Little BabyDoll Christine

The problem with cropping, in my case, is that a definitive part of my outfit is missing. Also, if a full picture of me as LG were their, my eyes would be indigo; dark blue with a touch of pruple. Also, it would be of a whole person Unless you know how it got there, that HAS to be scary

Most of my images are on the moment or as close to it as possible so I would not have time for time-consuming manual edits. I do, or used to do as my eyesight is deteriorating and may or may not be recoverable, about 3 edit categories, size, crop, HSV and contrast (the latter using a single "color adjust" function, at most 3 times in irfanView. To make the kinds of adjustments that I am talking about would require a good deal of work and time to implement and make look natural. So you would want some of the parameters, like age, eye color, lip color to be "select once and keep" and adjusted to the image (lighting, pose,etc). That strikes me as quite complex and would be the job of an AI program. It might be the kind of thing used on the site where the image would be displayed

I wonder how many mommies may regret getting their little ones out of diapers early.. Just think of how much easier she would be if she were still dependent on Mommy to be changed. Whould she not be less likely to be dispbedient or arrogant or proud? Just imagine how quickly she would stop giving Mommy trouble if you told her you would change her in front of her best friend, worst enemy or favorite teacher. or that you would leave her rubber panties lying around for others to see and ask about? Then there are the very short dresses used to make changing easier that you need to keep pyaing attention to to keep them dow or your rubber panties will show The only question is at what age should she be potty trained ; 5, 8 or 10?

Here, apporaching 16 years

WWRROONNG! What have we been constanlty toold about using "We're all..."? That is in there with "multitasking", ""Left-brain/right=brain" and homeopathy. As an honest, knowledgeable person, I cannot emphasize that enough. Get it out of your head ASAP. The only person you can speak for is yourself on such matters

If you notice, in my photos, I do not include the head. This is to prevent anyone who might recognize me outside of the ABLG/Trans world from doing so. (No, I am not an ICE agent, or even SLUSH). I am not the only one. It would be nice if whe could have an AI generated mask for the eyes, noces, cheeks and lips.; espcially if it could be "in character" and maybe, as an AK/Little, enlarge the head a bit, while leaving my gorgeious tresses alone (blondespeak for I* am just too adorable to mess with)

Many of the better detergents, along with surfactants, also use enzymes and bluing ("optical white") and some use oxygen bleach ("oxy" which is color-safe). Unfortunatly Dreft no longer has the "baby" smell that once defined it

The minute I saw "Diaper Covers" instand of "... pants" I knew I was on Mars and left when I saw "wraps" which fell out of use 20 years ago because they were no good for active infants

Not necessarily but maybe. It could make you AK, which was previously part of AB but has since spun off. It could be an adjuncat to Sissy, which appears to be more BDSM>FemDom, as a form of humilitation. Or it could be that AB nappies are better at doing what they should, so that is what you use. Most DL's assiduously try to avoid any AB entanglements

There is plenty of overlap between LG and Sissy outfuts. The only differences are that Sissies overdo the frills and the Sissy "babydoll" lets the panties show a bit. Also, in terms of rubber panties, the Sissy seems to be almost defined by the "Ruumba" ruffled panty, which does not feature the rubber, rather a nylon covering with ruffles only at the back. This seems to be a big deal for the sissies as part of the overdone frilliness; far more so than for LG's As to the whys and wherefores, there are 4 threads around here, by Sissies, trying to figure out what a sissy is. IRL, "sissy" references an 8-14 year old boy, lacking in the more forward boyish qualities, defining him as girlish by the absence of these qualities, in an effeminate rather than feminine way. Now, you would think that would fall right into AK here. However, itr does not, it comes from BESM>FemDom, I gathered this some years ago by the fact that, judging from the multipe threads by sissies trying to define it, it does not "resolve" clearly. Also, given all that it includes, it also seems to be a catch-all for things that do not quite fit elsewhere but seem to be vaguely related to humiliation via gender-shaming using ffeminine stereotyping in a negative way

I was born in the 3rd quarter of '45, technically, before the baby boom, but in personality, I am an early Boomer.3-1/2 months does not make that much difference. Aside from being progrock/psychedelic rock, my optimum musical era was 'ate '58-mid '63: Read the Drifters,, Shirelles, Orbison, and the height of Bobby Darin and the Everly Brothers, which was between the Elivs as "King" and "Beatlemania". Even so, my prinary instruemtns were the combo orgna, after the fashion of Manzarek and Ingles, and the electric 12-string guitar, after the fashion of McGuinn more than the electric 6-string

I wonder if decades are approrpriate, It may be more like half-dacades, or decades that start in the middle, . If you were borne in '45, you are very different from one born in '55 or even '50

You need to read the "Care section of RUBBER PANTIES 'R' US. I do not know what brand or thicknoess of material they are, but replace after three whasings: WWhat are they made of; sugar? You might also want to read "selection". The link is in my siggy

I have two pair of white satin panties that are part of babydolls. They have 5 rows of lace riffules all around and fit over my thick diapers and ruppber panties with a pair of clear rubber panties over them

Like this?