peanuts

I always think it's crazy when parents have that attitude. I sort of understand the feelings of parents who think "diapers/pull-ups would embarrass an older child too much," but honestly (and maybe I'm biased) I feel like it's far more embarrassing for that child to wake up in soaked pjs and a soaked bed than to wake up in a wet pull-up/diaper but a dry bed and dry pjs. At least that attitude, while ignorant, is in consideration of the child's feelings, but far worse are parents who have the mindset that if an older child wears pull-ups/diapers for bedwetting it will discourage them from staying dry, as if a child can help it (making a bedwetter uncomfortable isn't going to help them stop).

TAPE? I'm a pins in a cloth diaper baby--the way it should be!

More please

This might be permissible morally or legally if the company added another word to the one in use and copyrighted/trademarked the whole thing, like "The ABDL" for a specific model of diaper, or changed it in some easily recognizable way that deliminted its use, Like "BabyDoll". The generic term has three iterations "babydoll", "baby doll" and "baby-doll", any of which could be appended to a little girl's name. BabyDoll has two upper-case letters. Upper case letters are well known to make names of words. Now, if someone was willing to produce the items with that name as per my instructions, "BabyDoll" could probably be copyrighted or the image on the label as shown in the albums trademarked The main point being made is that while a generic word is used, it is PART of a larger whole that is copyrighted/trademarked, not the word itself