Quality Diapers _ Med

[DailyDi]

For Small and large BMX diapers, ABU is the the place, but I se ein today's update Quality-Diapers is showing they will carry "Young Men's" 36-44" size as well as the youth 23-30.

[pepjoe1]

about time i wanted o try them but they didnt have the medium

[AutieAB]

OK. I'm doubtless going to get some crap for this but I'm posting it anyway. I was just browsing /r/ABDL (reddit) and their take on the whole Quality Diapers situation. I got to this post which didn't match up with what I saw on the QD site when this first blew up a week or two ago. So I looked again. It's changed.

For the love of god, there's no doubt now. It's a pedo site, end of fucking conversation. Before there was just a few slightly dodgy photos. Now it has dozens of photos of a young boy in diapers in different poses and states of dress and is clearly a sham excuse to slap a load of inappropriate images of minors on the internet. Writing "it's just a model and his parents were there" at the bottom DOES NOT make it okay. Apparently they plan to offer a printed catalogue soon. I wonder what type of person that is aimed at, huh?!

Yes, I'm swearing, yes, I'm angry, yes, this post will be rapidly deleted because QD are being protected on this site for reasons I simply cannot understand or fathom. But ban me for all I care - the community has a right to know what is really going on at a website that is being portrayed here as 'just a site for parents of disabled kids to get decent diapers'. It's not on.

[puffybedwetter]

Why would you get banned for expression your over heard opinion? You're over reacting. take a chill pill, you are going to pop a blood vessel. Honestly everyone has forgotten about this whole ordeal, as it is of no concern. May I ask why are you bringing this up again?

[AutieAB]

Why would you get banned for expression your over heard opinion?

I've had numerous posts where I've expressed my opinion deleted from this forum without notice in the past few weeks and I'm not the only one. At least one post (not one of mine) has been deleted in this very thread. Every time somebody questions the legitimacy of Quality Diapers on this forum, the post is deleted by a moderator, normally very quickly. If you want to see *every* post that gets made here, switch on immediate email notification for the thread(s).

Honestly everyone has forgotten about this whole ordeal, as it is of no concern.

In your opinion.

In my opinion, it IS a big deal and absolutely bloody well is of concern. Especially now that....

May I ask why are you bringing this up again?

...the situation has changed for the worse. With QD's previous website, the community seemed split pretty much down the middle when the QD site had a few photos on it about whether it was acceptable or not. Now there are many, many, more photos. Just how many photos do they have to publish before people get it into their heads that something is not right here and we should be asking very serious questions.

[puffybedwetter]

Holy Sh1t I know what you mean. I checked out that site. Although it does seem legitimately set up. But those pictures really are a bit awkward.

[dl_ashlee]

I agree, just going to that site made me feel icky! I have no idea WTF they are thinking with their pictures on their site, serious WTF!

[Dirty Diaper/Maxipad Lover]

I saw the updated site, and I really don't think that it's that much different from the previous design. In the context the additional pictures are intended to be viewed in, I don't find them anymore offensive then the pictures used in many children's clothing catalogs. As I mentioned in another thread on this subject, those catalogs frequently featured suggestive poses, and frequently involved children modeling underwear, as well as other clothing--I know this because my family used to by clothing for my less well-off relatives, which is why the catalogs were in our house in the first place. Those catalogs are no more or less suggestive, and in the context they're intended to be used for, aren't something that I find offensive. Now posting those pictures on DD or ABU is another story entirely--the context changes and the images become fap fodder for pedophiles.

As for QD itself, and the use of a Yahoo! e-mail address, some of you are really overreacting. There are plenty of legitimate businesses that use Yahoo! e-mail addresses, often because they're Yahoo! stores--I've dealt with plenty of these, all reputable, and all with varying website design quality. Some of these stores have really professional well-designed websites, and others have websites that look like something I could've thrown together in a few hours. QD is obviously in the latter category, but many upstarts fall into that category, and I don't consider that suspicious.

One reason I think some people here are overreacting to those pictures is that said people have their AB/DL blinders on. To someone who sexualizes diapers, those images may be disturbing. Those who are able to look at QD with the AB/DL blinders off though, will find them far less offensive. Are they suggestive? Yes. Are they pornographic? No, not in the way QD is using them at least. QD has a giant watermark stamped over their images, that's the type of thing you do when you try to prevent someone from using your images in ways that they're not intended to be used. Do I think QD could tone the suggestive nature of their images down a bit? Absolutely--a shirt would go a long way in making those images less suggestive. Likewise, DK Enterprises having a name similar to that site's operator is far from enough to prove that the owners are one and the same. DK Enterprises could tone down their images, but I don't see them as being too shady--I doubt Di would be defending them if they weren't legitimate. Speaking of Di, he seems to be one of the few people that's been looking at this with a level head. QD is marketing to parents, there is a market for the product that they're selling, and they're targeting that market accordingly. They have a phone number, why don't any of the "concerned" people here call it and see if they'd be willing to answer some questions for you. If the images disturb you so much, why not e-mail them and let them know? I'm sure that they'd like to retain their customers, and to have new ones. As others have said, if you truly believe QD is breaking the law, alert law enforcement. If they're simply not living up to your specific moral and ethical standards, well that's too bad for you--you (and I use the word "you" generically,) don't have the right to not be offended, as long as no laws are broken. If I thought QD was seriously engaged in illegal activities, I'd have alerted law enforcement myself. I've done so before, and wouldn't hesitate to do so again.