![[DD] Boards & Chat](https://www.dailydiapers.com/board/uploads/monthly_2021_11/DDweb-02.png.0c06f38ea7c6e581d61ce22dffdea106.png)
 |
 |
OMFG
-
Posts
49 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Store
Posts posted by OMFG
-
-
I avoid Wal-mart for sanity reasons. Sometimes the price isn't worth the fifty screaming unmonitored children; the people having conversations in the aisles blocking them completely - oblivious to the other shoppers trying to get by; The guy shouting on his cell phone as he only has one bar in there - trying to talk to his wife WHO IS TWO AISLES OVER!
Plus I'm a techie, and lack the patience to request a security escort to open the glass cases so I can look at the specs of a gadget while they impatiently repeat "Do you want it or not?"
Also, infants in umbrella strollers with their heads unsupported. It makes me cringe every time I see it.
Also, also, they always seem to miss getting the security tag deactivated for stuff I buy, then I get the "Stop, apparently we failed to remove the inventory control tag from your purchases. Please see the nearest sales associate." hassle at the end.
-
So, what we've ascertained is that it isn't illegal, although there is a chance there could be a civil case in the very remote chance than the subject saw the photo, and that it's okay to post humiliating photos of other people, as long as a different web site does it first and it's not British people we're embarrassing.
Got it.
-
I wondered when someone would see it this way
Without an identifiable piccie I don't think it matters, but when you identify someone without their consent, you're outing them 
even if they were in public when the pic was taken. The general rule at many conventions and/or meetings of people who may not want their piccie taken is to ask first and be sure you don't have any unknowing bystanders in the shot 
How would you feel if by chance your diaper was exposed, you didn't know it, and someone took a pic without your knowledge which got posted online and everyone you know found it?
Do unto others as you'd have them do unto you, and expect retribution if you do something unto to them they don't want to have done
Bettypooh
I am the photographer here, and to answer your question, I think there is a big difference in engaging in behavior at a private function such as a convention/meeting and engaging in it in a completely public venue such as the London Tubes. I don't wear diapers in public because I view it as a private act, so the circumstance you've asked about would never happen. She outs herself by sucking her thumb in public. All my iPhone did was capture the moment for posterity. I maintain that if she felt her thumbsucking was private and shameful, she wouldn't have been doing it in a tube. Frankly, I'd be more concerned about the sheer number of germs she is exposing herself to by sucking her thumb after passing through tube stations and potentially touching things. The London Underground is a vile petri dish of the very worst of human filth, simply due to the volume of people that pass through it daily. She would be well off to consider some hand sanitizer if she insists on sucking her thumb in the underground after potentially touching any surface in the entire tube system.
Eh I take my statments back actully, after some research its not actully illegal to take photo's on a public scene trains are public therfor its not illegal. Sorry to the OP for my claims.
It sparked me to read up on the subject, and I learned stuff, so I think sNs would not be opposed if I said thank you.
-
Yes we have that as well, but that's different.
There is implied consent when photos are for private usage or for media usage. For example if the picture came from a news report taken on the tube it is fair usage, if it's a holiday snap for a photo album, it's fair usage.
Private photos on public grounds that are not intended to 'out' a person as such are also fair game, so long as the material in the shot is not illegal or risqué (for example, if someone was naked on a beach and you took a photo, that would be an infringement.) Same although untested would possibly apply to thumb sucking as it's a purely private act and there is no implied consent.
I am failing to see anything online that supports your stance that it is illegal to take or post pictures of people in public in Britain.
From answers.com
Because of the excesses of some elements of the media and the unethical behaviour of a few photographers, privacy is an ongoing subject of debate in Britain, with high-profile cases (usually involving tabloid newspapers) fought out expensively in the courts. This is because, at present, the UK does not have specific laws preventing the taking of photographs that infringe a person's privacy.There is an increased trend toward protection of a person's privacy, but:
A. it seems to be more concerned with the media
B. it seems to pertain to cases where the person has a reasonable expectation to privacy
C. in case where the person is in public, it seems more relevant to children, namely the children of celebrities
I did not take this photo of her in her home or backyard or using a telephoto lens while she was alone on a beach. It was in a crowded tube. I am not selling the photo to the local news. She is not a child. Even if one of these conditions were met, it still does not appear to be illegal, although she might be able to sue for damages.
I am interested in seeing what laws you're referring to. Could you please provide a link?
-
I feel so ignored sometimes,
You have to prove it is a private act by your own definition.
I'd be inclined to think that if she felt the act was terribly private, she wouldn't be doing it obviously on a london tube...
-
HOLY SHIT! YOU WENT TO AN ISLAND TO BUY DIAPERS? THAT IS HARDCORE!
-
Not really sure this is the best venue for getting advice regarding your real kids. Sure, there are parents here, but it's kind of like getting advice on how to fix your car on a computer forum. Why not register on a parenting message board and ask this? Your chances of finding someone who has experienced this are much better than they would be here.
-
There is also a fine line between having the fetish or actually needing them for being incontinent. I don't know...I won't get into it.
Totally agree. If diapers are needed due to incontinence, it's a completely different story than if someone is choosing them over their spouse. The latter just makes me sad.
-
Honesty would have avoided this
Also, find it kind of sad that diapers are more important to him than his wife...
-
I say that it's awesome. Let's not look at the not-so-brightside of it yet; let's focus more on that he's liberated himself in such a way that someone close to him knows and is cool about it all. Those of you who have let others into this part of your life know what I mean when I say it's like a high that keeps on giving. And let's face it: if your friend HAD to know about it, wouldn't you rather have a girl tell him and put it the way only girls can, than have one of your guy friends breach the subject and possibly fuck up the explanation and make you out to be a weirdo?
This is good. Congrats and happy newyear, my volkswagen friend. .
I fully agree that the end result was good, and I think that's great. I am happy for OP, but I still think his girlfriend betrayed his trust horribly by telling people.
If the friend had told a whole bunch of other people - family, friends, employer, etc - and OP was being ostracized and considered a freak by his social circle, everyone would be jumping on the girlfriend for betraying his trust. It could have just as easily gone sour. I still this the gf sucks for telling. It wasn't her secret to tell, no matter how well everything turned out.
-
It depends on who they told through, and that persons relationship to both people.... Its not exactly blabbing to "people", its talking about it to a best friend of the couple... (I take it he's good friends to babyvr6 and his fiance). You don't know if she "readily" shared it either, what if he told her something weird about his sex life?
People get drunk, and with friends they say things, with close friends they say more.... I think you're assuming way too much on this issue. Whats a big thing to some isn't quite so big to others.
If he wanted his best friend to know, he would have told his best friend. Hearing information about someone does not dictate that one responds in kind.
In relationships, there is implied confidentiality. Among other things, this includes what goes on behind closed doors, whether it be kinky or vanilla. Once you start sharing details of that stuff with other people, it is no longer sacred and special to the relationship. She broke this confidentiality by blabbing about their sex life to a friend. It doesn't matter that it was well received. It doesn't matter that she revealed that she was involved. It doesn't matter that she revealed it to only one close friend (ever heard of Pandora's Box). His ABDL side was his to share or not to share, and she robbed him of that choice. Hence, she sucks.
-
Why do you say that? Sure she told on me, but she is just as guilty of it as I am. I guess I didn't mention the fact that she has feeties and sippy cups, did I?
She didn't omit her involvement in it from her inebriated blabfest, either. I.E. she told him about her feeties and sippys.
I would be incredibly upset if I found out my boyfriend was telling friends personal details about our sex life, fetish related or not. Don't you wonder what else she is blabbing to people about when she's drunk if she so readily shares this tidbit?
-
DELICIOUS, especially with Cilantro
Fancy spa packages
-
Okay, kiddies, let's pick a day! sNs and I leave in less than 2 weeks!!
-
Your fiancee sucks.
-
I think a hoarder is someone who keeps excessive amounts of items, even when they are valueless and potentially hazardous. Also, a hoarder experiences extreme anxiety at the thought of getting rid of any of their hoarded items.
-
She/he was so wet.
He's hitting the bottle.
-
My car came with bluetooth.
You don't need a passport, you're just going between Canada and the States.
Vampires don't sparkle, stupid.
-
I'm the gf. As SnS said, we're up for meeting. We're casual, but fun. Hope we can make this work
-
I am glad you have found a balance that works for you in your relationship, but I am not enjoying the suggestion that one must atone for being incontinent. I want a partner who accepts me for who I am, as I accept them. I wouldn't expect my boyfriend to rub my feet and legs and back every night simply because he has terrible asthma. It is something that he can't help, much like you can't help incontinence. I much prefer being mutually supportive and understanding, and have the back rubs and sweet things be because we love each other and want to be kind to each other, not because one of us feels we owe the other for something we can't change.
-
open hand spanking i'm okay with, it's when the hand becomes a fist that i toss the penalty flag.
But for several minutes? Go set your stove timer for 3 minutes. Use your open palm to spank your bare thigh continuously until the timer goes off. 3 minutes is an awfully long time for a spanking. I don't think the point of a spanking, if you're going to spank, should be to cause prolonged pain. It is to get the child's attention and reinforce the message that their behavior is incorrect.
-
{Edited out to stop this from being a monster post}
Do I think doing it on your own is superior to WLS? No, absolutely not, because I know losing weight by any means is hard. But sometimes, to me, it feels like WLS is an "easy way out" of obesity.
What do you think?
~ moogle
I am now down 110 lbs. Without surgery.
I can understand why someone would choose to go the WLS route vs the "au natural" route, and I briefly considered it. However, after further research and reflection, I decided not to. My biggest qualm is that weight loss surgery is done on the stomach, not the brain. I didn't have a stomach that was in any way abnormal, other than it was stretched out from a history of overeating. It was my brain that needed retraining. I needed to learn how to eat properly - what a correct portion size was, and what my body needed in order to function. No surgery was going to do that for me. It was a long process of researching and reading and experimenting to find out what worked for me. I am still learning on a regular basis.
I sometimes get frustrated because if I had gone for WLS, I'd be DONE by now. As it stands, I still have 20-30 lbs to lose, and it's coming off slowly at a max of 5 lbs per month.
I feel I am much healthier now than I would be if I'd had surgery. I can run. I can eat the volume of fruits and vegetables and lean protein and dairy and complex carbs that my body needs. I would not be able to do that with a WLS stomach. I would be forever dependant on vitamins to be properly nourished. I can run and do push ups and walk as many kilometers as I feel like every day. I don't think I would be able to get an adequate number of calories to support these activities with a post WLS stomach. Eventually, I will be able to nourish a baby from conception to birth. Again, I think that would be a real problem with a post WLS stomach. Finally, I feel that all the steps I've taken to change my body have extended my life span, and I'm not convinced WLS would have done the same for me.
I think weight loss surgery would have saved me from obesity and related complications, but I would have been swapping it for a whole bunch of new issues related to malabsorption of nutrients. Although there are many people who have it and have few complications and have a fantastic quality of life after, the risks were too high for me to personally undergo it.
I don't think it's the "easy way" out, but I am very glad I didn't go that way.
-
Don't come crying to us if they take your license away. I hate speeders. Repeat offenders should have to drive old junker cars that can berely reach the speed limit in the first place.
And spanking in under a minute?! As they say on Mythbusters: "Well there's your problem!"... A proper spanking lasts several minutes and leaves the kid's butt sore for about half an hour or so and them in tears. This is supposed to be done when the kid has not responded to explanations of what they're doing is wrong and have been given at least 3 chances to stop what they're doing (these may include groundings from things, as well), with full knowledge that if they keep it up, they're going to get their butt whupped.
They won't take my license. It's photo radar. I pay my little fine and it's like it never happened. That's entirely my point. If a cop pulled me over and gave me a ticket that resulted in demeirts on my license and the threat of losing it, I would be more inclined to stop speeding.
Also, I think a spanking that lasts several minutes is starting to head to abuse. I would not be comfortable doing that to a child.
-
A cannibal had his mother over for dinner one night. She was complaining that she didn't like his friends, so he told her to try the vegetables.
Is This True?
in Our Lifestyle Discussion
Posted
Actually, it only matters if it was on Facebook. FB is the one source of truth. Did he update his status to "don't you just hate it when a drunk driver kills your ass?". If not, he's still alive
Not really familiar with you, but I'm glad you're okay.