Leaderboard

ROFLCOPPER! Powder Bomb! Pew! Pew! Duck and cover man! I probably would have just tried to tape up anyway, then plop down on the couch and watch the mushroom cloud envelope myself.

If your hips and waist are within the quoted size range for the diapers you bought, I'd be inclined to complain. I guess since the tapes simply don't stick anywhere but the landing zone, getting the right size is extremely important with these diapers. They're still great though - I just ordered a case (the code is still active <nudge nudge wink wink>).

The pores, which are at the base of your hair follicles (as well as all over your body) will eliminate sweat. This design requires air to evaporate this moisture from the skin surface. When this area is covered with a diaper, this moisture gets trapped. Urine added to this can cause a caustic chemical reaction and severe diaper rash. It is the hair that is trapping the moisture. It is advisable to keep this area well cleaned between diaper changes, and if possible, hair free. Shaving can scrape skin cells from the surface of the skin, and cause razor burn, which can be as bad if not worse than the diaper rash you are trying to prevent. The best way to eliminate these hairs is electrolysis. The hair root is removed, and the proudness of the skin retreats and leaves the area smooth. Note - Hair removal creams only remove the hair above the skin level, and about a mm or two below. Since the hairs we are referring to are pubic hairs, they are thicker than the hair on ones head, and can cause problems if they regrow below the surface of the skin - (ingrowing hair) - which can require surgery to remove.

It all matters what state your in on the east coast or west coast I am on the east coast in pa and it takes 6 sometimes 7 days for me to get my diapers from them if your in say mid or west coast it would be much faster.

Since [that site] has been around so long, if you do a Google for Diapers, it is usually one of the first to come up, unfortunately. It would be good if someone would buy it just to turn into some lousy advertisement site like DPF, or if someone bought it to point to a page like understanding.infantilism.org. [That Site} wasn't all that bad when it first started, but Crosby seemed to get more and more depraved as time went on, and much of the content got to the point of sick and disturbing. (That Site) is a cancer on our community - every time you think it is gone, it keeps coming back...

Good riddance and don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out!

#1 Every time, P&G create a new 'Pampers' line, the 'green group' create the standard list of complaints. For years, they complain that the SAP within disposable diapers create rashes AND absorb vital moisture from a babies skin. Every time, under medical testing, the validity of that statement fails. In reality, due to the absorbency capability of Pampers products, some parents leave their child in a diaper much longer between changes than they would, or could with a cloth or standard disposable diaper. As a result, the infant is sitting in stale faeces and urine, which has time to break down the childs skin. To some, the mentality is that P&G is responsible for the rash and associated problems rather than the negligent parent. (see McDonalds coffee as an example) If parents paid attention to their infants needs, diapers wouldn't be needed. (see infant potty training). I have tested the pampers 'dry max' technology (using a baby diaper as an insert) and found that the pampers absorbs upto 10 times that of an adult diaper. To test this yourself, place the dry diaper on an accurate scales, and zero the scales. Using warm salt water, ( a large sink would be ideal), submerge the diaper into the water, and leave for 15mins. Weigh the diaper again on said zeroed scales. Compare this weight ( the water weight the diaper has absorbed in 15 mins to that of another diaper. #2 P&G seem to always use Kimberly Clarke's research team to outlay the original cost for market test before copying the design. P&G seem to think / know from market sales of Huggies 'Jeans' diaper, that enough market demand - one viable enough to cover the cost to produce multiple designs of diapers. What I want to know is, is the law, OR people's attidudes changing in relating to see an infant in only a diaper / diaper & t-shirt. A few years ago, it was not proper (or legal in some states / countries) to dress a child in only a diaper / diaper and t-shirt, the diaper would be covered by either shorts / or some form of undergarment - like a onesie etc.