If you are a Sissy do you want to be dominated and humiliated?

[Sissy baby Jess]

For me it's a BIG YES to being both dominated and humiliated. It's a big part of the vibe for me and really turns me on. In my fantasy world, I want to be forced to regress to being a 'toddler' and a sissy. Being forced to wear and use diapers, put in dresses, petticoats etc - and controlled by strong and domineering woman. No idea why I feel this this way, but I do. I've tried to get rid of these feelings so many times as they feel wrong - but they keep coming back. Anyone else feel the same? 

[Snugglebear_69]

I like being dominated by my Daddy because it makes me feel protected, loved and like I have a Wolf keeping me safe from the outside world, my own bad habits and just in general cared for very, very deeply. IlMy submission is a gift I offer my Daddy that He takes, treasures and then returns as living Domination.

As for humiliation, I used to think I wanted it but after exploring found that for me it was really more a poor substitute for the feeling of care, focus and attention that being dominated by my Daddy brings. Once I found that kiving domination from Him my desire for humiliation went to basically zero.

[Rachael-Little]

Yes I’m submissive but I only want the humiliation to a point. Regressing me I think would be easy probably because I want it so bad and it’s difficult to do it alone . Now I’m not a fan of being shown in public as a little but in the right environment yes I think I would be ok with it 

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

So far, none of us who answered are sissies. That is a different form of humiliation than that of being a little of some kind, especially a little girl. We do not live with things like SPH or being considered inferior in some way. Calling me a little girl would be a big "so what", calling a sissy one is demeaning. I am not trying to be boyish at all

[Sissybabyrandi]

Lord yes! I want to be humiliated and degraded, forced into diapers and the filliest baby outfits possible. Then be taken out in public to let everyone see what a pathetic sissy baby I am.

 

[ValentinesStuff]

16 minutes ago, Sissybabyrandi said:

Lord yes! I want to be humiliated and degraded, forced into diapers and the filliest baby outfits possible. Then be taken out in public to let everyone see what a pathetic sissy baby I am.

 

Don't hold back, let us know how you really feel.

[wellpaddedagain]

On 5/4/2025 at 5:44 PM, Sissy baby Jess said:

For me it's a BIG YES to being both dominated and humiliated. It's a big part of the vibe for me and really turns me on. In my fantasy world, I want to be forced to regress to being a 'toddler' and a sissy. Being forced to wear and use diapers, put in dresses, petticoats etc - and controlled by strong and domineering woman. No idea why I feel this this way, but I do. I've tried to get rid of these feelings so many times as they feel wrong - but they keep coming back. Anyone else feel the same? 

Abso-friggin-lutely! 🤩

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

There is a certain amount of dominant/submissive in any ABDL relationship, since diapers have a built-in infantile zeitgeist and leitmotif based on the overwhelming bulk of their use in "the wild". It was even more so in the heyday of cloth diapers since they included a panty made for that purpose that was very different from normal undies as well as being dressed in such a way as to accommodate  the whole thing, which is where the babydoll got its name in the 1950's. If you were in "diapers and rubber pants", someone was putting them on . And if you were 4-1/2 and up, you knew it and if you were a little girl, in many causes, they were put on you not because there was something "wrong", but as part of certain situations, such as long car tripss and if several of you who could not hold it comfortably for about two hours and would be in the same persons' home (this to keep the bathroom from being heavily used), and you were put in a special dress: short, high-waisted and full-skirted. In my area, they were used as part of "chastity training" to teach you to keep your skirt down. They were also used as punishment (though in the case of little boys, I only saw it carried out about 3 or 4 times) For girls it was an alternative to spanking. Also, rubber panties were often used without a diaper where it was feared that the little one might have small accidents, over, under or instead of reguar undies. For girls, there was a special thing; "chastizement" which was not a punishment for something you did but for being a certain way, babyish, whiny, disobedient, etc. In all cases somebody was putting them on you and usually making you lay down for it, often, if not usually, very forcefully

Also in the adult/little relationship, the grownup could make you do things, being sooo much bigger than you. Even if there was no physical force, from 5 on, they could use embarrassment (a kind of blackmail or behavioral extortion). Since this was usually done my Mommy, this had special implications for girls and in adolescence led to kinds of confrontations unique to girls, such as the "15 going on 35" game that involved the girl lying to her mother thinking she was clever well beyond her years

Now, DPF did not recognize Sissy but they did have a dom/sub category in their roster list of preferences

As I understand it 90% of diaper-inclusive relationships, and all little-grownup relationships have some dominance and humiliation in them  but the sissy relationship can be abusive with things like SPH and cuck as well as, the special 'sissy baby" treatment. Go and read about "diapers peeking out"  in the sissy wardrobe. For me, as a little girl, it is that if I do not pay attention to how I carry myself and how I move, my undethings will show and I will be trollopy. Anything pertaining to that, for a little girl in my area in the timeframe was called "chastity" and began at about 4. It was part of French-Canadian culture and had to do with us being very aware of our reputation

As to femininity, I am "uber-fem", the sissy brand is exaggerated: "emasculated" or "effeminate", especially in the form of SPH and cuck. How could you demean a girl with "Small Penis Humiliation" and the cuckoling is done because the cuckold is unable to satsfy the lady's needs so she looks elsewhere with spite and malice toward the sissy. For the Sissy, being feminine is humiliating and is used as such.. There is also the pre-teen sluttiness which no OG would do and the make-up lessons. When I was 4 IRL, I was curious about lipstick and nail polish and experimented with adult approval and help. I found the lipstick to be too icky and the nail polish to be too delicate. So, as a little girl, I had no interest in make-up and learning how to use it would be of not interest to me. For Little Girls, femininity is the major part of what and who she is, for sissies, it appears to be a mojor form of humiliation. But then again the core of Sissy is not ABDL, but BDSM>FemDom from all I can tell, with forced AB strapped onto it

[widdlemikey]

On 5/5/2025 at 8:54 AM, Rachael-Little said:

Yes I’m submissive but I only want the humiliation to a point. Regressing me I think would be easy probably because I want it so bad and it’s difficult to do it alone . Now I’m not a fan of being shown in public as a little but in the right environment yes I think I would be ok with it 

This very much is myself.  Some humiliation, to a point.  And teasing among trusted individuals, but not out in general public.  Even in the 'chat room', someone can 'put mikey in a dress' and instantly I struggle to stay 'adult' and not regress by such a simple suggestion.  Sadly, I'm pretty much solo, so it just remains a fantasy.

[TammyG]

Just the "fact" you're being AB, VLG/B or Little changes the dynamic as the "adult" is in charge just as they were when you were younger with them telling you what you were going to be doing as much as you might think you know what want to be so really that's not of itself a kink thing although it can be played as such where obviously more sexual humilations like sph are (You might not get off on it but those that do enjoy it).

Having your underwear spoke off publically can give you real embarassment as play that you might enjoy without going down the other route, indeed as kids sometimes we'd do stuff like that to bring someone down a peg or two.

[Baby-Vivianne]

I would very much like to be exposed in this manner. But at my age now (67,real life age), it just trying to find the right person who would be willing to do these things to me.

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

On 6/23/2025 at 10:49 AM, TammyG said:

 

Having your underwear spoke off publically can give you real embarassment as play that you might enjoy without going down the other route, indeed as kids sometimes we'd do stuff like that to bring someone down a peg or two.

And do you know how vulnerable you are if you are in the typical little girl dress/skirt, with it's full-circle 2/3 or 3/4 to the knee? By the time you are 5, you are very conscious of it. Or, you could be put in a baby-lenght halfway to the knee for some reason so you will be especially aware of what can happen and Mommy might mention rubber panties. Or, you may have no younger siblings and Mommy  leaves rubber panties where they may be seen, like drying over the bathtub, in the tub, on a dresser in your room or on the bed and tells you that if you move them, she3 willput them on you and lift up your skirt. Just imagine that happening when your favorite teacher may be over for a visit, in from of your best friend, or your worse enemy when you are about 6 or 7

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

What is involved here is being made a suborinate PERSON, such as a slave, child, cock, or "gender reference deciciency". This is different from a supordinate RANK, where one's actions are directed by a superior in an organization, such as police military or fire, In these cases, the POSITION is subordinante while the person is often very skilled with a good deal of merit and holds that position by choice, maybe intending to read higher positions in that chain

A child's life is totally controlled by the parent, sitter, governess, etc, without any choice. It is in the nature of being a child, even though the AB/AK accepts that condition volutarily. The sissy, is defined by a sex role defined deficiency: the SP in SPH. Cuck, emasculated/effeminate or a "Pre-teen slut". Now, observe that none of these is NECESSARILY AB/AK. The infantile/little element is added. The Sissy, a product of BDSM>FemDom, is made effeminate by being framed as "little/baby girl" adding forced femiization into a parody of femininity. Hence the over-abundance of frill,, mincing, lisping, "princess" etc, putting him on the wrong side of the boy/girl group antipathy by exiling him from the "boy". Since the essential sexual variables are inactive in the 7-10 years old, a boy and a girl are basically equal so the attack is sex-role based rather than sex based. That kind of thing cuts at a cetral idea of who one is. That is where the humiliation comes in

 

[Little BabyDoll Christine]

20 hours ago, Ellie Jean said:

This precisely. Others assume I'm a sissy, and I honestly find it super offensive, because in my mind, a sissy is just a feminized boy, and I'm not a boy. The only way I can picture myself in sissy stories is if I imagine the "caregivers" are just super transphobic and are trying to hurt me by using he/him pronouns for me LOL. 😝

This presumption has been the bane of ALG's for decades, even before Sissy became a thing, with many LG's accepting that designation out of ignornace. It was best addressed here

https://joanne-chan1.blogspot.com/p/test.html

On more than one occasion, a Sissy has ended correspondence with me, saying I am "too girl". In fact there is a bit of group antipathy between LG's and Sissies because of the use of feminine, especially little girlish things that we cherish by Sissies is to be demeaning or humiliating, and the confusion that we are like that (I do not mince, lisp, want to be a princess in any wah and I am quite low on the "frilliness" scale. I have not been cuckolded nor SPH'ed and I cannot be any kind of a slut as I am always being sure my skirts are down)

[abpenelope]

Yes, but having read the thread I’m not thoroughly confused as to what a sissy is…

[TammyG]

20 hours ago, abpenelope said:

Yes, but having read the thread I’m not thoroughly confused as to what a sissy is…

It is like most things are really what your own likes and inclinations take you as no one is 100% one identity or other because we are all individuals so don't obesses about "fitting in".

Most of us like very feminine things, often far more feminine than girls and women of the same age, most of us enjoy some sort of submissiveness which doesn't have to be sexual and we can chose when to let that out  and some (and online culture especially) enjoy being humiliated in various ways. Those of us with a younger side love playing games, colouring, creating stories for our dollies and when we're like that nothing else is in.

You are highly unlikely to see yourself as "really a girl" or "a girl trapped in boys body", not looking at any sort of transitioning regardless of whither or not medically or otherwise that is possible.

If you're happy with that, be a sissy and own the label even being chastised by some who don't want us around cos we're not going away.

[Sissy Baby Minky]

On 5/5/2025 at 1:44 AM, Sissy baby Jess said:

For me it's a BIG YES to being both dominated and humiliated. It's a big part of the vibe for me and really turns me on. In my fantasy world, I want to be forced to regress to being a 'toddler' and a sissy. Being forced to wear and use diapers, put in dresses, petticoats etc - and controlled by strong and domineering woman. No idea why I feel this this way, but I do. I've tried to get rid of these feelings so many times as they feel wrong - but they keep coming back. Anyone else feel the same? 

Absolutely 

 

[Sissyjess40]

I live for domination and humiliation. Send me to get coffee dressed as a boy wearing Mac candy yum yum lipstick and I’m in heaven

[Guest]

Submissive. Love pleasing and being humiliated

[TammyG]

The main thing is to feel your needs are accepted. They certainly don't have to be the same as anyone else's so good for some of you in just saying what it is in your lives.

[ClaireWilson]

Dominated, yes - with caveats. Humiliated? No, but again with caveats.

I love the idea of being forced by a domineering woman - cis or trans - into being a sissy - forced into wearing sissy dresses, crinolines, and nappies with sissy nappy covers - the idea that the decision is taken away from me is a big thing for me. And at this point, domination and humiliation kinda cross each other at a comfortable point, and going partly beyond that point it can get nicely into the world of humiliation. The problem comes when humiliation - the comfortable sense of humiliation - like taking the bins out dressed as a sissy, turn into degradation, and that would be where I would draw the line.

[backdoorlarry]

I want to be encouraged, not humiliated. Well maybe a little.

I want to encourage, not dominate. Some instructions might be nice.

For her I'll be her little baby or sissy.

For me she can be my little baby or sissy.

Take turns and have double the fun.

[TammyG]

13 hours ago, backdoorlarry said:

I want to be encouraged, not humiliated.

I want to encourage, not dominate.

For her I'll be her little baby or sissy.

For me she can be my little baby or sissy.

Take turns and have double the fun.

That form of more encouragement to be yourself on the basis of what you have shared with another I feel is really what a substantial number of us want and really the "forced" bit isn't actually forced as in against our will, dominated without respect for our feelings. Consent is so so important and beyond any kind of agreed "play" humiliation isn't I feel good for us.

[latexdolli]

This is a lovely and loving topic. 

For dolli, well, me, it would be more like this, kind of. 

She likes me. But She wants devotion. She is So pretty, so kind, and so so much. We kiss. Will You show devotion?

Yes and yes. 

a lil test?

Yes and yes. 

This chastity belt for a month of these loving diapers for a month then. Choose. 

Easy choice. diapers for a month. 

Then come the rules. 

You can only go to the bathroom every four hours. Otherwise its diaper time. Keep the diaper dry. Show dedication. Give me some loving obedience. 

And to help You think of me, loving Abby, here's a lil plug for the backside. No messes.

And one more thing, She says, if You commit, You commit. You can be my boyfriend or my baby friend. Are you sure You wouldn't prefer the chastity belt for a month?

i smile. i can do this. I can win Her heart. just need to cut down on beer a lil . 

Anyways,,,,dolli could continue. but dolli thoughts on this lovely topic. 

 

 

 

[cuteandfun99]

Yep. Humiliation and domination are a big part of me and my wife's relationship.

She's the dom in every aspect and dictates my humiliation or sets me up for humiliating circumstances.

One of the recent ones?  We went on vacation and she only packed my female clothes.  Most were generally androgynous and weren't outwardly feminine but none were bought in the men's department.