Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

Alexandra

Members
  • Posts

    160
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Alexandra

  1. The reason the rich are and for the most part should be dispised is that most of them did not earn their money and insteed just inherrited and because of that they have no appreciatation for that money and waste it in hedonism. Plus even thoose who did earn their money usually earned it through decit and inhumanity and greed now of course there are exception to both rules I know tht first hand but at the same time the majority of rich people are horrible people. Also it sounds like blaming the victim here some people just have a hard life even if they make all the right descisions in life they could still end up broke begging for scraps on streets. just my opinion I know but there you go

  2. Sith turned Jedi for me, like revan, for one I wouldn't want my body corrupted by the dark side of the force and for another to many evil sith and I think the detachment from emotions is cool a very buddist like way of seeking inner peace and knowledge but I'd want to know some of the sith powers like force lightning

  3. Ok read my whole post I'm not for any of the republican candidates and I despise the tea party more than I can properly describe, as a side note though I do think America can be saved it'll just take more than one person president or not. I had a problem with your reasoning for not liking Romney, because he's mormon, which I just think is a dispiacable reason to not vote for someone. But to be clear I support Obama and I think the tea party is full of rich prigs who care nothing for the lower classes yet put on a fasud like they're your average working class american.

  4. Darkfinn the issue is your using begittry to decied your politics now I'm no expert on mormons and maybe their church is questionable but saying a person shouldn't be president because of his faith is so wrong it'd be like me saying no monotheist person should be elected because the abrahamic faiths have a long bloody history of bigotry, discrimination, cruelty, and lies that'd be just as offensive because chirstens don't all behave the same and more so most good ones would keep their political agenda seqular. now am I saying I support Romney, no in fact I'd rather spend an eternity in the fields of punishment than see him elected but thats because of his stance on varrious issue and the ludicris ideas he represents. to sum it up remeber just because there's a correlation doesn't mean there's a causation

  5. O sweet gods above did you really just say that are you serious Darkfinn as dumb and misguide/plain false as I think alot of RDB's comments and positions are at least he has some notition of pretense you can't really think its ok to just admit to being predjudice against mormons and then basing your politics around it no strike that its ok do wht you want its a free country more or less but I say it here that method of thinking is neither helpful nor intelligent. voting for, in my opinion, the lesser of two evils based on evil reasons is just as evil as voting for the greater of two evils if you get my point.

  6. Ron Paul would support the elimination of the Federal Reserve Bank. Most people don't know it but the Federal Reserve is a privately owned corporation. It is a federal as Federal Express. Ironically the Federal Reserve Act and the IRS came about in 1913. JFK was looking at returning to the gold standard and look what happened to JFK.

    For the last 100 years, the progressives have had us moving toward socialism. Socialism is a stepping stone to Marxism.

    There are too many people, that want to use the government to confiscate part of other peoples lives to acomplish their own political agenda. I am saying Republicans and or Democrats are both responsible for America's problems. It is the progressive branch of both parties that created problems. The biggest offenders happened to be Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndyn Johnson, Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush (both of them) Bill Clinton and Obama.

    The government needs to get away from social issues. Prior to LBJ's Great Society, there weren't people starving in the street. People had access to healthcare. Charitable organizations like the Red Cross, the Catholic Church and others took care of social issues.

    ok first of all the president does not have the power to shut down the reserves end of story done, two I love how you list some of the best and worst presidents in this list, three yes their were people starving the street queit a bit actually the 1920s had one of the worst economic class divisions in our history just because you grew up in some white subburb and didn't see the poor doesn't mean they didn't exist, fourth our country was created by progressives they are called the founding fathers look them up, and finially this still has nothing to do with campaigning techinques

    • Like 1
  7. RDB you just proved my point there is no reason you support the conservitive angle besides the lies you've been told your whole life and that is my main point Americans have stopped thinking when it comes to voting we shouldn't settle for who sounds like the less evil person we should vote for who make the best proposals and who seems most likely to follow through on them but no instead we have degraded to basically and elementray school playground with politican calling one another names to sound like the cooler kid.

  8. RDB I did not create this topic to create more partisan bickering so I'm asking you niecely please keep your comments in the general sense, I don't want anyone saying either side alone is guity of this because really everyone is doing this and this is more about the current state of politics than any one candidate

  9. I'm seeing this more in the republican ads but now I'm also seeing this in Obama's ads as well and its really annoying me to no end, mudslinging. Why is this so effective, why are people so easily taken in by this type of campaigning. I wish there was a candidate who didn't just say the other guy sucks so vote for me and instead told people why they would make a good candidate. I mean is that really so hard a thing to do not use slander and libel to beat your opponet its a disgrace to the basis of American politics if you ask me

    • Like 4
  10. this is a relative issue aside from personal beliefs the only food that is univeraly morally pugnate to eat is another human being, i.e. cannibalism. Although I couldn't ever eat a dog in all reality they are below us on the food chain so if someone decied to eat them I'll think no less of them for it I'm of the belief that even if I can't stomach a certain animal being eaten such as dogs as long as their deaths had a purpose, here to provide nurishment, then it isn't evil or bad. and even if this was offensive to me it wouldn't change my political opinion about Obama and although hearing the thing about the dog on Romneys car roof made me think less of him as a person it still didn't change my political opinion about him.

    • Like 1
  11. Yeah and I appologised for the name calling, its not for sex for the last time its for other medical reasons in this case i believe it was ovarian cysts so stop trying to pretend its about so easy girl looking for a goverment handout its not. also fine keep using thoose words it only lowers my already poor opinion of anything you have to say. also the government isn't forcing you to buy anything they are forcing you to pay taxes and let me tell you if yyou have a beef with that you'd better go build a cabin on so deserted island because like good ol' Benjamin Franklin once said only two things in life are certain death and taxes. And america is differnt from the one you grew up in like Bob Dylan said these times are a changing.

  12. Fine call me whatever helps you sleep at night I have thicker skin than a word like cunt can pierce and i would consider GWB to be a childish name as well these men are the leaders of western civilization they deserve to have they're full names used. I'll admit I haven't follow the whole Georgetown issue thatclosely but i don't recall her ever being paid for sex and the issue isn't about preventing pregnancy if thats all the pills did i'd agree with you but the treat many other medical conditions if you want an indepth explantion of it go read the last few pages of the obama forum. and lets say for all in tense and purposes she is a "prostitue" you can use kinder and more scholarly words than slut like cortisan for example. and no it isn't uncostitutional the tenth ammendment is "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." and if you read the constitution the power to tax is delegated to congress and the federal government. and furthor more I'm sick of people throwing arround the word uncostitutional all the time there are only 9 people in this country who have the right to say what is unconstitutional John G. Roberts jr., Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Samuel Anthony Alito jr., Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan thats it so unless your one of thoose people you can not declare something is uncostitutional

  13. annoyance however i'll point out out i do at least use a dead language for any major curses and even the ones i don't i tend to use the arcaic varriant like prick to prig only once did i use a modern curse word and slut wasn't my word it was his. still your right i should exercise some more controll in my response so i'll try to watch my tounge in the future and your right no direct attacks no matter the reason i got angry and didn't think it does me no credit to shink to the level of person attacks even if there directed at a person who's already at that level. that being said though i still firmly stand by my post though I agree could have and should have state my point more maturelly and for that i do appoligise

  14. diaperboykcmo please kindly Futue te ipsum! you have no right to call anyone a slut and by doing so you only dibase and dibunk any shred of crediablity you might have had, and further more her issue with birth control was about a medically neccary medicine which is far more than just a contraciptive for more info on this i'll refer you to the last few pages of the Obama forum because i don't have the patients to explain it hear but your wrong and you just sound like and ignorant extreamist saying crap like that. Its not a double standard because having a contribution and having a person be one of the leading voices for your party is two entirely differnet things like saying a person giving to charity is the same as the annoying person calling houses looking for a donations. Also of course he wouldn't comment on Maher because he's a commedian and the president has more important issues than disscussing some prig late night comedian's offensive jokes so lay off and drop the whole bho shit show some damned respect good or bad he is still your president call him Obama you only sound more ignorant when you use childish nicknames like BHO. and who are you to tell her not to voteTu es stultior quam asinus you should go live in a totalitearn state if you like taking away peoples right to vote and yeah i know she said to take away voting rights from idiots too but there a big differnces between that and saying someone by name should not vote you prick. efutue!

  15. ok I know the parties are seperate from the government I'n not saying its possible to get ride of them I'm saying it would be better had they never been created period but they were so yeah we're stuck with them. and fair enough I misunderstood your point but the first issue I stated is still there its not possible to insure that every citizen is educated and informed enough to make reasonable decisions in elections which is the reason the electoral college exist to act as a buffer for ignorance in the political process, and that not a dig at anyone in particular or even people with politicaly incorrect opinions but people who don't know what roles a politcal position has and who don't know anything about political candidates.

  16. Diapered Jason it is the parties fault for suppuling people with an easy path to an opinion based not on the individuals own thoughts and opinions but on partisan bases and while i don't nessecarliy disagree with you on the problems with the electoral college the alternative is to be a direct democracy which we can't be there are a few major reasons we're a republic:

    1. it'd be impossible to insure every citizan is informed enough to make wise judgements in elections which is why we have the elctorate.

    2. there are too many people to account for each person in an election if every vote counted legistically it'd be a nightmare

    3. direct democracys are nice in theory and in a city like Athens it can work but for such a large and diverse populace it leaves too big a window for corruptions its much simpler to have a contained set of individuals who can be better watched for corruption than letting the whole country run wild.

    And also while it wouldn't be easy or plassible to campaign with a limited budget theres no manditory cost for running for elections and standing on a connor soap box is free so while i get what your saying its not impossible to run with out partisan monteray backing.

×
×
  • Create New...