Rawr

Sure it's the 26th? I can't see it on my EPG or on the C4 listings. Also, 10pm on a Monday is the regular timeslot for 8 out of 10 cats - and I think they have a few more episodes left in this series. So perhaps they've told you the date slightly wrong. My money would be on the 29th at 10 instead, as that seems to be the usual time for Channel 4's one-off documentaries. But I can't see that far ahead on the listing yet to check. Either way, if you don't find a way to record the show - as a contributor, the production company should be able to send you a complimentary DVD copy if you email and ask them nicely Good luck with the show. Hope the programme is what you want it to be.

Please, enlighten me. Where does it say that you have the right to air travel? It doesn't. Whilst the 4th Ammendment or Article 8 of the ECHR might say you have a right not to be searched (or to a private life in the case of the ECHR), you can easily protect that right by NOT travelling by air. If you decide to travel by air, then you have to abide by the rules. If you feel that infringes your rights, then don't travel by air. What's the problem there? Actually, you're wrong. After the discovery of the transatlantic liquid bombs plot, UK air travel changed hugely (specifically restrictions on hand luggage). But people here just accept it as part and parcel of the world we live in. As someone else mentioned earlier, the anger shouldn't be directed at the government agencies who are protecting our safety; but instead at the people who make such searches and restrictions necessary. I'm from the UK, and I travel very frequently by air travel (usually once a week), both throughout Europe, to the USA and elsewhere. Countries like Germany and The Netherlands have some of the most thorough screening I've ever been through - almost every time I vist, they search my bags, pat me down, swab inside my bags, and also use a full body scanner. But nobody in the UK, or in Germany, or anywhere else for that matter, has the same anti-security attitude that America does.

"Slowly our rights slip away..." Last time I checked, the 'right to air travel' was enshrined.... nowhere. US Consitution? Nope. ECHR? Nope. If you don't like the security, then you don't fly. Simple as. Personally, I'd rather be strip searched a hundred times than get blown up on an aircraft once. If you don't agree, then don't get on a plane. "I'm not even Muslim nor middle eastern." <--- Nice casual racism there :-/

My wife and I refer to diaper as an 'orange T-shirt'. That way, I can say something like "I think I might wear my orange T-shirt tonight" when we're in public or I'm on the phone, and to anyone else, it sounds totally innocuous. We've used that code word so long, I can't even remember where the hell it came from... Rx

Judge Judy Road Wars / Cops / World's Wildest Police Chases Cheaters (it's gotta be fake, right?) Masterchef The Aprentice sometimes The Jeremy Kyle show...

As a bisexual guy, I totally know what you're feeling. Personally, I think everyone falls along a scale of sexuality - there's no black and white. Maybe you're into guys at the moment, but that might pass. It might not, but why not just let it be whatever it will be, and learn to accept yourself. And even when you've picked a self-identity that you're comfortable with, it doesn't mean you have to stick with that forever; sexuality is a beautiful, fluid thing, which you can't label or put in a box. In my own experience, my sexual preferences shift from time to time - I'm mostly hetero in my desires, but I'm also sometimes attracted to guys. I'm now married, but I still find other men attractive (my wife is cool with that, we both know that fantasy is only fantasy, and I would never cheat on her in real life). But before I was married, I had sexual encounters with straight guys (or bi-curious ones) who realise that the thought of being with another guy is exciting, but in reality it's not their thing. Doesn't make you gay or bi just to have those thoughts, or even to act on them. You're still young, and you have time to work all this out. The most important thing is to not stress out over it, and to accept yourself for whoever you are. Sounds like your family is understanding and accepting too, which is great. Rx

Sadly, yet another report of another sick individual who doesn't represent this community very well. I just wish that these people would go and get help... http://www.liverpool...00252-29354368/ Anyone who even fantasises about involving minors in sexual scenarios really should seek help, in my opinion. The sad fact of the matter is that stories like this will reinforce the negative stereotype associating our community with paedophillia. But there's very little we can do about that, as 'Man leads successful, uneventful life, has a good social circle and stable relationships, likes to wear nappies occasionally' doesn't really make for a great headline or article. [i'd also like to take this opportunity to point out the ludicrous headline - not only does the inclusion of the nappy fetish in the headline seem somewhat spurious, a detail added solely to further sensationalise the story and make it more salacious - but the use of 'obscene' before the words 'child porn' is downright daft; is the writer suggesting that there's such a thing as a 'non-obscene child porn' film?! Plus, whilst I'm ranting, I hate the phrase 'child porn' anyway, people (especially when writing in the media) should call it exactly what it is, which is images of child sexual ABUSE. Refering to it as 'kiddie porn' or 'child porn' runs the risk of legitimising it in the minds of the abusers, or downplaying the damage that it causes to the children who are portrayed in it. Rant over.] Rx

I lived for a while in West London - and the chemist down the road from my old house stocked Tena Slip, Depends and a few other brands. Many local/independent chemists do stock decent nappies, you just have to keep an eye out. Or phone a couple up and ask them if they stock adult nappies - if they don't, they'll probably be able to point you in the right direction. It's true that there are fewer chain stores in Britain that stock them, compared to the USA - but that's almost certainly because of the differences in the healthcare situation. If you have a severe incontinence issue in the UK, the NHS will provide you with nappies; so there's not much need for private individuals to buy their own. In the US, lots of people either won't have insurance, or will have a plan that doesn't provide for incontinence products, hence the need for shops to sell them. But lots of smaller chemists do still sell them, and as other people have mentioned, most chemists can order them in for you. But as they're not as commonly sold, you might not see them on display. Rx

My favourite booster (which is available anywhere) is a Pampers diaper. You'll need to tear off the wings to make it more comfortable, but other than that, they're pretty much ready made boosters... and, boy are they thirsty! I tend to either fold the diaper in half so that the absorbent side is outermost, and just place that in my nappy. Sometimes I'll use a pin or something similar to puncture lots of holes through the cloth and plastic outer, and place it unfolded into my main diaper. Either way, they seem to work great - they smell nice, they're easy to get hold of, and they're pretty cheap. Rx

Well dude, you're at a time in your life when you're basically just figuring out exactly *who* you are - so don't worry if it's confusing. Also, speaking from my own experience, I find that my feelings towards diapers come and go. Sometimes I'll want to indulge whenever possible, other times I won't be bothered about it, and more interested in other things (vanilla sex with my GF etc). But it never really goes away, but is just sometimes more or less important to me. Does that make sense? Maybe that's what's happening to you? The only other thing I can say is that you should try to be happy in who you are! Rx.

Yeah, what d_drew12 said. At the end of the day, there's no real way to find out if we're part of a larger group or not. Maybe worth thinking about, but don't lose any sleep over it!

Personally, I like the slash. I'm NOT an AB, but I do self-identify as part of a wider "AB/DL" community that encompass strictly ABs with no DL, strictly DLs with no AB, and people who fall somewhere inbetween, as well as those who enjoy AB, ABDL, AB/DL or DL as part of/along with other fetishes (spanking, bondage/BDSM, furry etc). But it's hardly a huge issue, certainly not something to be bothered by, in my opinion. I mean, lets just let everyone self-identify with whatever labels make them happy, and get along nicely Rex.

I agree with the majority of other posters - I wouldn't recommend sharing it with your kids, any more than I'd suggest you also show them your porn mags and any sex toys that your wife has! Even if you wait until your kid is an adult, I don't think it's something they'd deal with very well. Angela, I think your situation is quite unusual in that you have a lot of incontinence in the family anyway, so diapers probably aren't a 'taboo' subject because of medical necessity. But for the majority of people, I think that a parent's kinks should be kept within the adult/adult relationship, rather than shared amongst parent/child. But to the OP, if your kid ever came to you of their own volition to discuss their kink, then it's up to you about how much to share with them. But I'd recommend until that point, not to discuss it with them at all, because it's just likely to unsettle them, in my opinion.

For the most part, I agree, babykeiff. I still don't quite understand where you've got a 98.8% absorption rate from (though that might just be me being a bit thick!) - though bear in mind that only a fraction of the overall bowel bypasses the hepatic portal system, as much of the lower intestine is served by the inferior mesenteric vein. Only the blood vessels of the anal canal itself offer a direct route for immediate systemic circulation, if I'm not mistaken BUT, this is all academic really, because we both agree that the bowel still absorbs alcohol much faster than ingesting it in a normal fashion. Whilst we can quibble over the facts and figures, at the end of the day I think we're agreed on the main point which is that having an alcohol enema is stupid and dangerous! I hope you don't take offense to me being pedantic about this kind of thing, but I do enjoy a good discussion! Rx.

babykeiff - the calculation is done assuming that the person has an 'average' amount of blood in their body - i.e. eight pints. It's a somewhat approximate method for calculating BAV levels, but it's enough to give you an idea that 7.56ml isn't enough to kill anyone (at least, anyone who didn't have a severe underlying medical condition, such as having very little blood in their body!). Likewise, in the case of the bulgarian, I've estimated that he had the full 5.2 litres of blood that an 'average' person has; but my suspicion would be that if he was 67, he probably has a little less than that, which would bring up the total volume of alcohol in his blood even higher than my (somewhat conservative) estimate. I'm not disagreeing with you that toxins are more readily absorbed by some parts of the bowel, I just think your data on what level of alcohol will kill you is off. But I think we both agree that an alcohol enema is a stupid, risky idea! Rx.

What about Jack Bauer from 24?! He never takes a leak!

I think your 'highest recorded amount of alcohol in bloodstream' data is somewhat off; 7.56ml of alcohol in the bloodstream of an average adult human equates to a Blood Alcohol Content level of approx. 0.15%, which is over the legal limit for driving (very much so in most countries), and probably represents a reasonable level of intoxication - but as far as I know, it's not anywhere near the highest recorded level of alcohol in the bloodstream. Bear in mind that 0.4% is regarded as a potentially lethal amount. The highest recorded level of alcohol in the bloodstream of a person who not only survived is a staggering 0.914% - link here - which works out to around 46ml of alcohol in the man's bloodstream! Not only did he survive, but he was conscious and talking. Crazy. BabyBat - The more I think about this, the more think that you should steer clear of doing an alcohol enema. I mean, of all the shitty ways to be found dead, having accidentally poisoned yourself with a funnel up your ass is probably not the most dignified And nobody really seems sure about how much is a safe amount, because of all the variables. If you want to get drunk, but don't like the taste... then why not try a cocktail or two? I mean, a really good mojito is to die for... whereas an alcohol enema... well, that might just make you die. You get the picture Rx.

This recipe sounds awesome, I'll hopefully try it sometime soon! I don't think I'll tell my friends where I got the recipe from though, if that's ok with you! Just one quick question from a Brit who doesn't know better... what's "a tube of refrigerated crescent rolls"? Is that just a brand of pre-made filo pastry or puff-pastry? Thanks, DD! Rex.

.

No, I think that because you'll be ingesting it DIRECTLY into the bloodstream, rather than through the process of normal digestion, it's possible that you'd run into problems with much less alcohol than would normally take to get you drunk. Remember that the effective dose is very near to the effective lethal dose for most people - so what gets you drunk orally might be enough to kill you, or at least make you very, very ill. I'd suggest steering clear of this altogether. If you want to get drunk... why not just have a drink? If you *insist* that you want to try it, I think you should work up from a very tiny amount - say, half a shot. Have half a shot, wait for an hour, if it's not enough, have another half a shot, wait for an hour. Two shots is a pretty arbitrary amount, and you have no idea how your body will react to that much alcohol instantly hitting your bloodstream.

*sigh* I've never said that we should censor anything! Please, someone tell me where I've said "THIS IS WRONG AND IT NEEDS TO BE BANNED RIGHT NOW!". All I'm suggesting is that there IS a proportion of the community who don't wish to read stories that involve minor characters - and as such, it would be helpful to indicate what each story contains. Likewise, I imagine there are people who want to avoid stories that involve messing, or humilliation, etc etc. In which case, a simple code system, to be added as the thread's sub-heading, would make it easier for people to judge the content of a story before clicking the link. My understanding of the law is that posting a photograph of a child on a website like this is probably illegal as, although it might not show any child abuse etc, by association it becomes legally dubious, taking into context the content of the site where it has been posted (and that's not even getting started on the person in the photo's privacy rights). And as I mentioned in my first post, in the UK at least, it's very possible that possession of a sexualised drawing where the age of the characters is questionable may well become illegal. There definitely are stories here where there is sexual contact between an adult and a minor. All I'm suggesting is that I wish to avoid such stories, as I'm sure other people do as well. Rx

You could say the same thing about anything - why are the people looking so happy in the toothpaste commercials? I *never* look that pleased to be brushing my teeth in the morning!

Have you read anything I've said, Pete? At what point am I 'sticking my opinion down your throat'? Please enlighten me. In fact, in my first post, I actually said: that's just one viewpoint (one I happen to agree with), and it's not something that I think should be forced onto others. I agree, that's very true - but what I'm suggesting is that stories need clearer signposting so that people can make an INFORMED CHOICE into whether or not they want to start reading a particular story or not. Why take such great offence to that? In what way have I attempted to restrict your liberties? By your own admission this isn't something that concerns you as you don't visit the forum - so I think that it's more of a case of you sticking your oar in, rather than people trying to stick opinions down your throat... Rx

Well, if it's purely a fantasy - and part of the turn on is that the object of your desires is an adult role-playing as a child, then I'd argue that whilst it's not particularly common, I don't believe that it's anything to worry about - as long as you keep your activities to consenting adults only. However, if you're experiencing excessive anxiety or guilt because of your sexual desires, then maybe you could see a sex therapist/councilor? There are plenty of "kink-aware" practitioners out there who won't say "MY GOD YOU FREAK! WE MUST CURE YOU NOW!", but instead will help you work through your guilt, so that you can enjoy your fetish without it impacting on the rest of your life / your mental health. What counts as 'excessive' guilt is down to you - but if it's enough that you're seeking advice here, then it might be an option to consider counseling. I know it's not for everybody, and it might seem like quite a daunting prospect to go and tell your most intimate desires to a complete stranger face to face; but it's certainly an option that may be worth considering. I hope this helps! Rx

I think we're discussing it because there are a clearly range of different opinions on the subject. The OP had/has a problem with something, some people disagree, some people agree. Maybe if we all talk it through like adults, a compromise that keeps everyone happy might be reached?