifyably, felt agrieved.
The result was that they rebelled against the troops that they had asked to help, so that they could take on from the way the French had behaved, slaughtering the local inhabitants and stealing their land, and to do this they gave themselves the "right" to form raiding parties and carry guns.
Please don't start a flame war because your history books are inaccurate !
Apologies Bettypooh.
-
Just watched 15 stone babies.
It treated the subject very fairly, no stigma, just enough understanding, no titilation and no attempt to portray phreaks
-
"LIKE RIDING A BIKE"
Whoooooooo (Long disaproving intake of breath)
Dodgy heading ! Could be misunderstood.
When Andrea mentioned bikes, I got into a lot of trouble from Alex for a misunderstood comment .
Lasses who like to share their favours and enjoy being ridden, become known as "the village bike"
-
At prep-school in the 1950's I was taught that the left testicle usually hangs lower than the right. Google confirms it still does.
-
This week you can mention how pleased you are that the Duke of Cambridge and his wife are expecting a baby.
-
If it's what you want, I hope you do it! Wishing you the best, but we'll be here for you if you return.
"If it's what you want, I hope you do it! Wishing you the best, but if you return we'll be here" , in which case, remind us why you left and we will try and help you to resist this foible.
-
Arizona Care P.U. pants are very comfortable, hardly know they are being worn, they are so breathable.
As with most things, there is a downside, that elastics are spongelike and wick if your nappy gets too wet.
If you want a nappy and plastic pants for confidence or just-in-case, they are ideal.
-
If you ever see a bunny
with its nose all wet and runny
you may think its funny
but it snott.
-
On Saturday afternoon there was a fire and expolsion at the Nippon Shokubai Co chemical factory near Osaka.
The company, which due to demand was working at full capacity, produced 20%, (320,000 tons per year) of the world's super absorbent polymer used in nappy production.
As responsible adult wetters, should we ease the problem by using cloth nappies when and where possible?
-
I think this can only be posted under "The rest of your life".
About 10 days ago I heard that someone in a nearby village had dropped dead while playing Bowls, but was kept alive by mouth to mouth and heart massage until parramedics revived him.
Good for him and all involved I thought, and forgot it, but it seems he had a dreadfull experience of ear piercing screams and falling through black cloud, that is too awful to describe.
Does any one else know of someone who has died, been revived and know that they were destined for hell?, but have a second chance during the rest of their life.
-
Well done WB and Sarah; you have cought on to the unspoken lavatory/nappy allusion and the aspiration of many people to be something other than lavatory cleaners.
I too cleaned lavatorys for a month when the job fell vacant. I did it rather than tell someone else to, while working in the drawing office.
The experience and the fact that it was a job that I could fall back on, has never been a comfort to me.
-
The two things don't have to be mutually exclusive. But look at it this way for example.
You decided to drop out and with time on your hands, hang out with some friendly lavatory cleaners, when one day a mythical fairy appears and says "I'm delighted to tell you that you have won an exciting job with excellent prospects and if you stay with the company there is a pension that will continue to pay out long after you die; Oh, and by the way, it is not mutually exclusive to hanging out with your lavatory cleaning pals".
Even though your pals say they will keep you a spare lavatory brush, do you think you would want to go on hanging out with them, when you could spend the time improving your prospects with the company ?
-
I hope we never see you here again.
Said in the nicest possible way.
Bless you.
-
Good luck in that, I was going to say that God doesn't have Internet, but after watching Bruce Almighty, I will retract that statement. Good luck to you, will be here if you need us.
Some of you are sort of missing the point, your being here isn't dependant on "if he decides to return", your being here is a probability, whether he comes back or not.
By contrast, Cookie has probably discovered something on which he can depend:
GOD WILL BE THERE WHENEVER YOU NEED HIM.
(Revised, in view of Bettypooh's comments)
-
it also doesnt mention whether the accidents were cause by people who were speeding hitting people who were going the speed limit .... or were all parties going the speed limit ....
It could be the same number of people, hitting each other more often.
-
Lol, assumptions are going to be the bane of our existence. I just know it. How do statistics speak for themselves.......... You need more information to make a conclusion and at best, that will just be a theory. One thing that is missing is the change in car accidents on other road types,
I think we can assume that there were less accidents on the other types of road, because they are now happening on 20 MPH roads
-
SCOOP.
By our motoring expert.
It was announced in England at lunch time today, that in the last year, car accidents have risen by 26% on roads where the speed restriction has been reduced to 20 MPH.
The statistic speak for themselves. A lapse of concentration at 20 MPH can be more likely than at 30 MPH !!.
Clearly all these 20 MPH areas must be increased to 30 MPH. This will reduce accidents in 20 MPH areas to zero.
Don't you just love statistics. It doesn't mention whether there are more 20 MPH areas than last year.
-
You have never heard of "Wet Wet Wet"? The boy band, over whom girls in their thousands, wet their knickers !!!
GLUGGLE THEM.
-
WET WET WET are to reunite after 25 years.
-
We are gathered here to hang this man, but first we are going to give him a fair trial and find him guilty.
KKK
-
1
-
A Pill Causing Temporary Incontinence
in Incontinent-Desires
Posted
Not a pill, although a diuretic like "frusimide" can be interesting.
Purchase a couple of balloons, about 1/2 the size of a clenched fist before inflating. Cut off about 1/2 of the neck for a start (more can be cut off later) and inserting four fingers into the now much looser neck, pull it over your cock with a full bladder and an additional extra drink. Don't worry, unless you are huge you can safely wear it for 1/2 an hour, maybe more, it does not cut off the blood supply and your knob does not drop off.
The knack is to have just enough neck to hold the balloon on, depending on "the angle of dangle", when it is sufficiently filled ( it may take a few balloons to get this just right ) .
Once you have just filled the balloon, position it in your nappy, then hang on till you bladder refills. from the moment that you continue filling the balloon you are committed to have an urgent uncontrolled wetting when the balloon blows off.