Baby Oil

[dlsafrica]

I've just purchased baby oil. I want to see if it plunges me down a rabbit hole like baby powder did. 

Experiences with baby oil? Application? Uses? I don't know if the one I got is scented.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

There is already a thread about baby oil

If it is Johnson's then it should have the traditional baby smell. Also there is baby lotion. However, most baby oil destroys rubber panties. There is a DIY baby oil; BabyDoll Bath, Body and Baby Oi,l that does not. It is part of the BabyDoll Personal Care and Grooming line. It has protective, hydrating, therapeutic and restorative properties and a baby smell. Like all BabyDoll items, it is rubber panty friendly. I have used these for a number of years. I would say that this is the best that you can get Here is the whole product line

 

[SissyBabyBenita]

My mommy use baby oil for clean my butt from baby cream and front from baby powder. She use baby oil from Penaten and Bübchen

[KPAXOR1987]

On 3/9/2024 at 6:26 AM, dlsafrica said:

I've just purchased baby oil. I want to see if it plunges me down a rabbit hole like baby powder did. 

I doubt it will at least not in the same way you expect. 

 

[Miss Mummy]

I have purchased baby oil. To be honest, I don't use it very much because putting baby oil on a diaper would make a paste if then I use talcum powder, and the times I have used it has been more for massage.

[KPAXOR1987]

On 4/10/2024 at 6:56 AM, Miss Mummy said:

I have purchased baby oil. To be honest, I don't use it very much because putting baby oil on a diaper would make a paste if then I use talcum powder, and the times I have used it has been more for massage.

 

https://www.torhoermanlaw.com/johnson-and-johnson-talcum-powder-lawsuit/how-does-talcum-powder-cause-ovarian-cancer/

Mikey I posted the link because it was important and knowledge is power man. Just so happens this knowledge has the potential to save a life . 

I just hope she isn't useing Johnson&Johnson talc based body powders man. 

 

[Miss Mummy]

8 hours ago, KPAXOR1987 said:

 

https://www.torhoermanlaw.com/johnson-and-johnson-talcum-powder-lawsuit/how-does-talcum-powder-cause-ovarian-cancer/

Mikey I posted the link because it was important and knowledge is power man. Just so happens this knowledge has the potential to save a life . 

I just hope she isn't useing Johnson&Johnson talc based body powders man. 

 

That is correct. The isue about absestos is indeed controversial. Asbestos is a known carcinogen, although not all talc contains it. And it is correct, that Jonhson&Jonhsons used to be contaminated with traces of asbestos, which has been linked to some types of cancer. This was first found in the 1950s.

For this reason the company decided to transition and make all their products with cornstarch. Talc products are now banned in the UK so even if you wan't you can't buy them, but they are not banned in US, so one needs to be careful on the ingredients. Fortunately there are a good selection of baby powder in here (that we still commonly refer as 'talc' even if technically is 'baby powder') that don't contain talc, starting by the new Johnson's formula, Neil Yard's, Soft & Gentle, Little Violets... etc

And yes, I don't know in every other country. Here is also possible to purchase the one that replicates talc but is made with other ingredients, so if in US or other place I'd reccomend look carefuly at the label. In any case, not advisable to sprinkle over genitalia.

 

 

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

Google up "jama ovarian cancer baby powder". That claim was debunked long ago in JAMA but the story was drowned out by the Trump impeachment story. I did hear it in the news

[Miss Mummy]

Yes, its true that there are writings in one direction and writings in another direction and it's difficult to know what is right, not even many in the medical proffesion who are not specialists (I have worked for our National Health Services). Apparently chances are that there can be asbestos close to where talc is extracted and asbestos is a cancer risk. How many the possibilities of getting it, not something I know.

However, in my country I would not have access to purchase talk (at risk of containing traces of asbestos) even if I wanted, and as a proffesional person, I would always aim to make sure that babies are safe in every circumstance. As I am no medical specialist, I rather be safe than sorry in any case given that I provide services.

There are more things that can be contaminated with absestos, like certain makeups, paint in the walls of old buildings, roofs, water tanks...

Having said that, my babies love to get a sprikle of "talcum" (ok, it's baby powder) in their belly and groins. I avoid sprinkling it over genitalia because at the very least is drying and those more delicate body parts should not be covered with products with artififial aromas.

It's a good topic and a good discussion. I might want to write a post about it.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

This is thanks to the shysterocracy. There are different types of asbestos. Some are harmful if breathed and some are not. I have used talc for 78 years and not a bit of a problem. This kind of crap caused David Brudnoy; a leading libertarian commentator of the late 20th century to say that lawyers should be paid by the State as officers of the court and forbidden to advertise to keep justice off the auction block (If he suggested an increase in government activity, you KNOW the situation was reallybad)

Whe have the same problem with getting talc here in the Land of the Free. The shysters, who should be executed for massibve Abuse of Process, threaten bank-breaking lawsuits that nobody wants to run the risk of losing and the people get screwed again. The talc fiasco was so blatant that the ad to join the class action suit, instead of saying "a recent medical study" said "a recent media study..." a couple of years back

[KPAXOR1987]

12 hours ago, Little BabyDoll Christine said:

Google up "jama ovarian cancer baby powder". That claim was debunked long ago in JAMA but the story was drowned out by the Trump impeachment story. I did hear it in the news

I already read the research you are refering to, the link and the research said the same thing. 

I searched instead for safe to breathe in asbestos. 

You are correct there is multiple types of asbestos yet you are incorrect that any are safe.

https://www.mesothelioma.com/asbestos-exposure/types-of-asbestos/

 

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

Not if you create a cloud of it. About 33 years ago. Dr. Petr Beckmann, a double specialist in ED and Statistics cited research about perosns living in an area rch in asbestos, wich menat that there was more than normal aspbestos dust in the air. The life expectancy of these persons did not vary from normal

The big deal with talc was ovarian cancer. Five will get you ten that, in order to ssalvage their position after their case had collapsed. The persons wanting to outlaw or put talc out of business to maintain their powere. cooked up this asbestos thing. It does not seem to be an issue in Canada or many other places that tend to be more sensitive about such things than the US

[KPAXOR1987]

On 4/12/2024 at 8:59 PM, Little BabyDoll Christine said:

Not if you create a cloud of it. About 33 years ago. Dr. Petr Beckmann, a double specialist in ED and Statistics cited research about perosns living in an area rch in asbestos, wich menat that there was more than normal aspbestos dust in the air. The life expectancy of these persons did not vary from normal

The big deal with talc was ovarian cancer. Five will get you ten that, in order to ssalvage their position after their case had collapsed. The persons wanting to outlaw or put talc out of business to maintain their powere. cooked up this asbestos thing. It does not seem to be an issue in Canada or many other places that tend to be more sensitive about such things than the US

I couldn't find any research about that by him however if it does exsist I guess his research was wrong then because  he died of cancer in 1993. 

 

 

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

1 hour ago, KPAXOR1987 said:

I couldn't find any research about that by him however if it does exsist I guess his research was wrong then because  he died of cancer in 1993. 

 

 

At what age? What kind of Cancer? Do you know how many different kinds of cancer there are? Where did you get your medical degree? (BTW I know two of those answers) Cancer is not monolithic and is really a class of cell disorders, with many causes; viral, hereditary chemical and some unknown, more than a single disease

His work on the matter was not his own, but based on that of another,, referenced in his newsletter ACCESS TO ENERGY, in the late 1980's That work was based on compiled data

[KPAXOR1987]

2 hours ago, Little BabyDoll Christine said:

At what age? What kind of Cancer? Do you know how many different kinds of cancer there are? Where did you get your medical degree? (BTW I know two of those answers) Cancer is not monolithic and is really a class of cell disorders, with many causes; viral, hereditary chemical and some unknown, more than a single disease

His work on the matter was not his own, but based on that of another,, referenced in his newsletter ACCESS TO ENERGY, in the late 1980's That work was based on compiled data

It just says cancer.

It doesn't matter go old research if you want to and I will go with the current. 

The data was from the 1980's you mean the same time frame joe cool and the every other cigarret ad as well as data showing light cigarretes were safer. OK thank you for telling when the research was done so I can say. I don't believe a damn word of it. 

Parents smoking with their kids in the car all the windows up 

They didn't die instantly it's safe. 

But I'm done responding to this subject because asbestos has nothing to do with baby oil. 

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

He died of bladder cancer. not mesophelioma, which resides in the lungs. He came from Czechoslovakia and lived in Boulder, Co where he was a Professor Emeritus at the univversity there

The 1980's was not the Dark Ages unless you think the CAT scanner is a medieval torture device. Statistical procedures were well validated for almost a cetury by the time I took Tests and Meeasurements in 1975 and Stat was one of Beckmann's double specialties. So he knew how to check and validate statistical material

The original research that demonstrated a link between some kind of asbestos and meso was done in 1960: If  the 1980's was the Dark Ages, This was the time of the pyramids. The type of aspbestos used in the Army base was pretty much a known source of trouble and was shunned as a building material. The Gvernment used it (wrongly) because it was cheap

But at any rate,  The ovarian cancer link to talcum that generated the furor was debunked by HAMA and I suspect this was a put-up job to salvage the situation created by the shysters who brought the cdlass-action suit, who, as late as 2022/early '23 cited "a media [sic] study" in their ad to attracts participants in the class action suit

That is all I am going to say about the matter