If you were expecting a long prison sentence would you wear nappies in prison?

[Goerge]

Say you had to attend court for sentencing and you was expecting 10+ years would you wear a nappy and take supplies to court so you could wear over the duration of your sentence? I think by doing this you would establish your incontinent and be easier to get and wear nappies in prison, I would imagine it would be really difficult to establish incontinence in prison and get it written up on your medical chart. If I was looking at a 10+ year sentence I would definitely wear to court. 10 years without nappies would be worse than the actual prison sentence for me. It'll be hell not wearing. What would you do?

Also what do you think it would be like for someone wearing nappies 24/7 either for pee and poop in prison, what would it be like sharing a large shared dormantly with IC or what would sharing a cell with with 1 or maybe 3/4 people. I would think it'll be hell but I would still wear in prison. probably wouldn't be able to change alone? Would you be given a single cell?

[bbtwin]

why are you going to prison goerge

[Goerge]

42 minutes ago, bbtwin said:

why are you going to prison goerge

its a hypothetical question.

[DiaperboyEddie12]

2 hours ago, Goerge said:

Say you had to attend court for sentencing and you was expecting 10+ years would you wear a nappy and take supplies to court so you could wear over the duration of your sentence? I think by doing this you would establish your incontinent and be easier to get and wear nappies in prison, I would imagine it would be really difficult to establish incontinence in prison and get it written up on your medical chart. If I was looking at a 10+ year sentence I would definitely wear to court. 10 years without nappies would be worse than the actual prison sentence for me. It'll be hell not wearing. What would you do?

Also what do you think it would be like for someone wearing nappies 24/7 either for pee and poop in prison, what would it be like sharing a large shared dormantly with IC or what would sharing a cell with with 1 or maybe 3/4 people. I would think it'll be hell but I would still wear in prison. probably wouldn't be able to change alone? Would you be given a single cell?

Nah as this would create a lot of problems.  And I do not plan on visiting that kind of place any time soon as I am a good person.

[astrodiaper]

Anything that is seen as a weakness would be targeted.  There may have to be a bit of a break if it was a pre-existing condition, but I wouldn't imagine it would be much.  I speculate that with a small sample of the population, being ABDL would wrongfully associate such behaviors with what is considered the scum of the prison population.  On the other side, if someone who was legitimately incontinent, chances are they would be supplied as needed, but with institutional diapers and supplies, and bare miniums.  (A lot of "services" tend to be lowest bidder, whether the correctional facility is state-run, or privately owned.) If it becomes too much of hassle for staff, they could end up either in a medical unit, or a secured facility that can handle that.)  Having said all that, wearing a diaper and trying to play incontient would really not be a good idea.

[spoonchicken]

Diapers would be the very last of my concerns in prison 

[rusty pins]

Sounds like a sure way to get yourself butt-fucked every day.

[ValentinesStuff]

Beats pooping my pants occasionally.

[abdlwpg]

Ya maybe if this is some magical jail where I don't have to worry about my safety (or some posh Scandinavian jail maybe). Otherwise definitely not.  

[Diapered Dave]

The LAW is finally catching up with Goerge...  😳😆

[HappyNappin]

Just a little pop back to reality, I've got a close family member in a UK jail, you cant take anything with you from court to prison, everything is taken off you, even medication or anything paper, if you've got any prescriptions they are re assessed by the prison pharmacist.

Unless you're fully incontinent there's no chance of getting nappies in there, unless you're physically disabled it's 2 to a cell, you don't get to pick who your in with, although bullying and threatening behaviour between prisoners is forbidden, I don't really know how that's enforced.

There's also no privacy, in the cells, but there is a toilet 

[Dubious]

In America you would most likely end up in the psych ward or anywhere else not in the general population, if movies have any truth in them how the system works.

In Norway you usually get a room alone, so wearing diapers isn't an issue. 
I would just pee myself until I get diapers. 

And the only reason I would get 10+ years is for murder. 
We aren't barbaric in Norway, no insane sentences for stealing cookies. 

[Little Sherri]

This is a dark conversational back alley, but for the sake of a thought experiment... hmmmm. I'm a bit stuck, in that I wet the bed pretty regularly now, so I might actually need to ask for some help with that, were I to find myself in the unfortunate position of facing some prison time. But weakness is exploited, so being "diaper guy" probably wouldn't be fun in there, unless you were in a separate unit for disabled people or something. 

The US prison system, in particular, has to deal with a portion of their population requiring incontinence supplies, because true lifetime sentences are far more common there, than in in Europe, the UK or Canada, for example. So people who committed crimes when they were in their early adulthood, or even late childhood, when criminality is most demographically common, get "rest of their natural life" sentences, as do "three-strikers" in some states. The third offence, to @Dubious's point, can be stealing bread, or kiting cheques or whatever, although you don't get a life sentence for petty theft, the first time out, unless someone gets killed in the process. 

Without wanting to get political, there is an interesting "chicken-or-egg" argument to be mounted, regarding the inarguable fact that the US has a greater crime rate, and particularly violent crime, with its harsh sentencing regimen, than Europe, the UK or Canada do. So, are harsh sentences required, because people in the US are for some reason more prone to this behaviour, or, do harsh sentences not really work? Criminologists would tend to argue the latter. In fact, studies show that harsh sentences impose high costs - keeping someone in prison for decades is not cheap - and those high costs can end up diverting resources from things that can help lower overall crime, such as lowering poverty, via social programs, mentoring and community programs for at-risk youth, and some other soft-touch stuff that sounds cuddly and weak, but that alleviates the grinding desperation which tends to make people not care about themselves, outcomes, or others. But those solutions are not as momentarily gratifying as vengeful retribution feels. Believe me, I understand - I read about some horror someone has committed, and I think, "Shoot that dog at dawn!" But in the long-term, experience suggests that doesn't solve the overarching problem, just the problem with that one idiot. The other idiots don't make rational, risk-based decisions, after evaluating what happened to that guy, like you and I probably do, when we, for example, think about buying Google stock, versus some penny mining company, or we decide to put winter tires on, rather than spending the money on sports gambling. 

[Dubious]

Make all prisons federal or state, not privately owned, and you will see that people get way shorter sentences.
Hospitals and prisons is big business in the US.