Jump to content
LL Medico Diapers and More Bambino Diapers - ABDL Diaper Store

Mindlessly Diapered in the Daily Mail


Recommended Posts

This is precisely what we DO NOT need. It lends an aura of credibility to "those ****ing perverts!" and runs counter to the standard messages about "balance" that were the norm in DPF and other AB entities. As with any extreme or agenda-driven "examples" they do NOT represent the norm of ANY lifestyle and, therefore, damage it and it's sane practitioners by setting up a real case of what would ordinarily be a "straw man" that is patently absurd and easy to portray as being a few diapers short of a pack, then attribute to the rest of us

  • Like 2
Link to comment

I dont think she is doing anything at all wrong. yes, the public thinks it is weird, but that is hardly news. She keeps in indoors and online, not in public view or inappropriately. BTW Paigey is a computer science graduate so not at all some kind of dimwit. She is courageous and has made it work for her and that is more than most.

No one other than us is ever going to understand why someone wants to live fulltime as a baby. The least we can do is express that understanding. 

Is it wise for her to be so open? Perhaps not, but that is not for us of all people to be critical of. If ABDL is to ever be understood and accepted, it will need a whole lot of Paigeys to go before us opening the minds of a rather close-minded public.

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Oh, gee.   We now have an official "norm of AB" arbiter.    Frankly, I don't see anything wrong with the story and you're going to get detractors in comments on just about anything.   If it said the person was a transexual fashion model, you'd probably get worse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I dont have any issue with what she is doing.  She is creating online pornography and creating an income source using her lifestyle.  I think she is clever.  Calling what she does something other than pornography is disingenuous.  People in that type of business have to grow thick skin.  If nothing else, her income will grow due to the attention.  Her pictures may stir strange feelings deep within some of the population.  If i read that article when I was 16, I'd have considered her a Goddess.

If you really want to support her, id suggest going here.

https://allmylinks.com/mindlessdiaper

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I agree with Rosalie. To be accepted means accepting those of us who may go extreme. I must say I’m quite surprised DM decided to release few photos that, at least in my opinion, should be considered pornographic. Then again the article’s point is to get views/shock, not to be good journalism, so there is that I guess. 

Link to comment

I don’t have an issue with what she does ether. I’ve watched her stuff and find her openness with the lifestyle refreshing to be honest. The only part I personally am not a fan of his having subscribers fund your lifestyle. I guess that’s pretty common with Internet personalities and the kink community these days, but It doesn’t sit completely right. Otherwise I applaud her and wish her continued success 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

IF we want the right to be adult babies without the ridiculous insults, abuse and insinuations that we currently get, we need to support those that are 'outed' as such. Not all ABs that go public do us a good service, but Paigey does nothing wrong by modern morals so lets stand up for her

Remember, the next person that gets outed may be you. You might want some support s well.

  • Like 4
Link to comment

The Daily Mail is a piece of shit so I'm not going to click the link and give them traffic.

From the comments here it seems this is just someone turning their fetish into a business? I obviously have no problem with that (I've done the same thing myself!) I am rather surprised it is in the news but I guess it is our turn to be "freak show of the week" again :D

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Good for her! She accepts herself and is comfortable as an adult baby. Being accepted either by friends or family or in her case, subscribing fans can be the ultimate freedom of acceptance many of us crave.  As she states in her post, she is discrete in the adult world and doesn’t force her lifestyle on anyone. i will agree that some pics seem a bit more pornographic, it is intended for an adult audience (subscribers).

This should not come as a surprise to anyone, whether in the lifestyle or as vanilla as can be.  People have been fighting adulting or growing old, probably since the dawn of man or woman. People leaving their spouses of forty or fifty years for a much younger model,  seniors buying the car of their youth, paint balling or  Sophomoric  behavior to name a few. Not to mention plastic surgery, hair dye, etc, 

Lets not get our diapers in a bunch here. This is just an enterprising youth embracing who she is and making money doing it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
12 hours ago, Elfy said:

The Daily Mail is a piece of shit so I'm not going to click the link and give them traffic.

From the comments here it seems this is just someone turning their fetish into a business? I obviously have no problem with that (I've done the same thing myself!) I am rather surprised it is in the news but I guess it is our turn to be "freak show of the week" again :D

So you won't even read the article, but you feel a need to post about it negatively anyway? Do you need a hug? You seem really cranky lately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I heard that Harry potter was full of Nazi's too.  I have heard many people and companies called Nazi's.  When you use that term so loosely I am not sure that you know what a National Socialist or member of the past or present Nazi party actually is.  

Making such grand statements while refusing to even read the article makes you more of a brown shirt than a fascist, but it doesnt look good on you.

Link to comment

A journalist or group of editors and even the owner from that paper 90 years ago supported a Fascist Germany.  Those people are all long dead.  Are you going to hold present day people accountable for crimes committed by dead people from long ago?  Your horse died on Sept 2 1945, many years before you were even born.  It might be time to stop beating it.

You might as well condemn all modern air travel too, since a Nazi engineering team designed the first gas turbine engine for aviation.  You should condemn rocket space travel, all Disney products, particle board, modern pain killers, ADHD medication and even computers.  The first computer was a Z1 mechanical computer made by Konrad Zuse.  

People are still people when you take away the ideology, when are you going to forgive the dead?  Holding a grudge against a dead ideology and those who supported it is like holding a hot coal, with the intent to throw it at someone, only you are going to get burned.

Link to comment
9 hours ago, Elfy said:

They've not got much better since then unfortunately.

What in your point of view would be the best way for AB/DL people to present themselves in public? What platform or news agency is the correct one? How do you feel we as individuals should conduct ourselves while presenting to the media? Do you see any positives or only negatives with this type of fame? Why do you feel this way?  

I do not personally agree with you on many subjects, but I feel that if you expressed your points of view constructively we could all find some common ground on this touchy subject of public identity. 

Respectfully. 

Voodu

 

Link to comment

I posted this on Reddit, but I thought i'd share it here as well...

I fully support MindlesslyDiapered in this. I do have some thoughts in addition to that support.

Dailymail and other british rags have been asking me since My Strange Addiction and I never went ahead with any interviews etc, mainly due to their penchant to bash transpeople. I know that they'd focus on that and weaponize it against the community, not just mention it in passing or not at all like other outlets. These offers included a free trip to London and what would have inevitably ended in an ambush interview with notorious troll Piers Morgan. I know how these outlet skew stories about any diverse behaviour, especially in regards to sex work, kink, LGBT, alternative lifestyles etc. They play off of the "normal" person seeing someone like myself and laughing, getting disgusted, getting angry, and through this we remain divided, they sell papers, maintain the status quo. I like the term SQWs, Status Quo Warriors.

With that said, the thing I see people miss most in these conversations, is that when producers are contacting people to make these shows or write these articles they start with the most visible people, like Kitten, Binkie, myself, Mindless etc, but they're not going to stop there. MSA would have been made regardless of my participation, and I felt I was the best person to fit into that role, because I knew how not to embarass myself. MD knows how to not embarass herself either, which is why i've always been happy to see her rise to prominence.

So to confront OP's title (the title on Reddit was "Can We All Make A Pact To Not Go On Media?") no matter how much you may huff and cross your arms, these shows are going to get made, be happy it's one of us and not some terrible person or worse, an actor they hire to be one of us.

Now should we take on every article? No. Would I ever fuck with anything as conservative as DailyMail or the dozens of podcasts/YT/Radio programs that have tried to have me on and make me look like an asshole? No. Was that recent video Gummi, Koneko and I did with Anthony Padilla super chill and positive? Yeah! DailyMail gave MD a fairer shake then they'd ever give me, and now that this article is out, maybe they'll cool it for a while on the AB stuff and no harm will be done, except the often forgotten slings and arrows MD will have to face from the complete cretins in the comments of the article.

I think it's fine to talk about this stuff as a community, just maybe don't come at her or anyone too hard. It's all harder than you may think, and there's always some complicated stuff going on that you may haven't thought of yet. Maybe as a community we shouldn't drag our own people like this, it's easy to sit back and criticize, but some empathy goes a long way here.

I must say though, this thread is a lot more positive than when MSA came out. Some people in the community hated that and were very aggressive and cruel, especially about me being trans, but here 10 years on it's looked back on as a relatively positive representation. Basically, media is gonna put a spotlight on us like they do the furries and every other unique "lifestyle" group out there, just hope the right people are out there. And always, i've made a point to do interviews NOT as a representative of a community, but merely an individual in that community, and I think that distinction goes a long way.

And as always, if you're contacted by the media and are looking for guidance, you can contact me on StayDiapered.com ~

  • Like 2
Link to comment

 

On 2/21/2020 at 9:44 AM, Brudda Voodu said:

People are still people when you take away the ideology, when are you going to forgive the dead?  Holding a grudge against a dead ideology and those who supported it is like holding a hot coal, with the intent to throw it at someone, only you are going to get burned.

I occasionally read the DM for the entertainment value. I'll read it most days for about a month, and then all the negativity, racism, cartoonishly-far right members bashing anything different than themselves will bring me down, and I'll stop reading it again for about 6 months. They're definitely blur the lines between truth and lies quite often, and they still post bigoted, sexist, politicized propaganda all the time, but now they paraphrase, or don't say it directly, instead allowing people in the comment section to say it. Whenever there's an act of violence in the U.K., there's no article about it, but

It's a far right-wing paper, but many of their readers even further on the edge complain about it being too liberal, even though if you say anything even remotely liberal in the comments, you will get destroyed. It's true, that they don't support Trump, but that's because they are first and foremost nationalists. There's a pattern of only writing flattering articles about the U.K., and only derogatory ones about the U.S..

Also, for some reason, there are hundreds of articles with the phrases "(celebrity name) puts on a leggy display"  or "puts on a busty display" in their women as sex objects articles. Strangely, they're attributed to different writers, so I don't exactly know how their article production works. It does seem that many of their "articles" are not written by native English speakers, and I often wonder if the authors' names are fake.

Link to comment
On 2/20/2020 at 3:16 PM, billybobtombo said:

I wouldn’t waste any time worrying about the comments...these are the view of the readers of the Daily Mail. The newspaper itself is very right wing and conservative, as well as loving to sensationalise, with a readership noted for intolerance and a fear of the ‘other’.

Link to comment

I was aware of Mindlessly Diapered prior to this, and found her a little to extreme for my tastes as far as Youtube diaper/little content related related videos.  I tend to lean more towards the Lilokat, and MD is too far down the spectrum for me to relate to.  

With that- I think we far too many people are concerned with the 'freak' aspect of this.   One of the benefits of the internet is that it has opened up awareness of 'freaks' in our everyday life, and the realization that we are all a little bit freaky in our own way.   I think we are near the point were somebody who is freakishly normal would be just as must freakish as anything else.   This means that somebody like Lilokat, or even Stanley wouldn't even warrant media attention.   Imagine the reaction from a producer if somebody tried to produce an expose on me.   A 50-year-old single male with a professional job who chooses to wear diapers every day because he likes it.  I suspect the response would be "So, what?"    Ten years ago a journalist would have love to talk to me, now- I give them nothing.

MD primary source of income if her lifestyle, which even I  admit is something I'm jealous of, but that's what makes her a story.   For her- she gets more views and income, and I can't fault her for that.    For us- it just more exposure that people like to pretend to be little, which only exposes it a little further.   

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...