Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

Leilin

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,238

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Leilin

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    @lielin. All you do is name call. I understand, if people present facts with you. YYou're only response is an attack or calling someone a name. As PATHETIC as they may be

    If you can't bother to read, just quit posting, unless you like looking like a drooling moron.

    Take some of your own advice!

    Debt ubder President Bush.. 5.7-10.6 trillion in 8 years

    BHO Debt 10.6-15+trillion in 3 years

    Bureau of Labor Satistics, department of Energy. From the BHO administration!

    So... you still haven't bothered to read that post, eh? Here's a LINK in case your memory doesn't extend to one page ago. You have yet to address the facts of the situation and have instead (for the third time) provided a complete nonsequitur to those facts. Care to try again?

    (Not even one insult. Let's see if you can respond in kind and even maybe use a relevant fact this time)

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    You do realize that is neither insightful nor intelligent sounding, don't you?

    You do realize that you have yet to actually respond to the facts as they have been presented to you, right?

    If you have no intention of reading the posts which address your flawed points in this debate, feel free to stop posting, as it's making you look like a drooling moron. If you choose to keep posting without addressing the facts, you shouldn't be surprised when people think you're an idiot and treat you like one.

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    @Lelin. You're wrong!! Debt under W Bush. 5.7-10.6 Trillion in 8 years

    BHO 10.6-15+ trillion in 3 years!!

    Class Dismissed

    Well that settles it. Your post on a forum is OBVIOUSLY more reliable than the CBO. -_-

    If you can't bother to read, just quit posting, unless you like looking like a drooling moron.

    (Yes, I will post that phrase every single time one of you displays your lack of willingness to read by responding to a post without addressing a single iota of its content)

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    The Bush deficit was higher. The issue is the Obama spending is almost that of Bush in a 3 year period!

    Wrong. This was disproven earlier in this thread. If you can't bother to read, just quit posting, unless you like looking like a drooling moron.

    You weren't educated in a pre Dept of Education America. You were educated in an educational system that has been hijacked by Marxists. What Obama is doing was predicted before I was born. I don't expect you to know any better.

    *yawn* You have yet to demonstrate why Obama fits the definition of Marxist and until then your insane ranting is worth less than what I scraped off of my sandals before I entered my house this morning.

    BotoX: You should be ashamed to be defending this twit, and I'm not talking about Bush.

    The reason why I compare Bush to Obama is thus:

    Obama has added, thus far, slightly less than 1/3 of what Bush did to the debt. Since Obama doesn't control the purse strings, it might surprise you that he cannot just instantly cancel the programs that Bush and the Congress (of both parties) signed into law. It is borderline idiotic to criticize Obama for something that is the direct responsibility of Congress, especially when Congresses controlled by either and both parties have contributed so ardently to the problem.

    Any candidate, ANY candidate, must be looked at in relief to his competition. If the Republican candidates had offered any differentiation between their policies and those of Bush, it would be reasonable NOT to compare them to his, but since they're nearly identical to many the policies that caused this mess (Tax cuts for the rich, two wars, constant useless expansion in defense spending), it's perfectly reasonable to compare them. If you can find a way in which any of the competing candidates, save one who I will address momentarily, has differentiated himself from Bush, then I welcome you to provide it with citation.

    The exception is Paul, who believes that States should have carte blanche to violate individual rights without any sort of judicial or congressional interference. He's not just a kook. He's an antifederalist. That discussion was had during the civil war, remember? The states don't get to decide to violate human rights or institute racist or sexist policies and the courts exist specifically to protect the individual in cases precisely like that.

    RDB has gone off the derp end, and unless he decides to discuss anything with even a modicum of fact is perfectly worth ridiculing for the waste of electrons that his posts merit at every opportune turn.

    The problem here isn't that Obama is above reproach. The problem is that the ways in which you have chosen to reproach him aren't based in a little thing called reality.

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    My wife worked for H&R Block. The low income Americans get back more in a refund than that which was with-held. This was Bush problem because gave in to Democrats with so-called tax cuts. In the mean time, people that really produce, get screwed.

    If you're not going to bother reading the links in the post that you're quoting, don't bother posting.

    Unless, of course, you really love looking like a drooling moron.

    Cloth Abu Cushies

    in Product Reviews and Info

    Posted

    Honestly, I like that they're providing new options. I give them credit for that. It seems like a new direction to go in and, even if I disagree with their history, that is ALWAYS a good thing. New ideas are better than NOT new ideas, and even if it does fail, which I find to be unlikely, as long as they actually deliver, at least they try.

    • Like 1

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    Botox: Who has added more to our debt. Bush or Obama? Show your work.

    Do you realize what taxes those fully half of Americans DO pay? You use them as an excuse to say you're doubletaxed, so not counting them for others who pay them is disengenuous. Here's a breakdown of what those households DO pay: http://www.taxpolicy...-households.cfm

    It's also important to realize who is actually not being taxed.

    Comparing the US to what is essentially a third-world country is disingenuous and silly.

    The rest is your usual anti-tax drivel. I'm just giving you a chance to sound less uninformed here, but once again I doubt you will take it.

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    I have many conservative friends. We discuss the facts and then disagree, openly, on them. Because we are working within the realm of facts, however, we disagree respectfully. Nobody ignorantly spouts the terms "Marxist" or "Hitler."

    Speaking of which, you surely realize how ironic it is criticizing someone else's call for "civil debate" immediately after posting a video calling someone "Hitler Junior," right, RDB? You're quickly approaching the realm of unintentional self-parody.

    I'm laughing, and it's not with you.

    Anyone Still Support Obama After Ndaa?

    in The Rest of your Life!

    Posted

    What liberals call "civil debate" is when someone, that is conservative, gives in!

    What most people call civil debate is primarily three things.

    1. Facts are used. Unproven statements or statements that cannot be backed up with valid citation are not. If your statements are contested, burden of proof is respected.

    2. Logical fallacies are not used.

    3. Insults are not used.

    You utterly failed to work within the first two realms on a consistent basis. Therefore, people responding do you assumed that you had no interest in civil debate, and responded in kind, including the third as your utter lack of respect for reality, fact, and good taste merited derision.

×
×
  • Create New...